Ependymoma occurring at the cerebellopontine (CP) angle is an extremely uncommon sight and poses diagnostic and management dilemmas to neurosurgeons, radiologists, and neuropathologists alike. Moreover, the presence of extensive chondro-osseous metaplastic elements in ependymomas is an exceptionally infrequent histopathological manifestation. However, due to the seldom-seen nature of this histomorphological feature, there is no definite consensus regarding its etiopathogenesis and clinical consequences, and there is an extreme scarcity of literature elucidating its clinicopathological spectrum and prognostic significance. Herein, we illustrate an intriguing clinical tale of a 7-year-old male child with posterior fossa ependymoma, central nervous system (CNS) World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3, arising at the right CP angle and masquerading as a vestibular schwannoma, which in itself is a rare presentation, and additionally, exhibiting extensive chondro-osseous metaplasia, which is a very uncommon histomorphological observation. To the best of the authors\' knowledge and after a comprehensive literature search, the coexistence of these two rare observations has merely been described once in international literature. This case sheds light on and highlights the importance of keeping ependymoma as a possible differential while coming across CP angle space-occupying lesions. They should be diligently distinguished from schwannomas and other masqueraders that typically occur at this site, as they have diverse management and follow-up protocols, with varying prognostic outcomes for the patients. Moreover, this case also unravels and details the clinicopathological characteristics of a scarcely described feature of chondro-osseous metaplasia in ependymomas.

OBJECTIVE: Ependymomas are the third most common brain tumors in children. Standard of care is surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. Controversy in the literature still exists over optimal radiation therapy dose. We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the optimal dose for local control (LC), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in pediatric patients.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science through January 2024. We included cohort studies that compared adjuvant radiation therapy of ≤54 Gy with >54 Gy in pediatric patients (≤22 years) with nonmetastatic intracranial ependymomas. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale of Cohort Studies. We pooled studies using a random effects meta-analysis for hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and assessed statistical heterogeneity via I2. When HRs were unavailable, we transformed risks using established methods. We narratively summarized qualitative outcomes.
RESULTS: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, covering a combined 1321 patients. Studies included a range of doses from 45 to 66.6 Gy. Compared with >54 Gy, we found no difference in LC for those receiving ≤54 Gy (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.24; I2, 49.1%), in EFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.09; I2, 0.00%), and OS (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82-1.20; I2, 37.5%). Two studies reported on subtotal resection by radiation therapy dose, neither study reporting statistical differences in LC, EFS, or OS, although the number of patients was small (n ≤ 30). Five studies reported on late effects, with brainstem radionecrosis, radiation-induced vasculopathy, and secondary tumors being the most frequent. Overall study quality was high, although lower scores were consistently seen in comparability of cohorts. To our knowledge, no studies reported on molecular subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in LC, EFS, or OS for those treated with ≤54 Gy compared with >54 Gy. There were insufficient data to complete a subgroup meta-analysis on radiation therapy dosing based on extent of resection or molecular subgroups.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after gross total resection (GTR) of the World Health Organization (WHO) grade II ependymoma is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the outcomes of adjuvant RT against observation after GTR of WHO grade II ependymoma. We also compared the outcomes of adjuvant RT against observation after subtotal resection (STR) of WHO grade II ependymoma and performed further subgroup analysis by age and tumor location.
METHODS: PubMed and Embase were systematically reviewed for studies published up till 25 November 2022. Studies that reported individual-participant data on patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant RT/observation for WHO grade II ependymoma were included. The exposure was whether adjuvant RT was administered, and the outcomes were recurrence and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed by the extent of resection (GTR or STR), tumor location (supratentorial or infratentorial), and age at the first surgery (<18 or ≥18 years old).
RESULTS: Of the 4,647 studies screened, three studies reporting a total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Of these 37 patients, 67.6% (25 patients) underwent GTR, and 51.4% (19 patients) underwent adjuvant RT. Adjuvant RT after GTR was not significantly associated with both recurrence (odds ratio =5.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.64-60.80; P=0.12) and OS (P=0.16). Adjuvant RT was also not significantly associated with both recurrence and OS when the cohort was analyzed as a whole and on subgroup analysis by age and tumor location. However, adjuvant RT was associated with significantly longer OS after STR (P=0.03) with the median OS being 6.33 years, as compared to 0.40 years for patients who underwent STR followed by observation.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our meta-analysis of 37 patients, administration of adjuvant RT after GTR was not significantly associated with improvement in OS or recurrence in patients with WHO grade II ependymoma. However, due to the small number of patients included in the analysis, further prospective controlled studies are warranted.

BACKGROUND: Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CENETs), previously described as cauda equina paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare and well-vascularized benign entities which can be often misdiagnosed with other intradural tumors more common in this anatomical site, such as ependymomas and neurinomas. We describe three cases of CENETs observed at our institution with particular focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management. Since the lack of guidelines, we performed a literature review to identify factors that can predict recurrence and influence postoperative decision making.
BACKGROUND: We report on three patients, two of them presenting with a clinical history of lower back pain and sciatica. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine with and without Gd-DTPA revealed an intradural lesion with strong contrast enhancement, first described as atypical ependymoma or schwannoma. A complete tumor resection was achieved in all cases, the histopathological diagnosis classified the tumors as CENETs. In our literature review, a total of 688 articles were screened and 162 patients were included. Patients demographic data, clinical symptoms, resection and recurrence were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Differential diagnosis between CENETs and other more common tumors affecting cauda equina region, such as ependymomas or schwannomas (neurinomas), is still very challenging. Due to the lack of specific clinical or radiological characteristics, a correct preoperative diagnosis is almost impossible. With this paper we want to point out that CENETs must be considered in the differential diagnosis, most of all in case of entities with atypical radiological features. According to the literature, tumor recurrence after gross total resection is unlikely, while a long-term follow-up is recommended in case of subtotal resection or local aggressive behavior.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) are a rare subgroup of neoplasms, encompassing both benign, slow-growing masses, and malignant lesions; radical surgical excision represents the cornerstone of treatment for such pathologies regardless of histopathology, which, on the other hand, is a known predictor of survival and neurologic outcome postsurgery. The present study aims to investigate the relevance of other factors in predicting survival and long-term functional outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a review of current literature on functional outcomes of IMSCTs, as well as a 10-years prospective analysis of a wide cohort of patients with diagnosis of IMSCTs who underwent surgical resection at our institution.
RESULTS: Our series encompasses 60 patients with IMSCTS, among which 36 ependymomas, 6 cavernous angiomas, 5 hemangioblastomas, 6 WHO Grade I-IV astrocytomas, 3 intramedullary spinal metastases and 4 miscellaneous tumors. GTR was achieved in 76,67% of patients, with high preoperative McCormick grade, syringomyelia and changes at neurophysiologic monitoring being the strongest predictors at multivariate analysis (P = 0.0027, P = 0.0017 and P = 0.001 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Consistently with literature, preoperative neurologic function is the most important factor predicting long-term functional outcome (0.17, CI 0.069-0.57 with P = 0.0018), advocating for early surgery in the management of IMSCTs, whereas late complications such as myelopathy and neuropathic pain were present regardless of preoperative function.

Ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor types with respect to age distribution, (epi)genetics, localization, and prognosis. Multimodal risk-stratification, including histopathological and molecular features, is essential in these biologically defined tumor types. Gross total resection (GTR), achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation, and if necessary, second-look surgery, is the most effective treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is mandatory in high-risk tumors and in case of residual tumor. There is yet growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone. To date, the role of chemotherapy is unclear and subject of current studies.Even though standard therapy can achieve reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients, long-term follow-up still reveals a high probability of relapse in certain biological entities.With increasing knowledge of biologically distinct tumor types, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy gains importance. Beyond initial tumor control, and avoidance of therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients, intensified treatment for high-risk patients comprises another challenge. With identification of specific risk features regarding molecular alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.

OBJECTIVE: More than one-third of pediatric patients who undergo resection of intradural spine lesions develop progressive postoperative deformity, with as many as half of these patients subsequently requiring surgical fusion. Intradural spinal procedures with simultaneous instrumented fusion in children, however, are infrequently performed. Moreover, the rationale for patient selection, outcomes, and safety of this single-stage surgery in children has not been systematically investigated. In this study, the authors review the practice of simultaneous intradural spinal resection and instrumented fusion in pediatric patients and provide two representative case examples from their institution.
METHODS: The authors searched the PubMed and Embase databases and performed a systematic review following the PRISMA protocol. Original articles of pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent intradural spine surgery, regardless of pathology, with concomitant instrumented fusion and reported outcomes were included. An institutional database of all spinal operations with instrumented fusion performed in patients aged ≤ 18 years over a 3-year period was screened to identify those who underwent intradural spine surgery with concomitant fusion.
RESULTS: Nine patients (median age 12 years) from 6 studies who underwent intradural lesion resection and concomitant fusion met inclusion criteria. Among all 11 patients included, primary rationales for concomitant fusion were extensive bone removal (i.e., corpectomy or total facetectomy, 73%), concerns for deformity in the setting of multilevel laminectomy/laminoplasty (18%), and severe baseline deformity (9%). The most represented pathology was neurenteric cyst (55%) followed by schwannoma (18%). Myxopapillary ependymoma, granular cell tumor, and pilocytic astrocytoma each were seen in 1 case. Seven patients (64%) underwent an anterior-approach corpectomy, tumor resection, and fusion, while the remaining 4 patients (36%) underwent a posterior approach. All patients with at least 1 year of follow-up cases achieved bony fusion. CSF leak and new-onset neurological deficit each occurred in 9% (1/11).
CONCLUSIONS: The rationales for performing single-stage intradural resection and fusion in pediatric patients in studies to date include the presence of severe baseline deformity, large extent of bone resection, and multilevel laminectomy/laminoplasty across cervicothoracic or thoracolumbar junctions. As current literature involving this cohort is limited, more data are needed to determine when concomitant fusion in intradural resections is appropriate in pediatric patients and whether its routine implementation is safe or beneficial.

BACKGROUND: Ependymomas are the third most common central nervous system tumor in the pediatric population; however, spinal ependymomas in children are rare. Ependymomas affecting the spinal cord most frequently occur in adults of 20-40 years of age. The current World Health Organization classification system for ependymomas is now composed of ten different entities based on histopathology, location, and molecular studies, with evidence that the new classification system more accurately predicts clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We present the case of a 16-year-old Caucasian female patient with a history of type 2 neurofibromatosis with multiple schwannomas, meningioma, and spinal ependymoma. Chromosome analysis of the harvested spinal ependymoma tumor sample revealed a 46,XX,-6,+7,-22,+mar[16]/46,XX[4] karyotype. Subsequent OncoScan microarray analysis of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sample confirmed + 7, -22 and clarified that the marker chromosome represents chromothripsis of the entire chromosome 6 with more than 100 breakpoints. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and microarray analysis showed no evidence of MYCN amplification. The final integrated pathology diagnosis was spinal ependymoma (central nervous system World Health Organization grade 2 with no MYCN amplification.
CONCLUSIONS: This case adds to the existing literature of pediatric patients with spinal ependymomas and expands the cytogenetic findings that may be seen in patients with this tumor type. This case also highlights the value of cytogenetics and microarray analysis in solid tumors to provide a more accurate molecular diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation.
METHODS: A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies.
RESULTS: Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46).
CONCLUSIONS: Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.