OBJECTIVE: Although previous studies have described phenomenological diagnoses, they lacked description of aetiological spectrum in patients visiting movement disorders (MD) service. Herein, we classify the MD phenomenology and describe aetiology wise distribution of each phenomenology in patients visiting a tertiary care movement disorders service.
METHODS: Collected information included demographic profile (age of onset, age at presentation, gender, duration of illness before presentation), predominant MD phenomenology [such as parkinsonism, dystonia, ataxia, tremor, chorea, ballism, myoclonus, tics, stereotypy, restless legs syndrome (RLS) and others], diagnostic evaluations and detected aetiology.
RESULTS: This observational study included 1140 MD patients over a span of 5 years. The median (IQR) age of onset was 49 (35-60) years and age at presentation was 54 (40-65) years, with median duration of illness being 36 (18-72) months. Nearly two-third of patients were males (M:F=731:409). Parkinsonism (n=494, 43.3 %) was the most common MD phenomenology observed, followed by dystonia (n=219, 19.2 %), ataxia (n=125, 11 %), tremor (n=118, 10.4 %), myoclonus (n=73, 6.4 %), chorea (n=40, 3.5 %), spasticity (n=22, 1.9 %), tics (n=8, 0.7 %), and RLS (n=8, 0.7 %). Thirty-three (2.9 %) patients were grouped under miscellaneous MDs. Overall, neurodegenerative disorders (57.4 %) were the most common cause of MDs. Parkinson\'s disease, genetic dystonia, essential tremor, genetic ataxias, hemifacial spasm, and Huntington\'s disease were the most common aetiologies for parkinsonism, dystonia, tremor, ataxia, myoclonus, and chorea, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Parkinsonism was the most common phenomenology observed in MD patients, and was followed by dystonia, ataxia and tremor. Neurodegenerative disorders were the most common aetiology detected.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Midline Tremor is defined as an isolated or combined tremor that affects the neck, trunk, jaw, tongue, and/or voice and could be part of Essential Tremor (ET), or dystonic tremor. The clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation for Midline Tremor has been rarely reported. The Ventral Intermediate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus are the preferred targets, but with variable outcomes. Thalamic Ventral-Oralis (VO) complex and Zona Incerta (ZI) are emerging targets for tremor control in various etiologies.
OBJECTIVE: To report on neuroradiological, neurophysiological targeting and long-term efficacy of thalamic Ventral-Oralis complex and Zona Incerta deep brain stimulation in Midline Tremor.
METHODS: Three patients (two males and one female) with Midline Tremor in dystonic syndromes were recruited for this open-label study. Clinical, surgical, neurophysiological intraoperative testing and long-term follow-up data are reported.
RESULTS: Intraoperative testing and reconstruction of volume of tissue activated confirmed the position of the electrodes in the area stimulated between the thalamic Ventral-Oralis complex and Zona Incerta in all patients. All three patients showed optimal control of both tremor and dystonic features at short-term (6 months) and long-term follow-up (up to 6 years). No adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: In the syndromes of Midline Tremor of various origins, the best target for DBS might be difficult to identify. Our results showed that thalamic Ventral-Oralis complex/Zona Incerta may be a viable and safe option even in specific forms of tremor with axial distribution.

Paroxysmal dyskinesias (PDs) are a group of involuntary, hyperkinetic movement disorders that recur episodically and may last seconds to hours. An important feature of PD is that there is no loss of consciousness during the episode. Using a clinical classification, three main types of PDs have been distinguished in canine PD: (1) paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD) that commences after (sudden) movements, (2) paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia (PNKD) not associated with exercise and can occur at rest, and (3) paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia (PED) associated with fatigue. Canine PDs are diagnosed based on the clinical presentation, history, and phenomenology. For the latter, a video recording of the paroxysmal event is extremely useful. An etiological classification of canine PDs includes genetic (proven and suspected), reactive (drug-induced, toxic, metabolic, and dietary), structural (neoplasia, inflammatory, and other structural causes), and unknown causes. In this review, an overview of all reported canine PDs is provided with emphasis on phenotype, genotype, and, where possible, pathophysiology and treatment for each reported canine PD.

Lesch-Nyhan Disease (LND) is an X-linked recessive genetic disorder arising from hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 gene mutations, leading to a complete deficiency. LND presents a complex neurological profile characterized by generalized dystonia, motor dysfunctions and self-injurious behavior, which management is challenging. We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in management of neurological symptoms in LND (PROSPERO registration number:CRD42023446513). Among 34 reviewed full-text papers; 22 studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. Considerable heterogeneity was found in studies regarding the timing of treatment implementation, adjunctive treatments and outcome assessment. Single-patient studies and clinical trials often showed contradictory results, while therapeutic failures were underreported. S-Adenosylmethionine and Deep Brain Stimulation were the most studied treatment methods and require further research to address inconsistencies. The evidence from levodopa studies underlines that optimal timing of treatment implementation should be thoroughly investigated. Standardized study design and reducing publication bias are crucial to overcome current limitations of assessing intervention efficacy in LND.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Increased 4-12 Hz oscillatory activity in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) loop is reported in dystonia. Coherence analysis is a measure of linear coupling between two signals, revealing oscillatory activity drives that are common across motor units. By performing coherence analysis, activity of the CBGTC-loop can be measured with modalities like local field potentials (LFPs), electromyography (EMG), and electro-encephalography (EEG). The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review on the use of coherence analysis for clinical assessment and treatment of dystonia.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed on a search in Embase and PubMed on June 28th, 2023. All studies incorporating coherence analysis and an adult dystonia cohort were included. Three authors evaluated the eligibility of the articles. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist.
RESULTS: A total of 41 articles were included, with data of 395 adult dystonia patients. In the selected records, six different types of coherence were investigated: corticocortical, corticopallidal, corticomuscular, pallidopallidal, pallidomuscular, and intermuscular coherence. Various types of 4-12 coherence were found to be increased in all dystonia subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: There is increased 4-12 Hz coherence found between the cortex, basal ganglia, and affected muscles in all dystonia subtypes. However, the relationship between 4-12 Hz coherence and the dystonic clinical state has not been established. DBS treatment leads to a reduction of 4-12 Hz coherence. In combination with the results of this review, the 4-12 Hz frequency band can be used as a promising phenomenon for the development of a biomarker.

BACKGROUND: The complexities of unilateral dystonia have led to exploring simultaneous (dual) globus pallidus internus (GPi) and motor ventral thalamus (Vim/Vop) deep brain stimulation (DBS), yet detailed assessments are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of GPi, Vim/Vop, and dual DBS in unilateral dystonia.
METHODS: Three patients with unilateral dystonia (two idiopathic, one acquired), implanted with two DBS electrodes targeting ipsilateral Vim/Vop and GPi, were included. Three stimulation modalities were assessed. First, one electrode was activated, then the other, and finally, both electrodes were activated simultaneously.
RESULTS: DBS yielded substantial symptomatic reductions in all three evaluated stimulation modalities. Patients exhibited varying responses regarding quality-of-life and depressive symptoms. Treatment satisfaction didn\'t align with clinical improvements, potentially affected by unrealistic expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes critical insights into GPi, Vim/Vop and simultaneous stimulation for unilateral dystonia. The safety of the procedure underscores the promise of this approach.

The cerebellum contributes to a diverse array of motor conditions, including ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. The neural substrates that encode this diversity are unclear. Here, we tested whether the neural spike activity of cerebellar output neurons is distinct between movement disorders with different impairments, generalizable across movement disorders with similar impairments, and capable of causing distinct movement impairments. Using in vivo awake recordings as input data, we trained a supervised classifier model to differentiate the spike parameters between mouse models for ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. The classifier model correctly assigned mouse phenotypes based on single-neuron signatures. Spike signatures were shared across etiologically distinct but phenotypically similar disease models. Mimicking these pathophysiological spike signatures with optogenetics induced the predicted motor impairments in otherwise healthy mice. These data show that distinct spike signatures promote the behavioral presentation of cerebellar diseases.
Intentional movement is fundamental to achieving many goals, whether they are as complicated as driving a car or as routine as feeding ourselves with a spoon. The cerebellum is a key brain area for coordinating such movement. Damage to this region can cause various movement disorders: ataxia (uncoordinated movement); dystonia (uncontrolled muscle contractions); and tremor (involuntary and rhythmic shaking). While abnormal electrical activity in the brain associated with movement disorders has been recorded for decades, previous studies often explored one movement disorder at a time. Therefore, it remained unclear whether the underlying brain activity is similar across movement disorders. Van der Heijden and Brown et al. analyzed recordings of neuron activity in the cerebellum of mice with movement disorders to create an activity profile for each disorder. The researchers then used machine learning to generate a classifier that could separate profiles associated with manifestations of ataxia, dystonia, and tremor based on unique features of their neural activity. The ability of the model to separate the three types of movement disorders indicates that abnormal movements can be distinguished based on neural activity patterns. When additional manifestations of these abnormal movements were considered, multiple mouse models of dystonia and tremor tended to show similar profiles. Ataxia models had several different types of neural activity that were all distinct from the dystonia and tremor profiles. After identifying the activity associated with each movement disorder, Van der Heijden and Brown et al. induced the same activity in the cerebella of healthy mice, which then caused the corresponding abnormal movements. These findings lay an important groundwork for the development of treatments for neurological disorders involving ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. They identify the cerebellum, and specific patterns of activity within it, as potential therapeutic targets. While the different activity profiles of ataxia may require more consideration, the neural activity associated with dystonia and tremor appears to be generalizable across multiple manifestations, suggesting potential treatments could be broadly applicable for these disorders.