The use of proteasome inhibitors (PIs), new immune modulators (IMiDs), and other new drugs, as well as high-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation has considerably improved the survival of young patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, the improvement in survival among elderly patients remains insufficient. Optimal treatment recommendation models for elderly patients with MM have not been developed especially there are quite few study in the real world.
We retrospectively analyzed the treatment patterns and outcomes of 328 Chinese patients (≥65 years) with MM in a real-world setting. Patients were divided into three groups according to induction regimens.
The median age of the cohort was 70 (65-86) years. The patients were divided into group 1 (PIs based regimens, n = 218), group 2 (IMiDs based regimens, n = 48) and group 3 (PIs + IMiDs, n = 62). Induction regimens in group 3 produced higher overall response rate than group 1 and 2 (85.42% vs. 71.08% vs. 66.67%, p = 0.016). The median follow-up of the cohort was 30 (interquartile range [IQR] 18-36) months. For the entire cohort median progression-free survival (PFS) was 26 (IQR 12.00-42.89) months and overall survival (OS) was 60 (IQR 40.00-67.20) months. The PFS were not significantly different among the three groups (28 months vs. 18 months vs. 26 months, p = 0.182). So were the OS (60 months vs. 59 months vs. not reached, p = 0.067). Multivariate analysis revealed that age >70 year, frailty status (Geriatric vulnerability score), induction efficacy < partial remission, and no maintenance treatment were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.
Front-line induction regimens combining PIs and IMiDs developed more deep response than single PI or IMiD based regimens. Maintenance treatment can further improve the clinical outcome in elderly MM patients in real-world setting.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of TEMIRI as a front-line treatment in primary disseminated Ewing sarcoma (PDMES) using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The secondary objectives included the assessment of toxicity and the performance status/symptom changes.
METHODS: Between 2012 and 2018, patients with PDMES received two courses of temozolomide 100 mg/sqm/day + irinotecan 50 mg/sqm/day for 5 days every 3 weeks as an amendment to the Italian Sarcoma Group/Associazione Italiana EmatoIogia ed Oncologia Pediatrica (ISG/AIEOP) EW-2 protocol (EUDRACT#2009-012353-37, Vers. 1.02).
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 19 years (range 3-55). After TEMIRI, the RECIST response was as follows: a partial response in 20 (59%) patients, stable disease in 11 (32%), and disease progression in 3 (9%). The ECOG/Lansky score was improved in 25/34 (73.5%) cases, and a reduction or disappearance of pain was observed in 31/34 patients (91%). The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was 3%. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21% (95% CI 6-35%) and 36% (95% CI: 18-54%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: the smooth handling and encouraging activity demonstrated by up-front TEMIRI did not change the EFS in PDMES, so this result suggests the need for the further evaluation of the efficacy of TEMIRI in combination with conventional treatments in non-metastatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib-related peripheral neuropathy (PN) affects a relevant proportion of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with melphalan, prednisone, and bortezomib (VMP). Empirical dose modifications have attempted to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the dose-response and dose-toxicity relationships in 114 unselected untreated MM patients intended for treatment with VMP with subcutaneous bortezomib.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (54%) completed the 9 scheduled cycles. Median treatment duration was 48 weeks (range 1-57), cumulative bortezomib dose was 41.8 mg/m2 (2.6-67.6) and median dose intensity was 1.0 mg/m2 /wk (0.2-2.6). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the full cohort were 86 weeks (95%CI 77-104) and 209 weeks (95% CI 157-259) respectively. Patients who progressed <60 days after discontinuing bortezomib had received a significantly inferior mean cumulative dose, 34.6 mg/m2 than the remaining individuals, 45.5 (P = .023). PFS was significantly improved for patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) or better (P = .00007). Additional variables with a prognostic impact on PFS on univariate analysis included completion of the 9 scheduled cycles (P = .00002), patients with at least 50 weeks of treatment (P = .02) and patients receiving a cumulative dose of at least 49 mg/m2 (P = .05). Achievement of a VGPR (HR 0.23; 95%CI 0.12-0.46; P = .00002) and a cumulative dose of 49 mg/m2 (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.27-0.78; P = .003) were statistically independent prognostic factors for PFS. Toxicity-related treatment dose reductions occurred in 75 individuals (66%). PN was observed in 50 individuals (44.6%), grade 3 in 9 (8%). The only prognostic factor for emergence of PN in multivariate analysis was the presence of baseline PN.
CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly full-dose treatment in the first cycles has a major impact in depth of response. Depth of response, cumulative bortezomib dose, and treatment duration had an impact in prolongation of PFS.

This Phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine, bortezomib and rituximab in patients with previously untreated low-grade lymphoma. Eligible patients had low grade lymphoma with no previous systemic disease treatment. Treatment for all patients was given in 28-day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6; bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 2; and bortezomib 1·6 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15. Patients were permitted to begin maintenance treatment with rituximab 6 months after completion of study treatment and after 6-month follow-up assessments had been conducted. Fifty-four eligible patients were enrolled. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leucopenia (28%), neutropenia (30%) and lymphopenia (17%). There were no treatment-related deaths and 1 unrelated death on study (embolic stroke). The overall response rate was 94% for all patients. The median follow-up was 54 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival at 36 months were 75% and 88%, respectively. The treatment regimen was well tolerated and produced high response rates. Further study of this regimen in patients with previously untreated lymphoma is warranted.

BACKGROUND: About 75% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are more than 65 years at the time of diagnosis. Treatment of the elderly remains complicated due to multiple factors, such as comorbidities, decline in functional reserve and fitness. Since chronological age by itself cannot properly predict life expectancy and treatment tolerance, an accurate assessment of the fitness status is of crucial importance for an optimal treatment choice. Areas covered: This review will discuss the most relevant aspects concerning the issues experienced in the management of elderly/unfit patients with CLL. The most frequently observed age-related toxicities, fitness assessments, supportive care measures and treatment options for elderly patients and for patients who are deemed unfit will be discussed. Literature search methodology included examination of PubMed index. Expert commentary: During the last decade, different trials focusing on elderly/unfit patients have investigated more tolerable chemoimmunotherapy schedules and, more recently, the activity and safety of chemo-free regimens. Chlorambucil combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody has shown clinical activity with a relatively good profile of toxicity. The recent introduction of the B-cell receptor antagonists, ibrutinib and idelalisib, and other targeted drugs in development (e.g. venetoclax), is broadening the therapeutic armamentarium of elderly CLL patients.