depressive disorder

抑郁症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,精神和身体疾病,创伤事件的类型,研究了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的复发频率和社会人口学特征.
    该研究包括179名18岁以上的患者的档案,这些患者在2010年12月至31.01.2023年间进入精神科门诊就诊并被诊断患有PTSD。数据来自医院自动化系统和国家数据库。
    在被诊断为单一共病精神疾病的44名患者中,45.5%患有混合焦虑和抑郁障碍,36.4%患有抑郁障碍。PTSD合并精神病患者的比例为51.4%,慢性躯体疾病占59.8%。在我们的研究中,在创伤性事件中,性创伤和家庭暴力的复发率最高(80%).
    精神和身体合并症在PTSD中很常见。缺乏足够的检查时间和适当的治疗环境导致临床医生错过这种诊断,并阻止患者获得理想的健康服务。为了防止性创伤和家庭暴力再次发生,主管当局必须使保护社会弱势群体的做法更加有效,并按照国际公约行事。
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, mental and physical illnesses, types of traumatic events, frequency of recurrence and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) were examined.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included the files of 179 patients over the age of 18 who were admitted to the psychiatry outpatient clinic between 01.12.2010 and 31.01.2023 and diagnosed with PTSD. The data was obtained from the hospital automation system and national database.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 44 patients diagnosed with a single comorbid mental illness, 45.5% had mixed anxiety and depressive disorder and 36.4% had a depressive disorder. The rate of patients with comorbid mental illness in PTSD was 51.4%, and chronic physical illness was observed in 59.8%. In our study, sexual trauma and domestic violence had the highest recurrence rates among traumatic events (80%).
    UNASSIGNED: Comorbid mental and physical illnesses are common in PTSD. The lack of adequate examination time and an appropriate therapeutic environment causes this diagnosis to be missed by clinicians and prevents patients from getting an ideal health service. In order to prevent recurrences of sexual traumas and domestic violence, the competent authorities must make practices of protecting socially disadvantaged groups more effective and act in accordance with international conventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗可以通过更准确和更早的反应预测来改善。潜在类别混合物(LCMM)和非线性混合效应(NLME)模型已应用于对TMS的抗抑郁反应(或无反应)的轨迹进行建模,但目前尚不清楚这些模型是否有助于预测临床上有意义的症状严重程度的变化,即分类(非)响应,而不是连续得分。
    我们比较了LCMM和NLME方法在238名接受rTMS治疗抵抗性抑郁症的患者的自然样本中模拟对TMS的抗抑郁反应,跨多个线圈和协议。然后我们比较了这些模型的预测能力。
    LCMM轨迹主要受基线症状严重程度的影响,但基线症状对后期抗抑郁反应的预测能力不大.相反,最佳LCMM模型是考虑基线症状的非线性两类模型.该模型准确地预测了患者在治疗4周时的反应(AUC=0.70,95%CI=[0.52-0.87]),但不是以前。NLME在治疗4周时提供了轻微改善的预测性能(AUC=0.76,95%CI=[0.58-0.94],但同样,不是以前。
    在显示这些方法对rTMS响应轨迹进行建模的预测有效性时,我们提供了轨迹建模可用于指导未来治疗决策的初步证据.
    UNASSIGNED: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy could be improved by more accurate and earlier prediction of response. Latent class mixture (LCMM) and non-linear mixed effects (NLME) modeling have been applied to model the trajectories of antidepressant response (or non-response) to TMS, but it is not known whether such models are useful in predicting clinically meaningful change in symptom severity, i.e. categorical (non)response as opposed to continuous scores.
    UNASSIGNED: We compared LCMM and NLME approaches to model the antidepressant response to TMS in a naturalistic sample of 238 patients receiving rTMS for treatment resistant depression, across multiple coils and protocols. We then compared the predictive power of those models.
    UNASSIGNED: LCMM trajectories were influenced largely by baseline symptom severity, but baseline symptoms provided little predictive power for later antidepressant response. Rather, the optimal LCMM model was a nonlinear two-class model that accounted for baseline symptoms. This model accurately predicted patient response at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI = [0.52 - 0.87]), but not before. NLME offered slightly improved predictive performance at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI = [0.58 - 0.94], but likewise, not before.
    UNASSIGNED: In showing the predictive validity of these approaches to model response trajectories to rTMS, we provided preliminary evidence that trajectory modeling could be used to guide future treatment decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抑郁和焦虑在全球范围内越来越普遍。对治疗的需求增加和临床医生的缺乏导致患者接受第一次治疗的等待时间延长。为了应对这种差距,已发现数字心理健康干预(DMHIs)可有效治疗抑郁症和焦虑症,对于等待面对面心理治疗的患者而言,它可能是有希望的预处理.然而,目前尚不清楚数字干预是否能有效缓解等待接受面对面心理治疗的患者的症状.
    目的:本综述旨在综合DMHIs对缓解等待面对面治疗的患者抑郁和焦虑症状的有效性。这篇评论还调查了这些特征,感知的可信度,和DMHI在等待时间的可用性。
    方法:在这篇系统综述中,我们搜索了PubMed,PsycINFO,科克伦,和WebofScience进行研究,调查DMHIs在减少等待面对面心理治疗的个体的抑郁或焦虑症状方面的有效性。搜索于2024年6月进行,我们纳入了符合纳入标准并在2024年6月6日之前发表的研究。
    结果:在确定的9267条唯一记录中,8项研究符合资格标准,并纳入系统评价。五项研究是随机对照试验(RCTs),3项研究没有。在RCT中,我们发现数字干预减少了抑郁和焦虑症状,但与对照组相比,大多数干预措施并不更有效,对照组参与者只是等待或接受自助书.对于非RCT,干预措施也减少了症状,但是没有控制组,对调查结果的解释是有限的。最后,纳入研究的参与者认为数字干预是可信和有用的,但高辍学率引起了人们对治疗依从性的担忧.
    结论:由于在综述的研究中缺乏有效的干预措施,尤其是在RCT中,我们的结果表明,与简单地等待或使用自助书相比,等待列表DMHI并没有更有效.然而,为了得出更可靠的结论,需要更多具有更大样本量的高质量RCT。此外,由于这篇综述揭示了人们对数字干预措施辍学率高的担忧,未来的研究也许可以在干预中采用更个性化和以人为中心的功能来提高用户的参与度,具有提高治疗依从性和有效性的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety have become increasingly prevalent across the globe. The rising need for treatment and the lack of clinicians has resulted in prolonged waiting times for patients to receive their first session. Responding to this gap, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have been found effective in treating depression and anxiety and are potentially promising pretreatments for patients who are awaiting face-to-face psychotherapy. Nevertheless, whether digital interventions effectively alleviate symptoms for patients on waiting lists for face-to-face psychotherapy remains unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of DMHIs for relieving depression and anxiety symptoms of patients on waiting lists for face-to-face therapy. This review also investigated the features, perceived credibility, and usability of DMHIs during waiting times.
    METHODS: In this systematic review, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Web of Science for research studies investigating the effectiveness of DMHIs in reducing either depression or anxiety symptoms among individuals waiting for face-to-face psychotherapy. The search was conducted in June 2024, and we have included the studies that met the inclusion criteria and were published before June 6, 2024.
    RESULTS: Of the 9267 unique records identified, 8 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Five studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 3 studies were not. Among the RCTs, we found that digital interventions reduced depression and anxiety symptoms, but the majority of interventions were not more effective compared to the control groups where participants simply waited or received a self-help book. For the non-RCTs, the interventions also reduced symptoms, but without control groups, the interpretation of the findings is limited. Finally, participants in the included studies perceived the digital interventions to be credible and useful, but high dropout rates raised concerns about treatment adherence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to the lack of effective interventions among the reviewed studies, especially among the RCTs, our results suggest that waiting list DMHIs are not more effective compared to simply waiting or using a self-help book. However, more high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are warranted in order to draw a more robust conclusion. Additionally, as this review revealed concerns regarding the high dropout rate in digital interventions, future studies could perhaps adopt more personalized and human-centered functions in interventions to increase user engagement, with the potential to increase treatment adherence and effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)影响2%至4%的人,沙特阿拉伯的患病率越来越高,达到13.4%。FMS可以发生在青少年,称为青少年性纤维肌痛(JFM),伴有包括抑郁症在内的合并症,焦虑,和心理压力。我们的患者被送往沙特国王大学医院医疗城的儿童和青少年精神病学诊所。来我们诊所的前一年,在15岁时,她最初被诊断为JFM,随后合并为持续性抑郁症.
    方法:作为一种新的治疗方法,使用了一种联合治疗方法,包括度洛西汀的药物干预,以及对青少年进行人际心理治疗的非药物干预。她完成了16周的治疗,同时监测度洛西汀的反应和副作用。
    结果:抑郁症状在治疗结束时缓解,并在治疗后的第一个月继续随访,FMS症状也得到控制。
    结论:我们目前的案例强调了一种治疗青少年抑郁症和JFM的联合方法,这是一种新颖的干预方法,因此我们强烈建议将其用于类似病例。
    BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) affects 2% to 4% of people, with increasing prevalence in Saudi Arabia reaching 13.4%. FMS can occur in adolescents, known as juvenile-onset fibromyalgia (JFM) with comorbidities including depression, anxiety, and psychological stress. Our patient presented to the child and adolescent psychiatry clinic at King Saud University Hospital Medical City. A year before coming to our clinic, at the age of 15 she was initially diagnosed with JFM followed by a comorbid persistent depressive disorder.
    METHODS: As a novel treatment method, a combination treatment approach was used, including a pharmacological intervention with Duloxetine, and a non-pharmacological intervention with interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents. She completed 16 weeks of therapy while monitoring for duloxetine response and side effects.
    RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were in remission by treatment\'s end and continued to be in her first month posttreatment follow-up, and the FMS symptoms were also controlled.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our present case highlights a combined approach to treat depression and JFM in adolescents as a novel intervention method thus we strongly recommend utilizing it for similar cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    证据表明,肠道微生物群(GM)的组成与抑郁症和焦虑症有关。然而,它们之间的因果关系仍然存在争议。调查转基因和抑郁/焦虑障碍之间的潜在因果关系,并确定特定的细菌分类群,我们对与抑郁症和焦虑症相关的肠道微生物组进行了2个样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析.我们将来自荷兰微生物组计划7738名个体和MiBioGen联盟18,340名个体的微生物组的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总数据作为我们的暴露变量。同时,采用抑郁和焦虑障碍的GWAS作为我们的结局变量.主要估计是使用逆方差加权检验获得的,并辅以4种稳健方法:MREgger,加权中位数,简单模式,和加权模式。此外,我们进行了全面的敏感性和方向性分析.结果显示,5个细菌类群与抑郁症呈正相关,6个呈负相关;5个与焦虑症呈正相关,与11呈负相关。这项研究为GM与抑郁症和焦虑症发病机制之间的联系提供了新的见解,并为这些疾病的诊断和治疗提供了新的视角。
    Evidence shows that the composition of the gut microbiota (GM) is associated with depression and anxiety disorders. However, the causal relationship between them remains controversial. To investigate the potential causal relationship between the GM and depression/anxiety disorders and to identify specific bacterial taxa, we conducted a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on the gut microbiome implicated in depression and anxiety disorders. We incorporated summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the microbiome derived from 7738 individuals in the Dutch Microbiome Project and 18,340 individuals in the MiBioGen consortium as our exposure variable. Concurrently, the GWAS of depression and anxiety disorders was employed as our outcome variable. The principal estimates were procured using the inverse-variance weighted test complemented by 4 robust methods: MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. In addition, we performed comprehensive sensitivity and directionality analyses. The results showed that 5 bacterial taxa were positively correlated with depression, 6 were negatively correlated; 5 were positively correlated with anxiety disorders, and 11 were negatively correlated. This study provides new insights into the connection between the GM and the pathogenesis of depression and anxiety disorders and offers new perspectives for the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重度抑郁症(MDD)的患病率构成了重大的全球健康挑战,与可用的治疗往往不足以实现许多患者的缓解。数字健康技术,如基于短信的认知行为疗法,提供可访问的替代方案,但可能无法覆盖所有个人。电子邮件通信为健康通信提供了一条安全的途径,然而,与SMS短信相比,其在为MDD患者提供心理健康支持方面的有效性仍不确定.
    目的:本研究旨在比较电子邮件和短信作为支持MDD患者的交付平台的功效。解决在理解精神卫生保健的最佳数字干预方面的关键差距。
    方法:进行了一项随机非劣效性试验,比较通过电子邮件接受6周每日支持信息的患者和通过SMS短信接受信息的患者的结局。此持续时间对应于邮件传递的最少180天。支持消息在两种传递方法中保持一致的长度和结构。参与者(N=66)从埃德蒙顿的Access24/7诊所招募,艾伯塔省,在那些被诊断为MDD的人中。使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)在基线和入组后6个月测量结果,广义焦虑症-7(GAD-7),和世界卫生组织福祉指数(WHO-5)。
    结果:大多数参与者是女性(n=43,65%),年龄在26至40岁之间(n=34,55%),受过高中教育(n=35,58%),受雇(n=33,50%),和单身(n=24,36%)。再一次,大多数参与者没有任何重大身体疾病史(n=56,85%),并且(n=61,92%)对有心境障碍治疗入院史回答"否".电子邮件和SMS短信组之间的PHQ-9,GAD-7和WHO-5得分的平均变化没有统计学上的显着差异(平均差异,95%CI:-1.90,95%CI-6.53至2.74;5.78,95%CI-1.94至13.50;和11.85,95%CI-3.81至27.51),分别。两种支持方式都显示出减少抑郁症状和改善生活质量的潜力。
    结论:研究结果表明,电子邮件和SMS短信干预措施在减轻MDD患者的抑郁症状方面具有同等效果。随着数字技术的不断发展,利用多个数字平台的力量进行心理健康干预可以显著有助于弥合现有的治疗差距,改善抑郁症患者的整体健康状况。需要更大的样本量进行进一步的研究,以确认和扩展这些发现。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04638231;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552095/。
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) poses significant global health challenges, with available treatments often insufficient in achieving remission for many patients. Digital health technologies, such as SMS text messaging-based cognitive behavioral therapy, offer accessible alternatives but may not reach all individuals. Email communication presents a secure avenue for health communication, yet its effectiveness compared to SMS text messaging in providing mental health support for patients with MDD remains uncertain.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of email versus SMS text messaging as delivery platforms for supporting patients with MDD, addressing a critical gap in understanding optimal digital interventions for mental health care.
    METHODS: A randomized noninferiority pilot trial was conducted, comparing outcomes for patients receiving 6-week daily supportive messages via email with those receiving messages via SMS text message. This duration corresponds to a minimum of 180 days of message delivery. The supportive messages maintained consistent length and structure across both delivery methods. Participants (N=66) were recruited from the Access 24/7 clinic in Edmonton, Alberta, among those who were diagnosed with MDD. The outcomes were measured at baseline and 6 months after enrollment using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5).
    RESULTS: Most of the participants were females (n=43, 65%), aged between 26 and 40 years (n=34, 55%), had high school education (n=35, 58%), employed (n=33, 50%), and single (n=24, 36%). Again, most participants had had no history of any major physical illness (n=56, 85%) and (n=61, 92%) responded \"No\" to having a history of admission for treatment of mood disorders. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean changes in PHQ-9, GAD-7, and WHO-5 scores between the email and SMS text messaging groups (mean difference, 95% CI: -1.90, 95% CI -6.53 to 2.74; 5.78, 95% CI -1.94 to 13.50; and 11.85, 95% CI -3.81 to 27.51), respectively. Both supportive modalities showed potential in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study\'s findings suggest that both email and SMS text messaging interventions have equivalent effectiveness in reducing depression symptoms among individuals with MDD. As digital technology continues to evolve, harnessing the power of multiple digital platforms for mental health interventions can significantly contribute to bridging the existing treatment gaps and improving the overall well-being of individuals with depressive conditions. Further research is needed with a larger sample size to confirm and expand upon these findings.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04638231; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552095/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估基于互联网的自助干预措施在治疗青少年和年轻人抑郁症中的有效性。
    方法:在六个数据库中进行了系统搜索,包括PubMed,确定符合特定纳入和排除标准的随机对照试验(RCT)。干预措施包括基于互联网的自助干预措施。
    结果:本分析共纳入23项随机对照试验(RCT)。荟萃分析表明,基于互联网的自助疗法显着降低了青少年和年轻人的抑郁评分。(OR=-0.68,95CI[-0.88,-0.47],P<0.001)。我们检查了来自不同地区的患者招募的影响,药物使用,治疗师参与,每周干预时间,和干预持续时间。从学校挑选的病人,初级保健中心,诊所和当地社区的效果更好。短期持续30至60分钟和每周60至180分钟的干预有效。
    结论:基于网络的自助干预可以有效治疗青少年和年轻人的抑郁症。然而,患者招募地点等因素,药物使用,治疗师的参与,每周干预时间,干预持续时间与结果相互作用。由于纳入研究的数据不足,无法对潜在不良反应和性别进行亚组分析。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Internet-based self-help interventions in treating depression in adolescents and young adults.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across six databases, including PubMed, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that satisfied the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The intervention measure consisted of Internet-based self-help interventions.
    RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this analysis. Meta-analysis indicated that Internet-based self-help therapies significantly reduced depression scores in adolescents and young adults. (OR = -0.68, 95%CI [-0.88, -0.47], P < 0.001). We examined the effects of patient recruitment from various regions, medication usage, therapist involvement, weekly intervention time, and intervention duration. Patients selected from school, primary healthcare centers, clinics and local communities had better results. Intervention lasting 30 to 60 min and 60 to180 minutes per week were effective in the short term.
    CONCLUSIONS: The internet-based self-help intervention can be effective in treating depression in adolescents and young adults. However, factors such as patient recruitment locations, medication usage, Therapists\' involvement, weekly intervention time, and intervention duration interacted with the outcome. Subgroup analysis on potential adverse effects and gender was impossible due to insufficient data from the included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:虽然已知协作护理可以改善初级保健中的抑郁和焦虑症状,在现实世界环境中,缺乏虚拟协作护理与虚拟专业精神病学治疗的比较有效性研究。这项研究检查了6个月以上的协作护理和专业精神病学患者的抑郁和焦虑症状。
    方法:这是一项观察性研究,在一个大型的,以社区为基础,综合医疗系统。参与者年龄≥18岁,通过患者健康问卷-9或广泛性焦虑症-7量表测量轻度-中度抑郁或焦虑症状。排除标准包括急性自杀风险。患者被分配到协作护理或专业精神病学,和症状在治疗开始后6个月使用线性混合效应回归与治疗权重的逆概率进行测量.
    结果:有N=10,380名患者(协作护理中n=1,607;专业精神病学中n=8,773)患有抑郁症,N=2,935(协作护理中n=570;专业精神病学中n=2,365)患有焦虑症。6个月时的模型效果显示,协作护理患者的症状显着改善(抑郁症的校正平均差异[AMD]=-9.0,95%CI,-9.7,-8.4;焦虑的-5.4,95%CI,-6.2,-4.7)和专业精神病学(抑郁症的AMD=-5.0,95%CI,-5.6,-4.5;-2.8,95%CI,-3.6,-2.1),与专业精神病学患者相比,协作治疗患者的改善明显更大(抑郁症患者为AMD=-4.0,95%CI,-4.7,-3.3,P<0.0001;焦虑患者为AMD=-2.6,95%CI,-3.4,-1.8,P<0.0001)。
    结论:虚拟协作护理在治疗抑郁和焦虑方面至少与专业精神病学一样有效。协作护理的实施可以支持有关抑郁症和焦虑症筛查和治疗的国家指南。
    Objective: While collaborative care is known to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms in primary care, comparative effectiveness studies of virtual collaborative care versus virtual specialty psychiatry treatment in real world settings are lacking. This study examined patient depressive and anxiety symptoms over 6 months in collaborative care versus specialty psychiatry.
    Methods: This was an observational study with target trial emulation in a large, community-based, integrated health care system. Participants were ≥18 years old with mild-moderate depressive or anxiety symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale. Exclusion criteria included acute suicide risk. Patients were assigned to collaborative care or specialty psychiatry, and symptoms were measured 6 months after treatment initiation using linear mixed-effects regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting.
    Results: There were N = 10,380 patients (n = 1,607 in collaborative care; n = 8,773 in specialty psychiatry) with depressive disorders and N = 2,935 (n = 570 in collaborative care; n = 2,365 in specialty psychiatry) with anxiety disorders. Model effects at 6 months showed significant symptom improvement for patients in collaborative care (adjusted mean difference [AMD] = -9.0, 95% CI, -9.7, -8.4 for depression; -5.4, 95% CI, -6.2, -4.7 for anxiety) and in specialty psychiatry (AMD = -5.0, 95% CI, -5.6, -4.5 for depression; -2.8, 95% CI, -3.6, -2.1 for anxiety), with patients in collaborative care showing significantly greater improvement compared to those in specialty psychiatry (AMD = -4.0, 95% CI, -4.7, -3.3, P < .0001 for depression; AMD = -2.6, 95% CI, -3.4, -1.8, P < .0001 for anxiety).
    Conclusions: Virtual collaborative care was at least as effective as specialty psychiatry for depression and anxiety. Collaborative care implementation can support national guidelines regarding depression and anxiety screening and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,心理健康状况的治疗存在很大差距,在那里,大多数接受任何护理的患者都来自非专业初级卫生保健工作者(PHCW)。我们试图研究在尼日利亚初级卫生保健(PHC)环境中为患有抑郁症的老年人提供护理的PHCW的经验。
    方法:定性研究设计。共有24名PHCW参加。使用深入的关键线人访谈(KIIs),我们探索了从尼日利亚西南部10个农村和城市PHC中选择的15个PHCW的观点。还举行了由9名与会者组成的另一个焦点小组讨论,讨论基伊研究所的新主题。采用专题分析法对数据进行分析。
    结果:确定了三个总体主题:关于抑郁症的观点,治疗方案,和社区外展影响。参与者认为老年人的抑郁症以一系列情绪为特征,行为,和认知症状,这使得临床评估特别具有挑战性。PHCW使用的常见治疗方案包括一般建议和咨询,以及经常需要开温和的镇痛药,维生素和偶尔的镇静剂符合患者的期望。即使PHCW获得授权,也很少使用抗抑郁药。虽然家访是他们预期工作时间表的一部分,由于没有运输设施,PHCW很少实施这些措施。移动技术被认为是克服这种限制的一种可能方法,可以为老年人提供基于社区的精神保健。
    结论:PHCW认为患者认知能力较差,期望开镇静剂,镇痛药和维生素,以及不存在基于社区的服务是在研究环境中为患有抑郁症的老年人提供基于证据的持续护理的现有障碍.
    OBJECTIVE: There is a large treatment gap for mental health conditions in sub-Saharan Africa where most patients who receive any care do so from lay primary health care workers (PHCW). We sought to examine the experiences of PHCW who provide care for older people with depression in Nigerian primary health care (PHC) settings.
    METHODS: Qualitative study design. A total of 24 PHCW participated. Using in-depth key informant interviews (KIIs), we explored the views of 15 PHCW selected from 10 rural and urban PHCs in South-Western Nigeria. An additional focus group discussion comprising nine participants was also conducted to discuss emerging themes from KIIs. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Three overall themes were identified: views about depression, treatment options, and community outreach implications. Participants perceived depression in older people as being characterised by a range of mood, behavioural, and cognitive symptoms which made clinical assessments particularly challenging. Common treatment options used by PHCW included general advice and counselling, as well as frequent need to prescribe mild analgesics, vitamins and occasional sedatives in line with patients\' expectations. Antidepressants were rarely used even though PHCW are authorised. While home visits are part of their expected work schedule, PHCW rarely implemented these due to non-availability of transport facilities. Mobile technology was identified as a possible way of overcoming this constraint to providing community based mental healthcare for older people.
    CONCLUSIONS: PHCWs perceived that patients\' poor cognitive performance, expectations to prescribe sedatives, analgesics and vitamins, as well as non-existence of community-based services were existing barriers to providing evidenced based continued care for older people with depression in the study settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症是全球范围内的重大公共卫生问题,与全身炎症反应密切相关。另外,体力活动(PA)被认为与较低水平的抑郁症和炎症标志物有关。本研究旨在阐明PA之间的复杂相互作用,抑郁症,和炎症标志物。根据国家健康和营养调查(NHANES),应用各种逻辑回归分析三者之间的成对相关性。构造了限制性三次样条,以探索PA与凹陷之间的非线性关系。使用介导模型来鉴定炎症标志物的介导作用。研究结果揭示了抑郁症和炎症标志物之间的积极联系,而PA与炎症标志物和抑郁症呈负相关。特别是,我们注意到,当PA水平在1200~1722MET-min/周时,抑郁风险降低最大.此外,我们证明了炎症标志物介导了缺乏运动对抑郁症的潜在影响,1.72%至6.25%不等。总之,PA似乎可以预防抑郁症,其中炎症标志物可能起中介作用。此外,我们确定了PA的最佳剂量,以最大程度地降低抑郁的可能性,从而为抑郁症的管理提供有价值的指导。
    Depression is a major public health problem worldwide and is closely related with systemic inflammatory responses. Additionly, physical activity (PA) is thought to be associated with lower levels of depression and inflammatory markers. This study aimed to elucidate the complex interactions between PA, depression, and inflammatory markers. Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), various logistic regression were applied to analyze the pairwise correlations among the three. Restrictive cubic splines were constructed to explore the nonlinear relationship between PA and depression. Mediation models were used to identify the mediating role of inflammatory markers. The findings revealed a positive link between depression and inflammatory marker, whereas PA was inversely correlated with both inflammatory marker and depression. Particularly, we noticed the greatest reduction in the risk of depression when the level of PA was between 1200 and 1722 MET-min/week. Besides, we demonstrated that inflammatory markers mediate the potential effects of physical inactivity on depression, ranging from 1.72 % to 6.25 %. In conclusion, PA appear to protect against depression, in which inflammatory markers may play a mediating role. Moreover, we determined the optimal dosage of PA to minimize the likelihood of depression, thereby offering valuable guidance for managing depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号