Amidst the current healthcare workforce crisis, nurses continue to experience burnout, with one contributor being the growing amount of required documentation and other electronic health record (EHR) tasks that must be completed. This study aims to identify ways in which nurses can be better supported through consideration for the burden that EHR systems may present due to increasing documentation requirements and areas of inefficient use. This study leverages nursing engagement to ensure the needs of nurses are identified and EHR efficiency is improved. Practical strategies and EHR system improvements will be proposed based on the recommendations and guidance of nursing staff.

OBJECTIVE: Outpatient rehabilitation (rehab) physical, occupational, and speech therapists use electronic health records (EHR), yet their documentation experiences, including any documentation burden, are not well researched. Therapists are a growing portion of the U.S. healthcare workforce, whose need is critical to the health of an aging population. We aimed to describe outpatient rehab therapists\' documentation experiences and identify strategies for mitigating any documentation burden.
METHODS: We used qualitative descriptive methodology to conduct 4 focus groups with outpatient rehab therapists at Hospital for Special Surgery, a multi-site orthopedic institution. Transcripts were inductively coded to identify themes and actionable strategies for improving the therapists\' documentation experiences. Therapists provided feedback and prioritization of proposed strategies.
RESULTS: A total of 13 therapists were interviewed. Five themes and 10 subthemes characterize the therapists\' documentation experience by a feeling that documentation inhibits clinical care and work/life balance, a perceived lack of support and efficiencies, the desire to document to communicate clinical care, and a design vision for improving the EHR. Top prioritized strategies for improvement included use of timesaving templates, expanding dictation, decluttering the EHR interface, and support for free texting over discrete data capture.
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient rehab therapists experience documentation burden similar to that documented of physicians and nurses. Manual data entry imposes burden on therapists\' time and clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: A multi-faceted approach is needed for improving therapists\' experiences including EHR redesign, technology supporting dictation and narrative to discrete data capture, and support from leadership and regulators.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our methods to compare patient-reported symptoms of acute myeloid leukemia and the corresponding documentation by healthcare providers in the electronic health record.
BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia experience many distressing symptoms, particularly related to chemotherapy. The timely recognition and provision of evidence-based interventions to manage these symptoms can improve outcomes. However, lack of standardized formatting for symptom documentation within electronic health records leads to challenges for clinicians when accessing and comprehending patients\' symptom information, as it primarily exists in narrative forms in various parts of the electronic health record. This variability raises concerns about over- or under-reporting of symptoms. Consistency between patient-reported symptoms and clinician\'s symptom documentation is important for patient-centered symptom management, but little is known about the degree of agreement between patient reports and their documentation. This is a detailed description of the study\'s methodology, procedures and design to determine how patient-reported symptoms are similar or different from symptoms documented in electronic health records by clinicians.
METHODS: Exploratory, descriptive study.
METHODS: Forty symptoms will be assessed as patient-reported outcomes using the modified version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. The research team will annotate symptoms from the electronic health record (clinical notes and flowsheets) corresponding to the 40 symptoms. The degree of agreement between patient reports and electronic health record documentation will be analyzed using positive and negative agreement, kappa statistics and McNemar\'s test.
CONCLUSIONS: We present innovative methods to comprehensively compare the symptoms reported by acute myeloid leukemia patients with all available electronic health record documentation, including clinical notes and flowsheets, providing insights into symptom reporting in clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study will provide foundational understanding and compelling evidence, suggesting the need for more thorough efforts to assess patients\' symptoms. Methods presented in this paper are applicable to other symptom-intensive diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the prescription and implementation of pressure injury preventative interventions following risk assessment combined with a risk-stratified intervention bundle.
METHODS: Single-centre, cross-sectional, observational, prospective.
METHODS: The charts and bedsides of 341 adult inpatients were examined. Data collection included pressure injury risk level, prescribed preventative interventions and evidence of intervention implementation.
RESULTS: Most patients (68.6%) were at risk of pressure injury, and most interventions were prescribed according to their risk level. However, evidence from direct observation and/or documentation indicated intervention implementation rates were relatively poor. Of nine interventions mandated for all patients, compliance with three patient-/carer-focused interventions was particularly poor, with evidence indicating they had been implemented for 3%-10% of patients. Also, nutritional screening-related interventions were implemented poorly. Clinically indicated implementation of heel-elevation devices and bariatric equipment was low for at-risk patients, and the implementation of interventions for patients with existing pressure injuries was suboptimal. Significant proportions of several interventions that were observed as having been implemented were not documented as such.
CONCLUSIONS: While most interventions were prescribed according to patient risk level, the overall implementation of interventions was poor. However, the results may in part be due to failure to document interventions as opposed to omitting them.
CONCLUSIONS: Documentation of interventions is crucial as it provides evidence of the care provided. An increased focus on documentation of pressure injury preventative interventions is required, with a clear distinction between prescription and implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: The results highlighted several deficiencies in care, particularly relating to evidence of implementation, patient involvement and nutritional screening. The results from this study will be used to inform and improve future pressure injury prevention practice within the study hospital and should be used to inform and benchmark pressure injury preventative practices in other hospitals.
UNASSIGNED: The study adheres to STROBE guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: None.

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most commonly used invasive devices in acute care hospitals, with nurses being primarily responsible for the insertion and care of these devices. This point prevalence study aimed to describe current PIVC status and nursing documentation in a large, regional health care system and to explore variables associated with PIVC complications. The study was conducted with adult inpatients. There were 665 PIVCs included in the study. Dressings were clean, dry, and intact in 83% of observations; only 2.7% did not have a transparent dressing. Thirty-one percent of PIVCs were inserted in areas of flexion. Median dwell time was 2.39 days (± 2.36 days), with upper arm sites having the longest dwell time. Overall inter-rater reliability (IRR) for an infiltration or phlebitis score of 0 was high (97.4% and 92%, respectively). However, overall agreement was only 77.16% for infiltration and 40.07% for phlebitis, with significant disagreement as scores increased. Study findings support that there was strong compliance with the Infusion Nurses Society\'s (INS) Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice vascular access practice recommendations; however, opportunities to improve infiltration/phlebitis assessment and documentation exist.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the associations between patient-to-nurse staffing ratios and rates of mortality, process of care events and vital sign documentation.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the evaluating processes of care and outcomes of children in hospital (EPOCH) cluster-randomised trial.
METHODS: 22 hospitals caring for children in Canada, Europe and New Zealand.
METHODS: Eligible hospitalised patients were aged>37 weeks and <18 years.
METHODS: The primary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included five events reflecting the process of care, collected for all EPOCH patients; the frequency of documentation for each of eight vital signs on a random sample of patients; four measures describing nursing perceptions of care.
RESULTS: A total of 217 714 patient admissions accounting for 849 798 patient days over the course of the study were analysed. The overall mortality rate was 1.65/1000 patient discharges. The median (IQR) number of patients cared for by an individual nurse was 3.0 (2.8-3.6). Univariate Bayesian models estimating the rate ratio (RR) for the patient-to-nurse ratio and the probability that the RR was less than one found that a higher patient-to-nurse ratio was associated with fewer clinical deterioration events (RR=0.88, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.77-1.03; P (RR<1)=95%) and late intensive care unit admissions (RR=0.76, 95% CrI 0.53-1.06; P (RR<1)=95%). In adjusted models, a higher patient-to-nurse ratio was associated with lower hospital mortality (OR=0.77, 95% CrI=0.57-1.00; P (OR<1)=98%). Nurses from hospitals with a higher patient-to-nurse ratio had lower ratings for their ability to influence care and reduced documentation of most individual vital signs and of the complete set of vital signs.
CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study challenge the assumption that lower patient-to-nurse ratios will improve the safety of paediatric care in contexts where ratios are low. The mechanism of these effects warrants further evaluation including factors, such as nursing skill mix, experience, education, work environment and physician staffing ratios.
BACKGROUND: EPOCH clinical trial registered on clinical trial.gov NCT01260831; post-results.

UNASSIGNED: Social needs screening can help modify care delivery to meet patient needs and address non-medical barriers to optimal health. However, there is a need to understand how factors that exist at multiple levels of the healthcare ecosystem influence the collection of these data in primary care settings.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews involving healthcare providers and primary care clinic staff who represented 16 primary care practices. Interviews focused on barriers and facilitators to awareness of and assistance for patients\' social needs in primary care settings in Maryland. The interviews were coded to abstract themes highlighting barriers and facilitators to conducting social needs screening. The themes were organized through an inductive approach using the socio-ecological model delineating individual-, clinic-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to identifying and addressing patients\' social needs.
UNASSIGNED: We identified several individual barriers to awareness, including patient stigma about verbalizing social needs, provider frustration at eliciting needs they were unable to address, and provider unfamiliarity with community-based resources to address social needs. Clinic-level barriers to awareness included limited appointment times and connecting patients to appropriate community-based organizations. System-level barriers to awareness included navigating documentation challenges on the electronic health record.
UNASSIGNED: Overcoming barriers to effective screening for social needs in primary care requires not only practice- and provider-level process change but also an alignment of community resources and advocacy of policies to redistribute community assets to address social needs.

Community health worker (CHW) incentives and remuneration are core issues affecting the performance of CHWs and health programs. There is limited documentation on the implementation details of CHW financial compensation schemes used in sub-Saharan African countries, including their mechanisms of delivery and effectiveness. We aimed to document CHW financial compensation schemes and understand CHW, government, and other stakeholder perceptions of their effectiveness.
A total of 68 semistructured interviews were conducted with a range of purposefully selected key informants in 7 countries: Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Niger, and Zambia. Thematic analysis of coded interview data was conducted, and relevant country documentation was reviewed, including any documents referenced by key informants, to provide contextual background for qualitative interpretation.
Key informants described compensation schemes as effective when payments are regular, distributions are consistent, and amounts are sufficient to support health worker performance and continuity of service delivery. CHW compensation schemes associated with an employed worker status and government payroll mechanisms were most often perceived as effective by stakeholders. Compensation schemes associated with a volunteer status were found to vary widely in their delivery mechanisms (e.g., cash or mobile phone distribution) and were perceived as less effective. Lessons learned in implementing CHW compensation schemes involved the need for government leadership, ministerial coordination, community engagement, partner harmonization, and realistic transitional financing plans.
Policymakers should consider these findings in designing compensation schemes for CHWs engaged in routine, continuous health service delivery within the context of their country\'s health service delivery model. Systematic documentation of the tasks and time commitment of volunteer status CHWs could support more recognition of their health system contributions and better determination of commensurate compensation as recommended by the 2018 World Health Organization Guidelines on Health Policy and System Support to Optimize Community Health Worker Programs.

Electronic health records (EHRs) have become ubiquitous in clinical practice. Given the rich biomedical data captured for a large panel of patients, secondary analysis of these data for health research is also commonplace. Yet, there are many caveats to EHR data that the researchers must be aware of, such as the accuracy of and motive for documentation, and the reason for patients\' visits to the clinic. The clinician-the author of the documentation-is thus central to the correct interpretation of EHR data for research purposes. In this study, I interviewed 11 physicians in various clinical specialties to bring attention to their view on the validity of research using EHR data. Qualitative, in-depth, one-on-one interviews were conducted with practicing physicians in inpatient and outpatient medicine. Content analysis using a data-driven, inductive approach to identify themes related to challenges and opportunities in the reuse of EHR data for secondary analysis generated seven themes. Themes that reflected challenges of EHRs for research included (1) audience, (2) accuracy of data, (3) availability of data, (4) documentation practices, and (5) representativeness. Themes that reflected opportunities of EHRs for research included (6) endorsement and (7) enablers. The greatest perceived barriers reflected the intended audience of the EHR, the interpretation and meaning of the data, and the quality of the data for research purposes. Physicians generally expressed more perceived challenges than opportunities in the reuse of EHR data for research purposes; however, they remained optimistic.

BACKGROUND: To help improve access to care, section 507 of the VA MISSION (Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks) Act of 2018 mandated a 2-year trial of medical scribes in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
OBJECTIVE: The impact of scribes on provider productivity and patient throughput time in VHA emergency departments (EDs) was evaluated.
METHODS: A clustered randomized trial was designed using intent-to-treat difference-in-differences analysis. The intervention period was from June 30, 2020 to July 1, 2022. The trial included six intervention and six comparison ED clinics. Two ED providers who volunteered to participate in the trial were assigned two scribes each. Scribes assisted providers with documentation and visit-related activities. The outcomes were provider productivity and patient throughput time per clinic-pay period.
RESULTS: Randomization to intervention resulted in decreased provider productivity and increased patient throughput time. In adjusted regression models, randomization to scribes was associated with a decrease of 8.4 visits per full-time equivalent (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.4-4.3; p < 0.001) and 0.5 patients per day per provider (95% CI 0.8-0.3; p < 0.001). Intervention was associated with increases in length of stay of 29.1 min (95% CI 21.2-36.9 min; p < 0.001), 6.3 min in door to doctor (95% CI 2.9-9.6 min; p < 0.001), 19.5 min in door to disposition (95% CI 13.2-25.9 min; p < 0.001), and 13.7 min in doctor to disposition (95% CI 8.8-18.6 min; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Scribes were associated with decreased provider productivity and increased patient throughput time in VHA EDs. Although scribes may have contributed to improvements in other dimensions of quality, further examination of the ways in which scribes were used is advisable before widespread adoption in VHA EDs.