OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to understand the advances in radiomics in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer and assess the current status of radiomics in EGJ cancer.
METHODS: We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 18, 2012, to January 15, 2023, to identify radiomics articles related to EGJ cancer. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS) tool, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 120 articles were retrieved from the three databases, and after screening, only six papers met the inclusion criteria. These studies investigated the role of radiomics in differentiating adenocarcinoma from squamous carcinoma, diagnosing T-stage, evaluating HER2 overexpression, predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy, and prognosis in EGJ cancer. The median score percentage of RQS was 34.7% (range from 22.2% to 38.9%). The median score percentage of METRICS was 71.2% (range from 58.2% to 84.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a considerable difference between the RQS and METRICS scores of the included literature, we believe that the research value of radiomics in EGJ cancer has been revealed. In the future, while actively exploring more diagnostic, prognostic, and biological correlation studies in EGJ cancer, greater emphasis should be placed on the standardization and clinical application of radiomics.

In the past 40 years, the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer has been gradually increasing worldwide. Currently, surgical resection remains the main radical treatment for early gastric cancer. Due to the rise of functional preservation surgery, proximal gastrectomy has become an alternative to total gastrectomy for surgeons in Japan and South Korea. However, the methods of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy have not been fully unified. At present, the principal methods include esophagogastrostomy, double flap technique, jejunal interposition, and double tract reconstruction. Related studies have shown that double tract reconstruction has a good anti-reflux effect and improves postoperative nutritional prognosis, and it is expected to become a standard digestive tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. However, the optimal anastomoses mode in current double tract reconstruction is still controversial. This article aims to review the current status of double tract reconstruction and address the aforementioned issues.

In Germany and Western Europe, gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer are currently treated with (transhiatal-extended) total gastrectomy (TG) according to the latest treatment guidelines. TG leads to a severe and long-lasting impairment of postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treated patients. Recent studies have suggested that HRQoL of these patients could be improved by proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DTR) without compromising oncologic safety. Our aim is therefore to conduct a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing PG-DTR with TG in AEG II/III and gastric cancer patients with overall survival as primary endpoint and HRQoL as key secondary endpoint.
This protocol is written with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015) statement. We will conduct searches in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. We will also check references of relevant studies and perform a cited reference research. Titles and abstracts of the records identified by the searches will be screened, and full texts of all potentially relevant articles will be obtained. We will consider randomized trials and non-randomized studies. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias of the included studies will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration).
This systematic review will identify the current study pool concerning the comparison of TG and PG-DTR and help to finally refine the research questions and to allow an evidence-based trial design of the planned multicenter randomized-controlled trial.
Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Study findings will be shared by publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
PROSPERO CRD42021291500.

Incidence rates for esophagogastric junction cancer are rising rapidly worldwide possibly due to the economic development and demographic changes. Therefore, increased attention has been paid to the prevention, diagnosis, and the treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer. Although there are discrepancies in the treatment strategy between Asian and Western countries, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer. Recent developments of perioperative multidisciplinary treatment may lead to better therapeutic effect, higher complete resection rate, and better control of the residual diseases, thus result in prolonged prognosis. In this review, we will focus on the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophagogastric junction cancer, and discuss the current status and future perspectives of the perioperative treatment including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy, as well as the surgical strategy. Better understanding of the latest treatment strategy and future overlook may enable to standardize and individualize the treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer, thus leading to better prognosis for those patients.

BACKGROUND: Considerable controversies exist regarding the severity of skeletal muscle wasting (SMW) during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and its impact on therapeutic outcomes in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer (EC/EGJC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to resolve these issues. Particularly, the prognostic value of SMW during NAT was compared to pre-NAT and pre-surgery sarcopenia status.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through October 13th, 2021 to identify cohort studies focusing on SMW during NAT and therapeutic outcomes in EC/EGJC patients. Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were studied. A meta-analysis was conducted to quantify SMW and increased sarcopenia during NAT. Therapeutic outcomes include perioperative morbidities and survival profiles. A separate meta-analysis investigating the impacts of pre-NAT/pre-surgery sarcopenia on therapeutic outcomes was synchronously performed.
RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with 2706 participants were included in this review. The pooled SMW during NAT were -2.47 cm2/m2 in skeletal muscle index and -0.23 cm2/m2 in psoas muscle index, with wasting proportion reaching 4.44%. The pooled prevalence rate of sarcopenia increased from 53.1% before NAT to 65.8% before surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, advanced age, and being male were identified as risk factors for severe SMW during NAT. Notably, severe SMW during NAT showed a greater hazard ratio (HR) than pre-NAT and pre-surgery sarcopenia in predicting overall survival (HR 1.92, P < 0.001; HR 1.17, P = 0.036; and HR 1.28, P = 0.011, respectively) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.51, P = 0.002; HR 1.27, P = 0.008; and HR 1.38, P = 0.006, respectively). However, severe SMW during NAT was not significantly associated with perioperative morbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: SMW during NAT is a novel prognosticator that is different from sarcopenia for poor survival in EC/EGJC patients. Interventions aiming at maintaining skeletal muscle during NAT are anticipated to promote therapeutic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been defined as any preoperative chemotherapy scheme aiming to reduce tumor staging and to control preoperative micrometastasis, which has been extensively used as a treatment for resectable gastric cancer. However, its effect on the long-term survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) or esophagogastric junction cancer (EGC) remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at investigating the long-term efficacy of NAC in locally AGC/EGC.
METHODS: The following databases were searched for articles published from their inception up to April 2020: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: A total of 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 4,446 patients. The results showed that NAC increased the patients\' 3-year OS (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.21-0.91; P<0.001), 3-year PFS (HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.66-0.87; P<0.001), 5-year OS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.78; P<0.001), and 5-year PFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.79; P<0.001) respectively. Besides, subgroup analysis showed that Asian countries have benefited significantly from NAC (HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.55-0.74; P<0.001), and other countries have also benefited (HR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.68-0.89; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone, NAC can improve the long-term survival outcomes (OS and PFS) of patients with resectable AGC or EGC.

OBJECTIVE: Diaphragmatic herniation (DH) is a rare but potentially fatal event after total gastrectomy (TG). Despite being life-threatening, risk factors for postoperative DH have yet to be elucidated. We conducted a retrospective analysis to identify clinical characteristics of patients developing DH after TG, along with a comprehensive review of the published literature.
METHODS: Among 1361 consecutive patients undergoing TG for esophagogastric cancer between 1985 and 2013 in Toranomon Hospital, those requiring surgical intervention for postoperative DH were included. We also conducted a PubMed literature search on DH following TG.
RESULTS: Five patients (four males, one female), with a median age of 68 at DH surgery, were identified. Intervals between TG and DH repair ranged from 2.9 to 189.0 (median, 78.1) months. Four patients had needed emergency surgery. Three patients had undergone open TG and two others laparoscopic TG, suggesting a significantly higher incidence of DH after laparoscopic TG (3/1302 vs. 2/59, p = 0.017). The diaphragmatic crus incision, creating the space for esophagojejunostomy, had been performed in all cases. The literature yielded seven relevant publications (16 patients). Intervals between TG and DH reduction ranged from 2 days to 36 months. All operations for DH had been carried out emergently.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DH persisted after TG. DH is potentially a very late complication of TG, presenting as a surgical emergency. Laparoscopic TG was suggested to be a risk factor for postgastrectomy DH. Incising the crus might also be a predictor of DH. Measures to prevent DH, e.g., appropriate closure of the crus, would be recommended in minimally invasive TG.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of transhiatally extended gastrectomy (TEG) and thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) for therapy of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) with focus on AEG type II, as the optimal approach for these tumors is still unclear.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched until July 24, 2018. Studies comparing TAE and TEG for surgical treatment of AEG type tumors have been included. Patient\'s baseline and perioperative data have been extracted and meta-analyses have been conducted for the outcomes: number of dissected lymph nodes, R0-resection rate, anastomotic leak rate, postoperative morbidity, and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Of 6709 articles identified, 8 studies have been included for further analysis. One thousand thirty-four patients underwent TAE, and 1177 patients TEG. No differences were found between the approaches in regard to number of dissected lymph nodes (MD - 0.96; 95% CI - 3.07 to 1.15; p = 0.37), R0-resection rates (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.63; p = 0.90), anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.86; p = 0.63), and 30-day mortality (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.61; p = 0.11). However, a higher rate of postoperative morbidity was found after TAE (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.14; p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal approach to surgical therapy of AEG II still remains unclear. This study identified a significantly higher rate of postoperative morbidity after TAE at comparable surgical outcomes. Due to major limitations concerning the quality of included studies, current data strongly mandates a properly designed randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal surgical approach for AEG type II tumors.

The current study presents the case of a 72-year-old woman with a rapidly enlarged liver metastasis from esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, accompanied by progressive leukocytosis (47,680/µl) and elevated serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 779 pg/ml). The patient underwent right hemihepatectomy 26 months after a total gastrectomy. On the seventh post-operative day the patient\'s leukocyte count and serum G-CSF level decreased to 4,280/µl and ≤19.5 pg/ml, respectively. Histologically, the lesion was a well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma similar to the primary lesion. Therefore, this tumor was clinically diagnosed as a G-CSF-producing liver metastasis from EGJ cancer, although immunohistochemical staining for G-CSF was negative. A right pulmonary nodule detected simultaneously with the hepatic mass was resected four months following the hepatectomy and was diagnosed as a pulmonary metastasis. The patient\'s leukocyte count was normal at the time of her initial surgery for EGJ cancer, and her clinical course varied for different metastatic sites. The liver metastasis was accompanied by progressive leukocytosis and elevated serum G-CSF and demonstrated rapid tumor growth during a six-month period, whereas the non-G-CSF-producing pulmonary metastasis grew slowly during the same period. In addition 21 reported cases of G-CSF-producing upper gastrointestinal tract cancer were reviewed to elucidate the clinicopathological features of this disease.

Brain metastases originating from esophageal or gastric cancer are rare, accounting for 2.1-3.3% of all brain tumors registered in Japan. There are no established therapeutic measures for brain metastases, which accordingly have a poor prognosis. We present here a patient who survived for 5 years after surgery and gamma knife treatment of a cerebellar metastasis from esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The primary gastric cancer was treated by laparotomy with total gastrectomy, splenectomy, and D2 lymphadenectomy. It was diagnosed as a esophagogastric junction Siewert type II tumor, type 3, tub1-2, pT3 (SS), pN1, and stage IIB on histopathological examination of the surgical specimen. Five months postoperatively, a solitary cerebellar metastasis was identified and surgically removed, followed by 20 Gy administered by gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery; the patient received no subsequent treatment such as chemotherapy. Five years after the primary surgery, there have been no recurrences and the patient has a good quality of life. There are very few case reports of long-term survival after surgical treatment of cerebellar metastases from esophagogastric junction cancer. We report our experience and review published case reports of surgical treatment of brain metastases from gastric cancer.