febrile infants

发热婴儿
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    发热婴儿有严重细菌感染(SBI)的风险,可能会危及生命。本研究旨在调查发热婴儿中延迟呈递与SBIs风险之间的关系。
    我们在2017年11月至2022年7月期间对新加坡儿科急诊科(ED)就诊的≤90天发热婴儿进行了前瞻性队列研究。我们将延迟呈现定义为从发烧开始>24小时到ED的呈现。我们比较了出现延迟的婴儿与没有出现延迟的婴儿的SBI比例,和他们的临床结果。我们还进行了多变量逻辑回归,以研究延迟呈现是否与SBI的存在独立相关。
    在分析的1911名发热婴儿中,198名婴儿(10%)出现延迟。出现延迟的发热婴儿更有可能患有SBIs(28.8%对[vs]16.3%,P<0.001)。延迟就诊的婴儿需要静脉注射抗生素的比例较高(64.1%vs51.9%,P=0.001)。在调整了年龄之后,性别和严重程度指数评分,延迟提示与SBI的存在独立相关(校正比值比[AOR]1.78,95%置信区间1.26~2.52,P<0.001).
    出现延迟的发热婴儿发生SBI的风险较高。一线临床医生在评估发热婴儿时应考虑到这一点。
    UNASSIGNED: Febrile young infants are at risk of serious bacterial infections (SBIs), which are potentially life-threatening. This study aims to investigate the association between delayed presentation and the risk of SBIs among febrile infants.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a prospective cohort study on febrile infants ≤90 days old presenting to a Singapore paediatric emergency department (ED) between November 2017 and July 2022. We defined delayed presentation as presentation to the ED >24 hours from fever onset. We compared the proportion of SBIs in infants who had delayed presentation compared to those without, and their clinical outcomes. We also performed a multivariable logistic regression to study if delayed presentation was independently associated with the presence of SBIs.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 1911 febrile infants analysed, 198 infants (10%) had delayed presentation. Febrile infants with delayed presentation were more likely to have SBIs (28.8% versus [vs] 16.3%, P<0.001). A higher proportion of infants with delayed presentation required intravenous antibiotics (64.1% vs 51.9%, P=0.001). After adjusting for age, sex and severity index score, delayed presentation was independently associated with the presence of SBI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.52, P<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Febrile infants with delayed presentation are at higher risk of SBI. Frontline clinicians should take this into account when assessing febrile infants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:年龄≤60天的发热婴儿的管理和对指南的依从性差异很大。我们的目的是描述管理≤60天的发热婴儿时的决策过程,并描述影响此决策的因素。
    方法:我们在斯科恩地区2所大学医院的儿科急诊科与19名临床活跃的医生进行了6次焦点小组讨论,瑞典。我们遵循了一个归纳的定性设计,使用现象学的方法。使用了二阶视角,专注于医生如何看待这种现象(控制婴儿发烧),而不是现象本身。使用7步方法分析转录的访谈。
    结果:进行腰椎穿刺(LP)被认为是一个复杂的,充满情感和精神的程序,并主导了小组讨论。三个主要类别是影响是否执行LP决策过程的因素:1)可能的感染重点可以解释发烧的起源,2)询问父母报告的家中温度是否发烧,尤其是当温度≤38.2℃时,3)婴儿的一般状况,并在出现良好的婴儿的情况下质疑需要LP。围绕这3个中心类别发展了6个次要类别,这些类别影响了是否执行LP的决策过程:1)医生希望能够信任他们的判断,2)害怕失败的风险,3)避免繁重的工作,4)考虑到他人,5)平衡指导方针和资源,和6)看到需要练习和学习执行LP。
    结论:执行LP的难度和情绪负荷是影响是否执行LP决策过程的重要因素。医生强调了能够依靠他们的临床判断并做出独立决定的重要性。指南可以考虑允许一定程度的灵活性和独立思考,以考虑患者的特征和需求。
    BACKGROUND: The management of febrile infants aged ≤ 60 days and adherence to guidelines vary greatly. Our objective was to describe the process of decision-making when managing febrile infants aged ≤ 60 days and to describe the factors that influenced this decision.
    METHODS: We conducted 6 focus group discussions with 19 clinically active physicians in the pediatric emergency departments of 2 university hospitals in Skåne region, Sweden. We followed an inductive qualitative design, using a phenomenological approach. A second-order perspective was used, focusing on how physicians perceived the phenomenon (managing fever in infants) rather than the phenomenon itself. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a 7-step approach.
    RESULTS: Performing a lumbar puncture (LP) was conceived as a complex, emotionally and mentally laden procedure and dominated the group discussions. Three central categories emerged as factors that influenced the decision-making process on whether to perform an LP: 1) a possible focus of infection that could explain the origin of the fever, 2) questioning whether the temperature at home reported by the parents was a fever, especially if it was ≤ 38.2°C, and 3) the infant\'s general condition and questioning the need for LP in case of well-appearing infants. Around these 3 central categories evolved 6 secondary categories that influenced the decision-making process of whether to perform an LP or not: 1) the physicians\' desire to be able to trust their judgement, 2) fearing the risk of failure, 3) avoiding burdensome work, 4) taking others into account, 5) balancing guidelines and resources, and 6) seeing a need to practice and learn to perform LP.
    CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty and emotional load of performing an LP were important factors that influenced the decision-making process regarding whether to perform an LP. Physicians highlighted the importance of being able to rely on their clinical judgment and make independent decisions. Guidelines may consider allowing a degree of flexibility and independent thinking to take into account patients\' characteristics and needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号