Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) refer to a group of disorders with chronic symptoms, such as abdominal pain, dysphagia, dyspepsia, diarrhea, constipation, and bloating. Among these, functional constipation significantly impacts the quality of life and is linked with comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression. The exact pathophysiology remains unclear despite the widespread occurrence. Research suggests that the gut-brain axis plays a role in FGIDs. Disruptions in the bidirectional communication between the brain and gastrointestinal (GI) tract contribute to GI symptoms and mood disturbances. The incomplete understanding of FGID pathophysiology has led to limited treatment options. Traditional treatments often focus on single symptoms and come with side effects, prompting the need for alternative approaches that address both GI and psychological components. Alternative approaches including herbal supplements offer a natural alternative to conventional medicine by promoting regularity and gut health. Abelmoschus esculentus L. or okra has a history of use in traditional medicine. Bioactive compounds such as polysaccharides and fibers found in okra offer gastroprotective benefits. Withania somnifera is a plant commonly referred to as ashwagandha. The plant root has been used for its health-promoting effects. Research supports the use of W. somnifera to help with stress and sleep. Digexin is a herbal supplement combining W. somnifera (ashwagandha) and A. esculentus (okra). It has shown promise in improving both GI regularity and mood by modulating the gut-brain axis. Clinical studies support the potential of a novel herbal supplement that aids in the management of FGIDs. This narrative review looks at FGIDs, etiologies, current treatment, and possible therapeutic supplements to aid in symptom management.

UNASSIGNED: Constipation is prevalent worldwide, significantly increasing healthcare costs and diminishing the quality of life in children affected. Current studies have yielded mixed results regarding the factors associated with constipation, and mainly focusing on patients outside of Asia. Moreover, most of these studies lack focus on the paediatric population. This study aimed to identify the prevalence and associated factors of constipation among children in Asia.
UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane for cohort and cross-sectional studies published from database inception up to October 12, 2022, and continued with manual searching until September 2, 2023. Eligible studies were those that included children in Asia aged 0-18 years old suffering from idiopathic constipation, with prevalence value provided in the English abstract. The analysis included clinical and general population. Children with organic constipation, who had undergone gastrointestinal surgery, or with congenital defects were excluded, as these factors affect the incidence of constipation. Data included in the analysis were extracted from published reports only. The extracted data were pooled using random-effects model to analyse the prevalence of constipation in children in Asia. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022367122.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 4410 systematically searched studies and 36 manually searched ones, a total of 50 studies were included in the final analysis, encompassing data from 311,660 children residing in Asia. The pooled prevalence of constipation was 12.0% (95% CI 9.3-14.6%, I2 = 99.8%). There was no significant difference in constipation prevalence observed by sex and geographical location. Nonetheless, adolescents and children aged 1-9 years exhibited a significantly higher prevalence constipation compared to infants (p < 0.0001) Additionally, significant differences in constipation rates were observed across various diagnostic methods, population sources, and mental health conditions.
UNASSIGNED: Despite the high heterogeneity resulting from varying diagnostic tools or definitions used among studies, our review adds to the literature on constipation among children in Asia. It reveals a notably high prevalence of constipation in this demographic. Diagnostic methods, age, and compromised mental health emerged as significant influencers of constipation among children in Asia, highlighting potential strategies to mitigate constipation prevalence in children in Asia.
UNASSIGNED: The National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan.

Constipation is a pretty common and sometimes complicated health condition around the world which is characterized by an inability to have regular bowel movements. In response to this worrying trend, various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been embraced to seek to produce promising outcomes, yet patient dissatisfaction continues to be reported. The main aim of this review paper was to determine the effectiveness and safety of the vibrating capsule in treating constipated patients. The key databases that were consulted to get articles on this subject include Google Scholar, Embase, and PubMed. Specific keywords were used in the database search to get the relevant articles. Based on the exclusion criterion, articles that were excluded include conference abstracts, commentaries, preclinical research articles, articles where full texts were inaccessible, and those that had been published in a language other than English. From the results, the safety profile of the vibrating capsule suggests that the intervention is generally well-tolerated, with only mild and transient side effects or adverse events noted, including abdominal discomfort and sensations of mild vibration. However, the impact of these adverse events (although mild to moderate) on the efficacy of the capsule remains unknown, an area requiring further scholarly attention in the future. Concerning the efficacy of the intervention, most studies were found to affirm that the vibrating capsule enhances the physiologic effects of meals and waking on bowel movements, but the need for providers in clinical environments to note the interplay between the number of vibrations and the effectiveness of the capsule or onset of complete spontaneous bowel movements could not be overemphasized. In conclusion, this paper established that the vibrating capsule is an effective and promising technology through which constipated patients could be treated while experiencing minimal or no adverse events, but future research efforts ought to seek to uncover the interplay between the mechanism of action of the capsule and any moderating role played by factors internal or external to patients, including their emotional, mental, and psychological statuses, as well as the type and quantity of food consumed before and after the vibration sessions.

A recent meta-analysis suggests that probiotic supplementation is moderately efficacious in decreasing intestinal transit times compared with control, demonstrating probiotics\' potential for treating chronic idiopathic constipation. This decrease in intestinal transit times has been proposed to be attributed to the capacity of probiotics to alter the gastrointestinal microflora, improve intestinal motility, and alter biochemical factors. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the effectiveness of probiotics in patients with constipation. The search was performed using PubMed, PMC, and Medline databases. Relevant data were extracted and assessed for quality using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A random effects model and the I2 statistic were used to estimate the pooled prevalence and explore heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the experimental group and the placebo group. Sensitivity analysis was performed, and publication bias was explored. Our meta-analysis assessed probiotics \' efficacy in constipation management by incorporating a sample size comprising 1,243 patients drawn from 10 distinct studies. Subgroup analyses unveiled a heterogeneity of 95%, accompanied by a statistically significant analysis (p-value < 0.05) that unequivocally favored probiotics over placebo for treating constipation. These findings underscore the statistically significant effectiveness of probiotics for individuals with constipation. They support the imperative to fortify this body of evidence through robust, larger-scale RCTs to deepen our understanding of the manifold benefits probiotics confer in nurturing and sustaining optimal gut health.

UNASSIGNED: constipation affects up to 29.6% of children worldwide, making it one of the most common gastrointestinal illnesses in the pediatric population. As a functional disorder, the development of constipation is mostly influenced by a child´s psychosocial condition, even considered as one of important contributing factors. This systematic review aims to evaluate the relationship between psychological stress with constipation in the pediatric population.
UNASSIGNED: three online databases were searched as study sources, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Study selection was carried out using the PRISMA diagram. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were then included in the data extraction and synthesis. The study quality assessment was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s (JBI) critical appraisal checklist.
UNASSIGNED: eleven studies are included in this systematic review, consisting of four cross sectional studies, four case control studies and three cohort studies. The included studies have good quality based on the assessment. Majority of the studies showed a significant relationship between psychological stress and constipation in children. Psychological stress in children can be classified into family-related stressors, school-related stressors, exposure to stressful life events, stress related to psychological disorders, and other factors.
UNASSIGNED: psychological stress and burden are associated to constipation in children. To overcome functional constipation in children, a collaborative effort is required between parents, children, and the healthcare professional.

Based on existing systematic reviews and meta-analyse we conducted this comprehensive review to evaluate the quality, effectiveness, and bias of evidence regarding the relationship between probiotic intake and improved constipation outcomes in children. A total of nine meta-analyses and systematic reviews were extracted from 628 articles, summarizing seven effectiveness indicators and the incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment of constipation. According to the results, our study revealed that the intake of probiotics in children with FC significantly improved treatment success rate and defecation frequency, while decreased the recurrence rate of constipation. However, no significant association was detected between probiotics intake and frequency of abdominal pain, stool consistency, frequency of defecation pain, frequency of fecal incontinence of children with FC. The intake of probiotics did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions and demonstrated good safety.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics and synbiotics in childhood functional constipation.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were searched up to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials involving children diagnosed with FC with Rome III/IV criteria were included. Treatment success, defecation frequency, stool consistency, painful defecation, fecal incontinence, and adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous variables as appropriate. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 assessed the risk of bias.
Seventeen RCTs with 1504 patients were included. Compared to placebo, probiotics significantly improved defecation frequency (SMD 0.40, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.70, I2 = 0%) and fecal incontinence (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96, I2 = 0%). However, it did not significantly improve treatment success, painful defecation, and abdominal pain. Probiotics, as add-on therapy, failed to yield a significant difference in treatment success (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.15 to 4.48, I2 = 52%), defecation frequency (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.39, I2 = 0%), defecation consistency (SMD -0.01, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.38, I2 = 1%), fecal incontinence (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.90, I2 = 0%), and abdominal pain (OR, 0.60, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.53, I2 = 0%) versus laxatives monotherapy. Synbiotics plus laxatives showed no significant effect on defecation frequency (SMD -0.57; 95% CI -1.29 to 0.14, I2 = 74%) and painful defecation (OR, 3.39; 95% CI 0.74 to 15.55, I2 = 0%) versus laxatives alone.
Current evidence did not advocate using probiotics and synbiotics in treating functional constipation in children. At this time, the effects of strain-specific probiotics, probiotics mixtures, and the optimal doses and treatment durations of the probiotics and synbiotics were unclear. Additional rigorous evidence is required to evaluate and establish the effectiveness and safety of probiotics and synbiotics for childhood functional constipation.
CRD42020195869.

Chronic functional constipation is a common condition that can have a significant impact on a patient\'s quality of life and healthcare costs. Hydrostatic enemas are a commonly observed practice among patients with chronic constipation. Rectal perforation is a rare yet serious complication that can be fatal if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Here, we present the case of an elderly lady with Parkinson\'s disease who presented with upper rectal perforation after using a hydrostatic enema and was treated with Hartmann\'s procedure. This case highlights the importance of having a low threshold for suspecting and diagnosing colorectal perforation in patients presenting with abdominal pain after receiving a hydrostatic enema.

Chronic constipation is a challenging functional gastrointestinal disorder that remains a global burden. Pharmacologic therapy, including laxatives and dietary fibers, are suggested as lines of treatment. Recent trials introduced an orally ingested vibrating capsule (VC) as an eligible option for chronic constipation management.
We conducted a literature search in English on electronic databases CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and WOS until February 27th, 2023. RevMan was used to perform the meta-analysis. The results were reported as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID: (CRD42023409422).
Three RCTs with a total of 601 patients were included in our analysis. There was no difference between the VC and placebo in responder rate (RR: 1.37 with 95% CI [0.82, 2.28], p = .22), CSBM change from baseline (MD: 0.21 with 95% CI [-0.26, 0.69], p = .38), SBM change from baseline (MD: 0.14 with 95% CI [-0.22, 0.49], p = .46), and the incidence of any adverse event (RR: 1.45 with a 95% CI of [0.79, 2.63], p = .23). However, VC was associated with increased vibration sensation (RR: 17.23, 95% CI [3.29, 90.20], p = .0008).
VC was not effective to improve bowel movement in patients with functional constipation with no difference in response rate. However, evidence is still uncertain, with only three small RCTs that yielded heterogenous findings, mainly due to the different vibration protocols. Also, our findings suggest that VC is safe and well-tolerated, with no significant harmful effects observed. Therefore, more large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of VC in patients with functional constipation, determining the most effective dose, frequency, and duration of treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Functional constipation is one of the common disorders of gut-brain interaction in infancy, and decreases the quality of life of infants and parents.
UNASSIGNED: Relevant articles up to November 2022 were reviewed. We searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE for guidelines, position papers, reviews, and randomized controlled trials on infant constipation.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials in this specific age group are mostly limited to trials with infant formula. The prevalence of infant constipation in formula-fed infants is decreasing, and can be associated with adaptations in formula composition. While the supplementation of infant formula with pro-, pre- and/or synbiotics decreases the prevalence of constipation, their efficacy in constipated infants is disappointing. There is limited evidence to support the addition of magnesium to infant formula to treat constipation. The evidence for the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol in children < 2 years has expanded over the past years. The administration of lactulose or polyethylene glycol is the preferred medical management, in case nutritional management does result in insufficient improvement.