Environmental flow (e-flow) is the water demand of one given ecosystem, which can become the flow regulation target for protection and restoration of river or estuarine ecosystems. In this study, an e-flow assessment based on the flow-ecological health index (EHI) relation model was conducted to improve ecosystem health of the Yangtze River Estuary (YRE). Monitoring data of hydrology, biology, and water environment in the last decades were used for the model establishment. For the description of the YRE ecosystem, an EHI system was developed by cumulative frequency distribution curves and adaption of national standards. After preprocessing original flow values into proportional flow values, the generalized additive model and Monte Carlo random sampling were used for the establishment of the flow-EHI relation model. From the model calculation, the e-flow assessment results were that, in proportional flow values, the suitable flow range was 1.05-1.35, and the optimum flow range was 1.15-1.25 (flows in Yangtze River Datong Station). For flow regulation in two crucial periods, flows of 42,630-65,545 m3/s or over 14,675 m3/s are needed for the suitable flow of YRE in summer (June-August) or January, respectively. An adaptive management framework of ecological health-based estuarine e-flow assessment for YRE was contrived due to the limitation of current established model when facing the extreme drought in summer, 2022. The methodology and framework in this study are expected to provide valuable management and data support for the sustainable development of estuarine ecosystems and to bring inspiration for further studies at even continental or global levels.

Water withdrawal from rivers is a key resource for agriculture, industry, and power generation. However, in order to maintain riverine ecosystem, withdrawal should not exceed certain thresholds, and normally a requirement is made that a certain amount of water be left in the river, to be assessed via Environmental Flow Assessment (EFA) procedure. In spite of the crucial importance of this task, little or no international standard exists to assess minimum values of the EF. Rather, general guidelines are provided, with large subjectivity entailed. Here, focusing on the case study Kumbih river, in Sumatra, Indonesia, we apply a multiple criteria approach to EFA procedure, testing the values of EF assessed with hydrological methods in a previous study, with a focus on a relevant target species, i.e. the fish Tor Soro. Based upon a two-dimensional hydraulic model, we explore 6 indicators, covering some most important criteria to ensure the welfare of the fish fauna. Indicator II, weighed usable volume, slightly modifies the well-known method PHABSIM. Indicators IIi.IIIII target water depth needed to ensure welfare of target species, whereas criteria IIV-VI target flow velocity, and sediment removal. Use of multiple indicators as shown here, albeit still subjective, may provide more consistent values of EF, and even an outlook of the disparity in terms of flow requirements given by the several criteria. Here we found that the maximum estimated EF under IV (flow velocity), is over twice as large as the flow estimate from II. Overall however, initial EF estimates from the hydrological criterion seem adequate against the criteria proposed. Our study is among the few covering EF for Indonesia, and the only one regarding Kumbih river, and our results are of interest, also as a benchmark for other EFA studies in the region.

Environmental flow is vital for maintaining river ecosystem health and ensuring the normal growth of aquatic organisms. The wetted perimeter method is indeed very useful in the assessment of environmental flow due to consideration of stream forms and minimum flow for aquatic life habitat. In this study, a river with obvious seasonality and external water diversion was selected as the typical research object; taking Jingle, Lancun, Fenhe Reservoir, and Yitang hydrological sections as control sections, we improved the existing wetted perimeter method in three aspects: (1) We improved the selection of hydrological data series. The selected hydrological data series should be of a certain length and can well reflect the hydrological changes of wet, normal, and dry years. (2) Different from the traditional wetted perimeter method, which only gives one environmental flow value, the improved method calculates the environmental flow month by month. (3) The improved wetted perimeter method establishes the relationship between native fish survival and environmental flow. Results indicated that the improved wetted perimeter took the survival of the main fishes into consideration, the ratio of the calculated results by the slope method to the multi year average flow was greater than 10%, which can ensure the fishes\' habitat is not being destroyed, and the results are more reasonable. Furthermore, the monthly environmental flow processes obtained were better than the annual unified environmental flow value determined by the existing method and are consistent with the natural hydrological situation and water diversion situation of the river. This study shows that the improved wetted perimeter method is feasible for research of river environmental flow with strong seasonal and large variation of annual flow.

Hydropower construction and climate change have aggravated river hydrological changes, which have reduced the water flow regime in the Ruhe River Basin. The reduced flow of the river seriously affected the water supply of nearby residents and the operation of the river ecosystem. Therefore, in order to alleviate the contradiction between water use for hydropower facilities and environmental water use, the urgent need is to explore the ecological flow-threshold of rivers. This study took the Fuhe River Basin as the research object, and summarized the monitoring data of eight hydrological stations from recent decades. Based on this, we explored the response law of P-IBI and flow, a tool to quickly measure the health of the ecosystem. Through the response relationship between alterations in environmental factors of the river and phytoplankton index of biotic integrity (P-IBI), it was determined that environmental flow was the dominant influencing factor of P-IBI. According to P-IBI, the threshold of environmental discharge in the Fuhe River was limited to 273~826.8 m3/s. This study established a regulatory framework for the river flow of large rivers by constructing P-IBI and determining the critical thresholds of environmental flow by constraining the constitution. These results provide a theoretical basis for better planning and improvement of river ecosystem restoration and river utilization.

This paper focuses on the environmental flow assessment (EFA) methods that maintain the river ecosystem and its integrity for hydropower plants (HPP) with their implementations on a run-off river type HPP. EFA is a crucial phenomenon in terms of electricity production and sustaining river integrity simultaneously. The novelty of this study is that it consists both a comparison of widely used preferred EFA methods and a detailed investigation of the river with pre and post-dam flow regimes. The research shows that by expanding the content and scope of the methods, their relative reliabilities increase. However, this situation requires much more expert, money, and time. Apart from most of the relevant literature, pre and post-dam situations are investigated with a flow duration curve (FDC). It is concluded that the dramatic difference between the flow characteristics of pre and post-dam situations affects long-term aquatic life. Furthermore, a case study is conducted using the selected hydrological flow assessment methods, Tennant and Tessman methods, and comparisons are made. The calculated flows are compared with monthly average flow values before dam construction, projected environmental flow data, and the current situation. Accordingly, Tennant\'s \"good classification\" is proposed to determine the environmental flow (EF) for the considered case study.