Although many trials have evaluated the use of dehydroepiandrosterone to improve outcomes in poor responders undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment, evidence supporting this approach is controversial. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing published data to further elucidate and supplement the use of Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to improve the effectiveness of vitro fertilization in patients with diminished ovarian reserve or adverse ovarian reactions.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched through December 2020. Oocyte yield, metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were analyzed as relative outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed and fitted to both fixed-effects models and random-effects models.
Eight prospective randomized controlled studies, five prospective case-control studies, and three retrospective cohort studies were conducted with a total of 1998 participants. Meta-analyses of these studies showed a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved (WMD 1.09, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.80), metaphase II oocytes (WMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.40), fertilized oocytes (WMD 0.84, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.26), top-quality embryos (WMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.86), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.61), and ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.46), although there was no difference in live birth rate (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.94) in the DHEA supplementation groups compared with that in the control groups.
Oral DHEA supplementation appears to improve some IVF outcomes. On the basis of this limited evidence, we conclude that further studies are required to provide sufficient data.

Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from various wireless devices has increased dramatically with the advancement of technology. One of the most vulnerable organs to the RF-EMR is the testes. This is due to the fact that testicular tissues are more susceptible to oxidative stress due to a high rate of cell division and mitochondrial oxygen consumption. As a result of extensive cell proliferation, replication errors occur, resulting in DNA fragmentation in the sperm. While high oxygen consumption increases the level of oxidative phosphorylation by-products (free radicals) in the mitochondria. Furthermore, due to its inability to effectively dissipate excess heat, testes are also susceptible to thermal effects from RF-EMR exposure. As a result, people are concerned about its impact on male reproductive function. The aim of this article was to conduct a review of literature on the effects of RF-EMR emitted by wireless devices on male reproductive hormones in experimental animals and humans. According to the findings of the studies, RF-EMR emitted by mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices can cause testosterone reduction. However, the effect on gonadotrophic hormones (follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone) is inconclusive. These findings were influenced by several factors, which can influence energy absorption and the biological effect of RF-EMR. The effect of RF-EMR in the majority of animal and human studies appeared to be related to the duration of mobile phone use. Thus, limiting the use of wireless devices is recommended.

OBJECTIVE: Radioactive iodine (RAI) is frequently used as adjuvant therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, its effect on ovarian reserve has not been fully elucidated, with studies yielding inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the best available evidence regarding the effect of RAI on ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with DTC.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus, through to December 6th, 2020. Data were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Four prospective studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations decreased at three (WMD -1.66 ng/ml, 95% CI -2.42 to -0.91, p<0.0001; I2 0%), six (WMD -1.58, 95% CI -2.63 to -0.52, p=0.003; I2 54.7%) and 12 months (WMD -1.62 ng/ml, 95% CI -2.02 to -1.22, p<0.0001; I2 15.5%) following a single RAI dose compared with baseline (three studies; n=104). With respect to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations, no difference was observed at six (WMD +3.29 IU/l, 95% CI -1.12 to 7.70, p=0.14; I2 96.8%) and 12 months (WMD +0.13 IU/l, 95% CI -1.06 to 1.32, p=0.83; I2 55.2%) post-RAI compared with baseline (two studies; n=83). No data were available for antral follicle count.
CONCLUSIONS: AMH concentrations are decreased at three months and remain low at 6 and 12 months following RAI treatment in women with DTC. No difference in FSH concentrations post-RAI is observed.

BACKGROUND: Individualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials.
METHODS: We evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used.
RESULTS: Initially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%.