Pulmonary disease is a commonly occurring abnormality throughout this world. The pulmonary diseases include Tuberculosis, Pneumothorax, Cardiomegaly, Pulmonary atelectasis, Pneumonia, etc. A timely prognosis of pulmonary disease is essential. Increasing progress in Deep Learning (DL) techniques has significantly impacted and contributed to the medical domain, specifically in leveraging medical imaging for analysis, prognosis, and therapeutic decisions for clinicians. Many contemporary DL strategies for radiology focus on a single modality of data utilizing imaging features without considering the clinical context that provides more valuable complementary information for clinically consistent prognostic decisions. Also, the selection of the best data fusion strategy is crucial when performing Machine Learning (ML) or DL operation on multimodal heterogeneous data. We investigated multimodal medical fusion strategies leveraging DL techniques to predict pulmonary abnormality from the heterogeneous radiology Chest X-Rays (CXRs) and clinical text reports. In this research, we have proposed two effective unimodal and multimodal subnetworks to predict pulmonary abnormality from the CXR and clinical reports. We have conducted a comprehensive analysis and compared the performance of unimodal and multimodal models. The proposed models were applied to standard augmented data and the synthetic data generated to check the model\'s ability to predict from the new and unseen data. The proposed models were thoroughly assessed and examined against the publicly available Indiana university dataset and the data collected from the private medical hospital. The proposed multimodal models have given superior results compared to the unimodal models.

Mosquito surveillance data can be used for predicting mosquito distribution and dynamics as they relate to human disease. Often these data are collected by independent agencies and aggregated to state and national level portals to characterize broad spatial and temporal dynamics. These larger repositories may also share the data for use in mosquito and/or disease prediction and forecasting models. Assumed, but not always confirmed, is consistency of data across agencies. Subtle differences in reporting may be important for development and the eventual interpretation of predictive models. Using mosquito vector surveillance data from Arizona as a case study, we found differences among agencies in how trapping practices were reported. Inconsistencies in reporting may interfere with quantitative comparisons if the user has only cursory familiarity with mosquito surveillance data. Some inconsistencies can be overcome if they are explicit in the metadata while others may yield biased estimates if they are not changed in how data are recorded. Sharing of metadata and collaboration between modelers and vector control agencies is necessary for improving the quality of the estimations. Efforts to improve sharing, displaying, and comparing vector data from multiple agencies are underway, but existing data must be used with caution.