In this part 1 of a 2-part continuing medical education series, the epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnostic methods for fungal skin neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), which include eumycetoma, chromoblastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis, emergomycosis, talaromycosis, and lobomycosis, are reviewed. These infections, several of which are officially designated as NTDs by the World Health Organization (WHO), cause substantial morbidity and stigma worldwide and are receiving increased attention due to the potential for climate change-related geographic expansion. Domestic incidence may be increasing in the setting of global travel and immunosuppression. United States dermatologists may play a central role in early detection and initiation of appropriate treatment, leading to decreased morbidity and mortality.

In this part 2 of a 2-part continuing medical education series, the management, outcomes, and morbidities for fungal skin neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), including eumycetoma, chromoblastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis, emergomycosis, talaromycosis, and lobomycosis are reviewed. While fungal skin NTDs are associated with poverty in resource-limited settings, they are more often associated with immunosuppression and global migration in the United States. These infections have a high morbidity burden, including disfigurement, physical disability, coinfection, malignant transformation, mental health issues, and financial impact. For most fungal skin NTDs, management is difficult and associated with low cure rates. Dermatologists play a central role in initiating appropriate treatment early in disease course in order to improve patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of implantation mycoses and invasive fungal infections prompts the need for studies describing the latest trends of these diseases; however, the literature remains scarce from tropical Asia in recent years. We shared our 11-year clinical experience at a tertiary center in Southern Taiwan to improve physicians\' understanding of the diseases, which could help them assume appropriate management strategies.
METHODS: Forty cases of pathology-proven cases of implantation mycoses and invasive fungal infections with cutaneous involvement were retrospectively reviewed. The epidemiology, patients\' characteristics, initial clinical impressions, fungal species, management, and outcomes were compared and reported.
RESULTS: Fonsecaea sp. was the most commonly (14%) involved species in implantation mycoses. The percentages of immunocompromised patients with implantation mycoses and invasive fungal infections were 26% and 60%, respectively. Additionally, 46% of patients with implantation mycoses had type 2 diabetes mellitus. The lesions were commonly mistaken for skin appendage tumors, skin cancers, and hyperkeratotic dermatoses. The prognosis was favorable for the implantation mycoses (83% showed clinical improvement) but bleak for the invasive fungal infections (100% mortality).
CONCLUSIONS: Presentations of implantation mycoses and invasive fungal infections vary widely, and immunocompromised status and diabetes mellitus are important associated factors.

BACKGROUND: Deep mycoses and pseudomycoses (DMP) may cause significant disability and even death; however, the reports regarding these diseases, mainly affecting the foot, are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological, clinical, and diagnostic characteristics of DMP of the foot in 160 patients.
METHODS: A retrospective and observational study of DMP affecting the foot was carried out in a tertiary-care center in Mexico for 20 years (from January 2000 to December 2019). Cases with confirmatory microbiological studies were included; the identification of the isolated fungi was based on the forms of reproduction. For actinomycetes, morphological analysis in an automated system ATB Vitek® 1574 (Biomèrieux) was used. The fungi were identified by PCR, using several primers from the ITS regions and for actinomycetes in the 16S rRNA region. Data from histopathological studies were also collected.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty proven cases of DMP of the foot were included. The cases were categorized into nine types of infections including mycetoma (actinomycetoma and eumycetoma) in 102 cases (63.7%); sporotrichosis in 21 cases (13.1%); chromoblastomycosis, 18 cases (11.2%); phaeohyphomycosis, 3 cases (1.8%); histoplasmosis, 12 cases (7.5%); coccidioidomycosis 2 cases (1.2%) and botryomycosis and nocardiosis with one case respectively (0.6%). Most cases developed after traumatic implantation (147 cases, 91.8%). One hundred fifteen cases (71.8%) were men. The evolution was chronic in 125 cases (78.2%); bone involvement was observed in 64 cases (40%). Parasitic forms were observed In 139 cases (86.8%). The isolation and identification of the etiological agents were confirmed in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The main DMP affecting the foot were infections due to traumatic implantation; most were endemic mycoses. The clinical characteristics and the evolution of the diseases are easily misdiagnosed, and thus, diagnostic tests are usually required.