fundoplication

胃底折叠术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抗反流手术旨在恢复抗反流屏障,减少胃内容物的逆行流量。然而,传统的手术技术通常涉及一定程度的食管环绕,这可能会导致副作用,如吞咽困难和不能打嗝或呕吐。根据首次公布的结果,采用RefluxStop™装置的新型外科技术有望在治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的同时,减少术后吞咽困难.这项研究描述了该程序在慢性胃食管反流病患者队列中的初始临床经验,以评估其在临床实践中的可行性和安全性。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究检查了瑞士一家私立医院的前40例接受了RefluxStop™设备腹腔镜抗反流手术的患者。该程序涉及在胃底外侧植入非活动装置,以稳定狭窄的食管胃折叠。可行性评估基于患者的比例,该装置可以成功植入。讨论手术细节。术中和术后并发症,不利影响,和胃食管反流病相关生活质量的变化(GERD-HRQL问卷)也被报道。
    结果:在2020年5月至2022年4月之间,40例患者接受了腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术和RefluxStop™装置植入的择期手术。所有患者均有典型的胃食管反流病症状,如胃灼热和反流;20(50%)有术前吞咽困难。腹腔镜手术在所有患者中都是可行的,除了由于粘连和相关出血而需要剖腹手术的患者。中位手术时间为57.5分钟(四分位距=51.75-64.25分钟),无装置相关的术中或术后并发症。所有患者术后1天和3个月成像,确认设备的正确放置。所有患者在3个月时的反流症状(胃灼热和酸反流)均显著改善(p<0.0001)。
    结论:这些初步结果支持在临床实践中引入这种新型腹腔镜抗反流手术治疗方案的可行性和安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: Anti-reflux surgery aims to restore the anti-reflux barrier and reduce the retrograde flow of stomach contents. However, traditional surgical techniques generally involve some degree of encircling of the oesophagus, which can result in adverse effects such as dysphagia and the inability to belch or vomit. Based on the first published results, a novel surgical technique - with the RefluxStop™ device - appears promising for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with minimal postoperative dysphagia. This study describes the initial clinical experience with this procedure in a cohort of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease to evaluate its feasibility and safety in clinical practice.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined the first 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with the RefluxStop™ device at a private hospital in Switzerland. The procedure involves implanting a nonactive device on the outside of the gastric fundus to stabilise a narrow oesophagogastric plication. Feasibility was assessed based on the proportion of patients in whom the device could be successfully implanted, with a discussion of the operative details. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, adverse effects, and changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL questionnaire) are also reported.
    RESULTS: Between May 2020 and April 2022, 40 patients underwent elective surgery for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and RefluxStop™ device implantation. All patients had typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, such as heartburn and regurgitation; 20 (50%) had preoperative dysphagia. Laparoscopic surgery was feasible in all patients except one who required laparotomy due to adhesions and associated bleeding when accessing the abdomen. The median operating time was 57.5 minutes (interquartile range = 51.75-64.25 minutes) with no device-related intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients were imaged one day and three months postoperative, confirming the correct placement of the device. Reflux symptoms (heartburn and acid regurgitation) were significantly improved in all patients at three months (p <0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results support the feasibility and safety of introducing this novel laparoscopic anti-reflux surgical treatment option in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于食管裂孔疝修补术的正式胃底折叠术和胃固定术的安全性结果比较的文献很少,尤其是在紧急情况下。这项研究的目的是评估在急诊食管裂孔疝修补术中进行胃底折叠和胃固定术之间30天的临床结果。
    方法:使用国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库进行了2011年至2021年的回顾性队列研究。使用ICD9/10代码确定研究人群,描述无梗阻或坏疽的膈疝,有障碍,还有坏疽.选择性病例被排除。CPT代码用于对胃底折叠术和胃固定术进行分组。主要结果是30天并发症发生率。次要结果包括30天的再入院,再次手术和死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来调整临床相关的混杂变量。
    结果:胃底折叠术和胃固定组共971和346人,分别。胃底折叠术与显著降低(p<0.05)30天并发症相关,再次手术和死亡率。在再入院方面没有统计学上的显着差异。调整后,胃底折叠术与30天并发症(OR0.53,p<0.00195%CI0.40-0.71)和死亡率(OR0.55,p=0.03395%CI0.32-0.95)的几率降低显著相关.然而,30天再入院(OR0.86,p=0.44995%CI0.59-1.27)和再手术(OR0.66,p=0.06395%CI0.42-1.02)无显著差异.
    结论:与接受胃固定手术的患者相比,接受紧急胃底折叠术修复的食管裂孔疝患者30天并发症和死亡率明显降低。胃底折叠术是在特定患者的急诊环境中管理食管裂孔疝的安全可行的方法。
    BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature comparing safety outcomes between formal fundoplication and gastric fixation procedures for hiatal hernia repairs, especially in the emergency setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate 30-day clinical outcomes between fundoplication and gastric fixation performed in emergency hiatal hernia repairs.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. The study population was determined using ICD9/10 codes describing diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction or gangrene, with obstruction, and with gangrene. Elective cases were excluded. CPT codes were used to group fundoplication procedures and gastric fixation procedures. The primary outcome was the 30-day complication rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation and mortality rates. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for clinically relevant confounding variables.
    RESULTS: A total of 971 and 346 were in the fundoplication and gastric fixation groups, respectively. Fundoplication was associated with a significantly lower (p < 0.05) 30-day complication, reoperation and mortality rates. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to readmission. After adjustment, fundoplication was significantly associated with a decrease in odds of 30-day complications (OR 0.53, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.40-0.71) and mortality (OR 0.55, p = 0.033 95% CI 0.32-0.95). However, there was no significant difference with respect to 30-day readmission (OR 0.86, p = 0.449 95% CI 0.59-1.27) and reoperation (OR 0.66, p = 0.063 95% CI 0.42-1.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hiatal hernias that underwent emergent repair with fundoplication had a significantly lower 30-day complication and mortality rates compared to those who underwent gastric fixation procedures. Fundoplication is a safe and feasible approach to manage hiatal hernias in the emergency setting for select patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)是一种常见的疾病,约占成年人口的20%。本研究旨在比较不同年龄组患者行腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术(LNF)治疗GERD的效果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2014-2018年某外科行LNF的患者。根据年龄将患者分为三组:40岁以下,40-65岁,年龄超过65岁。结果:本研究共分析了111例患者(44.1%为女性)。平均年龄50.2±15岁,平均随访50个月±16.6个月。23%的症状复发,20%,每个年龄组的23%,分别为(p=0.13),85%,89%,两组中80%的患者报告他们会向亲属推荐手术(p=0.66).此外,83%,92%,和73%的患者从各自的年龄组报告说,他们将再次接受手术,他们现在有知识(p=0.16)。结论:鉴于这些结果和观察,LNF已被证明是治疗各年龄组GERD的良好方法。在我们的研究中,在手术满意度和相关建议方面,研究年龄组间没有发现差异.
    Background and objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease affecting approximately 20% of the adult population. This study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in the treatment of GERD in patients of different age groups. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent LNF in one surgical department between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into three groups based on age: under 40 years of age, 40-65 years of age, and over 65 years of age. Results: A total of 111 patients (44.1% women) were analyzed in this study. The mean age was 50.2 ±15 years, and the mean follow-up was 50 months ± 16.6 months. Recurrence of symptoms occurred in 23%, 20%, and 23% in each age group, respectively (p = 0.13), and 85%, 89%, and 80% of patients from the respective groups reported that they would recommend the surgery to their relatives (p = 0.66). Furthermore, 83%, 92%, and 73% of patients from the respective age groups reported that they would undergo the surgery again with the knowledge they now had (p = 0.16). Conclusions: Given these results and observations, LNF has been shown to be a good method of treatment for GERD in every age group. In our study, there were no differences found in terms of satisfaction with surgery and associated recommendations between the studied age groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胃食管反流病患者在手术前常进行24hrpH检测以确认病理性反流。然而,阴性pH测试可能发生在一些反流的个体中,即使在没有内镜下食管炎的情况下,仍可能根据反流症状进行抗反流手术。尽管术前检查结果为阴性,但仍接受抗反流手术的患者的长期结局已确定。
    方法:从前瞻性数据库中选择患者。745例患者符合纳入标准;典型的食管反流症状,没有大的裂孔疝,术前24小时pH值研究,内窥镜检查,术后症状和满意度随访5年。根据24hrpH研究和内窥镜检查结果将患者分为3组;pH阴性和内窥镜检查阴性(n=65);pH阴性和内窥镜检查阳性(n=72);和pH阳性(n=608)对照。pH阴性和内镜组根据临床评估和典型食管反流症状行手术治疗。5年的基线和随访结果使用0-10个模拟评分评估胃灼热,吞咽困难和对总体结果的满意度。分析数据以比较各组。
    结果:组的人口统计学和术前症状评分匹配良好。在中位5年随访时,胃灼热的临床结局评分在组间相似,吞咽困难,和总体满意度。阴性pH和内窥镜检查组的平均胃灼热评分为1.80,在阴性pH和阳性内镜组中为1.88,在阳性pH组中为1.91(p=0.663)。所有组的平均满意度得分均较高;分别为8.13、7.31和7.72(p=0.293)。
    结论:临床结果评分没有差异。pH阴性和内镜检查组的满意度评分较高,胃灼热和吞咽困难评分较低。这些发现支持在精心选择的术前pH测试阴性的有症状患者中进行抗反流手术。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease often undergo a 24-hour pH test to confirm pathologic reflux before surgery. However, a negative pH test can occur in some individuals with reflux, and a case might still be made for antireflux surgery based on symptoms of reflux even in the absence of endoscopic esophagitis. The long-term outcomes in patients who underwent antireflux surgery despite negative preoperative test results were determined.
    METHODS: Patients were selected from a prospective database. A total of 745 patients met the inclusion criteria, which included typical esophageal reflux symptoms, absence of a large hiatus hernia, preoperative 24-hour pH study performed, endoscopy, and postoperative symptom and satisfaction follow-up available at 5 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on 24-hour pH study and endoscopy results: negative pH and negative endoscopy (n = 65), negative pH and positive endoscopy (n = 72), and positive pH (n = 608). The negative pH and negative endoscopy group underwent surgery based on clinical assessment and typical esophageal reflux symptoms. Baseline and follow-up outcomes at 5 years were evaluated using 0 to 10 analog scores, which assessed heartburn, dysphagia, and satisfaction with the overall outcome. Data were analyzed to compare the groups.
    RESULTS: The groups were well matched for demographics and preoperative symptom scores. At the median 5-year follow-up, clinical outcome scores were similar among the groups for heartburn, dysphagia, and overall satisfaction. The mean heartburn scores were 1.80 in the negative pH and negative endoscopy group, 1.88 in the negative pH and positive endoscopy group, and 1.91 in the positive pH group (P = .663). The mean satisfaction scores were high in all groups: 8.13, 7.31, and 7.72, respectively (P = .293).
    CONCLUSIONS: No difference in clinical outcome scores was observed. The negative pH and negative endoscopy group had high satisfaction scores and low heartburn and dysphagia scores. Our findings support antireflux surgery in well-selected symptomatic patients with a negative preoperative pH test.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景和目的:肥胖和胃食管反流病(GERD)正在稳步增加世界体重,肥胖患者必须在减重手术的同时进行抗反流手术。这项研究的目的是比较OAGB使用不同的胃底折叠术方法后的减肥和抗反流结果。材料和方法:这种开放标签,随机化,平行三臂试验于2019年3月和2021年12月进行.所有患者均行腹腔镜下一次吻合术胃旁路术和缝合术,然后在24个月时进行了随访。第1组患者使用排除的胃进行胃底折叠术(FundoRingOAGB);第2组,使用排除的胃进行尼森胃底折叠术(NissenOAGB);第3组,没有胃底折叠术(OAGB)。我们研究了BMI的变化,GERD症状(GERD-HRQL),和VISICK得分。结果:在接受筛查的219名参与者中,150人随机分为3组:FundoRingOAGB组(n=50),NissenOAGB组(n=50),和OAGB组(n=50)。治疗后第24个月,BMI变化如下:FundoRingOAGB组从40.7±5.9(31-53)到24.3±2.8(19-29)kg/m2;Nissen组从39.9±5.3(32-54)到26.3±2.9(23-32)kg/m2;GB组从40.9±6.2(32-56)到28.5±3.9(25-34)kg/m2。FundoRingOAGB组术前平均GERD-HRQL胃灼热评分从20.6±2.24(19.96,21.23)提高到0.44±0.73(0.23,0,64);NissenOAGB组从21.34±2.43(20.64,22.03)提高到1.14±1.4(0.74,1.53);GB组20.5±2.17(1.1.25)。FundoRingOAGB组的GERD-HRQL总分从手术前25.2±2.7(24.4,25.9)到手术后4.34±1.3(3.96,4.7);NissenOAGB组的手术前24.8±2.93(24,25.67)到5.42±1.7(4.9,5.9);从21.46±2.7(20.7,22.2)到OA6.6)。FundoRingOAGB的平均VISICK评分从3.64±0.94(3.7,3.9)提高到1.48±1.26(1.12,1.84),NissenOAGB组从3.42±0.97(3.1,3,7)到2.5±1.46(2.06,2.9),OAGB组从3.38±0.88(3.1,3,69)到2.96±1.19(2.62,3.2)。结论:FundoRingOAGB的抗反流和减肥效果优于使用NissenOAGB方法,并且明显优于不使用胃底折叠术的OAGB。
    Background and Objectives: Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are steadily increasing world weight and antireflux surgery must be performed simultaneously with bariatric surgery in obese patients. The purpose of this study is to compare bariatric and antireflux results after OAGB with different methods of fundoplication using the excluded stomach and without fundoplication. Materials and methods: This open-label, randomized, parallel three-arm trial was conducted from March 2019 and December 2021. All patients underwent laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass and suture cruroplasty, and then had a follow-up at 24 months. Group 1 of patients had fundoplication FundoRing using the excluded stomach (FundoRingOAGB); Group 2, with Nissen fundoplication using the excluded stomach (NissenOAGB); and Group 3, without fundoplication (OAGB). We studied changes in BMI, GERD symptoms (GERD-HRQL), and the VISICK score. Results: Of 219 participants screened, 150 were randomly allocated to 3 groups: FundoRingOAGB group (n = 50), NissenOAGB group (n = 50), and OAGB group (n = 50). At post-treatment month 24, BMI changes were as follows: from 40.7 ± 5.9 (31-53) to 24.3 ± 2.8 (19-29) kg/m2 in FundoRingOAGB group; from 39.9 ± 5.3 (32-54) to 26.3 ± 2.9 (23-32) kg/m2 in Nissen group; and from 40.9 ± 6.2 (32-56) to 28.5 ± 3.9 (25-34) kg/m2 in OAGB group. The mean pre-operative GERD-HRQL heartburn score improved post-op in FundoRingOAGB group from 20.6 ± 2.24 (19.96, 21.23) to 0.44 ± 0.73 (0.23, 0,64); in NissenOAGB group from 21.34 ± 2.43 (20.64, 22.03) to 1.14 ± 1.4 (0.74, 1.53); and in OAGB group 20.5 ± 2.17 (19.9, 21.25) to 2.12 ± 1.36 (1.73, 2.5). GERD-HRQL total scores were from pre-op 25.2 ± 2.7 (24.4, 25.9) to 4.34 ± 1.3 (3.96, 4.7) post-op in FundoRingOAGB group; 24.8 ± 2.93 (24, 25.67) pre-op to 5.42 ± 1.7 (4.9, 5.9) in the NissenOAGB group; and from 21.46 ± 2.7 (20.7, 22.2) to 7.44 ± 2.7 (6.6, 8.2) in the OAGB group. The mean VISICK score improved from 3.64 ± 0.94 (3.7, 3.9) to 1.48 ± 1.26 (1.12, 1.84) in FundoRingOAGB, from 3.42 ± 0.97 (3.1, 3,7) to 2.5 ± 1.46 (2.06, 2.9) in NissenOAGB group and from 3.38 ± 0.88 (3.1, 3,69) to 2.96 ± 1.19 (2.62, 3.2) in OAGB group. Conclusions: Antireflux and bariatric results of FundoRingOAGB are better than using the NissenOAGB method and significantly better than OAGB without the use of fundoplication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见的食管疾病,具有潜在的致命并发症。了解Heller心肌切开术(HCM)对贲门失弛缓症的不同手术治疗方式的结果,有助于选择最安全和最有效的选择。然而,在非洲,使用Heller肌切开术治疗脱位的数据有限。因此,我们的目标是确定围手术期的发病率,喀麦隆HCM的死亡率和短期功能结局。
    方法:我们在喀麦隆的两个三级卫生中心进行了一项为期10年的队列研究,研究对象是因贲门失弛缓症而接受HCM的患者,术后随访至少3个月。我们分析了人口统计数据,术前临床和影像学数据,治疗细节,以及使用Eckardt评分的HCM后3至12个月的结局。
    结果:我们招募了29例门失弛缓症患者,平均年龄为24±16岁,主要为女性(M/F为1/3.8)。平均症状持续时间为51±20个月。在80%的案例中,通过常规X线对比成像或"钡吞咽试验"(93%)和/或上消化道内窥镜检查(86%)进行诊断.无法通过食管测压的金标准诊断方法。术前,所有患者均有表现为活动性贲门失弛缓症的症状.通过剖腹手术进行HCM的比例为75%,而腹腔镜手术的比例为25%。Dor的前部分胃底折叠术是主要的抗反流手术(59%)。粘膜穿孔是8例患者中唯一的术中并发症(腹腔镜检查期间2例与6在剖腹手术中;p>0.5),并通过简单的缝线成功治疗。术后并发症是非严重的,在所有通过剖腹手术的患者中发生了10%。开腹手术的平均术后住院时间为7±3天。腹腔镜检查为5±2天;p>0.5。围手术期死亡率为零。总的来说,术后短期功能结局被评为优;平均Eckardt评分为1.5±0.5(vs.术前Eckardt评分为9±1;p<0.0001)。
    结论:在这种资源有限的情况下,贲门失弛缓症的诊断较晚。HCM产生令人满意的结果,尤其是通过腹腔镜管理。需要改善诊断性食管测压和微创外科基础设施以及所需的外科培训/技能,以实现最佳的门失弛缓症护理。
    BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare esophageal disease with potentially lethal complications. Knowledge of the outcomes of the different surgical treatment modalities for achalasia by Heller\'s cardiomyotomy (HCM) helps to choose the safest and most effective option. However, data on the management of achalsia using a Heller myotomy is limited in Africa. Thus, our aim was to determine the perioperative morbidity, mortality and short-term functional outcomes of HCM in Cameroon.
    METHODS: We conducted a cohort study throughout a 10-year chart review of patients who underwent HCM for achalasia and were followed up postoperatively for at least three months at two tertiary health centers in Cameroon. We analyzed demographic data, preoperative clinical and imaging data, treatment details, and outcomes at three to twelve months after HCM using the Eckardt score.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 29 patients with achalasia having a mean age of 24 ± 16 years and predominantly females (M/F of 1/3.8). The mean symptom duration was 51 ± 20 months. In 80% of cases, the diagnosis was made through a conventional x-ray contrast imaging or \"barium swallow test\" (93%) and/or an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (86%). The gold standard diagnostic method via esophageal manometry was unavailable. Preoperatievly, all patients had symptoms suggestive of an active achalasia. HCM was performed via laparotomy in 75% as opposed to 25% laparoscopic HCM procedures. Dor\'s anterior partial fundoplication was the main anti-reflux procedure performed (59%). Mucosal perforations were the only intraoperative complications in eight patients (2 during laparoscopy vs. 6 during laparotomy; p > 0.5) and were managed successfully by simple sutures. Postoperative complications were non-severe and occurred in 10% of patients all operated via laparotomy. The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 7 ± 3 days for laparotomy vs. 5 ± 2 days for laparoscopy; p > 0.5. The perioperative mortality rate was nil. Overall, the short-term postoperative functional outcome was rated excellent; average Eckardt score of 1.5 ± 0.5 (vs. preoperative Eckardt Score of 9 ± 1; p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Achalasia is diagnosed late in this resource-limited setting. HCM yields satisfactory outcomes, especially via laparoscopic management. An improvement in diagnostic esophageal manometry and mini-invasive surgical infrastructure and the required surgical training/skills are needed for optimal achalasia care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胃食管反流(GERD)是经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)后的一个问题。在病例系列中,经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)最近被描述为POEM后GERD的可能疗法。
    方法:我们前瞻性招募接受POEM的患者,这些患者同意参与客观的术后GERD评估。有GERD客观证据和合适解剖结构的患者提供TIF与仅质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。随访后,将接受TIF的患者与仅接受PPI治疗的患者进行比较。
    结果:在21名接受客观测试的POEM患者中,在11例(52%)中发现GERD。在那些有资格获得TIF的人中,4人(40%)选择追求TIF,并与仅接受PPI治疗的人(n=6)进行比较。TIF后三个月,75%的患者停用或显著降低PPI。无不良事件发生。GERD与健康相关的生活质量评分较低,在TIF(3.75±6.2)和仅接受PPI治疗的患者(4.1±5)之间具有可比性。
    结论:在此试点中,患者驱动的前瞻性研究,75%接受TIF的POEM后GERD患者停止或显著减少PPI使用。POEM后TIF是安全有效的,对于POEM相关GERD可能是PPI的可行替代方案;然而,未来的研究应包括对照组和干预后pH监测.
    BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is a concern after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) has been recently described as a possible therapy for post-POEM GERD in case series.
    METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing POEM who agreed to participate in objective post-procedure GERD evaluation. Patients with objective evidence of GERD and suitable anatomy were offered TIF vs. proton pump inhibitor (PPI) only. Patients who underwent TIF were compared to those on PPI-only therapy after follow-up.
    RESULTS: Of 21 enrolled POEM patients with objective testing, GERD was found in 11 (52%). Of those eligible for TIF, 4 (40%) opted to pursue TIF and were compared to those on PPI-only therapy ( n = 6). Three months post-TIF, 75% of patients had discontinued or significantly decreased PPI. There were no adverse events. GERD health-related quality of life scores were low and comparable between TIF (3.75 ± 6.2) and those who remained on PPI-only therapy (4.1 ± 5).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot, patient-driven prospective study, 75% of patients with post-POEM GERD undergoing TIF had stopped or significantly reduced PPI use. Post-POEM TIF is safe and effective and may be a viable alternative to PPI for POEM-related GERD; however, future studies should include a control arm and post-intervention pH monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估术前合并胃食管反流病(GERD)的病态肥胖患者Toupet-Sleeve(TS)胃切除术后的4年结局。
    研究组由19名在2017年8月至2019年2月期间手术的连续患者组成。有5名男性和14名女性,平均体重指数(BMI)为43±5kg/m2,平均年龄为42±15岁。对未进行临床随访的患者进行数据库和电话采访的回顾性分析。主要研究终点是体重减轻和手术成功。定义为不需要转换且%EWL>50%。GERD的消退是次要终点。
    无患者失访。随访一年后达到最低点体重减轻:平均BMI为32±5kg/m2,%EWL为61±21%,%TWL为24±7%。此后,我们观察到体重随着时间的推移逐渐恢复。平均随访时间为51±6个月,平均BMI为36±8kg/m2,%EWL为43±35%,%TWL为16±12%。由于吞咽困难和眼底扩张或体重减轻不足,两名患者被转换为另一种减肥手术。手术总成功率为32%(6/19)。在没有任何PPI治疗的情况下GERD的消退在88%(15/17)的未转化患者中被注意到。
    根据我们的经验,经过4年的随访,TS与显著的转化风险相关,中度体重减轻和手术成功率低。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the 4-year outcomes after Toupet-Sleeve (TS) gastrectomy in morbid obese patients with concomitant preoperative gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).
    UNASSIGNED: The study group consisted of 19 consecutive patients operated on between August 2017 and February 2019. There were 5 men and 14 women with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43 ± 5 kg/m2 and a mean age of 42 ± 15 years. A retrospective analysis of database and telephone interview of patients who defaulted clinic follow-up was conducted. The main study end-points were weight loss and success of surgery, defined as no need for conversion and %EWL > 50%. Resolution of GERD was a secondary end-point.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient was lost for follow-up. Nadir weight loss was reached after a follow-up of one year: mean BMI was 32 ± 5 kg/m2, %EWL 61 ± 21% and %TWL 24 ± 7%. Thereafter, we observed a progressive weight regain over time. With a mean follow-up of 51 ± 6 months, mean BMI was 36 ± 8 kg/m2, %EWL 43 ± 35% and %TWL 16 ± 12%. Two patients were converted to another bariatric procedure because of dysphagia and fundus dilatation or because of insufficient weight loss. The overall surgical success rate was 32% (6/19). Resolution of GERD without any PPI treatment was noted in 88% (15/17) of the non-converted patients.
    UNASSIGNED: In our experience, with a 4-year follow-up, TS is associated with a significant risk of conversion, a moderate weight loss and a poor surgical success rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目标:使用一个全面的澳大利亚队列,我们量化了与抗反流和裂孔疝手术相关的术中和术后并发症的发生率,并确定了独立预测因子.此外,我们进行了深入分析,以了解与各独立危险因素相关的并发症情况.
    背景:预测胃底折叠和裂孔疝修补术的围手术期风险将为治疗决策提供信息,医院资源配置,和基准。然而,可用的风险计算器在估计围手术期风险时没有考虑疝解剖学或手术技术方面。
    方法:回顾性分析了澳大利亚36家医院超过10年的所有选择性抗反流和裂孔疝手术。进行分层多因素logistic回归分析,以确定术中和术后并发症的独立预测因子,外科,解剖学,围手术期因素。
    结果:共分析了4301例手术。其中,1569(36.5%)为大型/巨大疝,292(6.8%)为修订程序。术中、术后并发症发生率分别为12.6%和13.3%,分别。Charlson合并症指数,疝气大小,修正手术,和基线抗凝剂使用独立预测术中和术后并发症。这些危险因素与它们自身的并发症有关。最后,使用风险矩阵,我们可视化了这四个危险因素对术中发展的累积影响,术后整体,和主要的术后并发症。
    结论:这项研究提高了我们对抗反流和裂孔疝手术相关围手术期发病率的认识。我们的发现对患者进行了一系列围手术期风险分组,这些风险为个人和机构层面的护理提供了信息。
    OBJECTIVE: Using a comprehensive Australian cohort, we quantified the incidence and determined the independent predictors of intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with antireflux and hiatus hernia surgeries. In addition, we performed an in-depth analysis to understand the complication profiles associated with each independent risk factor.
    BACKGROUND: Predicting perioperative risks for fundoplication and hiatus hernia repair will inform treatment decision-making, hospital resource allocation, and benchmarking. However, available risk calculators do not account for hernia anatomy or technical aspects of surgery in estimating perioperative risk.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all elective antireflux and hiatus hernia surgeries in 36 Australian hospitals over 10 years. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of intraoperative and postoperative complications accounting for patient, surgical, anatomic, and perioperative factors.
    RESULTS: A total of 4301 surgeries were analyzed. Of these, 1569 (36.5%) were large/giant hernias and 292 (6.8%) were revisional procedures. The incidence rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications were 12.6% and 13.3%, respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index, hernia size, revisional surgery, and baseline anticoagulant usage independently predicted both intraoperative and postoperative complications. These risk factors were associated with their own complication profiles. Finally, using risk matrices, we visualized the cumulative impact of these 4 risk factors on the development of intraoperative, overall postoperative, and major postoperative complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study has improved our understanding of perioperative morbidity associated with antireflux and hiatus hernia surgery. Our findings group patients along a spectrum of perioperative risks that inform care at an individual and institutional level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号