The word disease is a common word and there are many diseases like heart disease, diabetes, breast cancer, COVID-19, and kidney disease that threaten humans. Data-mining methods are proving to be increasingly beneficial in the present day, especially in the field of medical applications; through the use of machine-learning methods, that are used to extract valuable information from healthcare data, which can then be used to predict and treat diseases early, reducing the risk of human life. Machine-learning techniques are useful especially in the field of health care in extracting information from healthcare data. These data are very much helpful in predicting the disease early and treating the patients to reduce the risk of human life. For classification and decision-making, data mining is very much suitable. In this paper, a comprehensive study on several diseases and diverse machine-learning approaches that are functional to predict those diseases and also the different datasets used in prediction and making decisions are discussed in detail. The drawbacks of the models from various research papers have been observed and reveal countless computational intelligence approaches. Naïve Bayes, logistic regression (LR), SVM, and random forest are able to produce the best accuracy. With further optimization algorithms like genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and ant colony optimization combined with machine learning, better performance can be achieved in terms of accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and specificity.

In recent years, to infer phylogenies, which are NP-hard problems, more and more research has focused on using metaheuristics. Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood are two effective ways to conduct inference. Based on these methods, which can also be considered as the optimal criteria for phylogenies, various kinds of multi-objective metaheuristics have been used to reconstruct phylogenies. However, combining these two time-consuming methods results in those multi-objective metaheuristics being slower than a single objective. Therefore, we propose a novel, multi-objective optimization algorithm, MOEA-RC, to accelerate the processes of rebuilding phylogenies using structural information of elites in current populations. We compare MOEA-RC with two representative multi-objective algorithms, MOEA/D and NAGA-II, and a non-consensus version of MOEA-RC on three real-world datasets. The result is, within a given number of iterations, MOEA-RC achieves better solutions than the other algorithms.

A novel strategy of \"structural similarity based consensus modeling\" (SSCM) based on \"model distance and guided model selection\" (MD-QGMS) submodel set was proposed. The SSCM strategy is built upon a hypothesis, that is, similar compounds are most probably predicted more accurately by a same submodel among a model population, which can be concluded from the fact that models employing a different set of descriptors can predict compounds with specific structures more accurately. It is proved that the proposed SSCM strategy can remarkably improve the external prediction ability of QSAR models by employing two different datasets. In future, the proposed SSCM strategy may provide a new direction to develop more accurate predictive models.

Under REACH legislation, alternative methods (in silico or in vitro) like QSAR (Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships) models are expected to play a significant role. QSARs are based on the assumption that substances with similar chemical structures may have the same biological activities. However, identification of chemical classes could be problematic because chemicals often exhibit different chemical moieties, thereby confounding efforts to achieve a meaningful classification. This publication is focus on the notion of global model with the integration of a recent genetic algorithm for the generation of QSAR models. Starting from three datasets (EPAFHM, ECBHPV, AQUIRE), prediction of acute toxicity for fish (Pimephales promelas) with a global consensus model was carried out leading to very interesting statistics. The integration of the notion of Mode of Action was the second point of this study. A Bayesian classification associated to the genetic algorithm for consensus models was created leading to a good estimation of toxicity associated to derivatives with nonspecific MOA.