检查用于告知卫生政策的证据质量。外周静脉插管的政策被用作范例。
使用了组织案例研究设计，使用STROBE报告指南。
政策指南于2018年6月至9月期间从澳大利亚卫生部门获得。比较了七份关于静脉插管停留时间和血液收集使用的文件。使用牛津循证医学中心的评估指南对文件中使用的证据进行了批评。
关于血液采样和停留时间的策略之间存在很大差异。证据使用了各种来源。很少有参考文献获得A证据评级，并且对证据的解释不同。
To examine the quality of evidence used to inform health policies. Policies on peripheral intravenous cannulas were used as exemplars.
An organizational case study design was used, using the STROBE reporting
guidelines.
Policy
guidelines were sourced between June and September 2018 from health departments in Australia. Seven documents were compared regarding intravenous cannula dwell times and blood collection use. Evidence used in the documents was critiqued using assessment
guideline from the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.
Large variations exist between policies regarding blood sampling and dwell time. Evidence used a variety of sources. Few references received an A evidence rating and policies differed in their interpretation of evidence.
PDF(Sci-hub)