BACKGROUND: The majority of scapula fractures have historically been treated non-operatively. The current literature describing patient outcomes following scapula fractures is limited. Our objective was to determine differences in outcomes between operatively and non-operatively treated scapular fractures. The goal of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review for scapula body, neck, and glenoid fractures focusing on several outcomes including union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and any recorded complications.
METHODS: The PRISMA methodology was followed for this systematic review. Articles were obtained from the PubMed/Medline database using the following search terms: scapula body OR scapula neck OR intra-articular glenoid AND fracture. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of included references. Studies were included if they contained clinical data on one or more of our study objectives and contained participants with a scapular body, neck, and/or glenoid fracture who were at least 16 years old. A total of 35 papers, with 822 total cases were included. Studies chosen were assessed for level of evidence and reviewed for data pertaining to the current study objectives. All cases of scapula fractures found throughout the literature were analyzed for outcome data. Outcomes studied included union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and recorded complications.
RESULTS: The overwhelming majority of scapula fractures go on to union. The majority of patients will eventually return to work. Persistent post-injury pain is unfortunately common. Shoulder range of motion and strength are decreased when compared to the contralateral shoulder. Non-operative glenoid fractures have the lowest reported functional scores. Malunion, need for additional surgeries, and post-traumatic arthritis were the most common complications.
CONCLUSIONS: When treating scapula fractures, orthopedic surgeons must consider the specific fracture pattern, as well as patient specific goals. Risks and benefits of both operative and non-operative management should be discussed with the patient including the exceptionally low non-union rate regardless of treatment option and that persistent pain following injury is unfortunately common.

UNASSIGNED: To compare shoulder range of motion (ROM) in dominant vs. nondominant shoulder of competitive tennis players, and to determine whether shoulder ROM is different between younger and older players, or males and females.
UNASSIGNED: A search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Epistemonikos on December 18, 2023. This study conforms to the principles of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Clinical studies or case reports on shoulder ROM including external rotation (ER; shoulder at 90° of abduction) and internal rotation (IR) in competitive, elite, or professional tennis players.
UNASSIGNED: We found 25 eligible studies that reported on a total of 18,534 tennis players, of which 20 studies reported the ROM for the dominant and nondominant side. Comparing dominant vs. nondominant shoulders revealed that dominant shoulders had significantly smaller IR (53.0° vs. 62.6°; P < .001). Comparing adults vs. children revealed that adults have significantly smaller IR (44.5° vs. 57.1°; P < .001) and ER (95.3° vs. 110.3°; P < .001). Comparing females vs. males revealed no significant differences in ER (113.4° vs. 104.9°; P = .360) or IR (54.3° vs. 56.4°; P = .710).
UNASSIGNED: IR in shoulders of tennis players is significantly smaller in dominant vs. nondominant sides (53.0° vs. 62.6°, P < .001), and significantly smaller in adults vs. children (44.5° vs. 57.1°, P < .001). These findings could be relevant in the context of physical preparation and training of tennis players, to monitor evolution of IR as a result of their sport and/or as they transition from childhood to adulthood.

The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive resource for shoulder proprioception assessment and its integration into clinical decision making as well as targeted rehabilitation protocols. Data for this review were acquired from peer-reviewed articles from computerized online databases, namely PubMed and Medline, published between 1906 and 2021. The development of digital/smart phone goniometers can improve shoulder joint range of motion (ROM) measurements and demonstrate comparable measurement accuracy to the universal standard goniometer. The inclinometer offers a portable and cost-effective method for measuring shoulder joint angles and arcs of motion in the vertical plane. Two types of dynamometers, the computerized isokinetic machine and the handheld hydraulic dynamometer, are reliable tools for objective shoulder rotator cuff strength assessment. Motion analysis systems are highly advanced modalities that create three-dimensional models of motion arcs using a series of cameras and reflective beads, offering unparalleled precision in shoulder proprioception measurement; however, they require time-consuming calibration and skilled operators. Advancements in wearable devices and compact mobile technology such as iPhone applications may make three-dimensional motion analysis more affordable and practical for outpatient settings in the future. The complex interplay between proprioception and shoulder dysfunction is not fully understood; however, shoulder proprioception can likely both contribute to and be caused by shoulder pathology. In patients with rotator cuff tears, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, and shoulder instability, clinicians can track proprioception to understand a patient\'s disease progression or response to treatment. Finally, rehabilitation programs targeting shoulder proprioception have shown promising initial results in restoring function and returning athletes to play.

UNASSIGNED: Many joint-preserving surgical interventions for cartilage defects of the knee have been adapted for use in the shoulder; however, there still exists no clear consensus for treatment. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of different interventions in patients with focal chondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint.
UNASSIGNED: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Medline. Patients who underwent a joint-preserving surgical procedure to treat a focal chondral defect of the glenoid, humeral head or both were included. Patients treated for diffuse cartilage defects or with shoulder arthroplasty were excluded.
UNASSIGNED: Ten studies were included, with follow-up data available for 194 shoulders. Eight joint-preserving procedures were evaluated, with microfracture being the most common. One study evaluating microfracture reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at short-term and long-term follow-up compared to preoperative scores. Across all studies, 32 patients underwent subsequent shoulder surgery, with 22 being arthroplasties.
UNASSIGNED: We found improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes across all studies. Although joint-preserving procedures have shown reasonable outcomes for focal chondral defects of the glenohumeral joint, long-term outcomes remain unknown, and the progression of osteoarthritis remains a concern. Higher quality evidence is required to make definitive recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: IV.

UNASSIGNED: Currently, is there no consensus on a widely accepted measurement technique for calculating the Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the techniques and imaging modalities to assess the HSL pre-operatively.
UNASSIGNED: Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and COCHRANE) were searched for literature on the various modalities and measurement techniques used for quantifying HSLs, from data inception to 20 November 2021. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool was used to assess study quality.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-five studies encompassing 3413 patients were included in this review. MRA and MRI showed the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values. Intrarater and interrater agreement was shown to be the highest amongst MRA. The most common reference tests for measuring the HSL were arthroscopy, radiography, arthro-CT, and surgical techniques.
UNASSIGNED: MRA and MRI are reliable imaging modalities with good test diagnostic properties for assessment of HSLs. There is a wide variety of measurement techniques and imaging modalities for HSL assessment, however a lack of comparative studies exists. Thus, it is not possible to comment on the superiority of one technique over another. Future studies comparing imaging modalities and measurement techniques are needed that incorporate a cost-benefit analysis.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the clinical outcomes and associated predictors of outcomes for chronic glenohumeral dislocations treated with arthroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was performed with Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, BIOSIS, and CINAHL databases from the inception of these databases through January 1, 2021 to identify all articles that examined outcomes or predictors of outcomes of arthroplasty in patients with chronic glenohumeral dislocations. Studies that examined outcomes for patients with a chronic glenohumeral dislocation (≥3 weeks) treated with hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were included. Those with acute or subacute dislocations (<3 weeks), fracture dislocations, and those treated with joint preserving treatment modalities were excluded.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 195 articles; of which, 22 (201 patients/205 shoulders) met our inclusion criteria. A total of 14 studies reported outcomes of hemiarthroplasty, 10 studies reported outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, and 9 studies reported outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. All studies documented clinical improvement after arthroplasty. Among 16 studies that measured range of motion, all 16 studies demonstrated improvement in range of motion postoperatively. Thirty-one reoperations (15%) were performed across all studies.
UNASSIGNED: We found improved clinical outcomes after arthroplasty for the treatment of chronic glenohumeral fewer dislocations at a long-term follow-up. Some evidence suggests that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may have superior outcomes and less complications compared with hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. There is insufficient evidence regarding the potential influence that duration of dislocation, direction of dislocation, addition of concomitant procedures, or humeral component retroversion have on outcomes.

There is no consensus on how to measure shoulder joint laxity and results reported in the literature are not well systematized for the available shoulder arthrometer devices. This systematic review aims to summarize the results of currently available shoulder arthrometers for measuring glenohumeral laxity in individuals with healthy or injured shoulders. Searches were conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that measure glenohumeral laxity with arthrometer-assisted assessment. The mean and standard deviations of the laxity measurement from each study were compared based on the type of population and arthrometer used. Data were organized according to the testing characteristics. A total of 23 studies were included and comprised 1162 shoulders. Populations were divided into 401 healthy individuals, 278 athletes with asymptomatic shoulder, and 134 individuals with symptomatic shoulder. Sensors were the most used method for measuring glenohumeral laxity and stiffness. Most arthrometers applied an external force to the humeral head or superior humerus by a manual-assisted mechanism. Glenohumeral laxity and stiffness were mostly assessed in the sagittal plane. There is substantial heterogeneity in glenohumeral laxity values that is mostly related to the arthrometer used and the testing conditions. This variability can lead to inconsistent results and influence the diagnosis and treatment decision-making.

Glenoid superior biceps-labral pathology diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes are an evolving area of shoulder surgery. Historically, described as superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, these lesions were identified as a source of pain in throwing athletes. Diagnosis and treatments applied to these SLAP lesions resulted in less than optimal outcomes in some patients and a prevailing sense of confusion. The purpose of this paper is to perform a reappraisal of the anatomy, examination, imaging, and diagnosis by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons/SLAP biceps study group. We sought to capture emerging concepts and suggest a more unified approach to evaluation and identify specific needs for future research.

Luxatio erecta is an inferior glenohumeral dislocation. It is an uncommon pathology with a prevalence of 0.5% of all shoulder dislocations. An open luxatio erecta presentation is rarer. After an extensive literature search, we only could find three complete case reports. From these cases, 2 out of 3 developed complications such as infections and severely limited range of motion, especially in flexion and abduction. We report the case of a 39-year-old man with an open inferior glenohumeral joint dislocation with complete rotator cuff tear and fracture of the greater tuberosity secondary to a motor vehicle accident. He was treated with open reduction, glenohumeral capsulorrhaphy, and transosseous rotator cuff repair with good clinical outcome. In conclusion, an open inferior shoulder dislocation is rare, less than 0.1% of all dislocations, with a high incidence of nerve injury. We suggest prompt surgical treatment with immediate administration of antibiotic therapy, wound debridement, irrigation, open reduction, and repair of the rotator cuff as an adequate protocol and focused rehabilitation with early mobilization of the glenohumeral joint.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to describe the shoulder arthroplasty options for young and active patients (<60 years old) with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching on Pubmed database. Studies that reported outcomes of patients with glenohumeral arthritis, younger than 60 years, that underwent shoulder arthroplasty [(Hemiarthroplasty (HA), Hemiarthroplasty with biological resurfacing (HABR), Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)] were included. Data include patient characteristics, surgical technique, range of motion, pain relief, outcome scores, functional improvement, complications, need for and time to revision.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1591 shoulders met the inclusion criteria. Shoulder arthroplasty provided improvements in terms of ROM on the 3 plains, forward flexion (FF), abduction (Abd) and external rotation (ER), in different proportions for each type of implant. Patients submitted to RSA had lower preoperative FF (p = 0.011), and the highest improvement (Δ) in Abd, but the worst in terms of ER (vsTSA, p = 0.05). HA had better ER postoperative values (vsRSA p = 0.049). Pain scores improved in all groups but no difference between them (p = 0.642). TSA and RSA groups had the best CS Δ (p = 0.012). HA group had higher complication rates (21.7%), RSA (19.4%, p = 0.034) and TSA (19.4%, p = 0.629) groups the lowest, and HABR had the highest rate of revisions (34.5%).
UNASSIGNED: HA had the highest rate of complications and HABR unacceptable rates of revision. These implants have been replaced by modern TSAs, with RSA reserved for complex cases. Surgeons should be aware of the common pitfalls of each option.