early detection of cancer

癌症的早期检测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查男性前列腺癌的终生风险。
    方法:在2015年9月至2020年6月期间,在G_TEBORG-2试验中邀请男性进行前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的调查研究。
    方法:哥德堡地区的38775名男性,瑞典,被邀请进行PSA测试并参与了一项调查。
    方法:17980名男性参加了PSA测试,其中13189人完成了调查。此外,1264名男性仅回答了调查。
    方法:在进行PSA测试之前,男性回答了一项电子调查,并以视觉模拟量表估计他们接受前列腺癌诊断的终生风险为0%至100%。
    方法:主要结果是中位终生风险估计,与Wilcoxon检验相比,预期终生风险为20%(基于G_TEBORG-1试验).次要结果是在多变量线性回归模型中确定与风险估计相关的因素:先前的前列腺检查,家族史,体育锻炼,健康饮食,合并症,酒精消费,吸烟,教育水平,婚姻状况,泌尿症状和勃起功能障碍。
    结果:在PSA测试的男性中,估计前列腺癌的终生风险中位数为30%(IQR19%至50%),与预期风险相比,估计高出10个百分点(p<0.001)。前列腺癌家族史,中度至重度泌尿系症状和轻度至中度勃起功能障碍与>5个百分点的高风险估计相关.对于未经PSA测试的男性也获得了类似的结果。
    结论:大多数男性高估了他们的前列腺癌风险,这强调了向他们提供关于前列腺癌的准确信息的重要性。
    背景:ISRCTN94604465。
    OBJECTIVE: Investigating men\'s perceived lifetime risk of prostate cancer.
    METHODS: Survey-based study to men invited for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in the GÖTEBORG-2 trial between September 2015 and June 2020.
    METHODS: 38 775 men in the Gothenburg area, Sweden, were invited for PSA-testing and participated in a survey.
    METHODS: 17 980 men participated in PSA-testing, of whom 13 189 completed the survey. In addition, 1264 men answered the survey only.
    METHODS: Before having the PSA-test, men answered an electronic survey and estimated their lifetime risk of receiving a prostate cancer diagnosis on a visual analogue scale from 0% to 100%.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was the median lifetime risk estimation, which was compared with Wilcoxon test to an anticipated lifetime risk of 20% (based on GÖTEBORG-1 trial). The secondary outcome was to determine factors associated with risk estimation in a multivariable linear regression model: previous prostate examination, family history, physical exercise, healthy diet, comorbidity, alcohol consumption, smoking, education level, marital status, urinary symptoms and erectile dysfunction.
    RESULTS: Among PSA-tested men, the median estimated lifetime risk of prostate cancer was 30% (IQR 19% to 50%), corresponding to a 10 percentage-points higher estimation compared with the anticipated risk (p<0.001). Family history of prostate cancer, moderate to severe urinary symptoms and mild to moderate erectile dysfunction were associated with >5 percentage-points higher risk estimation. Similar results were obtained for non-PSA-tested men.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most men overestimated their prostate cancer risk which underscores the importance of providing them accurate information about prostate cancer.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN94604465.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在本研究中,我们的目的是验证PAX1和JAM3甲基化(PAX1m/JAM3m)检测在非16/18高危人类乳头瘤病毒阳性患者(非16/18hrHPV+)中作为检测宫颈上皮内瘤变3级或更高级别(CIN3+)的分诊工具的性能.
    方法:比较了液基细胞学(LBC)和PAX1m/JAM3m试验检测CIN3的分诊性能。
    结果:总计,1851名参与者有宫颈组织学结局,并纳入分析。LBC检测结果对意义不明确或更差的非典型鳞状细胞(LBC≥ASCUS)和PAX1m/JAM3m检测的敏感性/特异性分别为90.1%/26.7%和84.8%/88.5%,分别。PAX1m/JAM3m(+)在整个队列中具有最高的诊断AUC(0.866,95%置信区间(CI)0.837-0.896)。所有癌症(n=20)均通过PAX1m/JAM3m(+)检测。与LBC≥ASCUS相比,PAX1m/JAM3m()使需要转诊进行阴道镜检查的患者人数减少了57.21%(74.66%vs.17.45%)。LBC≥ASCUS和PAX1m/JAM3m(+)检测CIN3+的比值比为3.3(95%CI2.0-5.9)和42.6(27.1-69.6),分别(p<0.001)。LBC≥ASCUS或PAX1m/JAM3m(+)的组合略微增加了诊断灵敏度(98.0%,95%CI:95.8-100%)和转诊率(77.09%),但降低了诊断特异性(24.8%,22.7-26.8%)。
    结论:在非16/18hrHPV(+)女性中,PAX1m/JAM3m检测CIN3+优于细胞学。与LBC≥ASCUS相比,PAX1m/JAM3m(+)减少了转诊至阴道镜的显著次数而不影响诊断灵敏度。
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to validate the performance of the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1m/JAM3m) test as a triage tool for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +) in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus-positive patients (non-16/18 hrHPV +).
    METHODS: The triage performance of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test for detecting CIN3 + were compared.
    RESULTS: In total, 1851 participants had cervical histological outcomes and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity/specificity of the LBC test results with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (LBC ≥ ASCUS) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test were 90.1%/26.7% and 84.8%/88.5%, respectively. PAX1m/JAM3m( +) had the highest diagnostic AUC (0.866, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-0.896) in the whole cohort. All cancers (n = 20) were detected by PAX1m/JAM3m(+). Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of patients who needed referral for colposcopy by 57.21% (74.66% vs. 17.45%). The odds ratios for detecting CIN3 + by LBC ≥ ASCUS and PAX1m/JAM3m(+) were 3.3 (95% CI 2.0-5.9) and 42.6 (27.1-69.6), respectively (p < 0.001). The combination of LBC ≥ ASCUS or PAX1m/JAM3m(+) slightly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (98.0%, 95% CI: 95.8-100%) and referral rate (77.09%) but reduced the diagnostic specificity (24.8%, 22.7-26.8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: In non-16/18 hrHPV(+) women, PAX1m/JAM3m was superior to cytology for detecting CIN3 + . Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of significant referrals to colposcopy without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    持续的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染仍然是宫颈癌的关键危险因素。基于HPV的初筛在临床指南中被广泛推荐,与细胞学相比,需要进一步的纵向研究来优化检测高级别宫颈病变的策略。
    从2015年11月到2023年12月,31,942名参与者被纳入现实世界的观察研究。其中,4,219名参与者接受了至少两轮HPV测试,397人完成了三轮HPV检测。所有参与者均接受了高危型HPV16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68(hrHPV)和低危型HPV6/11基因分型检测。一些参与者还接受了细胞学检查或阴道镜检查。
    在横截面队列中,hrHPV和所有HPV亚型的患病率分别为6.6%(2,108/31,942)和6.8%(2,177/31,942),分别。前三个hrHPV基因型是HPV52(1.9%),HPV58(0.9%),和HPV16(0.9%)。年龄分布在45-49岁和60-65岁出现两个高峰。对于初级筛查队列,hrHPV患病率从2015-2017年的4.8%上升至2020年的7.0%,最终在2023年达到7.2%.对于纵向队列研究,重复人群中的hrHPV患病率(3.9、5.3和6.0%)低于初次hrHPV筛查率(6.6%),这表明重复筛查可能会降低患病率。方法上,hrHPV(89.5%)和16种亚型筛查组(92.3%)的敏感性优于细胞学组(54.4%).此外,纵向研究表明,持续性hrHPV亚组的高级别鳞状上皮内病变和更多组织学进展事件的发生率明显更高(p=0.04)(7/17vs.0/5)比再感染组。
    这项研究表明,东莞的高危型HPV患病率正在上升,反复筛查减少了这种趋势。研究结果支持基于HPV的初筛,并可能指导华南地区的HPV疫苗接种和宫颈癌预防。
    UNASSIGNED: Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection remains a key risk factor for cervical cancer. HPV-based primary screening is widely recommended in clinical guidelines, and further longitudinal studies are needed to optimize strategies for detecting high-grade cervical lesions compared to cytology.
    UNASSIGNED: From November 2015 to December 2023, 31,942 participants were included in the real-world observational study. Among those, 4,219 participants underwent at least two rounds of HPV tests, and 397 completed three rounds of HPV tests. All participants were tested for high-risk types of HPV 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68 (hrHPV) and low-risk types of HPV6/11 genotyping. Some participants also received cytology or colposcopy with pathology.
    UNASSIGNED: In the cross-sectional cohort, the prevalence of hrHPV and all HPV subtypes was 6.6% (2,108/31,942) and 6.8% (2,177/31,942), respectively. The three top hrHPV genotypes were HPV52 (1.9%), HPV58 (0.9%), and HPV16 (0.9%). Age distributions showed two peaks at 45-49 and 60-65 years. For the primary screening cohort, the hrHPV prevalence rate increased from 4.8% in 2015-2017 to 7.0% in 2020-2020 and finally reached 7.2% in 2023. For the longitudinal cohort study, the hrHPV prevalence rates in the repeated population (3.9, 5.3, and 6.0%) were lower than the primary hrHPV screening rates (6.6%), which indicated that repeated screening might decrease the prevalence rate. Methodologically, the hrHPV (89.5%) and the screening group of 16 subtypes (92.3%) demonstrated superior sensitivity than the cytology group (54.4%). Moreover, the longitudinal study indicated that the persistent hrHPV subgroup had a significantly higher (p = 0.04) incidence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more histology progression events (7/17 vs. 0/5) than the reinfection group.
    UNASSIGNED: The study indicates a rising high-risk HPV prevalence in Dongguan, with repeated screening reducing this trend. The findings support HPV-based primary screening and might guide HPV vaccination and cervical cancer prevention in South China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,使用靛蓝(IC)的常规内镜和色素内镜是确定早期胃癌病变的分界线(DL)的非常有用的方法,但它并不适合所有的病变。
    目的:本研究旨在确定IC色素内镜的适用条件。
    方法:我们回顾性评估了181例内镜诊断为EGC并接受内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗的患者中的187个病灶。根据病变粘膜与正常粘膜之间存在的DL,用IC染色内镜检查,病变分为2组:明确组和不明确组。评价各组的临床病理特征。2022年1月至2023年3月,对清晰组19个病灶(81片)和不清晰组19个病灶(80片)的术后病理切片进行高清晰度扫描,并评估两组间的隐窝结构。
    结果:明确组与不明确组之间的临床因素没有显着差异。隐窝面积有显著差异,地穴长度,两组之间的隐窝开口直径。在清晰的群体中,隐窝面积有显著差异,地穴长度,正常区域和癌症区域之间的隐窝开口直径,但不清楚组没有显着差异。
    结论:合并或缺失隐窝结构的病灶边缘,一个小小的隐窝区,一个短的隐窝长度,和一个短的隐窝开口直径可以很容易地确定与IC染色内镜。
    BACKGROUND: At present, conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine (IC) is a very useful method to determine the demarcation line (DL) of early gastric cancer lesions, but it is not suitable for all lesions.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the applicable conditions for IC chromoendoscopy.
    METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 187 lesions in 181 patients who had an endoscopic diagnosis of EGC and were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). According to the existence of the DL between the lesion mucosa and normal mucosa with IC chromoendoscopy, the lesions were divided into two groups: clear group and unclear group. Clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated in each group. From January 2022 to March 2023, the postoperative pathological sections of 19 lesions (81 slices) in the clear group and 19 lesions (80 slices) in unclear group were scanned with high definition, and the crypt structure between the two groups was evaluated.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in clinical factors between the clear group and unclear group. There were significant differences in crypt area, crypt length, and crypt opening diameter between the two groups. In the clear group, there were significant differences in crypt area, crypt length, and crypt opening diameter between the normal area and cancer area, but there was no significant difference in the unclear group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The margins of lesions with fused or absent crypt structures, a small crypt area, a short crypt length, and a short crypt opening diameter can be easily determined with IC chromoendoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的前列腺癌筛查存在争议,但在许多国家仍然很普遍。在瑞典或其他地方,关于PSA测试的空间变化的信息很少。这项研究旨在描述斯德哥尔摩地区在市政和小区域诊断前列腺癌之前PSA测试的时空变化。一项基于人群的登记研究包括2007-2016年期间居住在斯德哥尔摩地区的40岁及以上的男性。在2016年的斯德哥尔摩,我们报告了进行PSA测试的男性比例,两个,五年和十年的十年年龄组。按日历年,市政当局报告了接受PSA测试的男性的年龄标准化比例。我们使用空间平滑来计算每个日历年在小范围内进行PSA测试的男性的年龄标准化比例。2016年,60-69岁和70-79岁的男性中分别有74.0%和77.8%在过去十年中进行了PSA测试。Danderyd和Ekerö的市政当局对PSA测试的比例很高。在每个城市中观察到这种比例的明显异质性。在瑞典出生的人进行PSA测试的比值比为2.22(95%CI2.00-2.52)。机会性PSA测试很普遍,在过去的十年中,六七十岁的男性中有四分之三进行了测试。我们发现了明显的地理异质性的证据,较富裕和大都市地区的检测水平较高。PSA测试的变化与社会经济地位和人口因素有关,包括教育,收入和出生国。
    Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is controversial but remains prevalent in many countries. There is little information in Sweden or elsewhere on the spatial variation in PSA testing. This study aims to describe the spatio-temporal variation in PSA testing prior to a prostate cancer diagnosis in the Stockholm region at the municipality and small area levels. A population-based register study comprised men aged 40 years and over living in the Stockholm region during 2007-2016. For Stockholm in 2016, we reported the proportion of men who had a PSA test for the preceding one, two, five and ten years by ten-year age groups. The age-standardised proportion of men having a PSA test was reported for municipalities by calendar years. We used spatial smoothing for calculating the age-standardised proportion of men having a PSA test in a small area for each calendar year. In 2016, 74.0% and 77.8% of men aged 60-69 and 70-79 years respectively had taken a PSA test in the previous ten years. The municipalities of Danderyd and Ekerö showed high proportions of PSA testing. A marked heterogeneity in such proportions within each municipality was observed. The odds ratio for having a PSA test for those born in Sweden was 2.22 (95% CI 2.00-2.52). Opportunistic PSA testing is widespread with three quarters of men in their sixties and seventies having had a test in the preceding decade. We found evidence for marked geographical heterogeneity, where more affluent and metropolitan areas had higher levels of testing. Variations in PSA testing was associated with socio-economic position and demographic factors including education, income and country of birth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管宫颈癌(CC)和结直肠癌(CRC)筛查在降低癌症相关发病率和死亡率方面有效,但筛查参与仍不理想。我们通过利用乳腺癌(BC)筛查的高参与率作为向CC和CRC筛查的非参与者提供自我采样试剂盒的机会,调查了干预措施的有效性。
    结果:务实,未失明,集群随机化,多个周期,交叉试验于2021年9月1日至2022年5月25日在丹麦中部地区(CDR)的5个BC筛查单位进行.在100个选定的工作日中,1BC筛查单位被随机分配为干预单位,其余单位作为对照。在干预部门接受BC筛查的50至69岁女性接受了CC筛查状态(50至64岁)和CRC筛查状态(50至69岁)的行政检查。对逾期筛查的女性进行了自我抽样。根据有组织的方案,对照组的妇女仅接受标准筛查。主要结果是干预组和对照组在两个方案的总筛查覆盖率和逾期筛查妇女的筛查参与方面的差异。干预后6个月测量。这些是使用意向治疗分析进行评估的,用95%置信区间(CI)报告风险差异。共有27116名妇女被纳入试验,干预组5,618(20.7%),对照组21,498(79.3%)。干预后六个月,在CC筛查中,干预组的总覆盖率高于对照组(88.3对83.5,差异4.8个百分点,95%CI[3.6,6.0];p<0.001)和CRC筛查(79.8对76.0,差异3.8个百分点,95%CI[2.6,5.1];p<0.001)。在过期CC筛查的女性中,干预组为32.0%,对照组为6.1%(差异25.8个百分点,95%CI[22.0,29.6];p<0.001)。在CRC筛查中,干预组逾期筛查的女性参与率为23.8%,对照组为8.9%(差异14.9个百分点,95%CI[12.3,17.5];p<0.001)。未参与BC筛查的女性不包括在本研究中。
    结论:对未进行CC和CRC筛查的女性在参加BC筛查时进行自我抽样是一种可行的干预措施,导致参与和总覆盖率增加。需要其他干预措施才能接触未参与BC筛查的女性。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05022511。丹麦中部地区研究项目的处理活动记录(R.不。1-16-02-217-21)。
    BACKGROUND: Screening participation remains suboptimal in cervical cancer (CC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening despite their effectiveness in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effectiveness of an intervention by leveraging the high participation rate in breast cancer (BC) screening as an opportunity to offer self-sampling kits to nonparticipants in CC and CRC screening.
    RESULTS: A pragmatic, unblinded, cluster-randomised, multiple period, crossover trial was conducted in 5 BC screening units in the Central Denmark Region (CDR) between September 1, 2021 and May 25, 2022. On each of 100 selected weekdays, 1 BC screening unit was randomly allocated as the intervention unit while the remaining units served as controls. Women aged 50 to 69 years attending BC screening at the intervention unit were offered administrative check-up on their CC screening status (ages 50 to 64 years) and CRC screening status (aged 50 to 69), and women with overdue screening were offered self-sampling. Women in the control group received only standard screening offers according to the organised programmes. The primary outcomes were differences between the intervention group and the control group in the total screening coverage for the 2 programmes and in screening participation among women with overdue screening, measured 6 months after the intervention. These were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis, reporting risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 27,116 women were included in the trial, with 5,618 (20.7%) in the intervention group and 21,498 (79.3%) in the control group. Six months after the intervention, total coverage was higher in the intervention group as compared with the control group in CC screening (88.3 versus 83.5, difference 4.8 percentage points, 95% CI [3.6, 6.0]; p < 0.001) and in CRC screening (79.8 versus 76.0, difference 3.8 percentage points, 95% CI [2.6, 5.1]; p < 0.001). Among women overdue with CC screening, participation in the intervention group was 32.0% compared with 6.1% in the control group (difference 25.8 percentage points, 95% CI [22.0, 29.6]; p < 0.001). In CRC screening, participation among women overdue with screening in the intervention group was 23.8% compared with 8.9% in the control group (difference 14.9 percentage points, 95% CI [12.3, 17.5]; p < 0.001). Women who did not participate in BC screening were not included in this study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Offering self-sampling to women overdue with CC and CRC screening when they attend BC screening was a feasible intervention, resulting in an increase in participation and total coverage. Other interventions are required to reach women who are not participating in BC screening.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05022511. The record of processing activities for research projects in the Central Denmark Region (R. No.: 1-16-02-217-21).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺癌和宫颈癌是女性最常见的癌症,并与高发病率和死亡率有关。癌症筛查可以促进早期诊断,降低死亡率,减轻癌症的负担。社会支持和自我效能感与癌症筛查行为密切相关。本研究旨在探讨自我效能感对社会支持和癌症筛查行为的中介作用。
    方法:在2023年6月至10月进行的这项横断面调查研究中,从中国东海岸地区招募了312名35-65岁的女性。一般信息问卷,癌症筛查行为问卷,使用社会支持量表和自我效能感量表收集数据。采用描述性统计方法分析被试的一般特征;采用单因素方差分析检验被测变量的差异;采用皮尔逊相关分析描述社会支持之间的关系。自我效能感,和癌症筛查行为。使用SPSS的PROCESS宏构建和分析了中介模型。
    结果:乳腺癌和宫颈癌的平均(标准偏差)筛查行为评分为3.98(2.79),代表一个中间的水平。自我效能感与社会支持、癌症筛查行为密切相关。社会支持与自我效能感(r=0.37,p<0.01)和癌症筛查行为(r=0.18,p<0.01)呈显著正相关。自我效能与癌症筛查行为呈显著正相关(r=0.19,p<0.05)。自我效能在社会支持和癌症筛查行为之间表现出完全的中介作用。具有32%的解释力。
    结论:研究结果强调需要提高女性的社会支持水平和自我效能感,这反过来可以增加妇女在乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查中的参与。
    BACKGROUND: Breast and cervical cancer are the most common cancers in women, and are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Cancer screening can facilitate early diagnosis, reduce mortality, and ease the burden of cancer. Social support and self-efficacy are strongly associated with cancer screening behavior. The present study aimed to explore the mediating effect of self-efficacy on social support and cancer screening behavior.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey study conducted from June to October 2023, 312 women aged 35-65 years were recruited from the East Coast area of China. A general information questionnaire, cancer screening behavior questionnaire, social support scale and self-efficacy scale were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the general characteristics of participants; one-way analysis of variance was used to test for differences in the measured variables; and Pearson\'s correlation analyses were used to describe the relationship among social support, self-efficacy, and cancer screening behavior. A mediation model was constructed and analyzed using the PROCESS macro for SPSS.
    RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) screening behavior score for breast cancer and cervical cancer was 3.98 (2.79), representing an intermediate level. Self-efficacy was closely related to social support and cancer screening behavior. Social support showed a significant positive correlation with self-efficacy (r = 0.37, p < 0.01) and cancer screening behavior (r = 0.18, p < 0.01). Self-efficacy was also significantly positively correlated with cancer screening behavior (r = 0.19, p < 0.05). Self-efficacy showed a full mediating effect between social support and cancer screening behavior, with an explanatory power of 32%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize the need to increase women\'s level of social support and self-efficacy, which in turn can increase women\'s participation in breast and cervical cancer screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多发性骨髓瘤通常表现为模糊和非特异性症状。许多患者在计划外而不是选择性(计划的)诊断途径中被诊断。这项研究调查了非计划途径中多发性骨髓瘤的诊断以及与患者特征的关联。疾病概况,和生存。
    方法:我们进行了一项全国性的注册研究,包括2014-2018年在丹麦诊断为多发性骨髓瘤的所有患者。如果在多发性骨髓瘤诊断前30天内注册急性入院,并且没有其他先前注册的该诊断途径,则将患者分类为计划外途径。将计划外途径与组合的所有其他途径进行比较。
    结果:我们纳入了2,213例多发性骨髓瘤患者,32%的人被诊断为计划外途径。合并症,之前没有癌症诊断,很少去全科医生(GP)的历史,多发性骨髓瘤诊断时的并发症,高风险的细胞遗传学,和晚期癌症阶段与在非计划途径中被诊断的更高概率相关。例如,24.4%(95%置信区间(CI):21.8-27.0)的低合并症患者(Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分0)在非计划途径中被诊断为高合并症患者(CCI评分3)的50.9%(95%CI:45.6-56.1)。对于诊断时需要透析的患者,概率为66.0%(95%CI54.2-77.8)和30.9%(95%CI:28.9-32.9)。诊断为非计划途径的患者生存率较低(风险比1.44(95%CI:1.26-1.64))。然而,在限制存活超过3年的患者的分析中未发现这种关联.
    结论:高共病水平,很少有普通的全科医生就诊,诊断时的晚期疾病状态,并发症与非计划途径的诊断相关.Further,被诊断为非计划途径的患者生存率较低.促进早期诊断和预防计划外途径可能有助于改善多发性骨髓瘤的生存率。
    BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma often presents with vague and non-specific symptoms. Many patients are diagnosed in unplanned rather than elective (planned) diagnostic pathways. This study investigates the diagnosis of multiple myeloma in unplanned pathways and the association with patient characteristics, disease profile, and survival.
    METHODS: We conducted a nationwide register-based study, including all patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Denmark in 2014-2018. Patients were categorised as diagnosed in an unplanned pathway if registered with an acute admission within 30 days prior to the multiple myeloma diagnosis and no other previously registered pathway to this diagnosis. Unplanned pathways were compared to all other pathways combined.
    RESULTS: We included 2,213 patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma, hereof 32% diagnosed in an unplanned pathway. Comorbidity, no prior cancer diagnosis, a history of few visits to the general practitioner (GP), multiple myeloma complications at diagnosis, high-risk cytogenetics, and advanced cancer stage were associated with a higher probability of being diagnosed in an unplanned pathway. For example, 24.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.8-27.0) of patients with low comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 0) were diagnosed in an unplanned pathway as were 50.9% (95% CI: 45.6-56.1) of patients with high comorbidity (CCI score 3+). For patients with dialysis need at the time of diagnosis the probability was 66.0% (95% CI 54.2-77.8) and 30.9% (95% CI: 28.9-32.9) for patients with no dialysis need. Patients diagnosed in an unplanned pathway had inferior survival (hazard ratio 1.44 (95% CI: 1.26-1.64)). However, this association was not seen in analyses restricted to patients surviving for more than three years.
    CONCLUSIONS: High comorbidity level, few usual GP visits, advanced disease status at diagnosis, and complications were associated with diagnosis in an unplanned pathway. Further, patients diagnosed in an unplanned pathway had inferior survival. Promoting earlier diagnosis and preventing unplanned pathways may help improve survival in multiple myeloma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)提出了重大的全球健康挑战,特别是在肝硬化患者中,与丙型肝炎(HCV)的主要原因。在与HCV相关的肝硬化患者中,肝癌的风险增加后仍存在治愈。具有六个月超声的HCC监测已被证明可以提高生存率。然而,坚持一年两次的筛查目前是次优的。本研究旨在评估增加HCC监测摄取和改善超声敏感性对HCV治愈后HCV相关性肝硬化患者死亡率的影响。
    方法:本研究利用数学模型评估HCC进展,监视,诊断,以及成功接受HCV治疗的肝硬化患者的治疗。确定性房室模型纳入了巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)阶段,以模拟100名肝硬化患者的疾病进展和诊断概率,这些患者已成功治疗了超过10年的丙型肝炎。对四种干预措施进行了建模,以评估其改善预期寿命的潜力:监测依从性的现实改善,对监测依从性的乐观改善,诊断灵敏度增强,结果:实际依从性改善导致10年干预期内每100个队列增加9.8(95%CI7.9,11.6)个生命年;乐观依从性改善达到17.2(13.9,20.3)个生命年.诊断灵敏度的提高导致生命年增加7.0(3.6,13.8)年,治疗改善使寿命年延长9.0(7.5,10.3)年。
    结论:定期HCC超声监测对于降低治愈的丙型肝炎和肝硬化患者的死亡率仍然至关重要。我们的研究强调,即使是对超声监测依从性的微小增强,也可以比提高监测敏感性或治疗效果的策略更有效地显著提高人群的预期寿命。
    OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a significant global health challenge, particularly among individuals with liver cirrhosis, with hepatitis C (HCV) a major cause. In people with HCV-related cirrhosis, an increased risk of HCC remains after cure. HCC surveillance with six monthly ultrasounds has been shown to improve survival. However, adherence to biannual screening is currently suboptimal. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of increased HCC surveillance uptake and improved ultrasound sensitivity on mortality among people with HCV-related cirrhosis post HCV cure.
    METHODS: This study utilized mathematical modelling to assess HCC progression, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment among individuals with cirrhosis who had successfully been treated for HCV. The deterministic compartmental model incorporated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages to simulate disease progression and diagnosis probabilities in 100 people with cirrhosis who had successfully been treated for hepatitis C over 10 years. Four interventions were modelled to assess their potential for improving life expectancy: realistic improvements to surveillance adherence, optimistic improvements to surveillance adherence, diagnosis sensitivity enhancements, and improved treatment efficacy Results: Realistic adherence improvements resulted in 9.8 (95% CI 7.9, 11.6) life years gained per cohort of 100 over a 10-year intervention period; 17.2 (13.9, 20.3) life years were achieved in optimistic adherence improvements. Diagnosis sensitivity improvements led to a 7.0 (3.6, 13.8) year gain in life years, and treatment improvements improved life years by 9.0 (7.5, 10.3) years.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regular HCC ultrasound surveillance remains crucial to reduce mortality among people with cured hepatitis C and cirrhosis. Our study highlights that even minor enhancements to adherence to ultrasound surveillance can significantly boost life expectancy across populations more effectively than strategies that increase surveillance sensitivity or treatment efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究从中东和北非(MENA)地区移民的女性如何看待加拿大的乳腺癌风险和筛查,以及她们如何对待乳房健康,并探索这一人群乳腺癌筛查的障碍。
    方法:聚焦人种学。
    方法:埃德蒙顿,阿尔塔
    方法:在中东和北非地区出生的妇女(例如,埃及,伊拉克,黎巴嫩,利比亚,沙特阿拉伯,索马里,苏丹,和叙利亚),并且在学习招募前不到5年移民到加拿大,并居住在埃德蒙顿,阿尔塔
    方法:在2018年7月和8月的6周内进行了六个焦点小组,每组6名参与者(N=36);对结果进行了主题分析。
    结果:确定了三个广泛的主题:关于乳房健康的知识,癌症风险,和筛查服务;保持乳房健康和筛查的障碍;以及克服这些障碍的潜在解决方案。研究结果表明,参与者对艾伯塔省乳腺癌筛查实践的了解有限,筛查仍然存在多种障碍。
    结论:这项研究可以帮助制定文化上适当的干预措施,以克服障碍,并激励来自中东和北非地区国家的妇女使用乳腺癌筛查。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine how women who have emigrated from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region perceive breast cancer risk and screening in Canada and how they approach breast health, and to explore barriers to breast cancer screening in this population.
    METHODS: Focused ethnography.
    METHODS: Edmonton, Alta.
    METHODS: Women who were born in MENA countries (eg, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, and Syria) and had immigrated to Canada less than 5 years prior to study recruitment and lived in Edmonton, Alta.
    METHODS: Six focus groups were conducted over a 6-week period in July and August 2018 with 6 participants in each group (N=36); results were analyzed thematically.
    RESULTS: Three broad themes were identified: knowledge about breast health, cancer risk, and screening services; barriers to maintaining breast health and to screening; and potential solutions for overcoming these barriers. Findings indicated participants have limited knowledge about breast cancer screening practices in Alberta and that multiple barriers to screening remain.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study can help inform the development of culturally appropriate interventions to overcome barriers and to motivate women from MENA countries to use breast cancer screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号