infodemiology

信息流行病学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:水痘大流行已引起全世界公众的广泛关注。通过互联网和社交媒体传播错误信息可能会导致一种流行病,对水痘控制构成挑战。
    目的:这篇综述旨在总结与水痘相关的信息流行病学研究,以确定其特征,影响力,预防,并对今后的研究提出展望。
    方法:范围审查是基于结构化的5步方法框架进行的。使用PubMed,WebofScience,Embase,还有Scopus,搜索将于2024年4月30日完成。经过研究选择和数据提取,从四个方面对水痘传染病的主要主题进行了分类和总结,包括对在线信息搜索量的趋势分析,与mpox相关的在线帖子和评论的内容主题,在线内容的情感和情感特征,水痘病种的防治措施。
    结果:根据关键词从数据库中检索到1607篇文章,61项研究纳入最终分析.在世界卫生组织于2022年7月宣布国际关注的水痘公共卫生紧急情况之后,相关研究的数量开始迅速增长。谷歌是使用最广泛的搜索引擎平台(9/61,15%),Twitter是研究人员使用最多的社交媒体应用程序(32/61,52%)。来自33个国家的研究人员关注与水痘相关的主题。其中,文章发表最多的3个国家是美国(27项研究),印度(9项研究),和英国(7项研究)。对网络信息搜索趋势的研究表明,与水痘相关的网络搜索量在水痘爆发初期猛增,特别是当世界卫生组织提供重要声明时。有大量的错误信息带有负面情绪,以及对同性恋的歧视性和敌意内容,双性恋,和其他和男人发生性关系的男人.鉴于水痘的特征,这些研究提供了一些积极的预防和控制措施,包括及时积极地出版专业人士,高品质,和易于理解的在线信息;根据互联网数据加强对信息的监测和预警;并采取措施保护重点人群免受水痘的危害。
    结论:对以前的水痘病种研究的证据的综合总结对于了解水痘病种的特征以及制定预防和控制措施是有价值的。研究人员和政策制定者必须建立预测和预警方法以及有针对性的干预方法,以应对未来的水痘疫情。
    BACKGROUND: The mpox pandemic has caused widespread public concern around the world. The spread of misinformation through the internet and social media could lead to an infodemic that poses challenges to mpox control.
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize mpox-related infodemiology studies to determine the characteristics, influence, prevention, and control measures of the mpox infodemic and propose prospects for future research.
    METHODS: The scoping review was conducted based on a structured 5-step methodological framework. A comprehensive search for mpox-related infodemiology studies was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, with searches completed by April 30, 2024. After study selection and data extraction, the main topics of the mpox infodemic were categorized and summarized in 4 aspects, including a trend analysis of online information search volume, content topics of mpox-related online posts and comments, emotional and sentiment characteristics of online content, and prevention and control measures for the mpox infodemic.
    RESULTS: A total of 1607 articles were retrieved from the databases according to the keywords, and 61 studies were included in the final analysis. After the World Health Organization\'s declaration of an mpox public health emergency of international concern in July 2022, the number of related studies began growing rapidly. Google was the most widely used search engine platform (9/61, 15%), and Twitter was the most used social media app (32/61, 52%) for researchers. Researchers from 33 countries were concerned about mpox infodemic-related topics. Among them, the top 3 countries for article publication were the United States (27 studies), India (9 studies), and the United Kingdom (7 studies). Studies of online information search trends showed that mpox-related online search volume skyrocketed at the beginning of the mpox outbreak, especially when the World Health Organization provided important declarations. There was a large amount of misinformation with negative sentiment and discriminatory and hostile content against gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Given the characteristics of the mpox infodemic, the studies provided several positive prevention and control measures, including the timely and active publishing of professional, high-quality, and easy-to-understand information online; strengthening surveillance and early warning for the infodemic based on internet data; and taking measures to protect key populations from the harm of the mpox infodemic.
    CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive summary of evidence from previous mpox infodemiology studies is valuable for understanding the characteristics of the mpox infodemic and for formulating prevention and control measures. It is essential for researchers and policy makers to establish prediction and early warning approaches and targeted intervention methods for dealing with the mpox infodemic in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界卫生组织(WHO)将传染病定义为信息过多,准确与否,在数字和物理空间中,伴随急性健康事件,如爆发或流行病。它会影响人们的风险认知,信任,以及对卫生系统的信心,和卫生工作者。作为立即回应,世卫组织开发了传染病管理(IM)框架,研究议程,干预框架,能力,以及供卫生当局参考的过程。
    本系统评价探讨了卫生当局和其他健康组织对急性健康事件的反应。它还评估了当前干预措施的有效性。
    2023年6月26日,在线数据库搜索包括Medline(Ovid),Embase,科克伦图书馆,Scopus,认识论,和WHO网站。它只包括英语,同行评审的研究或报告涵盖由报告其有效性的卫生组织应用的IM流程。对发布日期没有限制。两名独立审核员进行了所有筛选,inclusion,和质量评估,第三位审稿人对两位审稿人之间的任何分歧进行了仲裁。
    审阅者确定了945条记录。经过最后的评估,29项研究被纳入审查,并在2021年至2023年之间发表。一些国家(巴基斯坦,也门,西班牙,意大利,香港,Japan,韩国,新加坡,英国,美国,新西兰,芬兰,韩国,和俄罗斯)将不同的IM方法应用于人们的行为。这些措施包括但不限于启动媒体和电视保护,使用网络和科学数据库搜索,发布基于科学的COVID-19信息,实施在线调查,创造一个创新的数字工具生态系统,和早期AI支持的响应与社会倾听(EARS)平台。大多数干预措施在遏制COVID-19传染病的有害影响方面都是有效的。然而,证据的质量并不可靠.
    在COVID-19期间应用的大多数传染病干预措施都属于WHOIM生态系统建议的行动范围。因此,该研究表明,需要更多的研究来研究卫生系统在不同的运行环境和国家背景下在设计方面面临的挑战,实施,并评估IM干预措施,战略,政策,和系统。
    The World Health Organization (WHO) defined an infodemic as an overabundance of information, accurate or not, in the digital and physical space, accompanying an acute health event such as an outbreak or epidemic. It can impact people\'s risk perceptions, trust, and confidence in the health system, and health workers. As an immediate response, the WHO developed the infodemic management (IM) frameworks, research agenda, intervention frameworks, competencies, and processes for reference by health authorities.
    This systematic review explored the response to and during acute health events by health authorities and other organizations operating in health. It also assessed the effectiveness of the current interventions.
    On 26 June 2023, an online database search included Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Epistemonikos, and the WHO website. It included English-only, peer-reviewed studies or reports covering IM processes applied by health organizations that reported their effectiveness. There was no restriction on publication dates. Two independent reviewers conducted all screening, inclusion, and quality assessments, and a third reviewer arbitrated any disagreement between the two reviewers.
    Reviewers identified 945 records. After a final assessment, 29 studies were included in the review and were published between 2021 and 2023. Some countries (Pakistan, Yemen, Spain, Italy, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States, New Zealand, Finland, South Korea, and Russia) applied different methods of IM to people\'s behaviors. These included but were not limited to launching media and TV conservations, using web and scientific database searches, posting science-based COVID-19 information, implementing online surveys, and creating an innovative ecosystem of digital tools, and an Early AI-supported response with Social Listening (EARS) platform. Most of the interventions were effective in containing the harmful effects of COVID-19 infodemic. However, the quality of the evidence was not robust.
    Most of the infodemic interventions applied during COVID-19 fall within the recommended actions of the WHO IM ecosystem. As a result, the study suggests that more research is needed into the challenges facing health systems in different operational environments and country contexts in relation to designing, implementing, and evaluating IM interventions, strategies, policies, and systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:公共卫生监测在告知公共卫生决策中起着至关重要的作用。2020年初COVID-19大流行的爆发导致公共卫生重点的广泛转变。全球努力侧重于COVID-19监测和接触者追踪。由于物理距离措施和资源重新分配,现有的公共卫生计划被中断。COVID-19大流行的爆发与有可能支持公共卫生监测工作的技术进步交织在一起。
    目的:本范围审查旨在探索COVID-19大流行早期的紧急公共卫生监测方法,以描述大流行对监测方法的影响。
    方法:从2020年3月至2022年1月,在多个数据库中进行了范围搜索,并扫描了主要的政府和公共卫生组织网站。包括已发表的论文和灰色文献,这些文献描述了新的或修订的方法在公共卫生监测中的应用。论文讨论了新的公共卫生监测方法从伦理,legal,安全,公平观点也包括在内。监视对象,方法,location,从每篇论文中提取和设置,以确定监测实践的趋势。邀请了两名公共卫生流行病学家作为同行评审员提供他们的观点。
    结果:在14,238篇独特的论文中,共有241篇论文描述了新的监测方法和监测方法的变化。80篇论文为综述论文,161篇为单项研究。总的来说,文献中大量详述了COVID-19传播监测的论文(n=187)。还描述了对其他传染病的监测,包括其他病原体(n=12)。其他公共卫生主题包括疫苗(n=9),心理健康(n=11),物质使用(n=4),健康营养(n=1),母婴健康(n=3),抗菌素耐药性(n=2),和错误信息(n=6)。文献主要是数字监控的应用,例如,通过移动跟踪和信息流行病学使用大数据(n=163)。废水监测也大量出现(n=48)。其他论文描述了对COVID-19大流行之前存在的程序或方法的适应(n=9)。范围搜索还发现了109篇讨论伦理的论文,legal,安全,以及新兴监测方法的公平影响。同行评审的公共卫生流行病学家指出,可能存在其他变化,超出了已经报道和可用于证据合成的范围。
    结论:COVID-19大流行加速了监测和新技术的采用,特别是数字和废水监测方法。考虑到这些系统的投资,公共卫生监测的进一步应用是可能的。监测方法的文献以传染病监测为主,特别是COVID-19。大量关于伦理的文献,legal,安全,这些新出现的监测方法的公平性影响也表明,需要谨慎考虑潜在的危害。
    BACKGROUND: Public health surveillance plays a vital role in informing public health decision-making. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 caused a widespread shift in public health priorities. Global efforts focused on COVID-19 monitoring and contact tracing. Existing public health programs were interrupted due to physical distancing measures and reallocation of resources. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic intersected with advancements in technologies that have the potential to support public health surveillance efforts.
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore emergent public health surveillance methods during the early COVID-19 pandemic to characterize the impact of the pandemic on surveillance methods.
    METHODS: A scoping search was conducted in multiple databases and by scanning key government and public health organization websites from March 2020 to January 2022. Published papers and gray literature that described the application of new or revised approaches to public health surveillance were included. Papers that discussed the implications of novel public health surveillance approaches from ethical, legal, security, and equity perspectives were also included. The surveillance subject, method, location, and setting were extracted from each paper to identify trends in surveillance practices. Two public health epidemiologists were invited to provide their perspectives as peer reviewers.
    RESULTS: Of the 14,238 unique papers, a total of 241 papers describing novel surveillance methods and changes to surveillance methods are included. Eighty papers were review papers and 161 were single studies. Overall, the literature heavily featured papers detailing surveillance of COVID-19 transmission (n=187). Surveillance of other infectious diseases was also described, including other pathogens (n=12). Other public health topics included vaccines (n=9), mental health (n=11), substance use (n=4), healthy nutrition (n=1), maternal and child health (n=3), antimicrobial resistance (n=2), and misinformation (n=6). The literature was dominated by applications of digital surveillance, for example, by using big data through mobility tracking and infodemiology (n=163). Wastewater surveillance was also heavily represented (n=48). Other papers described adaptations to programs or methods that existed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (n=9). The scoping search also found 109 papers that discuss the ethical, legal, security, and equity implications of emerging surveillance methods. The peer reviewer public health epidemiologists noted that additional changes likely exist, beyond what has been reported and available for evidence syntheses.
    CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated advancements in surveillance and the adoption of new technologies, especially for digital and wastewater surveillance methods. Given the investments in these systems, further applications for public health surveillance are likely. The literature for surveillance methods was dominated by surveillance of infectious diseases, particularly COVID-19. A substantial amount of literature on the ethical, legal, security, and equity implications of these emerging surveillance methods also points to a need for cautious consideration of potential harm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本范围综述的目的是总结有关在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)研究中使用为非流行病学目的收集的用户生成数字数据的文献。
    结果:最终综述中包含了39篇论文。使用了四种类型的数字数据:社交媒体数据,Web搜索查询,手机数据,和全球定位系统(GPS)设备的数据。有了这些数据,追求四个艾滋病毒流行病学目标,包括疾病监测,行为监测,评估公众对艾滋病毒的关注,和风险环境的表征。大约三分之一的人使用机器学习进行分类,预测,或主题建模。不到四分之一的人讨论了将用户生成的数据用于流行病学目的的道德规范。用户生成的数字数据可用于监控,预测,并将艾滋病毒风险与背景联系起来,并有助于破坏更接近发病的风险轨迹。然而,在后应用程序编程接口(API)的世界中,需要更多地关注数字道德和该领域的方向。
    The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize literature regarding the use of user-generated digital data collected for non-epidemiological purposes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) research.
    Thirty-nine papers were included in the final review. Four types of digital data were used: social media data, web search queries, mobile phone data, and data from global positioning system (GPS) devices. With these data, four HIV epidemiological objectives were pursued, including disease surveillance, behavioral surveillance, assessment of public attention to HIV, and characterization of risk contexts. Approximately one-third used machine learning for classification, prediction, or topic modeling. Less than a quarter discussed the ethics of using user-generated data for epidemiological purposes. User-generated digital data can be used to monitor, predict, and contextualize HIV risk and can help disrupt trajectories of risk closer to onset. However, more attention needs to be paid to digital ethics and the direction of the field in a post-Application Programming Interface (API) world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Google趋势是一个强大的在线数据库和分析工具,可以随时间的推移提供流行的Google搜索查询,并有可能为医疗实践和优先事项提供信息。
    目的:这篇综述旨在调查Google趋势在皮肤病学方面的文献,并阐明其当前的作用和与该领域的关系。
    方法:使用PubMed进行了文献检索,以访问和回顾过去5年内发表的与皮肤病学相关的Google趋势研究。
    结果:当前利用Google趋势数据的研究提供了与皮肤癌相关的见解,瘙痒,美容程序,和COVID-19。我们还发现,皮肤科目前是15个医学和外科专业以及全科医生中搜索量最高的医学专业。与皮肤病学相关的Google搜索显示了各种皮肤状况和与太阳有关的主题的季节性,取决于一个地区固有的气候和半球。此外,已发现名人社交媒体和其他病毒帖子可以增强Google对皮肤病学的搜索并引起公众兴趣。
    结论:本研究的简化搜索策略可能省略了有限数量的相关研究,以及对英语文章和PubMed数据库中索引的文章的限制。这可以在二次系统审查中扩展。未来的研究是有必要的,以更好地了解如何利用谷歌趋势来提高诊所就诊的质量,推动公共卫生运动,并实时检测疾病集群。
    Google Trends is a powerful online database and analytics tool of popular Google search queries over time and has the potential to inform medical practice and priorities.
    This review aimed to survey Google Trends literature in dermatology and elucidate its current roles and relationships with the field.
    A literature search was performed using PubMed to access and review relevant dermatology-related Google Trends studies published within the last 5 years.
    Current research utilizing Google Trends data provides insight related to skin cancer, pruritus, cosmetic procedures, and COVID-19. We also found that dermatology is presently the highest-searched medical specialty-among 15 medical and surgical specialties as well as general practitioners. Google searches related to dermatology demonstrate a seasonal nature for various skin conditions and sun-related topics, depending on a region\'s inherent climate and hemi-sphere. In addition, celebrity social media and other viral posts have been found to potentiate Google searches about dermatology and drive public interest.
    A limited number of relevant studies may have been omitted by the simplified search strategy of this study, as well as by restriction to English language articles and articles indexed in the PubMed database. This could be expanded upon in a secondary systematic review. Future re-search is warranted to better understand how Google Trends can be utilized to improve the quality of clinic visits, drive public health campaigns, and detect disease clusters in real time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)目的:确定和审查现有的营养失调应用于职业健康的信息流行病学研究,并分析干预措施对体重指数(BMI)或体重(BW)的影响;(2)方法:本研究涉及对从MEDLINE(通过PubMed)检索的文章进行批判性分析,Embase,科克伦图书馆,PsycINFO,Scopus,WebofScience,拉丁美洲,和加勒比健康科学文献(LILACS)和西班牙医学(MEDES)使用描述符“营养失调,\“职业健康\”和\“资料分类学\”,应用过滤器“人类”和“成人:19岁以上”。检索于2021年5月29日进行;(3)结果:从书目数据库检索中确定了共357篇参考文献;应用纳入和排除标准后,本综述共获得11项有效研究.干预措施可以分为(1)与生活方式相关的干预措施,身体活动,通过教育计划改变饮食,(2)与生活方式相关的干预措施,身体活动,通过使用远程监测系统或自助应用程序来改变饮食,(3)与生活方式相关的干预措施,身体活动,以及通过控制和/或社交网络支持小组的饮食变化,(4)与工作环境变化相关的干预措施,包括行为改变培训和工作环境培训任务。荟萃分析表明,在分析BMI结果时存在的异质性为72%(p<0.01),在分析体重结果时,下降到0%(p=0.57),在这种情况下,同质性的零假设可以被接受。在所有情况下,对BMI和BW的影响的最终总结是下降的一侧;(4)结论:尽管报告的结果具有高度异质性,在所有情况下显示的趋势表明,通过Web2.0技术授权个人实施的干预方法在超重问题方面是积极的。需要进一步实施支持个人的新策略来克服肥胖,and,至少在早期的研究中,这些策略似乎正在做出必要的改变。
    (1) Objective: to identify and review existing infodemiological studies on nutritional disorders applied to occupational health and to analyse the effect of the intervention on body mass index (BMI) or alternatively body weight (BW); (2) Methods: This study involved a critical analysis of articles retrieved from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American, and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Medicina en Español (MEDES) using the descriptors \"Nutrition Disorders, \"Occupational Health\" and \"Infodemiology\", applying the filters \"Humans\" and \"Adult: 19+ years\". The search was conducted on 29 May 2021; (3) Results: a total of 357 references were identified from the bibliographic database searches; after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 11 valid studies were obtained for the review. Interventions could be categorised into (1) interventions related to lifestyle, physical activity, and dietary changes through education programmes, (2) interventions associated with lifestyle, physical activity, and dietary changes through the use of telemonitoring systems or self-help applications, (3) interventions tied to lifestyle, physical activity, and dietary changes through control and/or social network support groups, and (4) interventions linked to changes in the work environment, including behavioural change training and work environment training tasks. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the heterogeneity present when analysing the results for BMI was 72% (p < 0.01), which decreased to 0% (p = 0.57) when analysing the outcomes for weight, in which case the null hypothesis of homogeneity could be accepted. In all instances, the final summary of the effect was on the decreasing side for both BMI and BW; (4) Conclusions: Despite the high heterogeneity of the results reported, the trend shown in all cases indicates that the intervention methodologies implemented by empowering individuals through Web 2.0 technologies are positive in terms of the problem of overweight. Further implementation of novel strategies to support individuals is needed to overcome obesity, and, at least in the early studies, these strategies seem to be making the necessary change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:互联网是患者健康信息的主要来源,补充医生护理。谷歌趋势(GT),一个流行的工具,允许探索公众对健康相关现象的兴趣。尽管GT研究的数量越来越多,没有人明确关注肿瘤学,需要进行系统的审查来弥合这一差距。
    目的:我们旨在使用GT系统表征与肿瘤学相关的研究,以描述其效用和偏见。
    方法:我们纳入了所有使用GT分析与恶性肿瘤相关的Google搜索的研究。我们排除了用英语以外的语言编写的研究。搜索是在2022年8月1日使用PubMed引擎进行的。我们使用以下搜索输入:\"Googletrends\"AND(\"肿瘤学\"或\"癌症\"或\"恶性肿瘤\"或\"肿瘤\"或\"淋巴瘤\"或\"多发性骨髓瘤\"或\"白血病\")。我们分析了偏见的来源,包括使用搜索词而不是主题,缺乏GT统计数据与现实世界数据的对抗,缺乏敏感性分析。我们进行了描述性统计。
    结果:共纳入85篇。第一项使用GT进行肿瘤学研究的研究发表于2013年,从那时起,出版物的数量逐年增加。这些研究分类如下:22%(19/85)与预防有关,20%(17/85)与意识事件有关,11%(9/85)与名人相关,13%(11/85)与COVID-19有关,47%(40/85)属于其他类别。最常分析的癌症是乳腺癌(n=28),前列腺(n=26),肺(n=18),结直肠癌(n=18)。我们发现在85项研究中,17(20%)承认使用GT主题而不是搜索词,79(93%)披露了复制结果所需的所有搜索输入细节,34人(40%)将GT统计数据与真实世界数据进行了比较。用于分析GT数据的最普遍的方法是相关性分析(55/85,65%)和峰分析(43/85,51%)。只有11%(9/85)的研究作者进行了敏感性分析。
    结论:使用GT数据与肿瘤学相关的研究数量逐年增加。本系统综述中包含的研究展示了各种相关主题,搜索策略,和统计方法。最常分析的癌症是乳腺癌,前列腺,肺,结直肠,皮肤,和宫颈癌,可能反映了它们在人口或公共利益中的流行。尽管大多数研究人员提供了可重复的搜索输入,只有五分之一的人使用GT主题而不是搜索词,许多研究缺乏敏感性分析。使用GT进行医学研究的科学家应通过提供透明的搜索策略来复制结果来确保研究的质量,更喜欢使用主题而不是搜索词,并进行稳健的统计计算和敏感性分析。
    The internet is a primary source of health information for patients, supplementing physician care. Google Trends (GT), a popular tool, allows the exploration of public interest in health-related phenomena. Despite the growing volume of GT studies, none have focused explicitly on oncology, creating a need for a systematic review to bridge this gap.
    We aimed to systematically characterize studies related to oncology using GT to describe its utilities and biases.
    We included all studies that used GT to analyze Google searches related to malignancies. We excluded studies written in languages other than English. The search was performed using the PubMed engine on August 1, 2022. We used the following search input: \"Google trends\" AND (\"oncology\" OR \"cancer\" or \"malignancy\" OR \"tumor\" OR \"lymphoma\" OR \"multiple myeloma\" OR \"leukemia\"). We analyzed sources of bias that included using search terms instead of topics, lack of confrontation of GT statistics with real-world data, and absence of sensitivity analysis. We performed descriptive statistics.
    A total of 85 articles were included. The first study using GT for oncology research was published in 2013, and since then, the number of publications has increased annually. The studies were categorized as follows: 22% (19/85) were related to prophylaxis, 20% (17/85) pertained to awareness events, 11% (9/85) were celebrity-related, 13% (11/85) were related to COVID-19, and 47% (40/85) fell into other categories. The most frequently analyzed cancers were breast (n=28), prostate (n=26), lung (n=18), and colorectal cancers (n=18). We discovered that of the 85 studies, 17 (20%) acknowledged using GT topics instead of search terms, 79 (93%) disclosed all search input details necessary for replicating their results, and 34 (40%) compared GT statistics with real-world data. The most prevalent methods for analyzing the GT data were correlation analysis (55/85, 65%) and peak analysis (43/85, 51%). The authors of only 11% (9/85) of the studies performed a sensitivity analysis.
    The number of studies related to oncology using GT data has increased annually. The studies included in this systematic review demonstrate a variety of concerning topics, search strategies, and statistical methodologies. The most frequently analyzed cancers were breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, skin, and cervical cancers, potentially reflecting their prevalence in the population or public interest. Although most researchers provided reproducible search inputs, only one-fifth used GT topics instead of search terms, and many studies lacked a sensitivity analysis. Scientists using GT for medical research should ensure the quality of studies by providing a transparent search strategy to reproduce results, preferring to use topics over search terms, and performing robust statistical calculations coupled with sensitivity analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    维基百科是一个开源的在线百科全书,也是最受欢迎的在线健康信息来源之一。同样,还对维基百科页面视图进行了分析,以告知公共卫生服务和政策。本综述分析了29项利用维基百科页面视图进行健康研究的研究。大多数综述的研究是近年来发表的,来自高收入国家。连同维基百科页面视图,大多数研究还使用其他互联网来源的数据,比如Google,Twitter,YouTube,Reddit审查的研究还探讨了各种非传染性疾病,传染病,和健康干预措施来描述维基百科在线健康信息利用的变化,为了检查公共事件对公共利益的影响以及与健康相关的维基百科页面的信息使用,估计和预测疾病的发病率和患病率,预测来自其他互联网数据源的数据,评估健康教育活动的有效性,并探索健康主题的演变。鉴于复制一些综述研究的局限性,未来的研究可以指定特定的维基百科页面或分析页面,维基百科页面的语言被检查,数据收集的日期,探索日期,数据类型,以及页面浏览量是否仅限于Internet用户,以及是否包括网络爬虫和重定向到Wikipedia页面。未来的研究还可以探索公众对维基百科上其他常见健康主题的兴趣,开发基于维基百科的模型,可用于预测疾病发病率和改善基于维基百科的健康教育活动。
    Wikipedia is an open-source online encyclopedia and one of the most-read sources of online health information. Likewise, Wikipedia page views have also been analyzed to inform public health services and policies. The present review analyzed 29 studies utilizing Wikipedia page views for health research. Most reviewed studies were published in recent years and emanated from high-income countries. Together with Wikipedia page views, most studies also used data from other internet sources, such as Google, Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit. The reviewed studies also explored various non-communicable diseases, infectious diseases, and health interventions to describe changes in the utilization of online health information from Wikipedia, to examine the effect of public events on public interest and information usage about health-related Wikipedia pages, to estimate and predict the incidence and prevalence of diseases, to predict data from other internet data sources, to evaluate the effectiveness of health education activities, and to explore the evolution of a health topic. Given some of the limitations in replicating some of the reviewed studies, future research can specify the specific Wikipedia page or pages analyzed, the language of the Wikipedia pages examined, dates of data collection, dates explored, type of data, and whether page views were limited to Internet users and whether web crawlers and redirects to the Wikipedia page were included. Future research can also explore public interest in other commonly read health topics available in Wikipedia, develop Wikipedia-based models that can be used to predict disease incidence and improve Wikipedia-based health education activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年冠状病毒病爆发后,充分的公共信息至关重要。公众广泛使用网络阅读有关大流行的信息,这赋予了重大责任,对许多人来说,随着疾病在全球蔓延,一种陌生的情况。这篇综述的目的是综合大流行第一年发布的关于2019年冠状病毒病的网络信息的质量。
    通过搜索五个电子数据库(CINAHL,通信和大众媒体完整,PsycINFO,PubMed,Scopus)。包括评估信息质量的经验性信息流行病学报告(n=22)。方法质量和偏倚风险用以前的研究改进的工具进行了评估,而质量评估评分采用描述性统计进行综合。说明全面性的主题通过内容分析进行了分类。
    包含的报告评估了基于文本的内容(n=13)和视频(n=9)。大多数人被评为总体方法学质量良好(n=17)。总的来说,报告评估了2,654个网站或视频,并使用了46名评估人员。大多数报告得出的结论是网站和视频质量较差(n=20)。总的来说,可读性水平超过建议的六年级水平。报告的平均或中值质量分数的范围有很大差异,15个样本总分中的13个被归类为质量差或中等。四项研究报告称,≥28%的网站包含不准确的陈述。说明全面性的六个类别的患病率差异很大。
    结果突显了在大流行的第一年发布的有关COVID-19的基于网络的信息的质量缺陷,这表明,当面对新的和不熟悉的情况时,这阻碍了普通人群充分了解情况的可能性很高。未来的研究应该解决突出的质量缺陷,确定有助于公民信息检索的方法,并确定旨在提高在线环境中信息质量的干预措施。
    Following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019, adequate public information was of outmost importance. The public used the Web extensively to read information about the pandemic, which placed significant responsibility in, for many, an unfamiliar situation as the disease spread across the globe. The aim of this review was to synthesize the quality of web-based information concerning the coronavirus disease 2019 published during the first year of the pandemic.
    A rapid systematic review was undertaken by searching five electronic databases (CINAHL, Communication & Mass Media Complete, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus). Empirical infodemiology reports assessing quality of information were included (n = 22). Methodological quality and risk of bias was appraised with tools modified from previous research, while quality assessment scores were synthesized with descriptive statistics. Topics illustrating comprehensiveness were categorized with content analysis.
    The included reports assessed text-based content (n = 13) and videos (n = 9). Most were rated good overall methodological quality (n = 17). In total, the reports evaluated 2,654 websites or videos and utilized 46 assessors. The majority of the reports concluded that websites and videos had poor quality (n = 20). Collectively, readability levels exceeded the recommended sixth grade level. There were large variations in ranges of the reported mean or median quality scores, with 13 of 15 total sample scores being classified as poor or moderate quality. Four studies reported that ≥ 28% of websites contained inaccurate statements. There were large variations in prevalence for the six categories illustrating comprehensiveness.
    The results highlight quality deficits of web-based information about COVID-19 published during the first year of the pandemic, suggesting a high probability that this hindered the general population from being adequately informed when faced with the new and unfamiliar situation. Future research should address the highlighted quality deficits, identify methods that aid citizens in their information retrieval, and identify interventions that aim to improve the quality of information in the online landscape.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:增加可负担性,全球互联网服务的可及性和普及性,大大改变了收集健康相关信息的方式。这导致了概念信息分类学的起源,该概念允许近乎实时地收集和分析信息。全球范围内,口腔疾病影响近35亿人;因此,口腔健康搜索的数量和概况将有助于了解特定的社区牙科需求和制定相关的口腔健康策略。
    目的:回顾已发表的关于口腔健康和疾病的流行病学方面的文献。
    方法:本范围审查按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行。电子搜索引擎(谷歌学者)和数据库(PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus)从2002年起进行了搜索。
    结果:这篇综述包括38篇文章。口腔健康和疾病的信息流行病学研究主要用于两个领域。在38篇文章中,24访问了可用在线信息的质量,15研究了在线口腔健康相关信息寻求行为。
    结论:搜索最常见的口腔疾病是牙痛,口腔癌,龋齿,牙周病,口腔颌面外科手术和儿童口腔疾病。大多数研究属于发达国家,谷歌是研究最多的搜索引擎。
    BACKGROUND: Increasing affordability, accessibility and penetration of internet services worldwide, have substantially changed the ways of gathering health-related information. This has led to the origin of concept infodemiology that allows the information to be collected and analysed in near real time. Globally, oral diseases affect nearly 3.5 billion people; thus, volume and profile of oral health searches would help in understanding specific community dental needs and formulation of pertinent oral health strategies.
    OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on infodemiological aspects of oral health and disease.
    METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic search engines (Google Scholar) and databases (PubMed, Web of science, Scopus) were searched from 2002 onwards.
    RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles were included in this review. The infodemiological studies for oral health and disease were mainly used in two domains. Out of 38 articles, 24 accessed the quality of available online information and 15 studied online oral health-related information seeking behaviour.
    CONCLUSIONS: The most commonly searched oral diseases were toothache, oral cancer, dental caries, periodontal disease, oral maxillofacial surgical procedures and paediatric oral diseases. Most of the studies belonged to developed countries and Google was the most researched search engine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号