haemophilia

血友病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于血友病护理集中于有限数量的壁内环境,许多血友病患者必须长途跋涉才能进入血友病专业治疗中心。然而,定期的理疗治疗可以提供的初级保健物理治疗师在自己的区域。由于该疾病的罕见性,大多数初级保健物理治疗师对该人群的经验有限。这项研究旨在为患有出血性疾病的初级保健物理治疗师提供临床实践指南。
    方法:最紧迫的关键问题列表来自先前的研究。文献是使用推荐评估的分级进行总结的,发展,和评估(等级)证据到决策框架。建议是根据与物理治疗师专家进行的四次90分钟共识会议起草的。建议在反馈和>80%的所有利益相关者达成共识(包括PWH,物理治疗师,血液病学家和相应的社团)。
    结果:制定了82项建议,以支持初级保健物理治疗师治疗出血性疾病患者。这些建议可分为13类:两类,包括关于护理组织的建议,六项关于成人出血性疾病患者的治疗,五项关于儿科护理的治疗适应。治疗建议包括关节或肌肉出血后的治疗,血友病性关节病,慢性滑膜炎,非血友病相关疾病和骨科手术。
    结论:基于证据的实践指南,根据文献和临床专业知识的现有证据,已开发用于治疗血友病患者的初级保健物理治疗师。为了改善护理,建议应在日常实践中实施。
    BACKGROUND: As a result of centralisation of haemophilia care to a limited number of intramural settings, many persons with haemophilia have to travel long distances to attend their haemophilia specialised treatment centre. However, regular physiotherapy treatment can be provided by primary care physiotherapists in the person\'s own region. Due to the rarity of the disease most primary care physiotherapists have limited experience with this population. This study aims to provide a clinical practice guideline for primary care physiotherapists working with persons with bleeding disorders.
    METHODS: A list of the most urgent key-questions was derived from a previous study. Literature was summarised using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were drafted based on four 90 min consensus meetings with expert physiotherapists. Recommendations were finalised after feedback and >80% consensus of all stakeholders (including PWH, physiotherapists, haematologists and the corresponding societies).
    RESULTS: A list of 82 recommendations was formulated to support primary care physiotherapists when treating a person with a bleeding disorder. These recommendations could be divided into 13 categories: two including recommendations on organisation of care, six on therapy for adult patients with bleeding disorders and five on therapy adaptations for paediatric care. Therapy recommendations included treatment after a joint- or muscle bleed, haemophilic arthropathy, chronic synovitis, non-haemophilia related conditions and orthopaedic surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based practice guideline, based on current evidence from literature and clinical expertise, has been developed for primary care physiotherapists treating a person with haemophilia. To improve care, the recommendations should be implemented in daily practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要长期抗凝和抗血小板治疗的心血管疾病(CVD)在接受因子替代疗法以降低出血风险的血友病(PWH)患者中存在问题。目前,日本没有关于心血管疾病PWH的管理指南。
    目的:为日本PWH防治CVD制定专家指导。
    方法:由四名专家组成的指导委员会(两名血友病专家,一位血栓形成专家,一位心脏病专家)确定了与五个关键主题相关的44项陈述。制作了一份在线调查问卷,其中包括4点Likert量表和多项选择题,并发送给日本患有CVD的PWH管理专家。如果≥75%或≥90%的受访者同意某一声明,则共识被定义为高或非常高。
    结果:在16名潜在受访者中,收到了15名专家的答复。在李克特量表的问题中,71%(29/41)达成了≥90%的协议(非常强的协议),17%(7/41)达成了75%-89%的协议(强协议),15%(6/41)未达成共识协议。三个多项选择题未能确定强烈的偏好。关于管理某些临床情况的特定目标谷凝血因子水平的协议,例如当存在非瓣膜性心房颤动或心肌梗塞时,也实现了。
    结论:这项共识研究的结果为心脏病专家和血液学家提供了一个框架,以管理有以下风险的PWH:或者谁有,CVD。本文提供的建议的实施可以改善具有CVD的PWH的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) that require long-term anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy presents a problem in people with haemophilia (PWH) who receive factor replacement therapy to reduce bleeding risk. Currently, there are no Japanese guidelines for the management of PWH with CVD.
    OBJECTIVE: To develop expert guidance on managing CVD in PWH in Japan.
    METHODS: A steering committee of four experts (two haemophilia specialists, one thrombosis specialist, one cardiologist) identified 44 statements related to five key themes. An online questionnaire was produced comprising a mix of 4-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions that was sent to specialists in the management of PWH with CVD in Japan. Consensus was defined as high or very high if a respective ≥75% or ≥90% of respondents agreed with a statement.
    RESULTS: Of 16 potential respondents, responses were received from 15 specialists. Of the Likert scale questions, 71% (29/41) achieved ≥90% agreement (very strong agreement), 17% (7/41) achieved 75%-89% agreement (strong agreement) and 15% (6/41) did not achieve consensus agreement. The three multiple-choice questions failed to identify a strong preference. Agreement on specific target trough clotting factor levels for managing certain clinical situations, such as when in the presence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation or myocardial infarction, was also achieved.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this consensus study provide a framework for cardiologists and haematologists to manage PWH who are at risk of, or who have, CVD. Implementation of the recommendations provided herein may improve outcomes for PWH with CVD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:A型血友病在海湾地区是一个重大的健康挑战,它的患病率特别高。该地区有一些与血友病A的管理相关的未满足的需求。本手稿的目的是将未满足的管理需求与背景联系起来,提供优化护理的建议,并规定了在该地区建立基因治疗中心的要求。
    结论:由来自科威特的十名临床血液学家组成的专家小组组成,阿曼,沙特阿拉伯,和阿拉伯联合酋长国。德尔菲方法用于就与血友病A的几个方面有关的陈述达成共识。匿名投票系统。共识声明涉及筛查和诊断,治疗方法,以及实施基因治疗的要求。
    结论:在海湾地区,存在阻碍A型血友病最佳管理的重大挑战。提出的共识声明为改进诊断和治疗方法提供了具体建议。促进多学科护理,并优化区域数据生成和报告。这些声明还描述了在该地区建立血友病A基因治疗中心的要求。
    BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A presents a significant health challenge in the Gulf region, where it has an especially high prevalence. There are several unmet needs associated with the management of hemophilia A in the region. The aim of this manuscript was to contextualize unmet management needs, provide recommendations to optimize care, and specify requirements for the establishment of gene therapy centers in the region.
    CONCLUSIONS: An expert panel was assembled comprising ten clinical hematologists from Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. The Delphi methodology was used to obtain a consensus on statements relating to several aspects of hemophilia A. A consensus was reached for all statements by means of an online, anonymized voting system. The consensus statements pertain to screening and diagnosis, treatment approaches, and requirements for the implementation of gene therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are significant challenges that hinder the optimal management of hemophilia A in the Gulf region. The consensus statements presented provide specific recommendations to improve diagnostic and treatment approaches, promote multidisciplinary care, and optimize regional data generation and reporting. These statements also delineate the requirements for the establishment of gene therapy centers for hemophilia A in the region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    血友病是一种严重的X连锁遗传凝血因子缺乏症。临床上,任何血管紊乱区域的长期出血或延迟凝血是所有血友病的主要表现。我们介绍了一名23岁的男性,自三岁以来就有左感觉内斜视的病史。患者以前没有接受过任何眼科手术,并且拒绝戴眼镜。血液学研究证实了A型血友病的诊断。患者的视力在右眼为20/20,左眼为20/120,深度弱视.患者表现为左下斜过度和V型。眼科检查未发现异常。术前校正因子VIII被认为是必要的,并给予推荐剂量以将因子VIII水平提高至52%.患者进行了双侧内侧直肌衰退,左直肌折叠,左下斜肌切除术.采用了一种新技术,该技术利用结膜下注射粘弹性溶液来减少术中出血,与标准斜视手术相比,出血减少。术中无异常出血。未观察到术后出血。病人在术后第四天出院,在主要位置实现了令人满意的美容对齐,没有与血友病相关的并发症。总之,斜视手术可以安全地进行斜视患者的血友病。Viscodissection是一种有用的新型手术技术,可降低手术期间出血的风险,我们建议在使用抗凝剂的患者中使用这种技术。为了获得最佳结果,多学科团队方法和严格的术后监测至关重要。
    Hemophilia is a serious X-linked inheritance coagulation factor deficiency. Clinically, prolonged bleeding or delayed clotting in any area of vascular disturbance is the main manifestation of all hemophilia. We presented a 23-year-old male with a history of left sensory esotropia since the age of three. The patient had not undergone any previous eye surgery and refused to wear glasses. Hematologic studies confirmed a diagnosis of hemophilia A. Upon ophthalmologic examination, the patient\'s visual acuity was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/120 in the left eye, with deep amblyopia. The patient exhibited left inferior oblique overaction and a V pattern. The ophthalmologic examination otherwise revealed no abnormalities. Preoperative correction of factor VIII was deemed necessary, and the recommended dose was administered to raise the factor VIII level to 52%. The patient underwent bilateral medial rectus recession, left lateral rectus plication, and left inferior oblique myectomy. A new technique utilizing viscodissection with subconjunctival injection of a viscoelastic solution was employed to minimize intraoperative bleeding, resulting in reduced bleeding compared to standard strabismus surgery. No unusual bleeding occurred during the procedure. No postoperative bleeding was observed. The patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day, having achieved satisfactory cosmetic alignment in the primary position with no complications related to hemophilia. In conclusion, strabismus surgery can be performed safely in strabismic patients with hemophilia. Viscodissection is a helpful novel surgical technique to decrease the risk of bleeding during surgery, and we recommend using this technique in patients using anticoagulants. A multidisciplinary team approach and strict post-operative monitoring are essential in order to achieve optimal results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:滑膜炎,血友病的一个共同特征,是由关节中的血液触发的,代表了慢性关节病发展的第一步。滑膜炎可以通过超声或磁共振成像扫描早期检测;在这种情况下,临床关节评分不太敏感。定期使用凝血因子浓缩物进行长期预防,作为初级预防,并根据个人需求量身定制,在预防滑膜炎方面有很高的疗效。总的来说,较高的因子水平降低出血风险,但是因子水平与滑膜炎发生率之间没有直接相关性。
    目的:本研究旨在就该定义达成专家共识,病理生理学,诊断,预防,滑膜炎的随访和治疗,认识到其与关节健康的相关性,并考虑到现有的知识差距。
    方法:设计并进行了Delphi共识研究。一个专家组根据现有文献编写了22份声明;一个更广泛的专家小组随后对这些进行了投票。
    结果:小组成员的保留率很高。经过三轮表决,需要对四项声明进行修正,并就所有声明达成共识。
    结论:这项e-Delphi共识研究探讨了滑膜炎在血友病患者关节健康中的重要性,并强调了该领域的知识差距。缺乏对滑膜炎自然过程的研究,并且该过程的生物学机制尚未完全阐明。虽然基础和临床研究在这一领域进行,专家共识可以帮助指导临床医生的常规临床实践,德尔菲方法通常用于产生最佳实践指南。
    BACKGROUND: Synovitis, a common feature in haemophilia, is triggered by the presence of blood in joints, and represents the first step towards the development of chronic arthropathy. Synovitis may be detected early by means of ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging scan; clinical joint scores are less sensitive in this setting. Regular long-term prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates, as primary prophylaxis and tailored to individual needs, has high efficacy in preventing synovitis. In general, higher factor levels lower bleeding risk, but no direct correlation between factor levels and synovitis incidence has been demonstrated.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop an expert consensus relating to the definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, follow-up and treatment of synovitis, recognising its relevance for joint health and taking into account existing knowledge gaps.
    METHODS: A Delphi consensus study was designed and performed. An expert group prepared 22 statements based on existing literature; a wider expert panel subsequently voted on these.
    RESULTS: Retention of panellists was high. Four statements required amending and consensus on all statements was achieved after three rounds of voting.
    CONCLUSIONS: This e-Delphi consensus study addressed the importance of synovitis in joint health of people with haemophilia and highlighted knowledge gaps in this field. Studies on the natural course of synovitis are lacking and the biological mechanisms underlying this process are not yet fully elucidated. While basic and clinical research proceeds in this field, expert consensus can help guide clinicians in their routine clinical practice, and Delphi methodology is often used to produce best-practice guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着血友病(PWH)患者接受更好的治疗,寿命更长,他们更有可能遇到心血管疾病(CVD)和其他合并症。急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的急性治疗ESC指南基于非血友病人群。
    目的:回顾指南,并提出对无抑制剂的PWHA的相关调整,这些PWHA经预防性治疗并出现ACS。
    方法:作为高级小组的一部分,20名欧洲血友病专家使用改良的Delphi方法,就不含抑制剂的PWHA的ESC指南的拟议改编制定并获得共识。
    结果:在两项指南的32项I类建议中,改编被认为是必要的,并建议15。这些适应强调了在没有抑制剂的A型血友病(HA)患者中抗血栓治疗时需要提供足够的FVIII波谷水平。接受emicizumab预防并需要口服抗凝治疗或单一抗血小板联合口服抗凝治疗的患者将需要额外的FVIII替代疗法。
    结论:在缺乏高质量临床证据的情况下,用于制定适应当前ESC指南的合并专家意见可能有助于指导临床医生在ACS患者出现PWHA时做出治疗决策.
    BACKGROUND: As people with haemophilia (PWH) receive better treatment and live longer they are more likely to encounter cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other comorbidities. ESC guidelines for the acute management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on the non-haemophilia population.
    OBJECTIVE: To review the guidelines and propose relevant adaptations for PWHA without inhibitors who are treated with prophylaxis and present with ACS.
    METHODS: As part of the ADVANCE Group, 20 European haemophilia experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop and gain consensus on proposed adaptations of the ESC guidelines for PWHA without inhibitors.
    RESULTS: Of the 32 Class I recommendations across both guidelines, adaptions were considered necessary and proposed for 15. The adaptions highlight the need to provide sufficient FVIII trough levels at the time of antithrombotic treatment in people with haemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors. Patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and requiring oral anticoagulation therapy or combined single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulation therapy will require additional FVIII replacement therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, the combined expert opinion used to develop these adaptions to the current ESC guidelines may help to guide clinicians in their treatment decisions when a PWHA presents with ACS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Emicizumab是一种双特异性单克隆抗体,具有桥接FIXa和FX的能力,模拟FVIII,并恢复血友病A患者的正常止血。大量证据表明,埃米珠单抗治疗的患者不需要监测,手术或侵入性手术前除外。然而,由于这种新药与常规凝血试验的相互作用,将这种新药推向市场对医生和临床实验室提出了一些挑战。
    方法:鉴于这种新药带来的挑战和实验室相互作用,有一个未满足的临床需要,为emicizumab实验室监测制定明确的建议,以强调应使用哪些实验室测试,哪些测试应该避免,以及何时进行这些测试。这些专家建议对于防止不适当的测试或误导性解释以及减少不必要的监测的额外成本至关重要。
    结果:2019年12月举行了一次共识会议,包括来自沙特阿拉伯的血友病顶级专家,来讨论这个问题。
    结论:专家们一致认为,aPTT(激活的部分凝血活酶时间)为基础的测试是不适合实验室监测患者治疗的emicizumab。仅基于牛FIX和FX蛋白的FVIII显色测定可用于测量FVIII水平。他们回顾并推荐了抗因子VIII抗体的测试类型和时间。只有在临床怀疑抗药物抗体(ADA)并且排除其他原因(例如患者不遵守)后,才应使用推荐的测试来测量药物水平。
    BACKGROUND: Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody with the ability to bridge FIXa and FX, mimic FVIII, and restore normal hemostasis in patients with hemophilia A. Moreover, substantial evidence has shown that emicizumab-treated patients do not require monitoring, except before surgery or invasive procedures. However, introducing this novel drug to the market poses some challenges to physicians and clinical laboratories due to its interaction with conventional coagulation tests.
    METHODS: Given the challenges and laboratory interactions posed by this novel drug, there is an unmet clinical need to develop clear recommendations for emicizumab laboratory monitoring to highlight which laboratory tests should be used, which tests should be avoided, and when these tests should be performed. These expert recommendations are essential to prevent inappropriate testing or misleading interpretations and reduce the extra costs of unnecessary monitoring.
    RESULTS: A consensus meeting was conducted in December 2019, including top experts on hemophilia from Saudi Arabia, to discuss this issue.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experts agreed that, aPTT (activated Partial Thromboplastin Time)-based tests are not suitable for laboratory monitoring patients treated with emicizumab. Only FVIII chromogenic assays based on bovine FIX and FX proteins can be used to measure FVIII levels. They reviewed and recommended the type and time of testing for anti-factor VIII antibodies. Drug levels should be measured using the recommended test only when the anti-drug antibody (ADA) is clinically suspected and after excluding other causes (such as patient non-compliance).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血友病(PWH)患者的骨质疏松症患病率很高,所有年龄段的跌倒和骨折。由于凝血因子缺乏,血友病本身的作用可能导致骨矿物质密度(BMD)降低。骨质疏松症管理指南,骨折和跌倒风险可能有助于减少骨折和跌倒风险,延缓骨质疏松症的发病.
    目的:我们的目的是回顾当前关于预防骨质疏松症的血友病指南,筛选,诊断和管理,跌倒预防。
    方法:数据库搜索(OvidMEDLINE)揭示了在过去十年中发表的两个血友病指南(世界和英国)。通过手动搜索确定了澳大利亚当地的血友病指南。
    结果:由于文献中缺乏证据,发现所有血友病指南对骨质疏松症管理和跌倒预防的建议不足。
    结论:需要进一步的研究来评估PWH中骨骼健康的轨迹,PWH骨丢失的机制,以及负重练习的有效性,预防跌倒的干预措施,筛选方案,以及在整个生命周期的PWH中使用抗骨质疏松药物。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with haemophilia (PWH) have a high prevalence of osteoporosis, falls and fractures at all ages. The role of haemophilia itself may contribute to low bone mineral density (BMD) due to coagulation factor deficiency. Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis, fracture and fall risk may help to reduce fracture and fall risk, and delay osteoporosis onset.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to review current haemophilia guidelines regarding osteoporosis prevention, screening, diagnosis and management, and fall prevention.
    METHODS: A database search (Ovid MEDLINE) revealed two haemophilia guidelines (World and British) published within the last ten years. Local Australian haemophilia guidelines were identified through a manual search.
    RESULTS: All haemophilia guidelines were found to contain inadequate recommendations for osteoporosis management and fall prevention due to a lack of evidence in the literature.
    CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are required to assess the trajectory of bone health in PWH, the mechanism of bone loss in PWH, and the effectiveness of weight-bearing exercises, interventions for fall prevention, screening programmes, and use of anti-osteoporosis medications in PWH across the lifecourse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Although synovitis is recognized as a marker of joint disease activity, its periodic assessment is not included in routine clinical surveillance of patients with haemophilia (PwH). In order to evaluate the current knowledge and to identify controversial issues, a preliminary literature search by the Musculoskeletal Committee of the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) has been conducted. Statements have been established and sent to the Italian AICE members to collect their level of agreement or disagreement by a Delphi process. Thirty-seven consensus recommendations have been drafted. We found a general agreement on the indication to consider the presence of synovitis as a marker of joint disease activity in PwH. Accordingly, there was agreement on the indication to search for synovitis both in patients reporting joint pain and in asymptomatic ones, recognizing ultrasound as the most practical imaging technique to perform periodic joint screening. Interestingly, after detection of synovitis, there was agreement on the indication to modify the therapeutic approach, suggesting prophylaxis in patients treated on demand and tailoring treatment in patients already under prophylaxis. Whereas the need of an early consultation with a physiotherapist is recommended for PwH affected by chronic synovitis, the exact timing for an orthopaedic surgeon consultation is currently unknown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Despite advances in haemophilia care, inhibitor development remains a significant complication. Although viable treatment options exist, there is some divergence of opinion in the appropriate standard approach to care and goals of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess consensus on United Kingdom (UK) standard of care for child and adult haemophilia patients with inhibitors.
    UNASSIGNED: A modified Delphi study was conducted using a two-round online survey. A haemophilia expert steering committee and published literature informed the Round 1 questionnaire. Invited participants included haematologists, haemophilia nurses and physiotherapists who had treated at least one haemophilia patient with inhibitors in the past 5 years. Consensus for 6-point Likert scale questions was pre-defined as ⩾70% participants selecting 1-2 (disagreement) or 5-6 (agreement).
    UNASSIGNED: In all, 46.7% and 35.9% questions achieved consensus in Rounds 1 (n = 41) and 2 (n = 34), respectively. Consensus was reached on the importance of improving quality of life (QoL) and reaching clinical goals such as bleed prevention, eradication of inhibitors and pain management. There was agreement on criteria constituting adequate/inadequate responses to immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the appropriate factor VIII dose to address suboptimal ITI response. Opinions varied on treatment aims for adults and children/adolescents, when to offer prophylaxis with bypassing agents and expectations of prophylaxis. Consensus was also lacking on appropriate treatment for mild/moderate patients with inhibitors.
    UNASSIGNED: UK healthcare professionals appear to be aligned on the clinical goals and role of ITI when managing haemophilia patients with inhibitors, although novel treatment developments may require reassessment of these goals. Lack of consensus on prophylaxis with bypassing agents and management of mild/moderate cases identifies a need for further research to establish more comprehensive, evidence-based treatment guidance, particularly for those patients who are unable/prefer not to receive non-factor therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号