inguinal

腹股沟
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在下腹部手术后的第一天报告了中度至重度的疼痛。没有研究比较腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与后椎板阻滞(RLB)在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的术后疼痛缓解。
    在这个前景中,随机试验,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的42名男性患者的身体状况I和II,18-65岁,BMI<40kg/m2的患者在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术后接受TAP或RLB。进行了标准的全身麻醉技术。患者被随机分为两组:单次TAP阻滞(I组)(n=21)或RLB(II组)(n=21),双侧20ml0.375%罗哌卡因。术后,静脉给予扑热息痛1g作为抢救镇痛。术后24小时累积视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分被认为是主要结果。
    术后24小时休息时的累积VAS评分,表示为平均值±S.D(95%CI),TAP阻滞组为3.54±3.04(2.16~4.93),RLB组为6.09±4.83(3.89~8.29).TAP阻滞组P值为0.112,运动VAS值为7.95±3.41(6.39~9.50[2.5~15.0]),而RLB组的P值为0.110,运动时的VAS值为10.83±5.51(8.32-13.34)。
    在接受TAP阻滞或RLB的患者中,术后24h运动时的累积疼痛评分相似。然而,术后18小时和24小时接受TAP阻滞的患者在休息和运动时的VAS评分降低。
    UNASSIGNED: Moderate-to-severe intensity pain is reported on the first day following lower abdominal surgery. No study has compared transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with retrolaminar block (RLB) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery for postoperative pain relief.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective, randomized trial, 42 male patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 18-65 years, and having a BMI <40 kg/m2 received TAP or RLB following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. A standard general anesthetic technique was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: single-shot TAP block (group I) (n = 21) or the RLB (group II) (n = 21) with bilateral 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, IV paracetamol 1 g was administered as rescue analgesia. Postoperative cumulative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score 24 hours after surgery was considered as the primary outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative cumulative VAS score at rest at 24 h, represented as mean ± S.D (95% CI), in the TAP block group was 3.54 ± 3.04 (2.16-4.93) and in the RLB group was 6.09 ± 4.83 (3.89-8.29). P value was 0.112 and VAS on movement was 7.95 ± 3.41 (6.39-9.50 [2.5-15.0]) in TAP block group, whereas P value was 0.110 and VAS on movement was 10.83 ± 5.51 (8.32-13.34) in the RLB group.
    UNASSIGNED: Similar postoperative cumulative pain score on movement at 24 h was present in patients receiving TAP block or RLB. However, VAS score at rest and on movement was reduced in patients receiving TAP block at 18 and 24 h postoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前的研究旨在研究优越的网片固定方法,与传统方法相比,单一可吸收粘着剂,通过腹腔镜全腹腹膜前(TAPP)方法进行双侧腹股沟疝修补术的患者。
    目前的随机临床试验已经在81例通过TAPP进行双侧疝修补术的患者中进行。患者被随机分配到网片固定组之一,包括单个可吸收固定器(S组)(n=41)和常规方法(C组)(n=40)。所有患者均在住院期间和术后1个月进行评估,以评估与手术相关的并发症和恢复日常活动的天数。在12个月的随访中,应用Eura-Hs问卷评估疝气手术后的生活质量(QOL)。
    双侧腹股沟疝手术时间(P=0.067),术后导尿(P=0.813),两组间住院时间(P=0.779)无差异;而C组需要更长的时间才能恢复日常活动(P<0.001).C组仅1例患者出现血肿(P=0.494)。两组血清瘤发生率无统计学差异(P=0.712)。S组术后疼痛在统计学上较少(所有评估均P<0.001)。疝修补术后一年内的术后生活质量总体上两组间无显著性差异(P>0.05);S组疼痛分量表显著较少(P=0.002).
    根据本研究的结果,考虑到其较少的术前和术后并发症,单一的可吸收粘着剂通常优于常规方法。然而,两种方法在1年随访QOL方面没有差异.
    UNASSIGNED: The current study aims to investigate the superior mesh fixation method, single absorbable tacker versus conventional method, in patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair through the laparoscopic total abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach.
    UNASSIGNED: The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 81 patients undergoing bilateral hernia repair through TAPP. The patients were randomly assigned into one of the mesh fixation groups including single absorbable tacker (Group S) (n = 41) and conventional method (Group C) (n = 40). All patients were assessed during the hospital stay and 1 month postoperatively to assess the surgery-associated complications and days for return to daily activity. Eura-Hs questionnaire was applied to assess the quality of life (QOL) after hernia surgery during 12-month follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The duration of bilateral inguinal hernia operation (P = 0.067), postoperative urinary catheterization (P = 0.813), and hospital stay duration (P = 0.779) did not differ between the groups; whereas Group C significantly required a longer time for returning to daily activity (P < 0.001). Only a patient in Group C represented hematoma (P = 0.494). Seroma incidence was not statistically different between the two groups (P = 0.712). Postoperative pain was statistically less in Group S (P < 0.001 for all the assessments). Postoperative QOL within a year after hernia repair revealed an insignificant difference between the groups in general (P > 0.05); however, a pain subscale was significantly less in Group S (P = 0.002).
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the findings of this study, a single absorbable tacker was generally superior to the conventional method considering its less pre- and postoperative complications. However, the two methods did not differ regarding 1-year follow-up QOL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析超声对单侧腹股沟疝患儿异时性对侧腹股沟疝(MCIH)和对侧持续阴道突(CPPV)的诊断价值。进行了一项前瞻性研究.
    方法:所有参与者都接受了对侧腹股沟的术前超声检查。A1组患者根据超声检查结果进行手术(对侧超声检查结果阴性的患者在患侧接受疝修补术),A2组患者根据腹腔镜检查结果接受手术(患者接受疝修补术和CPPV结扎术)。所有患者均接受了2年的随访,并与仅在患侧进行开放式疝修补术的历史对照组(B组)进行了比较,无论对侧US结果如何。
    结果:在A1组和A2组中,腹腔镜探查显示490例存在CPPV。在490例中有104例超声检查准确,其中4例假阳性和386例假阴性结果。这产生了59.3%的准确性,灵敏度为21.2%,和99.2%的特异性。A1组10例,B组74例发生MCIH。准确性,灵敏度,超声对MCIH预测价值的特异性为89.3%,52.4%,92.5%,分别。
    结论:对侧腹股沟的术前超声检查目前无法准确检测CPPV,但是通过严格的诊断标准来预测MCIH似乎是一种有前途的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the value of ultrasonography in predicting metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) and diagnosing contralateral persistent processus vaginalis (CPPV) in children with unilateral inguinal hernia, a prospective study was conducted.
    METHODS: All participants underwent a preoperative ultrasound on the contralateral groin. Patients in group A1 received operating procedure according to ultrasound results (patients with negative contralateral US results received hernia repair on the affected side), and patients in group A2 received operation according to laparoscopic results (patients received hernia repair and CPPV ligation). All patients were followed up 2 years and compared to a historical control (group B) who underwent open hernia repair only on the affected side regardless of contralateral US results.
    RESULTS: In groups A1 and A2, laparoscopic exploration revealed the presence of a CPPV in 490 cases. Ultrasound was found to be accurate in 104 out of the 490 cases with four false-positive and 386 false-negative results. This yielded an accuracy of 59.3%, a sensitivity of 21.2%, and a specificity of 99.2%. 10 patients in group A1, and 74 patients in group B developed MCIH. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the value of ultrasonography in predicting MCIH were 89.3%, 52.4%, and 92.5%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ultrasonography of the contralateral groin is currently unable to accurately detect CPPV, but it appears to be a promising method in predicting MCIH by using rigorous diagnosing criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem around the world. The two types of groin hernias are femoral hernias and direct and indirect inguinal hernias. The incidence rate is higher among males. This investigation intends to differentiate between open and laparoscopic methods of inguinal hernia surgery with respect to operative time, seroma formation, duration of hospitalization, and return to normal activity.
    METHODS: This prospective observational study included 84 patients with unilateral, bilateral, direct, and indirect inguinal hernias, but excluded those who were unwilling to have surgery, were under 12, had comorbidities, or had complete and recurrent hernias. In the end, 42 underwent open, and 42 underwent laparoscopic repair. Visual analog scales were used for pain assessments. Chi-square and unpaired student T-tests were employed (p<0.05).
    RESULTS: Among the 84 individuals analyzed, 79 (94.04%) were male patients, with the majority of them falling between the ages of 41 and 55. In contrast to the open group of patients, the laparoscopic group experienced a significant increase in operative time with a highly significant statistical difference (p<0.0001), and the laparoscopic group experienced a significant decrease in post-operative pain score with an insignificant p-value. A significant statistical difference (p<0.005) was estimated among the laparoscopic and open groups of patients in terms of post-operative hospitalization. Returning to normal activities was significantly different for laparoscopic patients relative to the open group (p-value<0.001). With a high level of significance of p<0.001, laparoscopic hernia repair required less time to recover before returning to normal activities than open hernia repair (p<0.005).
    CONCLUSIONS: In terms of decreased post-operative discomfort, shorter hospitalization, and an earlier return to activities, laparoscopic hernia repair has been found to be superior to open hernia repair, which is also known as Lichtenstein surgery. However, there was no discernible difference among the two groups with regard to post-operative problems, including seroma development and wound infections. To assess chronic discomfort and recurrence rates after laparoscopic hernia surgery, additional studies and extended follow-up are required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言腹股沟疝是全世界常见的外科问题。目前,可用的管理选择是开放网片疝修补术和腹腔镜网片修补术。腹腔镜网片修复可以通过经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复或完全腹膜外(TEP)修复进行。许多比较这两种程序的研究无法确定一种程序相对于另一种程序的优越性,并产生了相互矛盾的结果。因此,我们进行这项研究以比较TAPP和TEP.目的本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜TEP和腹腔镜TAPP在腹股沟疝修补术中的临床效果和安全性。材料与方法根据手术方式将患者随机分为两组。第一组患者行腹腔镜TAPP网片修补术,第二组患者行腹腔镜TEP网片修补术。记录了他们的术中和术后发现。患者定期随访6个月。结果两组患者的平均年龄和平均体重分布差异无统计学意义。发现与TEP相比,TAPP所需的手术持续时间(以分钟为单位)明显较少。在TEP组中,3名受试者(6.7%)转为开放,而TAPP组无转化.与TEP受试者相比,TAPP受试者在24小时的术后疼痛更高。但差异在统计学上无统计学意义。发现两组在手术后数小时开始对流质饮食的耐受性相同。住院时间与手术类型的相关性不显著。TEP组中有6名受试者(13.2%)显示血肿,而TAPP组中有5名受试者(11%)在手术一周后显示血肿。TEP组中有八名受试者(17.6%)出现血清肿,而TAPP组中有三名受试者(15.4%)在手术一周后出现血清肿。手术一周后,TEP组和TAPP组均有两名受试者(4.4%)出现浅表伤口感染。手术一周后,TEP组和TAPP组各有四名受试者(8.9%)显示阴囊水肿。在一周内,没有受试者显示出无鞘闭合的港口位置疝,一个月,以及六个月的随访。手术一周后,TEP组和TAPP组各有两名受试者(4.4%)表现出腹股沟疼痛。没有肠梗阻或网状物感染的实例。结论与TAPP相比,TEP对技术要求更高,因此需要更多的时间来执行。然而,由于不破坏腹膜,它是优越的。TAPP对较大的疝有利。手术的选择应根据患者的特点和外科医生的喜好进行个体化。
    Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem throughout the world. Currently, the management options available are open mesh hernioplasty and laparoscopic mesh repair. Laparoscopic mesh repair can be performed by either transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Many studies comparing the two procedures have been unable to establish the superiority of one procedure over the other and have yielded conflicting results. Thus, we performed this study to compare TAPP and TEP. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of laparoscopic TEP and laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. Materials and methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of surgical procedures. The first group of patients underwent laparoscopic TAPP mesh repair, and the second group of patients underwent laparoscopic TEP mesh repair. Their intraoperative and postoperative findings were noted. Patients were followed up at regular intervals for up to six months. Results The mean age and mean weight distribution between the two groups were not significant. The duration of surgery needed (in minutes) for TAPP was found to be significantly less compared to TEP. In the TEP group, conversion to open occurred for three subjects (6.7%) while there was no conversion in the TAPP group. Postoperative pain at 24 hrs was found to be higher in TAPP subjects compared to that in TEP subjects, but the difference was statistically insignificant. Tolerance to a liquid diet started few hours after surgery was found to be the same in both groups. Association of the duration of hospital stays with the type of surgery was not significant. Six subjects (13.2%) showed hematoma in the TEP group while five subjects (11%) in the TAPP group showed hematoma after one week of surgery. Eight subjects (17.6%) showed seroma in the TEP group while three subjects (15.4%) in the TAPP group showed seroma after one week of surgery. Two subjects (4.4%) showed superficial wound infection in both the TEP group and TAPP group after one week of surgery. Four subjects each (8.9%) showed scrotal edema in the TEP group as well as the TAPP group after one week of surgery. No subject showed port site hernia without closure of the sheath at one-week, one-month, and six-month follow-up visits. Two subjects (4.4%) each showed groin pain in the TEP group as well as the TAPP group after one week of surgery. There were no instances of bowel obstruction or mesh infection. Conclusion TEP is a more skill-demanding procedure as compared to TAPP and thus takes more time to perform. However, it is superior on account of not breaching the peritoneum. TAPP is favorable for larger hernias. The choice of procedure should be individualized according to the patient\'s characteristics and surgeon\'s preference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:淋巴结转移是阴茎癌患者生存的主要决定因素。常规临床可触及性用于将患者分层为腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(ILND)(如果临床淋巴结阳性(cN+))或动态前哨淋巴结活检(DSNB)(如果临床淋巴结阴性(cN0))。研究表明,DSNB的假阴性率(FNR)约为10%(5-13%)。据我们所知,没有研究报告所有临床淋巴结阳性(cN+)患者的生存和结果更困难的终点。我们提供了所有阴茎癌患者的结果数据,包括DSNB和ILND组的假阴性率和生存率。
    方法:一百五十八个连续患者(316个腹股沟盆),2008年1月至2018年在三级转诊中心接受阴茎癌淋巴结手术的患者被纳入研究.所有患者均行超声(US)±细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC),然后行MRI/CT检查,如果需要,阶段他们的疾病。我们使用了临床和放射学综合标准(淋巴结大小,建筑损失,不规则边缘)对患者进行DSNB和ILND的分层,而不是单独的临床可触性。
    结果:11.2%,即27/241例腹股沟盆通过DSNB发现淋巴结阳性疾病。54.9%,即39/71腹股沟盆(IBs)由ILND引起淋巴结阳性疾病。根据患者的要求,正在监测4个在前哨淋巴结扫描中没有示踪剂摄取的腹股沟盆地,迄今为止没有任何复发。平均随访65个月(范围24-150),DSNB的假阴性率(FNR)为0%。正确使用横截面成像需要在2个腹股沟盆地中进行ILND,这些腹股沟盆地具有不可触及的淋巴结和阴性US,ILND的假阳性率为6.3%(2/32)。如果仅使用可触知标准,则相同的DSNB患者队列可能具有11.1%(3/27)的FNR。根据我们的标准,需要进行横断面成像的43例(28%)患者的淋巴结阳性率低,为4.7%(p=0.03)。所有淋巴结阳性患者的平均癌症特异性生存期为105个月。
    结论:随着DSNB或ILND患者的放射分层增强,DSNB的表现得到改善。我们首次报告了阴茎癌所有淋巴结分期程序的综合结果。
    BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is the main determinant of survival in penile cancer patients. Conventionally clinical palpability is used to stratify patients to Inguinal Lymph node dissection (ILND) if clinically node positive (cN +) or Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) if clinically node negative (cN0). Studies suggest a false negative rate (FNR) of around 10% (5-13%) for DSNB. To our knowledge there are no studies reporting harder end point of survival and outcomes of all clinically node positive (cN +) patients. We present our outcome data of all patients with penile cancer including false negative rates and survival in both DSNB and ILND groups.
    METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients (316 inguinal basins), who had lymph node surgery for penile cancer in a tertiary referral centre from Jan 2008 to 2018, were included in the study. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) ± fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and then MRI/ CT, if needed, to stage their disease. We used combined clinical and radiological criteria (node size, architecture loss, irregular margins) to stratify patients to DSNB vs ILND as opposed to clinical palpability alone.
    RESULTS: 11.2% i.e., 27/241 inguinal basins had lymph node positive disease by DSNB. 54.9% i.e., 39/71 inguinal basins (IBs) had lymph node-positive disease by ILND. 4 inguinal basins with no tracer uptake in sentinel node scans are being monitored at patient\'s request and have not had any recurrences to date. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range 24-150), the false-negative rate (FNR) for DSNB is 0%. Judicious uses of cross-sectional imaging necessitated ILND in 2 inguinal basins with non-palpable nodes and negative US with false positive rate of 6.3% (2/32) for ILND. The same cohort of DSNB patients might have had 11.1% (3/27) FNR if only palpability criteria was used. 43 (28%) patients who did require cross sectional imaging as per our criteria had a low node positive rate of 4.7% (p = 0.03). Mean cancer specific survival of all node-positive patients was 105 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: The performance of DSNB improved with enhanced radiological stratification of patients to either DSNB or ILND. We for the first time report the comprehensive outcome of all lymph node staging procedures in penile cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹股沟疝修补术是一种常见的外科手术。我们比较了超声引导的前方肌(QL)阻滞与髂腹股沟/髂腹下(II/IH)神经阻滞在接受开放式腹股沟疝修补术的小儿患者中的镇痛效果。
    这是一项前瞻性随机研究,其中90名1-8岁的患者被随机分配到对照组(仅全身麻醉),QL块,和II/IH神经阻滞组。安大略省东部儿童医院疼痛量表(CHEOPS),围手术期镇痛消耗,并记录第一次镇痛请求的时间。通过单因素方差分析和事后Tukey的HSD检验分析正态分布的定量参数,而不服从正态分布和CHEOPS评分的参数使用Kruskal-Wallis检验,然后进行Mann-WhitneyU检验和Bonferonni校正进行事后分析。
    在术后第6h,对照组的CHEOPS评分中位数(IQR)高于II/IH组(P=0.000)和QL组(P=0.000),而后两组之间具有可比性.QL阻滞组的CHEOPS评分在12和18h时明显低于对照组和II/IH神经阻滞组。对照组的术中芬太尼和术后对乙酰氨基酚的消耗量高于II/IH和QL组,而QL低于II/IH组。
    超声引导下的QL和II/IH神经阻滞在接受腹股沟疝修补术的儿科患者中提供了有效的术后镇痛,与II/IH组相比,QL阻滞组的疼痛评分更低,围手术期镇痛消耗更少。
    UNASSIGNED: Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure. We compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum (QL) block versus ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (II/IH) nerve block in pediatric patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair.
    UNASSIGNED: It was a prospective randomized study in which 90 patients of 1-8 years of age were randomly assigned into control (general anesthesia only), QL block, and II/IH nerve block groups. Children\'s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS), perioperative analgesic consumptions, and time to first analgesic request were recorded. The normally distributed quantitative parameters were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey\'s HSD test while parameters that did not follow a normal distribution and the CHEOPS score were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferonni correction for post-hoc analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: In the 1st 6h postoperative, the median (IQR) CHEOPS score was higher in the control group than II/IH group (P = 0.000) and QL group (P = 0.000) while comparable between the latter two groups. CHEOPS scores were significantly lower in the QL block group than the control group and II/IH nerve block group at 12 and 18h. The intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative paracetamol consumptions in the control group were higher than II/IH and QL groups while lower in QL than II/IH group.
    UNASSIGNED: Ultrasound-guided QL and II/IH nerve blocks provided effective postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair with lower pain scores and less perioperative analgesic consumptions in the QL block group compared to II/IH group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是描述一组在美国综合医疗保健系统(IHS)内接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者,并根据外科医生和医院数量评估术后事件的风险。每种手术方法,打开,腹腔镜,和机器人。
    方法:对年龄≥18岁的首次腹股沟疝修补术患者进行了一项队列研究(2010-2020)。平均每年的外科医生和医院数量被分成四分位数,最低的四分位数作为参考组。多重Cox回归评估了按体积修复后同侧再次手术的风险。所有分析均按手术方法分层(开放,腹腔镜,和机器人)。
    结果:110,808例患者在研究期间接受了131,629例腹股沟疝修补术;手术由36家医院的897名外科医生进行。大多数维修是开放的(65.4%),其次是腹腔镜(33.5%)和机器人(1.1%)。随访5年和10年的再手术率分别为2.4%和3.4%,各手术组的发生率相似。在调整后的分析中,腹腔镜手术体积较高的外科医生的再手术风险较低(27-46年平均修复:风险比[HR]=0.63,95%置信区间[CI]0.53-0.74;≥47例修复:HR0.53,95%CI0.44-0.64),与体积最低的四分位数(<14年平均修复)相比.开放式或机器人腹股沟疝修补术后,参考外科医生或医院容量,未观察到再手术率的差异。
    结论:大容量外科医生可以降低腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的再手术风险。我们希望通过未来的研究更好地确定腹股沟疝修补术并发症的其他风险因素,并改善患者的预后。
    The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair within a United States-based integrated healthcare system (IHS) and evaluate the risk for postoperative events by surgeon and hospital volume within each surgical approach, open, laparoscopic, and robotic.
    Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent their first inguinal hernia repair were identified for a cohort study (2010-2020). Average annual surgeon and hospital volume were broken into quartiles with the lowest volume quartile as the reference group. Multiple Cox regression evaluated risk for ipsilateral reoperation following repair by volume. All analyses were stratified by surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic).
    110,808 patients underwent 131,629 inguinal hernia repairs during the study years; procedures were performed by 897 surgeons at 36 hospitals. Most repairs were open (65.4%), followed by laparoscopic (33.5%) and robotic (1.1%). Reoperation rates at 5 and 10 years of follow-up were 2.4% and 3.4%, respectively; rates were similar across surgical groups. In adjusted analysis, surgeons with higher laparoscopic volumes had a lower reoperation risk (27-46 average annual repairs: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74; ≥ 47 repairs: HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.64) compared to those in the lowest volume quartile (< 14 average annual repairs). No differences in reoperation rates were observed in reference to surgeon or hospital volume following open or robotic inguinal hernia repair.
    High-volume surgeons may reduce reoperation risk following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. We hope to better identify additional risk factors for inguinal hernia repair complications and improve patient outcomes with future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    <b>简介:</b>腹股沟疝修补术是全球最常见的手术。影响疝修补术的主要因素是术后生活质量,早日重返工作岗位,复发率低,和慢性疼痛预防。</br></br><b>目的:</b>这项研究的目的是比较Lichtenstein修复中自粘网和常规聚丙烯网的短期和长期结果。</br></br><b>材料与方法:50自粘网(S组),50与常规聚丙烯网(P组)。Prospective,患者平均随访36个月.比较两组手术时间,住院时间,日常活动/恢复工作的持续时间,术后疼痛,慢性疼痛,复发,伤口感染,血肿/血清瘤形成,和术后镇痛消耗。结果:P组39例,S组37例。P组37例。P组平均手术时间长于S组,两组之间的差异有统计学意义(45.1±6.6minvs.28.8±3.0min,P=0.0001)。在复发中,术后不适,慢性疼痛,住院时间,日常活动/返回工作,伤口感染,血肿/血清肿,和术后镇痛药的使用,两组间差异无统计学意义。</br></br><b>结论:除了手术时间,在列支敦士登的修复中。
    <b> Introduction:</b> Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation worldwide. The essential factors in hernia repair have been the postoperative quality of life, early return to work, low recurrence rate, and chronic pain prevention. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term results of the self-adhesive mesh and the conventional polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair. </br></br> <b> Material and methods:</b> A total of 100 male patients were randomized and operated on, 50 with the self-adhesive mesh (S group), 50 with the conventional polypropylene mesh (P group). Prospectively, the patients were followed for an average of 36 months. The two groups were compared for the duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, duration of daily activity/resumption of work, postoperative pain, chronic pain, recurrence, wound infection, hematoma/seroma formation, and postoperative analgesic consumption. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> The study involved 39 patients in the P group and 37 patients in the S group who underwent inguinal hernia surgery. The P group had a longer mean operation time than the S group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (45.1 ± 6.6 min vs. 28.8 ± 3.0 min, P = 0.0001). In recurrence, postoperative discomfort, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, daily activity/return to work, wound infection, hematoma/seroma, and postoperative analgesic use, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. </br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> It was found that the self-adhesive mesh did not produce statistically significant advantages over the conventional polypropylene mesh, except for operative time, in the Lichtenstein repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:与开放修补术相比,腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术显着降低了术后急性和慢性疼痛的发生率,但它仍然存在问题。本研究的目的是回顾性地确定腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后急性疼痛的预测因素。
    方法:我们回顾了193例患者的医疗记录。在排除非典型病例和女性患者后,对156名患者进行了分析。通过多变量logistic回归分析研究了影响抢救镇痛药需求的因素。独立变量包括年龄,身体质量指数,手术期间使用的镇痛药和手术因素(单侧/双侧,原发性/复发性)。还调查了术后疼痛程度和术后住院时间。
    结果:在156名患者中,40(25.6%)需要抢救镇痛药。60岁以下的患者需要抢救镇痛药的可能性是80岁以上患者的7倍。与复发性手术患者相比,初次手术患者需要抢救镇痛药的可能性约为5.5倍。89%的患者的最大言语评定量表得分小于3。所有患者均于术后2天前出院。
    结论:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术可减少术后急性疼痛。然而,对于年轻患者和初级手术患者,应谨慎考虑镇痛管理。
    Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative acute and chronic pain compared to open repair, but it remains problematic. This study\'s purpose was to retrospectively identify predictive factors of acute pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
    We reviewed the medical records of 193 patients. After excluding atypical cases and female patients, 156 patients were analysed. Factors affecting rescue analgesic requirements were investigated via multivariable logistic regression analysis. Independent variables included age, body mass index, analgesics used during surgery and surgical factors (unilateral/bilateral, primary/recurrent). The degree of postoperative pain and the hospital stay duration after surgery were also investigated.
    Of the 156 patients, 40 (25.6%) required rescue analgesics. Patients under 60 years of age were about seven times more likely to need rescue analgesics than patients over 80 years of age. Primary surgery patients were about 5.5 times more likely to need rescue analgesics than recurrent surgery patients. The maximum verbal rating scale score was less than 3 in 89% of patients. All patients were discharged by two days postoperatively.
    Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair results in less postoperative acute pain. However, analgesia management should be considered prudently for younger patients and primary surgery patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号