drug hypersensitivity reactions

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多症和全身症状(DRESS)综合征的药物反应通常在与该疾病有关的药物治疗后2至6周出现。然而,在某些情况下,它可以在开始相关药物治疗后超过八周出现。这是一种4型药物超敏反应,其中任何内部器官都可能涉及。虽然肝脏通常受累,心脏受累并非闻所未闻。合并症和多器官受累可能会掩盖诊断,和严重皮肤不良反应注册(RegiSCAR)标准是有用的诊断辅助工具。最好的治疗方法是撤回有问题的药物并给予全身性类固醇。氧化应激在DRESS综合征中很高。肝保护是所有患者的优先事项,并产生更好的预后。
    Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome usually presents two to six weeks after treatment with a drug implicated in this disorder. However, in some cases, it can present more than eight weeks after the initiation of an implicated medication. This is a type 4 drug hypersensitivity reaction in which any internal organ may be involved. While the liver is commonly involved, cardiac involvement is not unheard of. Comorbidities and multiorgan involvement may obscure the diagnosis, and Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) criteria are a useful diagnostic aid. It is best treated by withdrawing the offending agent and administering systemic steroids. Oxidative stress is high in DRESS syndrome. Hepatoprotection is a priority in all patients and yields a better prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    表现为血管炎的药物超敏反应(DHRs)很少见。抗生素,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),磺酰胺,利尿剂,免疫抑制剂和抗惊厥药物是药物诱导的白细胞碎裂性血管炎(LCV)的最常见元凶,但有关巴比妥类药物的信息很少.我们介绍了一例53岁女性,在使用含有苯巴比妥和NSAIDs的药物后患有严重血管炎。根据记忆和临床资料,对药物性血管炎进行了初步诊断。进一步的检查证实了LCV的诊断,并排除了其他更常见的血管炎原因。通过反应后对患者的长期观察来评估所用药物的致病意义,包括药物挑战系列和Naranjo的药物不良反应概率量表。结论苯巴比妥是最可能的罪魁祸首药物。患者的数据包括在亚美尼亚重度DHR患者登记处。从那以后,患者仅避免使用含有巴比妥酸盐的药物,未发现任何反应.因此,该案例表明,即使诊断能力有限,通过比较现有数据,可以确定罕见药物诱导的LCV甚至更罕见的罪魁祸首药物的最终诊断.对苯巴比妥的认识和对病例的适当记录对于治疗和预防表现为血管炎的DHR很重要。
    Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) manifested as vasculitis are rare. Antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sulphonamides, diuretics, immunosupressants and anticonvulsants are the most common culprits for drug-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) but there is scarce information about barbiturates. We present a case of 53-year-old female with severe vasculitis after phenobarbital- and NSAIDs-containing medications use. The preliminary diagnosis of drug-induced vasculitis was made based on anamnestic and clinical data. Further examinations confirmed the diagnosis of LCV and excluded other more common causes of vasculitis. The causative significance of used medications was assessed by long-term observation of the patient after the reaction, including the drug challenge series and Naranjo\'s Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. It was concluded that phenobarbital is the most probable culprit drug. The patient\'s data were included in the Armenian Registry of Patients with Severe DHRs. Since then, the patient has avoided only barbiturate-containing drugs and no reactions were noted. Thus, the case indicates that even with limited diagnostic capabilities, the final diagnosis of rare drug-induced LCV and even rarer culprit drug can be established by comparing the available data. Awareness about phenobarbital and proper recording of the case are important in the management and prevention of DHRs manifested as vasculitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    围手术期的过敏反应从轻度到潜在致命的过敏反应不等。导致显著的发病率和死亡率。大多数围手术期的过敏和过敏反应归因于抗生素,防腐解决方案,乳胶,和阿片类药物。在目前无阿片类药物麻醉的推动下,由于其多重优势,扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药在多模式疼痛和炎症反应管理中发挥重要作用.近十分之九的人经历术后疼痛,1/3术后恶心呕吐,和四分之一的发烧经验,不管手术和麻醉类型,通常作为炎症反应。虽然围手术期过敏反应很常见,对多种常用治疗疼痛的药物过敏的患者,发烧,酸消化性疾病,恶心和呕吐很少。此类病例对围手术期管理提出了巨大挑战。一名14岁的男性儿童在术前区域注射雷尼替丁和昂丹司琼后,计划进行胫骨后肌腱转移,导致轻度发烧,出现过敏反应。手术被推迟,并接受了常用药物的过敏概况测试。显示高IgE水平和对双氯芬酸和对乙酰氨基酚的中度至重度超敏反应。患者在脊髓麻醉下手术一个月后,避免雷尼替丁,昂丹司琼,双氯芬酸,和扑热息痛.第二天早上,他发高烧(102.3°F),这并没有以保守的措施解决。文献中报道了对NSAIDs的超敏反应和过敏反应。虽然有多种药物可作为NSAIDs,对同一组内的其他药物的交叉敏感性或过敏,甚至是化学相关的群体,也是管理此类患者时需要考虑的另一种可能性。甲芬那酸控制了发烧,观察48小时后,孩子出院回家。然而,该病例带来了巨大的围手术期管理困境;本报告旨在强调和讨论它。
    Perioperative hypersensitivity reactions vary from mild to potentially fatal anaphylaxis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Most of the perioperative hypersensitivity and allergic reactions are attributed to antibiotics, antiseptic solutions, latex, and opioids. In the current thrust for opioid-free anesthesia, owing to its multiple advantages, paracetamol and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents play a significant role in multi-modal pain and inflammatory response management. Nearly nine out of ten individuals experience postoperative pain, one-third experience postoperative nausea and vomiting, and one-fourth experience fever, irrespective of surgery and type of anesthesia, often as an inflammatory response. While perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are common, a patient allergic to multiple commonly used drugs for the treatment of pain, fever, acid-peptic disorder, and nausea and vomiting is scarce. Such cases pose a great challenge in perioperative management. A 14-year-old male child with a traumatic foot drop planned for tibialis posterior tendon transfer developed an allergic reaction with mild fever following an injection of Ranitidine and Ondansetron in the preoperative area. Surgery was deferred and was investigated for allergy profile testing for commonly used drugs, which showed high IgE levels and moderate to severe hypersensitivity for diclofenac and paracetamol. The patient was operated on after one month under spinal anesthesia, avoiding ranitidine, ondansetron, diclofenac, and paracetamol. The following morning, he developed a high-grade fever (102.3° F), which did not resolve with conservative measures. Hypersensitivity and allergic reactions to NSAIDs are reported in the literature. While there are multiple drugs available as NSAIDs, cross-sensitivity or allergy to other drugs within the same group, and even chemically related groups, is also another possibility that needs to be considered while managing such patients. Mefenamic acid controlled the fever, and the child was discharged home after 48 hours of observation. However, the case posed a great perioperative management dilemma; the present report intends to highlight and discuss it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号