epidermolysis bullosa acquisita

大疱性表皮松解症
  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    自身免疫性起泡疾病管理可能具有挑战性,因为治疗方式差异很大,并且没有单一的护理标准。我们合并了国际管理指南的建议,以便为医生提供最佳的管理建议。2019年11月在PubMed/MEDLINE中进行了全面的文献检索,以了解已发布的水疱疾病管理指南和共识声明。搜索术语包括“指南或指南”或“共识”和“类天疱疮”或“自身免疫性水疱病”或“大疱性表皮松解症”。我们纳入了已建立的皮肤病学会和专家共识小组的指南。我们排除了文献综述,由没有皮肤科医生的协会制定的指南,或特定于单一治疗的那些。考虑了所有语言的准则。选择了符合我们纳入标准的皮肤病学协会和共识组的11个指南。建议之间的几个差异,最值得注意的是什么时候为难治性疾病引入佐剂,在大疱性类天疱疮中发现。在粘膜类天疱疮中,治疗针对所涉及的部位,并使用全身性皮质类固醇和免疫抑制剂/生物制剂进行管理.对于大疱性表皮松解症的一线治疗尚无普遍共识,但是免疫抑制的组合,抗炎,使用抗中性粒细胞治疗。管理指南的比较显示,发展中国家的指南代表性不足,欧洲和亚洲的皮肤科医生之间的管理方式存在主要差异。我们将这些差异归因于指南之间经过的时间,地区差异,以及当地医疗系统的需求。
    Autoimmune blistering disease management can be challenging as treatment modalities vary greatly and no single standard of care exists. We consolidated the recommendations of international management guidelines in order to provide optimal management suggestions to physicians. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE for published blistering disease management guidelines and consensus statements was conducted in November 2019. Search terms included \"guideline or guidelines\" or \"consensus\" and \"pemphigoid\" or \"autoimmune blistering disease\" or \"epidermolysis bullosa acquisita\". We included guidelines from established dermatologic societies and expert consensus groups. We excluded literature reviews, guidelines established by an association without dermatologists, or those specific to a single treatment. Guidelines in all languages were considered. Eleven guidelines from dermatologic associations and consensus groups meeting our inclusion criteria were selected. Several differences between recommendations, most notably when to introduce adjuvants for refractory disease, were found in bullous pemphigoid. In mucous membrane pemphigoid, treatment was directed to the sites involved and managed with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants/biologics. There was no universal consensus on the first-line treatment for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, but a combination of immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-neutrophil therapy was utilized. Comparison of the management guidelines revealed underrepresentation of guidelines from developing nations and key differences between the management styles among dermatologists from Europe and Asia. We attribute these discrepancies to the time elapsed between guidelines, regional differences, and demands of the local healthcare systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    类天疱疮是一类自身免疫性表皮下起泡疾病,其中自身抗体线性沉积在表皮基底膜区(BMZ)。由免疫球蛋白G自身抗体介导的类天疱疮的主要亚型是大疱性类天疱疮(BP),粘膜类天疱疮(MMP)和大疱性表皮松解症(EBA)。建立日本皮肤病协会批准的第一个治疗天疱疮疾病的指南,天疱疮疾病(包括EBA)管理指南委员会是卫生部罕见难治性皮肤病研究小组的一部分,克服难治性疾病的劳动和福利研究项目。这些指南旨在为BP的管理提供最新信息,日本的MMP和EBA。根据证据,指南总结了临床和免疫学表现,病理生理学,诊断标准,疾病严重程度确定标准,治疗算法和治疗建议。由于这些疾病的罕见,很少有具有高度证据的临床研究,因此,这些准则的几个部分是根据委员会的意见制定的。为了进一步优化这些指南,根据新证据进行定期修订是必要的。
    The pemphigoid group is a category of autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases in which autoantibodies deposit linearly at the epidermal basement membrane zone (BMZ). The main subtypes of pemphigoid mediated by immunoglobulin G autoantibodies are bullous pemphigoid (BP), mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). To establish the first guidelines approved by the Japanese Dermatological Association for the management of pemphigoid diseases, the Committee for Guidelines for the Management of Pemphigoid Diseases (Including EBA) was founded as part of the Study Group for Rare Intractable Skin Diseases under the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Research Project on Overcoming Intractable Diseases. These guidelines aim to provide current information for the management of BP, MMP and EBA in Japan. Based on evidence, the guidelines summarize the clinical and immunological manifestations, pathophysiologies, diagnostic criteria, disease severity determination criteria, treatment algorithms and treatment recommendations. Because of the rarity of these diseases, there are few clinical studies with a high degree of evidence, so several parts of these guidelines were established based on the opinions of the Committee. To further optimize these guidelines, periodic revision in line with the new evidence is necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita are subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases whose antigenic target is located at the basement membrane zone. Mucous membrane pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita can evolve with cicatricial mucosal involvement, leading to respiratory, ocular and/or digestive sequelae with important morbidity. For each of these dermatoses, a literature review covering all therapeutic options was performed. A flowchart, based on the experience and joint discussion among the authors of this consensus, was constructed to provide treatment orientation for these diseases in Brazil. In summary, in the localized, low-risk or non-severe forms, drugs that have immunomodulatory action such as dapsone, doxycycline among others may be a therapeutic option. Topical treatment with corticosteroids or immunomodulators may also be used. Systemic corticosteroid therapy continues to be the treatment of choice for severe forms, especially those involving ocular, laryngeal-pharyngeal and/or esophageal mucosal involvement, as may occur in mucous membrane pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Several immunosuppressants are used as adjuvant alternatives. In severe and recalcitrant cases, intravenous immunoglobulin is an alternative that, while expensive, may be used. Immunobiological drugs such as rituximab are promising drugs in this area. Omalizumab has been used in bullous pemphigoid.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a complex autoimmune bullous disease disease with variable clinical presentations and multiple possible diagnostic tests, making an international consensus on the diagnosis of EBA essential.
    To obtain an international consensus on the clinical and diagnostic criteria for EBA.
    The International Bullous Diseases Group (IBDG) met three times to discuss the clinical and diagnostic criteria for EBA. For the final voting exercise, 22 experts from 14 different countries voted on 50 different items. When > 30% disagreed with a proposal, a discussion was held and re-voting carried out.
    In total, 48 of 50 proposals achieved consensus after discussion. This included nine diagnostic criteria, which are summarized in a flow chart. The IBDG was unable to determine one procedure that would be applicable worldwide. A limitation of the study is that differential diagnosis of bullous systemic lupus erythematosus has not been addressed.
    This first international consensus conference established generally agreed-upon clinical and laboratory criteria defining the clinical classification of and diagnostic testing for EBA. Holding these voting exercises in person with the possibility of discussion prior to voting has advantages in reaching consensus over Delphi exercises with remote voting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号