UNASSIGNED: Is there a statistically significant association between preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESI) and postoperative cervical and lumbar spinal surgery infections (SSI)?
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and meta-analysis was completed of patients 18 years or older who underwent elective cervical or lumbar spinal surgery. Those who underwent surgery with preoperative ESI were compared to those without. We assessed for differences in postoperative SSI incidence. Electronic literature databases were searched through October 2022. Peer-reviewed publications that included raw data regarding epidural exposure and non-exposure were included. Case reports, case series, abstracts, editorials, or publications that did not include raw data were excluded. Odd\'s ratios (OR) were calculated from the raw data collected. Meta-analysis was done using RevMan v5 with a fixed effects model.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 16 articles for inclusion. When not controlling for the type of surgery and time from ESI to surgery, there was a statistically significant OR between preoperative ESI and postoperative SSI. The association persisted when the ESI was performed within 30 days or 31-90 days of the surgery. No association was discovered when evaluating only cervical spine surgeries. The evidence is assigned a \"moderate\" GRADE rating.
UNASSIGNED: Our analysis shows a small, time-dependent, statistically significant association between preoperative ESI and postoperative lumbar SSI may exist. However, the OR produced, while statistically significant, are close enough to 1.0 that clinically, the effect size is \"small.\" The number needed to treat for an ESI in the appropriate clinical setting is, at worst, 3. The number needed to harm, meaning the number of patients who undergo an ESI at any time before their spine surgery and then develop a SSI, is 111 patients. Ultimately, the surgical sparing potential from an ESI outweighs the SSI risk based on our findings.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). The efficacy of this treatment is quite controversial.
OBJECTIVE: This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glans penis augmentation with HA gel for PE.
METHODS: This systematic review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), primary clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, case series, and case reports. Searches in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed blindly by 2 reviewers.
RESULTS: Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), questionnaires about PE, glans circumference (millimeters), and adverse events.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the evaluation: 4 RCTs, 8 prospective observational studies, and 1 restrospective study. The number of patients who received HA gel on the glans penis was 706. According to the results of 2 placebo-controlled RCTs, HA gel treatment significantly improved IELT at the end of the first month (mean difference [MD], 65.44 seconds). In the first month after the HA gel injection procedure, IELT increased vs before the procedure (MD, 176.18 [95% CI, 146.89-205.48]; P < .001, I2 = 83%). When the IELT values ​​were compared at 6 months after HA gel application, IELT improved vs before the procedure (MD, 143.93 [95% CI, 124.78-163.09]; P < .001, I2 = 82). The glans circumference expanded by approximately 1.5 cm after the procedure (MD, 14.82 mm [95% CI, 12.75-16.90]; P < .001, I2 = 65%). When the side effect profile of other studies was examined, side effects were observed in 91 patients after HA gel injection applied to 598 patients (15.22%). Among these side effects, the most common were pain (n = 46, 7.69%), bulla/nodule formation (n = 25, 4.18%), and ecchymosis (n = 20, 3.34%).
CONCLUSIONS: While HA shows promise as a therapeutic option for PE, ongoing research is essential to elucidate its clinical utility, mechanisms of action, and comparative efficacy.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of autologous fat (AF) grafting in plastic surgery, the occurrence of complications has garnered the attention from plastic surgeons. This study aims to estimate the cerebral complications following facial AF graft injection objectively and systematically with newly published literature.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted systematically on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published between 2000 and 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 11 articles comprising of 37 participants were included, all of which are case reports. For AF facial filling, the incidence rate of cerebral embolism among cases of cerebral and ocular embolism was found to be 60% (95% CI 0.41-0.79). The incidence of cerebral embolism presenting with initial symptoms of unconsciousness was 69% (95% CI 0.48-0.9), with limb movement disorders was 55% (95% CI 0.26-0.84), and with vision loss was 30% (95% CI 0.12-0.49). The incidence of cerebral embolism with ophthalmic artery occlusion was 36% (95% CI 0.20-0.53), compared to was 71% (95% CI 0.48-0.95) without ophthalmic artery occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS: AF grafting is generally safe and minimally invasive. However, with its widespread use as facial injection filling for cosmetic enhancement, the incidence of cerebral complications, such as cerebral infarction, has also increased. It is imperative to properly manage high-risk factors for cerebral embolism during the perioperative period to prevent its occurrence.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been the standard treatment for retinal diseases for almost two decades. These treatments are administered via intravitreal injection using single-use vials or prefilled syringes (PFS). In this systematic review, we evaluate health care resource use and clinical outcomes and experiences with PFS for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF treatments.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2015 to February 8, 2024 to identify literature reporting outcomes regarding procedural efficiency, health care resource use, patient and clinician experiences, and safety for currently approved anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab) administered using PFS. Comparators were vial-based injections of the same anti-VEGFs.
RESULTS: A total of 36 publications met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic literature review; the majority were non-randomized studies, with a small number of reviews, case series, survey studies, and opinion articles. Publications reported that preparation times were significantly shorter for PFS (40.3-57.9 s) versus vials (ranibizumab, 62.8-98.0 s; aflibercept, 71.9-79.5 s), with no differences in product stability between PFS and vials. Clinicians expressed a preference for PFS and thought PFS were faster, easier to use, and had increased safety versus vials. Publications consistently reported significantly lower rates of endophthalmitis per injection with PFS versus vials (ranibizumab PFS, 0-0.02%; aflibercept PFS, 0.01-0.02%; ranibizumab vial, 0.02-0.05%; aflibercept vial, 0.02-0.06%). Four publications reported increased rates of transient vision loss after aflibercept PFS injection versus vial-based injection. No publications reported outcomes regarding health care resource use or patient experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: The available literature supports the increased procedural efficiency of PFS versus vial-based intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs. PFS are positively perceived by clinicians and have a safety benefit in the form of a decreased risk of endophthalmitis versus vials.
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, given by injection into the eye, are commonly used to treat diseases that affect the back of the eye (the retina). Anti-VEGF drugs are provided in small containers (vials) or in syringes that are already filled with the drug (prefilled syringes). When someone is treated with an anti-VEGF drug from a vial, the drug must first be taken from the vial using a needle and syringe, and then injected. When someone is treated with an anti-VEGF drug from a prefilled syringe, the drug is injected directly from the prefilled syringe, i.e., there are fewer steps involved when a prefilled syringe is used. We searched the medical literature to see if there were differences in clinical outcomes and experiences between prefilled syringes and vials when used to inject anti-VEGF drugs. Clinicians spent about 50% less time getting ready for injections when prefilled syringes were used than when vials were used. Clinicians also preferred to use prefilled syringes than vials for injecting anti-VEGF drugs. Clinicians reported that prefilled syringes were easier to use, faster, and safer than vials. Patients who were given injections from prefilled syringes had a lower rate of infection of the inside of the eye (endophthalmitis) than patients who were given injections from vials. These results indicate that using prefilled syringes for injecting drugs into the eye can improve efficiency at ophthalmology clinics and improve safety for patients.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used for the treatment of shoulder pain in patients with osteoarthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy. These injections may increase the risk of infection following eventual shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing data to explore the relationship between preoperative CSI\'s and postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through September 29, 2023. Of the 4221 retrieved, 7 studies including 136,233 patients were included for qualitative analysis. Studies describing patients receiving CSI prior to shoulder arthroplasty and the effect on postoperative infection risk were included in the systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.
RESULTS: Receiving a CSI prior to shoulder arthroplasty was found to have a statistically significant association with increased risk for PJI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.19; P < .0001). The rate of PJI increased when injections were given closer to the time of surgery. Patients who received an injection at any time point before surgery had a 5.4% risk of PJI compared to 7.9% and 9.0% in patients receiving an injection within 3 months and 1 month of surgery, respectively. This time dependent association however did not reach statistical significance: 1 month OR 1.48; 95% Cl: 0.86-2.53; P = .16, 3 months OR 1.95; 95% Cl: 0.95-4.00; P = .07.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that patients receiving corticosteroid shoulder injections prior to shoulder arthroplasty may be at an increased risk for PJI postoperatively. While time dependent stratification did not reach statistical significance, our findings indicate a clear trend of increased risk for patients receiving injections closer to surgery.

BACKGROUND: Morton\'s neuroma (MN) is one of the most frequent neurological pathologies in feet, affecting approximately 4% of the general population. The treatment of MN can be surgical, conservative, and infiltrative, with different substances used in the injections for MN, as steroids, sclerosing solutions, and others. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of current infiltrative therapy for Morton\'s neuroma and, additionally, to define adverse effects of this therapy.
METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, Epistemonikos, Web of Science (WOS), SPORTSDiscus and Cochrane Library. This search involved the application of all types of infiltrative treatment applicable to MN. The search was limited to original data describing clinical outcomes and pain using the Visual Analogue pain Scale (VAS) or the Johnson Satisfaction Scale, between February and June 2023.
RESULTS: Twelve manuscripts were selected (six randomized controlled trials and six longitudinal observational studies) involving 1,438 patients. Capsaicin was reported to produce a VAS score reduction of 51.8%. Corticosteroids also reported a high level of efficacy. Alcohol and Hyaluronic Acid injections are well tolerated, but the effects of their application need further research. There were no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids, sclerosant injections, hyaluronic acid and capsaicin have been shown to be effective in reducing the pain related to MN.

UNASSIGNED: Acute upper respiratory tract infection (AURI) includes infections caused by a variety of pathogens and is one of the most common diseases in children. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) injections are widely used for treating AURI in clinical practice, but their efficacy is unclear because of the lack of clear evidence. In this study, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM injections in the treatment of AURI and to provide a reference for clinical treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Eight databases were searched, namely, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Wanfang database, and the Chinese Scientific Journal database (VIP). The search time period was from 1 January 2013 to 1 November 2023. Randomized controlled trials of herbal injections for treating AURI were searched. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to assess the quality of these studies. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 were used for the NMA.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 81 papers involving 11,736 patients were included. These involved five different TCM injections, namely, Xiyanping injection (XYPI), Qingkailing injection (QKLI), Reduning injection (RDNI), Yanhuning injection (YHNI), and Tanreqing injection (TRQI). QKLI was most effective in alleviating symptoms of fever and improving overall clinical effectiveness. TRQI was most effective in relieving cough symptoms. YHNI was most effective in alleviating sore throat, runny nose, and nasal congestion. The overall incidence of adverse effects of these herbal injections in the treatment of AURI was lower, and their safety profiles were better.
UNASSIGNED: The herbal injections combined with ribavirin improved clinical outcomes, and were superior to ribavirin injection alone in alleviating clinical symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, runny nose, and nasal congestion, and have favorable safety profiles.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023484099, CRD42023484099.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Treatment of CD with BoNT usually requires injections every 3-4 months for as long as symptoms persist, which can be for the lifetime of the individual. Duration of BoNT effect can impact quality of life since it is important that efficacy is maintained throughout an injection cycle to avoid fluctuations of effect after each injection. There is currently no consensus on how to assess duration of BoNT effect in patients with CD.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to summarize the available evidence from phase 3 clinical trials of BoNT in CD and on the interpretation of the reported duration of effect. The available evidence was analyzed in the context of clinical experience and real-world treatment practices of CD.
RESULTS: Methods for estimating duration of effect varied across publications; most were based on artificial constructs developed for clinical trials (time until a pre-specified efficacy endpoint was reached) and are not appropriate to apply in clinical practice. Clinical trial outcomes in CD were not objectively evaluated, and did not prioritize patients\' needs or focus on factors that impact patients\' daily living activities and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Better evidence and consistency of reporting for duration of effect for BoNT in CD is needed to help guide clinicians on when reinjection is likely to be required. The goal should be to keep patients as symptom-free as possible with flexible reinjection intervals tailored to individual needs.

UNASSIGNED: Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest subtype of stroke. Surgery remains a vital measure for life-saving in emergency situations, however, the recovery of post-operative patients is not optimistic. This study aimed to evaluate the evidence of the efficacy and safety of Xingnaojing injection (XNJ) for post-operative patients of ICH.
UNASSIGNED: From inception to 31 January 2024, we searched eight representative databases for randomized controlled trials on post-operative patients of ICH treated with XNJ. A meta-analysis was conducted using R4.2.2, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated by GRADE criteria.
UNASSIGNED: The results indicated that the combination of XNJ with conventional western medicine therapy improved the total efficiency rate (RR = 1.26; 95% CI [1.21 to 1.32]; p < 0.0001), reduced the all-cause mortality within 15 days (RR = 0.45; 95% CI [0.30 to 0.67]; p < 0.0001), decreased the volume of hematoma (MD = -4.72; 95% CI [-7.43 to -2.01]; p = 0.0006) and perihematomal edema (MD = -4.11; 95% CI [-8.11 to -0.11]; p = 0.0441), reduced the TNF-α levels (SMD = -1.61, 95% CI [-2.23 to -0.99], p < 0.0001), decreased neurological impairment (SMD = -1.44; 95% CI [-1.78 to -1.11]; p < 0.0001), improved the activities of daily living (SMD = 1.22; 95% CI [0.78 to 1.66]; p < 0.0001), and enhanced the consciousness level (MD = 2.08, 95% CI [1.22 to 2.93], p < 0.0001). In addition, the complications of the combination therapy group were lower (RR = 0.43; 95% CI [0.35 to 0.54]; p < 0.0001) and the adverse drug reactions were comparable to the control group (RR = 0.89; 95% CI [0.55 to 1.45]; p = 0.6521). The trial sequential analysis results showed that the sample size is sufficient.
UNASSIGNED: Current evidence indicates that XNJ can enhance the efficiency, reduce mortality, and lower the incidence of complications, while demonstrating good tolerability of post-operative patients of ICH. However, the level of evidence from existing studies is relatively weak, and only prove short-term effects, and high-quality RCTs are needed to further verify the accuracy of these conclusions. Systematic Review Registration: identifier (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024503006). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024503006, Identifier CRD42024503006.

BACKGROUND: For patients looking for temporary results or who do not want surgery, nonsurgical rhinoplasty using filler injections has become increasingly popular. Filler materials and surgical techniques have improved in recent years, but serious complications remain. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the common types of fillers and injection techniques, complications, and treatment to help clinicians perform in a safer and more effective way.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings search terms. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the appropriate search terms. Data collected from each study included injection materials, location, technique, patient satisfaction and complications, and treatment.
RESULTS: From the 1812 studies identified, 30 were included in the systematic review. A total of 9657 patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty, most commonly with hyaluronic acid (HA) (96.76%), followed by calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) (1.22%). Overall satisfaction was 99.08%. The overall incidence of complications was 39.11%, with the highest incidence of erythema and swelling (27.95%). Most of the complications are mild, but there are still 0.27% of the patients who have undergone severe complication-an arterial occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical rhinoplasty is an effective and relatively safe option for improving the profile of the nose, with a short operative time and high patient satisfaction. Most of the complications were mild, but still serious vascular complications such as blindness, skin necrosis, and stroke were as high as 0.27%. A thorough understanding of the anatomy of the nasal vessels and a precise surgical technique is an important basis for prevention. A BULLET POINT LIST: (1) We summarize the common types of fillers and injection techniques, complications, and treatment of complications to guide physicians to perform nonsurgical rhinoplasty in a safer and more effective manner. (2) Out of 1812 studies through the search strategy, 30 articles were included in the systematic review. A total of 9657 patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty. (3) Nonsurgical rhinoplasty is an effective and relatively safe option to improve the profile of the nose, with a short surgical time and high patient satisfaction. (4) Most of the complications were mild, but some severe complications due to the vascular factors such as blindness, skin necrosis, and cerebral infarction need to be vigilant.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .