immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

免疫介导的血栓性血小板减少性紫癜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血栓性血小板减少性紫癜,特别是它的免疫介导变体(iTTP),需要准确的诊断方法来进行有效的管理。
    比较化学发光免疫测定法(CLIA)和酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)在iTTP患者中检测ADAMTS-13活性和检测抗ADAMTS-13自身抗体(AAb)。
    这项研究涉及来自12名iTTP患者的31个配对样本。使用HemosILAcuStar测量ADAMTS-13活性(仪器实验室,CLIA)和Technozym(技术克隆)活性测定(ELISA)。在与正常池血浆混合后,在Bethesda测定法中使用TechnozymADAMTS-13-INH测定法(ELISA)和HemosILAcuStar活性(CLIA)评估了AAbs的存在。使用HYDRASYS-2SCAN系统和HYDRAGEL5-或11-VWMultimer试剂盒(Sebia)分析血管性血友病因子(VWF)多聚体。用HemosILAcuStarVWF:GPIbR在ACLAcuStar分析仪(IL)上测量VWF活性水平。
    对于ADAMTS-13活动,证实了CLIA和ELISA之间的强线性关系和无偏差(斜率=1.01[0.91,1.11],截距=0.00[-0.47,0])。然而,在ADAMTS-13活性在10%至50%之间的缓解期,在AAb检测中发现了显着差异,CLIA和ELISA显示出显着差异(P<.001,Cohen\sg=0.34)。始终如一,VWF多聚体和活性水平在ADAMTS-13活性低于50%和高于50%的缓解样品之间表现出显著不同的值。在多次iTTP复发患者的纵向分析中,在预测急性加重时,CLIA阳性似乎先于ELISA。
    虽然CLIA和ELISA对于评估ADAMTS-13活性可能是可互换的,它们不等同于检测AAbs,特别是在ADAMTS-13活性在10%至50%之间的临床缓解患者中。
    UNASSIGNED: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, particularly its immune-mediated variant (iTTP), necessitates accurate diagnostic approaches for effective management.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for testing ADAMTS-13 activity and detecting anti-ADAMTS-13 autoantibodies (AAbs) in patients with iTTP.
    UNASSIGNED: This study involved 31 paired samples from 12 iTTP patients. ADAMTS-13 activity was measured using the HemosIL AcuStar (Instrumentation Laboratory, CLIA) and Technozym (Technoclone) activity assay (ELISA). The presence of AAbs was assessed using Technozym ADAMTS-13-INH assay (ELISA) and HemosIL AcuStar activity (CLIA) within a Bethesda assay following mixing with normal pool plasma. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers were analyzed using the HYDRASYS-2 SCAN system and the HYDRAGEL 5- or 11-VW Multimer kits (Sebia). VWF activity levels were measured with the HemosIL AcuStar VWF:GPIbR on the ACL AcuStar Analyzer (IL).
    UNASSIGNED: For ADAMTS-13 activity, a strong linear relationship and no bias between CLIA and ELISA were confirmed (slope = 1.01 [0.91, 1.11], intercept = 0.00 [-0.47, 0]). However, significant discrepancies were found in AAb detection during remission phases with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%, with CLIA and ELISA showing significant divergence (P < .001, Cohen\'s g = 0.34). Consistently, VWF multimers and activity levels exhibited significantly different values between remission samples with ADAMTS-13 activity below 50% and above 50%. In longitudinal analysis of patients with multiple iTTP relapses, positivity to CLIA appears to precede ELISA in predicting exacerbations.
    UNASSIGNED: While CLIA and ELISA might be interchangeable for assessing ADAMTS-13 activity, they are not equivalent for detecting AAbs, particularly in patients in clinical remission with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近一项针对日本患者的2/3期研究表明,卡普拉斯单抗可有效治疗免疫介导的血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(iTTP),iTTP复发率低。在caplacizumab治疗期间每周监测ADAMTS13活性以指导停止caplacizumab并因此避免恶化或复发。这项研究的目的是评估该患者人群在卡普拉斯珠单抗治疗期间ADAMTS13活性/抑制剂水平的变化。
    方法:对日本患者的2/3期研究进行事后分析。确诊iTTP的≥18岁的患者在TPE后30天每天接受10mgcaplacizumab联合治疗性血浆置换(TPE)和免疫抑制。结果包括恢复ADAMTS13活性的时间,治疗结束时的ADAMTS13活性水平,ADAMTS13抑制剂再升高的发生率(即,抑制剂增强)在治疗期间,血小板计数恢复的时间,TPE的天数,和安全。还评估了根据抑制剂加强的存在的结果。
    结果:19例患者证实iTTP并纳入本分析。ADAMTS13活性恢复至≥10%的中位数(95%置信区间)时间,≥20%,≥60%为14.6(5.9-24.8),18.5(5.9-31.8),和47.5(18.5-60.9)天,分别。在caplacizumab治疗结束时,ADAMTS13活性水平的中位数(范围)为62.0%(29.0-101.0)。9例患者有ADAMTS13抑制剂增强。在抑制剂增强的患者中观察到ADAMTS13活性的延迟反应。与不使用抑制剂的患者相比,使用抑制剂的患者的血小板计数反应的中位时间和TPE天数的中位时间更短。利妥昔单抗用于几乎所有使用抑制剂加强的患者(88.9%),完成TPE后。用利妥昔单抗治疗的无抑制剂增强的患者在TPE完成之前接受了它。只有一个病人经历了复发,在因不良事件而停用caplacizumab后不久发生.
    结论:在iTTP患者中,如果利妥昔单抗在iTTP治疗期早期给药,卡普拉斯单抗联合TPE和免疫抑制可能会降低ADAMTS13抑制剂增强的风险.除卡普拉斯单抗外,早期服用利妥昔单抗可以预防iTTP复发,并增强抑制剂。
    背景:NCT04074187。
    BACKGROUND: A recent Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients showed that caplacizumab was effective in treating immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), with a low rate of iTTP recurrence. ADAMTS13 activity is monitored weekly during caplacizumab treatment to guide discontinuation of caplacizumab and consequently avoid exacerbations or relapse. The aim of this study was to assess changes in ADAMTS13 activity/inhibitor levels during caplacizumab treatment in this patient population.
    METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients was conducted. Patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed iTTP received 10 mg of caplacizumab daily in conjunction with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression for 30 days post-TPE. Outcomes included time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13 activity level at treatment end, incidence of ADAMTS13 inhibitor re-elevation (ie, inhibitor boosting) during treatment, time to platelet count recovery, number of days of TPE, and safety. Outcomes according to presence of inhibitor boosting were also assessed.
    RESULTS: Nineteen patients had confirmed iTTP and were included in this analysis. Median (95% confidence interval) time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity to ≥ 10%, ≥ 20%, and ≥ 60% was 14.6 (5.9-24.8), 18.5 (5.9-31.8), and 47.5 (18.5-60.9) days, respectively. Median (range) ADAMTS13 activity level at caplacizumab treatment end was 62.0% (29.0-101.0). Nine patients had ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting. Delayed response of ADAMTS13 activity was observed in patients with inhibitor boosting. The median time to platelet count response and median number of TPE days were shorter in patients with inhibitor boosting compared with patients without inhibitor boosting. Rituximab was administered to almost all patients with inhibitor boosting (88.9%), after completion of TPE. Patients without inhibitor boosting who were treated with rituximab received it prior to completion of TPE. Only one patient experienced a recurrence, which occurred shortly after caplacizumab discontinuation due to an adverse event.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with iTTP, caplacizumab with TPE and immunosuppression may reduce the risk of ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting if rituximab is administered early in the iTTP treatment period. Early administration of rituximab in addition to caplacizumab may prevent iTTP recurrence with inhibitor boosting.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04074187.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号