背景:在医疗保健中使用技术,通常被称为数字健康,由于在COVID-19大流行期间需要提供远程护理,该疾病的发展迅速。鉴于这种快速的繁荣,很明显,卫生保健专业人员需要接受这些技术的培训,以便提供高水平的护理。尽管医疗保健领域使用的技术越来越多,数字健康不是卫生保健课程中的一个普遍教授的话题。一些药房组织呼吁关注向学生药剂师教授数字健康的必要性;然而,目前对这样做的最佳方法没有共识。
目的:本研究的目的是确定学生药剂师对数字健康熟悉程度的评分是否有显著变化,态度,舒适,和知识量表(DH-FACKS)在为期一年的基于讨论的病例会议系列中接触到数字健康主题后。
方法:学生药剂师\'最初的安慰,态度,和知识在秋季学期开始时通过基线DH-FACKS分数收集。在整个学年的案例会议课程系列中,数字健康概念被整合到许多案例中。DH-FACKS在春季学期结束后再次对学生进行了管理。结果匹配,得分,并进行分析以评估DH-FACKS评分的任何差异。
结果:373名学生中的91名完成了调查前和调查后(回答率为24%)。使用从1到10的量表,平均学生报告的数字健康知识从干预前的4.5(SD2.5)增加到干预后的6.6(SD1.6)(P<.001),平均自我报告的舒适度从干预前的4.7(SD2.5)增加到干预后的6.7(SD1.8)(P<.001)。DH-FACKS的所有4个元素的得分均显着增加。平均熟悉度分数从11.6(SD3.7)增加到15.8(SD2.2),最大值为20(P<.001)。平均态度得分从15.6(SD2.1)增加到16.5(SD1.9),最多20个(P=0.001)。平均舒适度分数从10.1(SD3.9)增加到14.8(SD3.1),最大值为20(P<.001)。平均知识分数从9.9(SD3.4)增加到12.8(SD3.9),最大值为20(P<.001)。
结论:在案例会议系列中包括数字健康主题是一种有效且平易近人的方式,可以为学生提供有关重要数字健康概念的教育。学生经历了熟悉度的增加,态度,comfort,和为期一年的干预后的知识。由于基于案例的讨论是大多数药学和其他医学课程的重要组成部分,这种方法可以很容易地应用于其他程序,希望给他们的学生实践应用他们的数字健康的知识,以复杂的案例为基础的方案。
BACKGROUND: The use of technology in health care, often referred to as digital health, has expanded rapidly because of the need to provide remote care during the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of this rapid boom, it is clear that health care professionals need to be trained in these technologies in order to provide high-level care. Despite the growing number of technologies used across health care, digital health is not a commonly taught topic in health care curricula. Several pharmacy organizations have called attention to the need to teach digital health to student pharmacists; however, there is currently no consensus on best methods to do so.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if there was a significant change in student pharmacist scores on the Digital Health Familiarity, Attitudes, Comfort, and Knowledge Scale (DH-FACKS) after exposure to digital health topics in a yearlong discussion-based
case conference series.
METHODS: Student pharmacists\' initial comfort, attitudes, and knowledge were gathered by a baseline DH-FACKS score at the beginning of the fall semester. Digital health concepts were integrated into a number of cases in the
case conference course series throughout the academic year. The DH-FACKS was administered again to students after completion of the spring semester. Results were matched, scored, and analyzed to assess any difference in DH-FACKS scores.
RESULTS: A total of 91 of 373 students completed both the pre- and postsurvey (response rate of 24%). Using a scale from 1 to 10, the mean student-reported knowledge of digital health increased from 4.5 (SD 2.5) before intervention to 6.6 (SD 1.6) after intervention (P<.001) and the mean self-reported comfort increased from 4.7 (SD 2.5) before intervention to 6.7 (SD 1.8) after intervention (P<.001). There was a significant increase in scores for all 4 elements of the DH-FACKS. The mean familiarity scores increased from 11.6 (SD 3.7) to 15.8 (SD 2.2), out of a maximum of 20 (P<.001). The mean attitudes scores increased from 15.6 (SD 2.1) to 16.5 (SD 1.9), out of a maximum of 20 (P=.001). The mean comfort scores increased from 10.1 (SD 3.9) to 14.8 (SD 3.1), out of a maximum of 20 (P<.001). The mean knowledge scores increased from 9.9 (SD 3.4) to 12.8 (SD 3.9), out of a maximum of 20 (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Including digital health topics in a
case conference series is an effective and approachable way of providing education on important digital health concepts to students. Students experienced an increase in familiarity, attitudes, comfort, and knowledge after the yearlong intervention. As
case-based discussions are an important component of most pharmacy and other medical curricula, this method can be easily applied by other programs that wish to give their students practice applying their knowledge of digital health to complex
case-based scenarios.