electrocochleography

耳蜗电图
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    这项系统评价的目的是比较内淋巴积水(EH)磁共振成像(MRI)与听前庭功能检查的诊断价值,包括电子耳蜗造影(ECochG),宫颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)和热量测试可诊断明确的梅尼埃病(DMD)。在PubMed中进行了电子搜索,Embase和Cochrane数据库将于2022年8月发布。原始研究报道了钆MRI诊断DMD的功效,并将其与ECochG进行了比较。2007年至2022年的cVEMP和热量测试以英文出版。两名评审员提取了MRI和功能测试的方法和结果,独立评估。诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)的修订版用于评估每个研究的质量和偏倚风险。计算通过MRI积液诊断的DMD病例与相应功能测试的比例,并使用CohenKappa检验评估MRI与功能测试之间的关系。关于核磁共振,耳蜗EH诊断DMD的比例为0.67,前庭EH诊断为0.80-0.82。关于功能测试,ECochG对DMD的诊断率为0.48,cVEMP为0.76,热量测试为0.65。这项系统评价的发现是,前庭EH在影像学上最有效地辅助诊断DMD。在功能测试中,cVEMP是第二有效的测试。影像学和cVEMP之间的一致性是中等的(0.44),表明通过影像学和功能测试确定的患者之间的差距,基于相对较少的患者数量。
    The objective of this systematic review is to compare the diagnostic value of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with audiovestibular function tests, including electro cochleography (ECochG), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and caloric tests for the diagnosis of definite Meniere\'s disease (DMD). An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases in August 2022. Original studies which reported the efficacy of gadolinium MRI for diagnosis of DMD were compared with ECochG, cVEMP and caloric tests from 2007 to 2022 published in English. Two reviewers extracted the methodology and results of MRI and functional tests, assessing them independently. A modified version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used for the assessment of the quality and the risk of bias of each study. The proportion of DMD cases diagnosed by MRI hydrops vs corresponding functional tests were calculated and the relationship between MRI and functional tests were evaluated using the Cohen\'s Kappa test. Concerning the MRI, the proportion diagnostic of DMD was 0.67 by cochlear EH and 0.80-0.82 by vestibular EH. Regarding the functional test, the propotiojn diagnostic of DMD was 0.48 by ECochG, 0.76 by cVEMP and 0.65 by caloric test. The findings of this systematic review were that the vestibular EH on imaging most effectively assisted in diagnosing DMD. Among the functional tests, cVEMP was the second most effective test. The agreement between imaging and cVEMP was moderate (0.44), indicating a gap between the patients identified by the imaging and functional tests based on the relatively small number of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1) Objectives: This study reviews the use of electrocochleography (ECoG) as a tool for assessing the response of the peripheral auditory system and monitoring hearing preservation in the growing population of cochlear implant (CI) users with preserved hearing in the implanted ear. (2) Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL databases up to August 2020 to locate articles related to the ECoG measured during or after the cochlear implant (CI) surgery for monitoring purposes. Non-English articles, animal studies, literature reviews and editorials, case reports, and conference papers were excluded. The quality of studies was evaluated using the National Institute of Health (NIH) \"Study Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies\". (3) Results: A total 30 articles were included for the systematic review. A total of 21 articles were intraoperative ECoG studies, while seven articles were postoperative studies. Two studies were conducted ECoG both during and after the surgery. Intraoperative ECoG studies focused on monitoring changes in ECoG response amplitudes during and/or after electrode insertion and predicting the scalar location of the electrode array. Postoperative ECoG studies focused on using the ECoG measurements to estimate behavioral audiometric thresholds and monitor pathophysiological changes related to delayed onset hearing loss postimplant. (4) Conclusions: ECoG is feasible to provide real-time feedback intraoperatively and has a potential clinical value to monitor the status of hearing preservation postoperatively in this CI population with residual acoustic hearing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: Determine whether a combination of electrocochleography determined summating/action potential (SP/AP) ratio and other audiological measurements has greater sensitivity and specificity than that achieved with electrocochleography SP/AP ratio alone in diagnosing definite Ménière\'s Disease. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Study sample: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using search terms \"electrocochleography\", \"ECochG, ,\"ECoG\", \"Ménière\'s Disease\", and \"Idiopathic Endolymphatic Hydrops\". Inclusion criteria were extratympanic electrocochleography methodology, English language publication between January 2002 and December 2017, and the 1995 American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Ménière\'s disease diagnostic criteria. Five articles satisfied inclusion criteria and were sufficiently detailed for aggregate quantitative analysis of SP/AP ratio (315 subjects) and combination audiological measures (113 subjects). Results: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the SP/AP amplitude ratio was 47.6% and 83.8% and of combination diagnostic measures 63.5% and 89.3%, respectively. Point estimates of sensitivity (p = 0.248) and specificity (p = 0.969) and the summary Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (p = 0.407) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Statistically, combination diagnostic measures do not result in greater accuracy of definite Ménière\'s disease diagnosis compared to the SP/AP amplitude ratio alone. However, given the small sample size further studies are recommended to arrive at a definitive conclusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Electrocochleography (EcochG), incorporating the Cochlear Microphonic (CM), the Summating Potential (SP), and the cochlear Compound Action Potential (CAP), has been used to study cochlear function in humans and experimental animals since the 1930s, providing a simple objective tool to assess both hair cell (HC) and nerve sensitivity. The vestibular equivalent of ECochG, termed here Electrovestibulography (EVestG), incorporates responses of the vestibular HCs and nerve. Few research groups have utilized EVestG to study vestibular function. Arguably, this is because stimulating the cochlea in isolation with sound is a trivial matter, whereas stimulating the vestibular system in isolation requires significantly more technical effort. That is, the vestibular system is sensitive to both high-level sound and bone-conducted vibrations, but so is the cochlea, and gross electrical responses of the inner ear to such stimuli can be difficult to interpret. Fortunately, several simple techniques can be employed to isolate vestibular electrical responses. Here, we review the literature underpinning gross vestibular nerve and HC responses, and we discuss the nomenclature used in this field. We also discuss techniques for recording EVestG in experimental animals and humans and highlight how EVestG is furthering our understanding of the vestibular system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号