drug drug interaction

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)可能会增加地高辛浓度,治疗指数狭窄的药物。地高辛浓度的微小变化可能使个体容易发生毒性风险。
    目的:研究TMP-SMX联合处方与阿莫西林联合处方后服用地高辛的老年人发生地高辛毒性的风险。
    方法:安大略省基于人群的回顾性队列研究,加拿大(2002-2020年)使用关联医疗保健数据。参与者包括47,961名服用地高辛的老年人(58%为女性;中位年龄80岁[四分位数范围74-86]),他们新接受TMP-SMX治疗(n=10,273),而新接受阿莫西林治疗的人(n=37,688)。
    方法:TMP-SMX与阿莫西林在老年人同时服用地高辛的联合处方。
    方法:主要结果是住院(即,入院或急诊科就诊)在抗生素处方后30天内出现地高辛毒性。使用倾向评分上的治疗加权的逆概率来平衡基线健康指标上的比较组。使用改进的Poisson回归获得加权风险比(RR),并使用二项回归获得加权风险差(RD)。伤害所需的数量(NNH)计算为1/RD。
    结果:TMP-SMX治疗的49/10,273(0.48%)患者与阿莫西林治疗的32/37,688(0.08%)患者(加权RR,5.71[95%置信区间(CI),3.19至10.24];加权RD,0.39%[95%CI,0.25%至0.53%];NNH256[95%CI,233至400])。
    结论:在服用地高辛的老年人中,与阿莫西林相比,共同处方的TMP-SMX在医院遇到地高辛毒性的30天风险高出近6倍,尽管绝对风险差异较低(0.4%).医生应在临床上适当时开一种替代抗生素。如果TMP-SMX必须与地高辛共同处方(如果认为益处大于风险),地高辛应该在个体基础上减少剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may increase digoxin concentration, a medication with a narrow therapeutic index. Small changes in digoxin concentration could predispose individuals to the risk of toxicity.
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of digoxin toxicity in older adults taking digoxin following co-prescription of TMP-SMX compared with co-prescription of amoxicillin.
    METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (2002-2020) using linked health care data. Participants comprised 47,961 older adults taking digoxin (58% women; median age 80 years [interquartile range 74-86]) who were newly treated with TMP-SMX (n = 10,273) compared with those newly treated with amoxicillin (n = 37,688).
    METHODS: Co-prescription of TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin in older adults concurrently taking digoxin.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was a hospital encounter (i.e., hospital admission or emergency department visit) with digoxin toxicity within 30 days of the antibiotic prescription. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Weighted risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression and weighted risk differences (RD) using binomial regression. The number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated as 1/RD.
    RESULTS: A hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity occurred in 49/10,273 (0.48%) patients treated with TMP-SMX versus 32/37,688 (0.08%) in those treated with amoxicillin (weighted RR, 5.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.19 to 10.24]; weighted RD, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.25% to 0.53%]; NNH 256 [95% CI, 233 to 400]).
    CONCLUSIONS: In older adults taking digoxin, the 30-day risk of a hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity was nearly 6 times higher in those co-prescribed TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin, although the absolute risk difference was low (0.4%). Physicians should prescribe an alternative antibiotic when clinically appropriate. If TMP-SMX must be co-prescribed with digoxin (if the benefit is believed to outweigh the risk), digoxin should be dose-reduced on an individual basis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近已经验证了在老年人中潜在具有临床意义的药物-药物相互作用(DDI)的国际共识清单。我们的目标是描述在住院的老年患者的用药史中发现的可能导致临床上显著DDI的药物组合的患病率和特征,以及在入院时出现的不良药物事件中明显的DDI-DDI的患病率和特征。DDI有助于ADE相关的医院入院,和DDI涉及药物相关实验室偏差。方法:数据来自我们先前的研究,该研究通过捷克共和国的急诊医学部检查了赫拉德茨·克拉洛韦大学医院入院的药物相关性。包括≥65岁的患者。使用老年人中潜在临床显著DDI的国际共识列表鉴定了可能引起临床显著DDI的药物组合。结果:在医院收治的812名老年患者中,46%的人暴露于可能导致临床显著DDI的药物组合。影响钾浓度的药物组合占所有可能导致临床显著DDI的药物组合的47%。在27个案例中,有潜在临床意义的DDI与药物相关的住院相关.在4个案例中,有潜在临床意义的DDI与入院时存在的ADE相关.在4个案例中,潜在临床意义的DDI与实验室偏差相关.导致药物相关住院的明显DDI最常见的是抗血栓药物和中枢神经系统抑制剂。结论:结果证实了欧洲OPERAM试验的结果,研究发现,可能引起临床显著DDI的药物组合在老年患者中非常常见。入院的老年患者中有4.3%存在明显的DDI。在3.3%中,明显的DDI促成了与药物相关的住院。潜在DDI和明显DDI比率的差异表明,如果使用计算机化决策支持系统来警告老年患者中潜在的临床重大DDI,它需要上下文化(例如,服用合并药物,剂量的药物,实验室值,并考虑患者的合并症)。
    Background: An international consensus list of potentially clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older people has been recently validated. Our objective was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of drug combinations potentially causing clinically significant DDIs identified in the medication history of older patients admitted to the hospital and the prevalence and characteristics of manifest DDIs-DDIs involved in adverse drug events present at hospital admission, DDIs that contributed to ADE-related hospital admissions, and DDIs involved in drug-related laboratory deviations. Methods: The data were obtained from our previous study that examined the drug-relatedness of hospital admissions to University Hospital Hradec Králové via the department of emergency medicine in the Czech Republic. Patients ≥ 65 years old were included. Drug combinations potentially causing clinically significant DDIs were identified using the international consensus list of potentially clinically significant DDIs in older people. Results: Of the 812 older patients admitted to the hospital, 46% were exposed to drug combinations potentially causing clinically significant DDIs. A combination of medications that affect potassium concentrations accounted for 47% of all drug combinations potentially causing clinically significant DDIs. In 27 cases, potentially clinically significant DDIs were associated with drug-related hospital admissions. In 4 cases, potentially clinically significant DDIs were associated with ADEs that were present at admissions. In 4 cases, the potentially clinically significant DDIs were associated with laboratory deviations. Manifest DDIs that contributed to drug-related hospital admissions most frequently involved antithrombotic agents and central nervous system depressants. Conclusion: The results confirm the findings from the European OPERAM trial, which found that drug combinations potentially causing clinically significant DDIs are very common in older patients. Manifest DDIs were present in 4.3% of older patients admitted to the hospital. In 3.3%, manifest DDIs contributed to drug-related hospital admissions. The difference in the rates of potential and manifest DDIs suggests that if a computerized decision support system is used for alerting potentially clinically significant DDIs in older patients, it needs to be contextualized (e.g., take concomitant medications, doses of medications, laboratory values, and patients\' comorbidities into account).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:节拍托泊替康联合帕唑帕尼对妇科癌症临床前模型具有活性。两种试剂都是ATP结合盒家族转运蛋白的底物,因此药代动力学(PK)药物-药物相互作用的可能性增加。
    方法:在同意的成年妇科癌症患者中,在节奏性拓扑替康和帕唑帕尼的I期剂量递增研究的三个周期中进行了拓扑替康的PK分析。使用群体PK方法分析浓度时间数据。
    结果:21名患者可进行系列PK研究。在PK参数中观察到相当大的患者间和患者内差异,主要归因于高度可变的口服生物利用度。在给药周期之间没有检测到托泊替康处置的差异,在非帕唑帕尼研究与非帕唑帕尼研究之间也是如此。
    结论:缺乏统计学意义的药物-药物相互作用与临床前发现一致,表明帕唑帕尼不影响节奏性拓扑替康的PK。当与帕唑帕尼一起使用时,不需要调整低剂量节拍托泊替康剂量。
    BACKGROUND: Combination metronomic topotecan plus pazopanib is active against preclinical models of gynecological cancer. Both agents are substrates for ATP-binding cassette family transporters so there is an increased likelihood for pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions.
    METHODS: PK analyses of topotecan were performed during three cycles of a phase I dose-escalation study of metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in consenting adult patients with gynecological cancer. Concentration time data were analyzed using a population PK approach.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were evaluable for serial PK studies. Considerable inter- and intra-patient variability was observed in the PK parameters, attributable primarily to highly variable oral bioavailability. No difference in topotecan disposition was detected between administration cycles, nor between the off- versus on-pazopanib studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a statistically significant drug-drug interaction agrees with preclinical findings suggesting that pazopanib does not influence the PK of metronomic topotecan. No adjustment of low dose metronomic topotecan dosing is merited when used in conjunction with pazopanib.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号