hematoma

血肿
  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    ARISE(动脉瘤/AVM/cSDH与行业和中风专家的圆桌会议讨论)组织了为期一天半的会议和研讨会,汇集了来自学术界的代表,工业,和政府讨论改善慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)患者预后的最有希望的方法。脑膜中动脉栓塞在临床实践中的新兴作用以及当前和潜在的未来试验的设计是讨论的主要焦点。现有的成像证据,适应症,代理商,并审查了技术,确定了研究的重点领域和围绕cSDH新的和现有治疗方法开发的关键问题。多重随机,对照试验已达到其主要疗效终点,提供高水平证据,证明脑膜中动脉栓塞术在降低疾病复发率方面是神经系统稳定的cSDH患者的标准(手术和非手术)治疗的有效辅助治疗.这些试验的正式结论和公布后的汇总数据分析将为加强cSDH治疗模式和最佳患者选择的指南奠定坚实的基础。以及描绘未来的调查路线。
    ARISE (Aneurysm/AVM/cSDH Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts) organized a one-and-a-half day meeting and workshop and brought together representatives from academia, industry, and government to discuss the most promising approaches to improve outcomes for patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The emerging role of middle meningeal artery embolization in clinical practice and the design of current and potential future trials were the primary focuses of discussion. Existing evidence for imaging, indications, agents, and techniques was reviewed, and areas of priority for study and key questions surrounding the development of new and existing treatments for cSDH were identified. Multiple randomized, controlled trials have met their primary efficacy end points, providing high-level evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization is a potent adjunctive therapy to the standard (surgical and nonsurgical) management of neurologically stable cSDH patients in terms of reducing rates of disease recurrence. Pooled data analyses following the formal conclusion and publication of these trials will form a robust foundation upon which guidelines can be strengthened for cSDH treatment modalities and optimal patient selection, as well as delineate future lines of investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:小脑内出血(ICH)与不良的功能预后和高死亡率相关。已提出手术疏散以改善结果。这项审查的目的是确定小脑ICH手术后的益处,并建立何时应进行的指南。
    方法:写作委员会由SFNV和SFNC的9名成员组成。建议是根据使用PICO问题的文献综述建立的。美国心脏协会(AHA)分类用于定义推荐水平。在证据不足的情况下,提供了专家意见。
    结果:证据水平低至中等,排除明确的建议。根据现有数据,不建议手术血肿清除术改善功能结局(III类;B级NR).然而,基于子群分析,对于严格选择的患者(IIb级;C-EO级),可考虑进行手术疏散:血肿体积15~25cm3,GCS6~10,且无口服抗凝治疗或抗血小板治疗.此外,对于血肿体积>15cm3且GCS评分<10的患者,建议进行手术疏散以降低死亡风险(IIa级;B级NR).
    结论:这些指南基于观察性研究,限制证据水平。然而,除了严格挑选的病人,手术清除小脑ICH与改善的功能结局无关,限制性适应症。在该字段中需要来自RCT的数据。
    BACKGROUND: Cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with poor functional prognosis and high mortality. Surgical evacuation has been proposed to improve outcome. The purpose of this review was to determine the benefit of surgical evacuation of cerebellar ICH and to establish guidelines for when it should be performed.
    METHODS: The writing committee comprised 9 members of the SFNV and the SFNC. Recommendations were established based on a literature review using the PICO questions. The American Heart Association (AHA) classification was used to define recommendation level. In case of insufficient evidence, expert opinions were provided.
    RESULTS: Levels of evidence were low to moderate, precluding definitive recommendations. Based on available data, surgical hematoma evacuation is not recommended to improve functional outcome (Class III; Level B NR). However, based on subgroup analysis, surgical evacuation may be considered in strictly selected patients (Class IIb; Level C-EO): hematoma volume 15-25 cm3, GCS 6-10, and no oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Moreover, surgical evacuation is recommended to decrease risk of death (Class IIa; Level B NR) in patients with a hematoma volume >15 cm3 and GCS score <10.
    CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines were based on observational studies, limiting the level of evidence. However, except for strictly selected patients, surgical evacuation of cerebellar ICH was not associated with improved functional outcome, limiting indications. Data from RCTs are needed in this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:“2023年动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者治疗指南”取代了2012年“动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者治疗指南”。“2023年指南旨在为临床医生提供以患者为中心的建议,诊断,并处理动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者。
    方法:全面搜索自2012年指南以来发表的文献,来自主要涉及人类受试者的研究,以英文出版,并在MEDLINE中索引,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,以及与本指南相关的其他选定数据库,于2022年3月至2022年6月进行。此外,指南编写小组审查了美国心脏协会以前发表的相关主题文件.2022年7月至2022年11月之间发表的影响推荐内容的最新研究,推荐类,或证据水平包括在适当的情况下。结构:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血是一种重大的全球公共卫生威胁,是一种严重的病态和通常致命的疾病。2023年动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血指南根据目前的证据为这些患者的治疗提供了建议。这些建议提出了一种基于证据的方法来预防,诊断,并管理动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者,旨在提高护理质量,并符合患者及其家人和护理人员的利益。以前的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血指南的许多建议已经更新了新的证据,并且在发布的数据支持下创建了新的建议。
    The \"2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage\" replaces the 2012 \"Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.\" The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
    A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients\' and their families\' and caregivers\' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    小儿创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)指南提供了在小儿头部外伤(PHT)后请求头部计算机断层扫描(HCT)的框架;然而,缺乏关于在HCT上发现的TBI和根据PECARN指南的HCT请求的理由的定量数据。
    要评估类型,频率,以及儿童HCT上TBI的危险因素转诊至接受HCT治疗的急诊科(ED),并评估HCT要求的质量。
    这个多中心,回顾性队列研究纳入了18岁以下接受HCT治疗的PHT患者,这些患者在2020年1月1日至2022年5月31日期间的随诊时间内接受了91例ED.数据在2022年7月至8月之间进行了分析。
    所有具有病理结果的放射学报告均由4位资深放射科医师进行审查。根据PECARN指南,随机抽取了600个由急诊医师填写的HCT请求,以审查检查理由。
    TBI之间的关联,年龄,性别,使用单变量χ2和Cochrane-Armitage检验对格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)进行了调查。多变量逐步二元逻辑回归用于估计颅内出血(ICH)的比值比(ORs),任何类型的骨折,面部骨骨折,头骨穹窿骨折.
    总的来说,纳入5146名患有PHT的HCT儿童(中位[IQR]年龄,11.2[4.7-15.7]岁;5146个男孩中的3245个[63.1%])。5146例患者中有306例(5.9%)被诊断出ICHs,5146例患者中有674例(13.1%)被诊断出骨折。在多变量分析中,以下变量与ICH相关:GCS评分为8分或更低(OR,5.83;95%CI,1.97-14.60;P<.001),颅外血肿(OR,2.54;95%CI,1.59-4.02;P<.001),颅底骨折(OR,9.32;95%CI,5.03-16.97;P<.001),上颈椎骨折(OR,19.21;95%CI,1.79-143.59;P=.006),和颅骨拱顶骨折(或,35.64;95%CI,24.04-53.83;P<.001)。当在HCT上既未发现颅外血肿也未发现骨折时,显示ICH的OR为0.034(95%CI,0.026-0.045;P<.001)。颅骨穹顶骨折更常见于2岁以下的儿童(多变量OR,6.31;95%CI,4.16-9.66;P<.001;参考:儿童≥12岁),而面部骨骨折在12岁以上的男孩中更常见(多变量OR,26.60;95%CI,9.72-109.96;P<.001;参考:2岁以下儿童)。对于589名可评估儿童中的396名(67.2%)的急诊医师提出的要求,进行HCT的理由未遵循PECARN指南。
    在这项5146名接受PHTHCT的儿童的队列研究中,了解ICHs和骨折的临床和放射学特征的几率可以帮助急诊医师和放射科医师改善图像分析,避免遗漏重大损伤.近三分之二的患者没有实施PECARN规则。
    Pediatric traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of death and disability. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) guidelines provide a framework for requesting head computed tomography (HCT) after pediatric head trauma (PHT); however, quantitative data are lacking regarding both TBIs found on HCT and justification of the HCT request according to the PECARN guidelines.
    To evaluate the types, frequencies, and risk factors for TBIs on HCT in children referred to emergency departments (EDs) who underwent HCT for PHT and to evaluate quality of HCT request.
    This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients younger than 18 years who underwent HCT for PHT who were referred to 91 EDs during on-call hours between January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Data were analyzed between July and August 2022.
    All radiological reports with pathologic findings were reviewed by 4 senior radiologists. Six hundred HCT requests filled by emergency physicians were randomly sampled to review the examination justification according to the PECARN guidelines.
    Associations between TBIs, age, sex, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were investigated using univariable χ2 and Cochrane-Armitage tests. Multivariable stepwise binary logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds ratio (ORs) for intracranial hemorrhages (ICH), any type of fracture, facial bone fracture, and skull vault fracture.
    Overall, 5146 children with HCT for PHT were included (median [IQR] age, 11.2 [4.7-15.7] years; 3245 of 5146 [63.1%] boys). ICHs were diagnosed in 306 of 5146 patients (5.9%) and fractures in 674 of 5146 patients (13.1%). The following variables were associated with ICH in multivariable analysis: GCS score of 8 or less (OR, 5.83; 95% CI, 1.97-14.60; P < .001), extracranial hematoma (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59-4.02; P < .001), skull base fracture (OR, 9.32; 95% CI, 5.03-16.97; P < .001), upper cervical fracture (OR, 19.21; 95% CI, 1.79-143.59; P = .006), and skull vault fracture (OR, 35.64; 95% CI, 24.04-53.83; P < .001). When neither extracranial hematoma nor fracture was found on HCT, the OR for presenting ICH was 0.034 (95% CI, 0.026-0.045; P < .001). Skull vault fractures were more frequently encountered in children younger than 2 years (multivariable OR, 6.31; 95% CI, 4.16-9.66; P < .001; reference: children ≥12 years), whereas facial bone fractures were more frequently encountered in boys older than 12 years (multivariable OR, 26.60; 95% CI, 9.72-109.96; P < .001; reference: children younger than 2 years). The justification for performing HCT did not follow the PECARN guidelines for 396 of 589 evaluable children (67.2%) for requests filled by emergency physicians.
    In this cohort study of 5146 children who underwent HCT for PHT, knowing the odds of clinical and radiological features for ICHs and fractures could help emergency physicians and radiologists improve their image analysis and avoid missing significant injuries. The PECARN rules were not implemented in nearly two-thirds of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:肾脏是泌尿生殖系统中最常受损的组成部分,占所有创伤病例的5%。不同社会的一些指南解决了泌尿系统创伤的管理。然而,关于在血流动力学稳定的患者中血管栓塞的最佳使用仍未解决的问题,在血流动力学不稳定的情况下,对稳定的腹膜后血肿和肾脏抢救技术进行手术探查的指征,以及接受非手术治疗的患者的影像学实践。我们进行了系统的审查,荟萃分析,并制定了基于证据的建议来回答钝性和穿透性肾损伤中的这些问题。
    方法:工作组制定了四个人口,干预,比较器,结果(PICO)关于以下主题的问题:(1)血管栓塞(AE)在有持续出血证据的血液动力学稳定患者中的使用;(2)稳定区II血肿的手术方法(探索与无探查)在血流动力学不稳定的患者和(3)手术技术(肾切除术与肾脏保存)用于血流动力学不稳定患者的II区血肿扩大;(4)高度创伤性肾损伤中重复成像(常规或基于症状)的频率。对现有证据进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用RevMan5(Cochran协作)和GRADepro(等级工作组)软件。工作组成员对建议进行了表决,并对每项最终建议表示同意。
    结果:共鉴定和分析了20篇文章。遇到了两项前瞻性研究;大多数是回顾性的,单一机构研究。并非所有研究都报告了PICO问题预测的所有结果。对所有PICO问题进行荟萃分析,但PICO3继发于这些研究中包含的不同患者群体。PICO1在9项研究的荟萃分析中纳入了最多的文章;然而,由于研究设计的差异,没有出现关键结局;在一组较小的文章中,类似的差异阻碍了对PICO4关键结局的观察.对PICOs2和3的分析支持符合当前国际实践趋势的非侵入性或微创方法。
    结论:在血液动力学稳定的成年患者中,临床或影像学证据表明持续出血,没有关于AE与AE的作用的建议观察。在血流动力学不稳定的成年患者中,我们有条件地建议没有肾探查与稳定区Ⅱ血肿肾探查术。在血流动力学不稳定的成年患者中,我们有条件地推荐肾脏保存技术与II区血肿扩大的肾切除术。无法推荐在高度肾损伤中重复成像的最佳时机。
    方法:指南;系统综述,三级。
    BACKGROUND: The kidney is the most frequently injured component of the genitourinary system, accounting for 5% of all trauma cases. Several guidelines by different societies address the management of urological trauma. However, unanswered questions remain regarding optimal use of angioembolization in hemodynamically stable patients, indications for operative exploration of stable retroperitoneal hematomas and renal salvage techniques in the setting of hemodynamic instability, and imaging practices for patients undergoing non-operative management. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and developed evidence-based recommendations to answer these questions in both blunt and penetrating renal trauma.
    METHODS: The working group formulated four population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions regarding the following topics: (1) angioembolization (AE) usage in hemodynamically stable patients with evidence of ongoing bleeding; (2) surgical approach to stable zone II hematomas (exploration vs. no exploration) in hemodynamically unstable patients and (3) surgical technique (nephrectomy vs. kidney preservation) for expanding zone II hematomas in hemodynamically unstable patients; (4) frequency of repeat imaging (routine or symptom based) in high-grade traumatic renal injuries. A systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available evidence was performed. RevMan 5 (Cochran Collaboration) and GRADEpro (Grade Working Group) software were used. Recommendations were voted on by working group members and concurrence was obtained for each final recommendation.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 articles were identified and analyzed. Two prospective studies were encountered; the majority were retrospective, single-institution studies. Not all outcomes projected by PICO questions were reported in all studies. Meta-analysis was performed for all PICO questions except PICO 3 secondary to the discrepant patient populations included in those studies. PICO 1 had the greatest number of articles included in the meta-analysis with nine studies; yet, due to differences in study design, no critical outcomes emerged; similar differences among a smaller set of articles prevented observation of critical outcomes for PICO 4. Analyses of PICOs 2 and 3 favored a non-invasive or minimally invasive approach in-line with current international practice trends.
    CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable adult patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of ongoing bleeding, no recommendation could be made regarding the role of AE vs. observation. In hemodynamically unstable adult patients, we conditionally recommend no renal exploration vs. renal exploration in stable zone II hematomas. In hemodynamically unstable adult patients, we conditionally recommend kidney preserving techniques vs. nephrectomy in expanding zone II hematomas. No recommendation could be made for the optimal timing of repeat imaging in high grade renal injury.
    METHODS: Guideline; systematic review, level III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    SFE-AFCE-SFMN2022共识涉及甲状腺结节的管理,这是内分泌学咨询的常见原因。在90%以上的案例中,患者甲状腺功能正常,良性非进展性结节,不需要特殊治疗。临床医生的目标是检测有复发和死亡风险的恶性甲状腺结节,导致甲状腺功能亢进的毒性结节或压缩性结节需要治疗。甲状腺结节的诊断和治疗需要内分泌学家之间的密切合作,核医学医师和外科医生,但也涉及其他专家。因此,这一共识声明是由3个学会共同建立的:法国内分泌学学会(SFE),法语国家内分泌外科协会(AFCE)和法国核医学学会(SFMN);各个工作组包括来自其他专业的专家(病理学家,放射科医生,儿科医生,生物学家,等。).本节介绍甲状腺结节的外科治疗。
    The SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus deals with the management of thyroid nodules, a condition that is a frequent reason for consultation in endocrinology. In more than 90% of cases, patients are euthyroid, with benign non-progressive nodules that do not warrant specific treatment. The clinician\'s objective is to detect malignant thyroid nodules at risk of recurrence and death, toxic nodules responsible for hyperthyroidism or compressive nodules warranting treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules requires close collaboration between endocrinologists, nuclear medicine physicians and surgeons, but also involves other specialists. Therefore, this consensus statement was established jointly by 3 societies: the French Society of Endocrinology (SFE), French-speaking Association of Endocrine Surgery (AFCE) and French Society of Nuclear Medicine (SFMN); the various working groups included experts from other specialties (pathologists, radiologists, pediatricians, biologists, etc.). This section deals with the surgical management of thyroid nodules.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    真空辅助分娩(VAD)是一种常见且安全的产科手术。然而,偶尔会出现严重的并发症。已制定临床指南和大学声明以降低严重不良事件的风险。澳大利亚和新西兰皇家妇产科学院(RANZCOG)学院声明C-Obs16尚未进行评估,以查看建议是否可以改善结果。
    目的是评估是否遵守RANZCOGCollegeStatementC-Obs16建议可降低严重不良后果的风险,特别是临床上显著的盖下出血和严重的产伤。
    从2020年1月至2021年,在五级医院(新南威尔士州产妇和新生儿能力框架)对VAD进行回顾性审核。
    有1960名妇女在研究期间分娩,其中252人(12.8%)通过真空输送,完整的数据来自241例病例。81%的人遵守声明。与声明合规性的主要偏差是拉拔超过3。陈述依从性与大脑出血发生率的显著降低相关(0%vs11%,P=0.0002),重大产伤(3%vs22%,P=0.0001),新生儿复苏的要求(14%vs35%,P=0.0026)和一分钟少于6分钟的Apgar得分(5%vs22%P=0.0006)。陈述依从性与分娩时产妇失血量显著减少相关(388mLvs438mL,P=0.01)。在妊娠并发妊娠糖尿病的情况下,观察到不遵守陈述建议的情况更为明显(3%vs15%,P=0.02)和出生需要仪器的变化(4%vs13%P=0.031)。
    遵守大学声明与较低的盖层出血和新生儿严重创伤的发生率相关。与合规性的主要偏差是拉动超过3。关键词:产伤,临床指南,医疗保健的质量和安全,延髓下出血,真空输送。
    Vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) is a common and safe obstetric procedure. However, occasionally serious complications may occur. Clinical guidelines and College Statements have been developed to reduce the risk of serious adverse events. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) College Statement C-Obs 16 has not been evaluated to see if advice improves outcomes.
    The aim was to evaluate whether compliance with RANZCOG College Statement C-Obs 16 advice reduced the risk of serious adverse outcomes, specifically clinically significant subgaleal haemorrhage and major birth trauma.
    Retrospective audit of VADs in a level five hospital (NSW Maternity and Neonatal capability framework) from January 2020 to 2021.
    There were 1960 women who delivered in the study period, of whom 252 (12.8%) delivered by vacuum, and complete data were available from 241 cases. Statement compliance was observed in 81%. The main deviation from Statement compliance was pulls exceeding three. Statement compliance was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of subgaleal haemorrhage (0% vs 11%, P = 0.0002), major birth trauma (3% vs 22%, P = 0.0001), requirement for neonatal resuscitation (14% vs 35%, P = 0.0026) and Apgar scores at one minute less than six (5% vs 22% P = 0.0006). Statement compliance was associated with a significant reduction in maternal blood loss at delivery (388 mL vs 438 mL, P = 0.01). Noncompliance with Statement advice was observed significantly more often in pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes (3% vs 15%, P = 0.02) and birth requiring instrument change (4% vs 13% P = 0.031).
    Compliance with a College Statement is associated with lower rates of subgaleal haemorrhage and major neonatal trauma. The main deviation from compliance was pulls in excess of three. Keyword: birth trauma, clinical guidelines, quality and safety in healthcare, subgaleal haemorrhage, vacuum delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景技术细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)的并发症是罕见的,但是对于执行医师诊断和管理来说可能是具有挑战性的。这种类型的程序被认为是常规的,没有实质性的风险,但罕见的并发症可能会发生,需要通过仔细的检查来解决。病例报告她的全科医生要求对一名患有多个甲状腺结节的年轻女性患者进行FNAC手术。FNAC甲状腺手术后,我们怀疑颈动脉壁血肿,单用超声(US)不能排除.因此,患者接受了计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA),排除了颈动脉的血液外渗,证实了血管周围血液积聚的嫌疑.作为预防措施,病人住院了,随着美国的随访;根据SIAPEC-IAP分类,她因诊断为多结节性甲状腺肿的良性甲状腺结节而入院后第二天被解雇。结论此案例突出了诸如FNAC之类的常规感知程序如何对执行医师提出挑战,病理学家,和放射科医生,引起严重并发症的怀疑,需要通过易于使用的紧急服务来解决,该服务可能仅在中央医院级别的组织内才能使用。这种情况加强了这一点,即需要更加谨慎地遵守临床放射学指南,以避免潜在的不适当和有害的程序。审查有关FNAC程序指南的文献,诊断分类,报告的并发症作为本病例报告的一部分提供。
    BACKGROUND The complications of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are rare but can be challenging for performing physicians to diagnose and manage. This type of procedure is perceived as routine and devoid of substantial risks, but uncommon complications can occur and need to be addressed with careful workup. CASE REPORT A FNAC procedure for a young female patient with multiple thyroid nodules was requested by her general practitioner. After the FNAC thyroid procedure, a carotid wall hematoma was suspected and could not be excluded with ultrasound (US) alone. Thus, the patient underwent a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) that excluded blood extravasation from the carotid, confirming the suspicion of perivascular blood accumulation. As a precaution, the patient was hospitalized, with US follow-up; she was dismissed the day after her hospital admission with a diagnosis of a benign thyroid nodule in multinodular goiter according to SIAPEC-IAP classification. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights how a routine-perceived procedure such as FNAC could present a challenge to the performing physicians, pathologist, and radiologist, raising the suspicion of a severe complication that needs to be addressed with a readily available emergency service that may be accessible only within a central hospital-level organization. This case reinforces the point that more careful adherence to clinic-radiological guidelines is needed to avoid potentially inappropriate and harmful procedures. A review of the literature concerning guidelines for FNAC procedure, diagnostic classifications, and reported complications is provided as part of this case report.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用可注射神经调质和透明质酸填充剂进行面部美容治疗已得到完善,具有良好的安全性和一致的结果。和任何医疗一样,可能发生不良事件和并发症。与这些产品相关的不良事件通常是短暂的,严重程度为轻度至中度。严重不良事件,如感染和血管内闭塞,是罕见的。正确选择病人,同意和咨询,准备和无可挑剔的注射技术是重要的降低风险的策略。临床医生和患者都必须警惕并发症的体征和症状,以便及时开始适当的治疗。在这篇文章中,作者回顾了目前的文献,并提供了他们在使用肉毒杆菌毒素或透明质酸填充剂治疗患者时将不良结局降至最低的共识建议.
    Facial aesthetic treatment with injectable neuromodulators and hyaluronic acid fillers is well established, with favourable safety profiles and consistent outcomes. As with any medical treatment, adverse events and complications may occur. Adverse events associated with these products are typically transient and mild to moderate in severity. Serious adverse events, such as infection and intravascular occlusion, are rare. Proper patient selection, consent and counselling, preparation and impeccable injection technique are important risk reduction strategies. Both clinicians and patients must be alert to the signs and symptoms of complications so that appropriate treatment can be started promptly. In this article, the authors review the current literature and provide their consensus recommendations for minimising adverse outcomes when treating patients with botulinum toxin or hyaluronic acid fillers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号