UNASSIGNED: Return to play decision making for upper extremity injuries is challenging due to a lack of evidence-based protocols and testing. Current guidelines utilize tests and measures with minimal evidence on re-injury risks and prediction. The purpose of this case series is to highlight a functional testing algorithm for upper extremities injuries and the outcomes for the patients that followed it.
UNASSIGNED: Case series.
UNASSIGNED: Six subjects (18 - 21 years old) who underwent shoulder capsulolabral repair secondary to recurrent instability and/or unyielding pain are included. All subjects underwent a criterion-based rehabilitation program before being assessed with the authors\' upper extremity functional testing algorithm. The upper extremity functional testing algorithm consists of measures of active range of motion (AROM), passive range of motion (PROM), peak isometric force, a fatigue testing battery, and the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST) to assess readiness for return to sport.
UNASSIGNED: All athletes achieved > 90% symmetry on at least two out of three tests during a fatigue testing protocol and at least 25 touches on the CKCUEST. All of the athletes returned to unrestricted football the season following surgical intervention. None of the athletes sustained an additional glenohumeral subluxation, dislocation, or upper extremity injury requiring surgical intervention for the remainder of their athletic careers (six years).
UNASSIGNED: The presented cases help to illustrate the effectiveness of the upper extremity functional testing algorithm to assess return to sport readiness for male collegiate football athletes. The algorithm included testing of AROM/PROM and strength that is typically used, but also included the CKCUEST and fatigue testing to further challenge and assess the upper extremity prior to returning to sports.
UNASSIGNED: 4.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the disease-specific quality of life, and the objective clinical and functional outcomes of patients with symptomatic ACL deficiency and patellofemoral instability following surgical stabilization of both ligaments.
METHODS: Between February 2010 and August 2013, 22 subjects underwent a combined ACL reconstruction and patellofemoral stabilization. The anterior cruciate ligament quality of life questionnaire (ACL-QOL) was completed pre-operatively and two-years post-operatively. Clinical and functional assessments were performed two-years post-operatively. A paired t-test assessed the difference between the pre- and post-operative ACL-QOL scores. Effect size was calculated manually using the Eta squared formula. A Pearson r correlation coefficient assessed for a relationship between the post-operative ACL-QOL scores and functional tests.
RESULTS: Twenty patients completed the 24-month ACL-QOL, 17/20 completed clinical assessment, and 14/20 completed functional testing. The mean pre-operative ACL-QOL score was 21.20 (SD=7.25, range 5.8 to 31.7) and two-years post-operative it was 65.24 (SD=21.38, range 34.5 to 99.1). The paired t-test demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in ACL-QOL scores; t (19)=9.119, p<.001 (two-tailed). The Eta squared statistic (0.81) indicated a very large effect size. Statistically significant correlations (p<.05) were evident between post-operative ACL-QOL scores and all the operative limb single-leg hop tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL reconstruction and patellofemoral stabilization surgery leads to good results. This patient cohort with chronic ACL-MPFL injuries demonstrated a statistically significant change in disease-specific quality of life following surgery. In addition, the patient-reported outcomes and objective functional testing results correlated.
METHODS: Case series - IV.