背景:探讨椭球区(EZ)相关角度参数对原发性黄斑裂孔手术结果的预测价值。
方法:这是一项回顾性研究。纳入2018年至2021年诊断为大黄斑裂孔(MH)(最小直径>500μm)的患者。所有患者都接受了25号平面玻璃体切除术,内部限制膜(ILM)剥离和空气填塞。术前和术后2周测量频域OCT(SD-OCT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。通过ImageJ测量经典和角度相关参数。角度规则性(AR)定义为垂直和水平方向的角度参数的标准偏差。
结果:纳入76只眼进行分析;24只眼在术后2周显示未闭合的黄斑裂孔,52只眼显示闭合的黄斑裂孔。术前,MLD(P<0.001),初次手术后未能闭合孔的患者的BD(P=0.009)和EZ/ELM破裂直径(P=0.002和0.025)明显大于成功的患者。EZ-MH(P=0.018),EZ-NFL(P=0.006),EZ-GCL(P=0.004),EZ-INL(P=0.002),EZ-OPL(P=0.009)和EZ-ONL(P=0.011)角均小于未闭合孔患者。EZ-NFL的AR(P=0.009),EZ-GCL(P=0.009),EZ-OPL(P=0.023),未闭合患者的EZ-ONL(P=0.048)和Basal-NFL(P=0.030)角度明显大于闭合组。EZ-NFL(P=0.015),EZ-GCL(P=0.004),EZ-INL(P<0.001),EZ-OPL(P<0.001),EZ-ONL(P<0.001),未闭孔患者的基底角度(P=0.023)和基底NFL角度(P<0.001)在手术后明显增大。
结论:黄斑裂孔大,EZ相关角度和AR角度增加的患者在原发性MH手术后更有可能出现不成功的结果。因此,与EZ相关的角度可能是预测手术结果的有价值的参数。
BACKGROUND: To explore the predictive value of Ellipsoid Zone (EZ) -related angle parameters for the outcome of primary macular hole surgery.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with large macular hole (MH) (minimum diameter > 500 μm) between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled. All patients underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and air tamponade. Spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured in preoperative and 2-week post-operative. Classic and angle related parameters were measured via ImageJ. Angle regularity (AR) were defined as the standard deviation of the angle parameters in vertical and horizontal direction.
RESULTS: Seventy-six eyes were included for analysis; 24 eyes showed an unclosed macular hole at the 2-week postoperative and 52 eyes showed a closed hole. Preoperatively, MLD (P < 0.001), BD (P = 0.009) and diameter of EZ/ELM disruption (P = 0.002 and 0.025) in patients failed to close the hole after primary surgery were significantly larger than those succeeded. EZ-MH (P = 0.018), EZ-NFL (P = 0.006), EZ-GCL (P = 0.004), EZ-INL (P = 0.002), EZ-OPL (P = 0.009) and EZ-ONL (P = 0.011) angles were smaller in patients with unclosed hole. AR of the EZ-NFL (P = 0.009), EZ-GCL (P = 0.009), EZ-OPL (P = 0.023), EZ-ONL (P = 0.048) and Basal-NFL (P = 0.030) angles among the unclosed patients were significantly larger than those of the closed group. EZ-NFL (P = 0.015), EZ-GCL (P = 0.004), EZ-INL (P < 0.001), EZ-OPL (P < 0.001), EZ-ONL (P < 0.001), Basal (P = 0.023) and Basal-NFL (P < 0.001) angles of hole-unclosed patients enlarged significantly after the surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large macular holes and an increased EZ-related angle and angle AR are more likely to experience unsuccessful outcomes following primary MH surgery. Therefore, EZ-related angles hold potential as valuable parameters for predicting the surgical outcome.