hepatocellular

肝细胞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在调查肝细胞癌(HCC)患者术后早期复发的危险因素,并确定手术方法对早期复发的影响,以预测此类患者术后早期复发的风险并选择适当的治疗方法。
    我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2022年8月在绵阳市中心医院接受根治性手术的428例HCC患者的临床资料。术前相关常规辅助检查及术后定期电话或门诊随访,明确术后早期复发。风险因素进行了筛查,并构建了预测模型,包括患者术前辅助检查,术中和术后并发症,和病理检查与早期复发有关。根据预测模型估计每位患者的复发风险,将患者分为低危和高危复发组.使用生存分析评估了解剖性肝切除术(AR)对两组HCC患者术后早期复发的影响。
    总共,纳入353名研究患者。多因素logistic回归分析结果表明,肿瘤直径(≥5/<5cm,优势比[OR]2.357,95%置信区间[CI]1.368-4.059;P=0.002),甲胎蛋白(≥400/<400ng/L,OR2.525,95%CI1.334-4.780;P=0.004),肿瘤数量(≥2/<2,OR2.213,95%CI1.147-4.270;P=0.018),微血管侵犯(阳性/阴性,OR3.230,95%CI1.880-5.551;P<0.001),血管侵犯(阳性/阴性,OR4.472,95%CI1.395-14.332;P=0.012),和碱性磷酸酶水平(>125/≤125U/L,OR2.202,95%CI1.162-4.173;P=0.016)是肝癌根治术后早期复发的危险因素。模型验证和评价显示,曲线下面积为0.813。Hosmer-Lemeshow试验结果(X2=1.225,P=0.996>0.05),自举自我复制采样1000个样本的结果,和决策曲线分析表明,该模型也有很好的判别,具有潜在的良好临床效用。使用这个模型,患者被分为低危和高危复发组.比较两组采用不同手术方式的一年无病生存率。两组在预防术后早期复发方面均受益于AR,在高危复发组中,AR获益更为明显,术中出血的可能性较小。
    通过适当的手术技术和肿瘤可以进行R0切除,AR是预防HCC患者根治性手术后早期复发的潜在有用外科手术。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to investigate risk factors for early postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and determine the effect of surgical methods on early recurrence to facilitate predicting the risk of early postoperative recurrence in such patients and the selection of appropriate treatment methods.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data concerning 428 patients with HCC who had undergone radical surgery at Mianyang Central Hospital between January 2015 and August 2022. Relevant routine preoperative auxiliary examinations and regular postoperative telephone or outpatient follow-ups were performed to identify early postoperative recurrence. Risk factors were screened, and predictive models were constructed, including patients\' preoperative ancillary tests, intra- and postoperative complications, and pathology tests in relation to early recurrence. The risk of recurrence was estimated for each patient based on a prediction model, and patients were categorized into low- and high-risk recurrence groups. The effect of anatomical liver resection (AR) on early postoperative recurrence in patients with HCC in the two groups was assessed using survival analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 353 study patients were included. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis findings suggested that tumor diameter (≥5/<5 cm, odds ratio [OR] 2.357, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.368-4.059; P = 0.002), alpha fetoprotein (≥400/<400 ng/L, OR 2.525, 95% CI 1.334-4.780; P = 0.004), tumor number (≥2/<2, OR 2.213, 95% CI 1.147-4.270; P = 0.018), microvascular invasion (positive/negative, OR 3.230, 95% CI 1.880-5.551; P < 0.001), vascular invasion (positive/negative, OR 4.472, 95% CI 1.395-14.332; P = 0.012), and alkaline phosphatase level (>125/≤125 U/L, OR 2.202, 95% CI 1.162-4.173; P = 0.016) were risk factors for early recurrence following radical HCC surgery. Model validation and evaluation showed that the area under the curve was 0.813. Hosmer-Lemeshow test results (X 2 = 1.225, P = 0.996 > 0.05), results from bootstrap self-replicated sampling of 1,000 samples, and decision curve analysis showed that the model also discriminated well, with potentially good clinical utility. Using this model, patients were stratified into low- and high-risk recurrence groups. One-year disease-free survival was compared between the two groups with different surgical approaches. Both groups benefited from AR in terms of prevention of early postoperative recurrence, with AR benefits being more pronounced and intraoperative bleeding less likely in the high-risk recurrence group.
    UNASSIGNED: With appropriate surgical techniques and with tumors being realistically amenable to R0 resection, AR is a potentially useful surgical procedure for preventing early recurrence after radical surgery in patients with HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肝移植是早期肝细胞癌和肝硬化患者的最佳治疗方法。然而,大约15%的人肝细胞癌复发。本研究旨在评估肝移植后肝细胞癌复发预测模型的有效性。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括381例HCC患者,并评估了以下模型的性能:R3-AFP评分,甲胎蛋白(AFP)模型,加州大学,洛杉矶(UCLA)列线图,肝移植(MORAL)后复发的前模型,Post-Moral,和组合道德模型,肿瘤复发(RETREAT)模型和血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)模型的风险估计。
    结果:R3-AFP评分,加州大学洛杉矶分校列线图,AFP模型,撤退,组合道德,和后道德模型表现出可比的AUROC,范围从0.785到0.733。R3-AFP模型和AFP模型的AUROC优于Pre-MORAL和PLR模型的AUROC。加州大学洛杉矶分校的列线图,退缩得分,组合模型,和Post-MORAL模型类似于前两个模型,但仅优于PLR模型。
    结论:R3-AFP模型,加州大学洛杉矶分校列线图,AFP模型,撤退,组合道德,和MORAL后模型显示了移植后肝细胞癌复发的中等预测能力。这些模型在预测复发的能力方面没有观察到显著差异。
    OBJECTIVE: Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. However, hepatocellular carcinoma recurs in approximately 15 % of individuals. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of predictive models for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 381 patients with HCC and evaluated the performance of the following models: R3-AFP score, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) model, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) nomogram, Pre-Model of Recurrence after Liver Transplantation (MORAL), Post-MORAL, and Combo MORAL models, Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence (RETREAT) model and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) model.
    RESULTS: The R3-AFP score, UCLA nomogram, AFP model, RETREAT, Combo MORAL, and Post-MORAL models exhibited comparable AUROCs, ranging from 0.785 to 0.733. The AUROCs for the R3-AFP model and AFP model were superior to those of the Pre-MORAL and PLR models. The UCLA nomogram, RETREAT score, Combo MORAL model, and Post-MORAL model performed similarly to the first two models, but were only superior to the PLR model.
    CONCLUSIONS: The R3-AFP model, UCLA nomogram, AFP model, RETREAT, Combo MORAL, and Post-MORAL models demonstrated a moderate predictive capacity for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following transplantation. No significant differences were observed among these models in their ability to predict recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估经动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融术(TACE+RFA)对超声(US)引导经皮RFA测量≤3cm的肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗效果。
    方法:对2012年1月至2016年12月期间接受透视引导TACE+RFA治疗单个HCC的24例患者进行筛查。为了评估TACE+RFA结果与美国指导的RFA结果相比,在同一时期接受美国指导RFA的371例患者进行了筛查。我们比较了局部肿瘤进展(LTP)和肝内远处复发(IDR)两组之间的倾向评分(PS)匹配,并对所有患者进行单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归分析。
    结果:PS匹配在TACE+RFA和US指导的RFA组中产生了21和42例患者,分别。PS匹配后的累积LTP率在1时两组之间没有显着差异(0.0%vs.7.4%,p=0.072),2(10.5%与7.4%,p=0.701),和5年(16.9%与10.5%,p=0.531)。在1时,两组的IDR率没有显着差异(20.6%vs.10%,p=0.307),2(25.9%与25.9%,p=0.999),或5年(49.9%与53%,p=0.838)。多变量分析表明,治疗类型不是LTP或IDR的重要因素。
    结论:TACE+RFA治疗HCC的结果与一般US指导的RFA相似。当US引导的RFA不可行时,透视引导的TACE+RFA可能是一种有效的治疗方法。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation (TACE + RFA) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) measuring ≤3 cm infeasible for ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous RFA.
    METHODS: Twenty-four patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided TACE + RFA for single HCC between January 2012 and December 2016 were screened. To evaluate the TACE + RFA outcomes compared with those of US-guided RFA, 371 patients who underwent US-guided RFA during the same period were screened. We compared local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching, and performed univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for all patients.
    RESULTS: PS matching yielded 21 and 42 patients in the TACE + RFA and US-guided RFA groups, respectively. Cumulative LTP rates after PS matching were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 (0.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.072), 2 (10.5% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.701), and 5 years (16.9% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.531). IDR rates did not differ significantly between the two groups at 1 (20.6% vs. 10%, p = 0.307), 2 (25.9% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.999), or 5 years (49.9% vs. 53%, p = 0.838). Multivariable analysis showed that treatment type was not a significant factor for LTP or IDR.
    CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of TACE + RFA for HCC were similar to those of general US-guided RFA. Fluoroscopy-guided TACE + RFA may be an effective treatment when US-guided RFA is not feasible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的目的是将患者的生存率恢复到原来的水平,如果他们没有发展肝癌。我们检查了由于酒精相关性肝病(ALD肝硬化)导致的肝硬化患者中此类“统计治愈”的机会。
    UNASSIGNED:使用丹麦全国范围的医疗保健注册,所有在2004-2018年接受HCC治疗的ALD肝硬化患者均根据初始HCC治疗纳入队列.我们使用治愈分数分析来估计每个HCC治疗在统计学上治愈的机会。
    未经证实:我们纳入了1087例由于ALD肝硬化导致的HCC患者,其中51例(4.7%)接受切除治疗,215例(19.8%)接受消融治疗.固化分数,即没有经历HCC超额死亡率的患者比例,切除后为31.8%(95%CI:0.0-67.5),消融后为22.9%(95%CI:2.6-43.2)。在初次HCC治疗后仍存活五年的患者中,当时在统计学上治愈的可能性在切除后为69.0%,在消融后为60.2%.对于这两种治疗方法,在7年后达到了90%的机会在统计学上治愈.
    未经评估:基于固化分数分析,肝癌切除术在统计学上治愈了31.8%的肝癌和潜在的ALD肝硬化患者,而消融在统计学上治愈了22.9%的患者。肝癌治愈性治疗七年后,存活的患者有90%可能在统计学上治愈HCC。这些信息对患者和照顾他们的临床医生很有价值。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of curative-intent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is to restore the patients\' survival to what it would have been, had they not developed HCC. We examined the chances of such \'statistical cure\' from HCC in patients with cirrhosis due to alcohol-related liver disease (ALD cirrhosis).
    UNASSIGNED: Using nationwide Danish healthcare registries, all patients with ALD cirrhosis who were treated for HCC in 2004-2018 were identified and included in cohorts based on initial HCC treatment. We used cure fraction analyses to estimate the chance of being statistically cured by each HCC treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 1087 patients with HCC due to ALD cirrhosis, of whom 51 (4.7%) were treated with resection and 215 (19.8%) were treated with ablation. The cure fraction, ie the fraction of patients who experienced no excess mortality from HCC, was 31.8% (95% CI: 0.0-67.5) following resection and 22.9% (95% CI: 2.6-43.2) following ablation. In patients who were still alive five years after the initial HCC treatment, the likelihood of having been statistically cured at that time was 69.0% after resection and 60.2% after ablation. For both treatments, a 90% chance of having been statistically cured was reached after seven years.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on cure fraction analyses, resection for HCC statistically cures 31.8% of patients with HCC and underlying ALD cirrhosis, while ablation statistically cures 22.9% of patients. Seven years after curative-intent treatments for HCC, surviving patients are 90% likely to be statistically cured of HCC. This information is valuable to patients and the clinicians caring for them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    关于猫的原发性非造血恶性肝肿瘤(PMLT)的文献很少。在这项回顾性研究中,我们回顾了22年(2000-2021年)的40只诊断为PMLT的猫的医学数据.最常见的上皮性肿瘤是肝细胞癌(42.5%)和胆管癌(32.5%),只有6只(15%)猫有间充质肿瘤。中位年龄为13岁,临床体征通常包括缺氧/缺氧(62.5%),冷漠/嗜睡(52.5%),体重减轻(42.5%)和呕吐(35%)。初步诊断时,在1只(2.5%)猫中证实转移,在3只(7.5%)猫中怀疑转移.大量是最常见的形态(75%)。大多数肝内肿瘤为左侧(54.2%),左内侧叶主要受影响(25%)。肝外肿瘤罕见(5%)。在34只(85%)猫中,进行肝叶切除术(手术组),四个(10%)进行了姑息治疗(非手术组),2人(5%)未接受治疗。术中并发症发生率为11.8%,术后死亡4例(15.4%)。在中位数为151天(范围,79-684天),而在中位186天怀疑有21.4%的术后转移(范围,79-479天)。手术组(375天)的猫的中位生存时间(MST)明显长于非手术组(16天)(P=0.002)。肝细胞的MST为868天,而胆管癌的MST为270天(P=0.06)。总之,肝叶切除术与肝细胞猫的存活时间延长和预后良好有关,和可接受的预后猫胆管癌。
    There is scant literature on primary nonhematopoietic malignant liver tumours (PMLT) in cats. In this retrospective study, medical data of 40 cats diagnosed with PMLT were reviewed over a period of 22 years (2000-2021). The most frequent epithelial tumours were hepatocellular (42.5%) and bile duct carcinomas (32.5%), only six (15%) cats had mesenchymal tumours. The median age was 13 years and clinical signs commonly included ano-/hyporexia (62.5%), apathy/lethargy (52.5%), weight loss (42.5%) and vomiting (35%). At initial diagnosis, metastases were confirmed in 1 (2.5%) and suspected in three (7.5%) cats. Massive was the most frequent morphology (75%). Most intrahepatic tumours were left-sided (54.2%) with the left medial lobe being primarily affected (25%). Extrahepatic tumours were rare (5%). In 34 (85%) cats, liver lobectomy was performed (surgery group), four (10%) were treated palliatively (non-surgery group), and two (5%) received no treatment. Intraoperative complications occurred in 11.8% with four (15.4%) postoperative deaths. Recurrence was detected in 28.6% at a median of 151 days (range, 79-684 days), while postoperative metastases were suspected in 21.4% at a median of 186 days (range, 79-479 days). The median survival time (MST) was significantly longer in cats of the surgery group (375 days) than in the non-surgery group (16 days) (p = .002). MST was 868 days for hepatocellular compared to 270 days for bile duct carcinomas (p = .06). In summary, liver lobectomy is associated with prolonged survival times and good prognosis in cats with hepatocellular, and an acceptable prognosis in cats with bile duct carcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:卡博替尼在日本晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中显示出良好的获益-风险特征,II期研究(NCT03586973)。此分析将累积数据呈现给最终的数据库锁定。
    方法:先前接受过治疗的患者,晚期HCC接受卡博替尼60mg/天.独立放射学委员会(IRC)和研究者评估了索拉非尼和索拉非尼初治队列中的无进展生存率(PFS)和肿瘤缓解率。通过白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分评估肝功能。
    结果:卡博替尼暴露中位数为5.6个月。在先前的索拉非尼队列(n=20)中,每次IRC评估的中位PFS为7.4个月,每次研究者评估的中位PFS为5.6个月.在索拉非尼初始队列(n=14)中,根据IRC和研究者评估,中位PFS为3.6和4.4个月,分别。先前索拉非尼队列中每个IRC和研究者评估的六个月PFS率为59.8%和49.5%,分别,在索拉非尼初始队列中,分别为16.7%和35.7%,分别。通过IRC和研究者评估的疾病控制率在先前索拉非尼队列中为85.0%,在索拉非尼初始队列中为64.3%。在先前的索拉非尼和索拉非尼初始队列中,中位总生存期(Kaplan-Meier估计)为19.3个月和9.9个月,分别。在能够继续治疗的患者中,平均ALBI评分保持相对恒定。最常见的不良事件是掌-足红感觉综合征,腹泻,高血压,食欲下降。没有发现新的安全问题。
    结论:卡博替尼在日本晚期HCC患者中显示出疗效和可控制的安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: Cabozantinib showed a favorable benefit-risk profile in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in an open-label, phase II study (NCT03586973). This analysis presents cumulative data to final database lock.
    METHODS: Patients with previously treated, advanced HCC received cabozantinib 60 mg/day. Progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response rates in prior-sorafenib and sorafenib-naïve cohorts were assessed by independent radiology committee (IRC) and an investigator. Liver function was evaluated by albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score.
    RESULTS: Median cabozantinib exposure was 5.6 months. In the prior-sorafenib cohort (n = 20), median PFS was 7.4 months per IRC assessment and 5.6 months per investigator assessment. In the sorafenib-naïve cohort (n = 14), median PFS was 3.6 and 4.4 months per IRC and investigator assessment, respectively. Six-month PFS rate per IRC and investigator assessment in the prior-sorafenib cohort was 59.8% and 49.5%, respectively, and in the sorafenib-naïve cohort was 16.7% and 35.7%, respectively. Disease control rate by both IRC and investigator assessment was 85.0% in the prior-sorafenib cohort and 64.3% in the sorafenib-naïve cohort. Median overall survival (Kaplan-Meier estimate) was 19.3 and 9.9 months in the prior-sorafenib and sorafenib-naïve cohort, respectively. Mean ALBI score remained relatively constant in patients able to continue treatment. The most frequent adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension, and decreased appetite. No new safety concerns were identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib showed efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with advanced HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    门静脉浸润(PVI)是肝癌的典型并发症。一旦确诊,它导致分类为BCLCC,对患者管理产生巨大影响,因为今后建议进行全身治疗。我们的目的是研究在初始诊断时使用影像学进行的影像组学分析是否可以预测疾病过程中PVI的发生。在2008年至2018年之间,我们回顾性地确定了44例HCC患者,最初诊断时的多相CT扫描没有CT检测到的PVI,但在疾病过程中发展。考虑到病变的大小和数量,生长类型,动脉增强模式,Child-Pugh阶段,AFP水平,和随后的治疗,我们将44例未发生PVI的HCC患者与在病程中发生PVI的患者进行了匹配(2021年12月结束的随访).在初始诊断和纹理分析时对肿瘤进行分割后,我们使用LASSO回归在该匹配集中寻找适合PVI检测的影像组学特征.在训练和保持验证数据集之间使用80:20的分割,17个影像组学特征保留在拟合模型中。将模型应用于保持验证数据集,检测PVI发生的敏感性为0.78,特异性为0.78。影像组学特征提取具有检测可能导致未来PVI的侵袭性HCC形态的能力。在初始诊断的额外的影像组学评估可能是一个有用的工具,以确定在随访期间有PVI风险的HCC患者,受益于更密切的监测。
    Portal vein infiltration (PVI) is a typical complication of HCC. Once diagnosed, it leads to classification as BCLC C with an enormous impact on patient management, as systemic therapies are henceforth recommended. Our aim was to investigate whether radiomics analysis using imaging at initial diagnosis can predict the occurrence of PVI in the course of disease. Between 2008 and 2018, we retrospectively identified 44 patients with HCC and an in-house, multiphase CT scan at initial diagnosis who presented without CT-detectable PVI but developed it in the course of disease. Accounting for size and number of lesions, growth type, arterial enhancement pattern, Child-Pugh stage, AFP levels, and subsequent therapy, we matched 44 patients with HCC who did not develop PVI to those developing PVI in the course of disease (follow-up ended December 2021). After segmentation of the tumor at initial diagnosis and texture analysis, we used LASSO regression to find radiomics features suitable for PVI detection in this matched set. Using an 80:20 split between training and holdout validation dataset, 17 radiomics features remained in the fitted model. Applying the model to the holdout validation dataset, sensitivity to detect occurrence of PVI was 0.78 and specificity was 0.78. Radiomics feature extraction had the ability to detect aggressive HCC morphology likely to result in future PVI. An additional radiomics evaluation at initial diagnosis might be a useful tool to identify patients with HCC at risk for PVI during follow-up benefiting from a closer surveillance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于gadoxetic酸增强MRI数据,开发基于影像组学的肝细胞癌(HCC)分级分类器模型。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括137例患者,这些患者在手术前60天内接受了单例HCC和gadoxetic酸增强MRI的肝切除术。HCC分级分为低或高(改良的Edmondson-SteinerI-II级与III-IV)。我们使用肝胆阶段(HBP),门静脉期,T2加权图像(T2WI),和T1加权图像(T1WI)。从对HCC的兴趣来看,提取了833个放射学特征。使用随机森林回归器选择放射学和临床特征,并使用随机森林分类器和十倍分层交叉验证对分类模型进行了训练和验证。仅使用影像组学特征或通过结合影像组学和临床特征开发了八个模型。用内部登记数据(内部验证)和在单独机构(外部验证)的数据集(28名患者)验证模型。使用DeLong检验比较验证结果的曲线下面积(AUC)。
    结果:在内部和外部验证中,仅HBP影像组学模型显示出最高的AUC(内部0.80±0.09,外部0.70±0.09)。在外部验证中,所有模型都显示出比内部验证低的AUC,与内部验证结果(AUC0.67-0.78)相比,T2WI和T1WI模型未能预测HCC分级(AUC0.30-0.58)。
    结论:来自gadoxetic酸增强肝脏MRI的基于影像组学的机器学习模型可以区分低级别和高级别HCC。只有影像组学的HBP模型在八个模型中显示出最好的AUC,在内部验证中表现良好,以及在外部验证中的公平表现。
    To develop a radiomics-based hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) grade classifier model based on data from gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
    This retrospective study included 137 patients who underwent hepatectomy for a single HCC and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI within 60 days before surgery. HCC grade was categorized as low or high (modified Edmondson-Steiner grade I-II vs. III-IV). We used the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), portal venous phase, T2-weighted image(T2WI), and T1-weighted image(T1WI). From the volume of interest in HCC, 833 radiomic features were extracted. Radiomic and clinical features were selected using a random forest regressor, and the classification model was trained and validated using a random forest classifier and tenfold stratified cross-validation. Eight models were developed using the radiomic features alone or by combining the radiomic and clinical features. Models were validated with internal enrolled data (internal validation) and a dataset (28 patients) at a separate institution (external validation). The area under the curve (AUC) of the validation results was compared using the DeLong test.
    In internal and external validation, the HBP radiomics-only model showed the highest AUC (internal 0.80 ± 0.09, external 0.70 ± 0.09). In external validation, all models showed lower AUC than those for internal validation, while the T2WI and T1WI models failed to predict the HCC grade (AUC 0.30-0.58) in contrast to the internal validation results (AUC 0.67-0.78).
    The radiomics-based machine learning model from gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI could distinguish between low- and high-grade HCCs. The radiomics-only HBP model showed the best AUC among the eight models, good performance in internal validation, and fair performance in external validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是通过测试其他肝肿瘤的靶向采样来确定DNAJB1-PRKACA融合转录对肝细胞肝癌(FL-HCC)纤维板层亚型的特异性。儿童和年轻人中的增殖和肝外肿瘤,并使用市售的PRKACA分解探针开发FISH测定法,用于CLIA认证的临床实验室。
    方法:福尔马林固定石蜡包埋12例FL-HCC组织切片,142例其他肝肿瘤/增生(常规HCC,局灶性结节增生(FNH),肝细胞腺瘤(HA)和肝母细胞瘤(HB)和肝外肿瘤(神经母细胞瘤(NB),使用标准技术使用靶向19号染色体上的PRKACA基因基因座的分裂探针,对Wilms肿瘤(WT)和胃肠道神经内分泌肿瘤(GNET)和60个匹配的背景正常对照组织进行了荧光原位杂交(FISH)测试。
    结果:在11/12(92%)的FL-HCC病例和1/94(1%)的常规HCC病例中检测到PRKACA基因重排。所有其他病例和背景对照组织对PRKACA基因重排均为阴性。这些发现建立了91.7%的测试灵敏度和99.5%的特异性。
    结论:这项研究表明,使用标准技术,具有靶向PRKACA基因的市售分离探针的FISH测试可用作FL-HCC中常见的DNAJB1-PRKACA融合的替代。此外,PRKACA基因重排在儿童和年轻人的其他肝脏肿瘤/增生或肝外肿瘤中不表达.最后,FISH检测可作为诊断工具,以确认FL-HCC的诊断,在适当的临床环境中。
    OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to define the specificity of the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript for the fibrolamellar subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC) by testing a targeted sampling of other hepatic neoplasms/proliferations and extrahepatic neoplasms seen in children and young adults and to develop a FISH assay using a commercially available PRKACA break apart probe for use in a CLIA-certified clinical laboratory.
    METHODS: Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections from 12 FL-HCC cases, 142 cases of other hepatic neoplasms/proliferations (conventional HCC, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), hepatocellular adenoma (HA) and hepatoblastoma (HB)) and extrahepatic neoplasms (neuroblastoma (NB), Wilms tumor (WT) and Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor (GNET)) and 60 matched background normal control tissues underwent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing using a break apart probe targeting the PRKACA gene locus on chromosome 19 using standard techniques.
    RESULTS: The PRKACA gene rearrangement was detected in 11/12 (92%) FL-HCC cases and 1/94 (1%) of conventional HCC cases. All other cases and background control tissues were negative for the PRKACA gene rearrangement. These findings establish a test sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 99.5%.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, using standard techniques, FISH testing with a commercially available break apart probe targeting the PRKACA gene can be used as a surrogate for the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion commonly found in FL-HCC. Also, the PRKACA gene rearrangement is not expressed in other hepatic neo-plasms/proliferations or extrahepatic neoplasms seen in children and young adults. Finally, FISH testing can be used as a diagnostic tool to confirm the diagnosis of FL-HCC, in the appropriate clinical setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂靶向经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)介导的血管内皮生长因子,以抑制肿瘤血运重建并减缓肿瘤进展。本研究旨在比较TACE联合lenvatinib(TACE-lenvatinib)和TACE联合索拉非尼(TACE-索拉非尼)在不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的临床结果。
    方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年4月期间接受TACE-lenvatinib或TACE-索拉非尼治疗的诊断为不可切除的HCC患者的临床资料。肿瘤反应,无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS),评估并比较两组患者的不良事件(AE)。
    结果:共纳入112例患者,分为TACE-lenvatinib组(n=53)和TACE-索拉非尼组(n=59)。TACE-来伐替尼组和TACE-索拉非尼组患者的客观缓解率分别为54.7%和44.1%,分别(p=0.260),疾病控制率(DCRs)分别为81.1%和61.0%(p=0.020)。TACE-lenvatinib组的中位PFS时间明显长于TACE-索拉非尼组(10.7vs.6.0个月;p=0.002)。TACE-来伐替尼组和TACE-索拉非尼组之间的中位OS时间也显示出显着差异(30.5vs.20.5个月,p=0.018)。所有治疗相关的AE和3/4级AE在两组之间具有可比性(p>0.05)。
    结论:与TACE-索拉非尼相比,TACE-lenvatinib与更好的DCR相关,无法切除的HCC患者的PFS和OS结果。在巴塞罗那临床肝癌B期或TACE难治性患者的亚组中,TACE-lenvatinib也显示出优越性的趋势。
    OBJECTIVE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors target transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor to inhibit tumor revascularization and to slow tumor progression. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of TACE combined with lenvatinib (TACE-lenvatinib) and TACE combined with sorafenib (TACE-sorafenib) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    METHODS: The clinical data of patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC who received TACE-lenvatinib or TACE-sorafenib between January 2018 and April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were enrolled and classified into the TACE-lenvatinib group (n = 53) and the TACE-sorafenib group (n = 59). The objective response rates of patients in the TACE-lenvatinib and TACE-sorafenib groups were 54.7% and 44.1%, respectively (p = 0.260), and the disease control rates (DCRs) were 81.1% and 61.0% (p = 0.020). The median PFS time was significantly longer in the TACE-lenvatinib group than in the TACE-sorafenib group (10.7 vs. 6.0 months; p = 0.002). The median OS time between the TACE-lenvatinib and TACE-sorafenib groups also showed a significant difference (30.5 vs. 20.5 months, p = 0.018). All treatment-related AEs and grade 3/4 AEs were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TACE-sorafenib, TACE-lenvatinib was associated with better DCR, PFS and OS outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC. In subgroups of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B stage or TACE-refractory patients, TACE-lenvatinib also showed a trend of superiority.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号