UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effectiveness of decompression and various parameters that may affect volume change in cystic lesions. Patients and.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Ewha Womans University Medical Center between 2012 and 2022 for decompression of cystic lesions of the jaw. To measure volume changes, pre- and post-decompression cone-beam computed tomography was performed and reconstructed in three dimensions using Mimics 25.0 software (Materialise NV). A comparative analysis was performed based on sex, age, initial cyst volume, location, degree of cortical layer expansion, and pathologic diagnosis using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
UNASSIGNED: In all 20 cases, the duration of decompression was 7.84±3.35 months, and all patients successfully completed the decompression period without any complications. Significant differences were observed in the reduction rate and shrinkage speed based on the degree of cortical layer expansion. However, only the shrinkage speed (not the reduction rate) showed a significant difference with respect to the initial cyst volume. Significant differences were not observed based on sex, age, location, or pathologic diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: Although the present study involved a small number of cases, the effectiveness of decompression was confirmed. In particular, 3D analysis overcame the shortcomings of previous studies of decompression and allowed earlier resection. Further studies with more patients are required to provide a rationale for these results and identify factors that influence decompression.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare two ultrasound-guided, minimally invasive procedures to release the A1-pulley (needle release and thread release) regarding efficacy and safety in an anatomical specimen model.
METHODS: Twenty-one ultrasound-guided needle releases and 20 ultrasound-guided thread releases were performed on digits of Thiel-embalmed anatomical specimens. A scoring system was developed to assess ultrasound visibility, intervention outcome (incomplete, almost complete, or full transection of the A1 pulley), and injury to adjacent structures (neurovascular structures, tendons, A2 pulley). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the score of the two groups (group 1: needle release,group 2: thread release). A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Needle release was completely successful in 15 cases (71.5%), almost complete release was achieved in four cases (19%), and incomplete transection occurred in two cases (9.5%). Thread release was completely successful in 17 cases (85%), and almost complete transection was observed in the remaining three cases (15%). In both procedures no neurovascular structures were harmed. Slight injury of flexor tendons occurred in two cases (9.5%) in needle release and in five cases (25%) in thread release. There were no significant statistical differences between the groups regarding ultrasound visibility, intervention safety and outcome, (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided needle release and ultrasound-guided thread release have similar success of release, both being effective and safe techniques for the release of the A1 pulley.

UNASSIGNED: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), resulting from impaired blood supply to the head of the femur, presents a significant challenge to clinicians due to its debilitating nature. Conservative treatment often offers insufficient pain relief and debilitating functional outcomes which necessitate alternative therapies. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), a potent orthobiologics and rich in mesenchymal stromal cells and growth factors, holds good promise as the minimally invasive procedure for ONFH. With the preceding research suggesting clinical and functional efficacy, we assessed the therapeutic effectiveness of BMAC in ONFH management in joint preservation.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 20 patients suffering from ONFH who failed to respond to 6 months of conservative treatment. A uniform surgical procedure was performed by a single surgeon, involving bone marrow extraction from the anterior iliac crest and subsequent processing into an 8-10 mL of BMAC concentrate. The BMAC was then injected into the implanted into the decompressed femoral head. The post-operative protocol comprised weight-bearing mobilization, physiotherapy, and a 4-week NSAID-free regimen. Outcome measures included pain scores, hip function, knee symptoms, sports activities, patient satisfaction, and recommendation of the procedure.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 20 patients suffering from ONFH, primarily the left side, most of whom were at stage 2b, significant pain reduction and functional improvement were observed over 24 months. The mean pain score decreased from 9.00 to 3.55, while the hip function score increased from 46.12 to 88.60. However, some patients encountered complications such as symptom recurrence (5%), disease progression (10%), and persistent pain (5%).
UNASSIGNED: Core decompression with BMAC implantation emerges as a promising, effective, and safe treatment for ONFH with better costeffectiveness and minimal side effects, making it a feasible treatment alternative.

UNASSIGNED: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is common in routine orthopedic clinics. The challenge arises in managing early stages (I and II) without obvious radiological evidence. Authors explore this naïve research area by comparing surgical procedures in early AVN patients.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective multicentric study was performed from November 2020 to February 2023 on 82 patients treated with surgical decompression and adjuvants, concerning the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Radiopacity and intraosseous edema resolution and THA conversion rates were assessed. Hip pain VAS, groin/thigh pain, difficulty in sitting cross-legged incidence, pain-free walking distance, Harris hip scores, 30-s chair test, and complications were noted.
UNASSIGNED: Among 82 patients, the mean age was 28.46 years. Male:female ratio of 3.9:1. 8.5% had bilateral affection and 48.78% had a positive family history. 93.90% presented with groin pain and difficulty in sitting cross-legged, restricted hip movements in 85.3%, and thigh pain in 54.87%. Harris hip scored worst in Group 3 followed by Group 2 and Group 1. 63.41% and 36.58% of patients had Grades 1 and 2 AVN, respectively. At 1 week post-operatively, 96.3% and 93.9% of patients were relieved from groin and thigh pain, respectively (p < 0.001); the trend being Group 3 > Group 2 > Group 1. Hip pain VAS followed a similar trend. At 4 weeks, Harris hip scores improved in Group 3 > Group 2 > Group 1. At 6 months, the trend was Group 2 > Group 3 > Group 1. Group 3 had better 30-s chair test results, pain-free walking distance, and longer cross-legged sitting time. Complication rate of 3.6%. 6.09% of patients underwent THA later. Sclerotic patch and marrow edema resolution early in Group 3, i.e., 46 and 31 days respectively, followed by Group 2 and Group 1.
UNASSIGNED: In Stages I and II AVN, biplanar core decompression (double) and intraosseous PRP injection is a promising salvage option; patients have better early hip scores (4 weeks), and early groin and thigh pain recovery. Patients treated early have better clinical and radiological recovery.
UNASSIGNED:

BACKGROUND: Patients with lower lumbar stenosis and disc herniation report disability in standing and ambulation, despite normal neurological examination. The L5 and S1 nerve roots support the entire motor and sensory function of the foot, and their radiculopathy can affect foot loading during standing and walking. This has not been quantified before.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify alterations in static and dynamic foot pressure transfers in patients with lower lumbar nerve root compression, and document any beneficial effects of surgical decompression.
METHODS: Prospective, case-control study.
METHODS: Cases-Patients with unilateral radiculopathy (L5/S1) with normal neurology (n=50); Controls - Healthy volunteers (n=50).
METHODS: The volunteers and patients underwent pedobarographic analysis during standing (static) and walking (dynamic), and fifteen (12 dynamic and three static) parameters were documented. The patient\'s preoperative values were compared with that of the healthy volunteers. All the 50 patients underwent surgical decompression, and clinical outcome measures (VAS/ODI at 3 months) were documented. Pedobarographic analysis was repeated in the postoperative period (48 hours) and 3-month follow-up and compared with the preoperative scores.
RESULTS: In healthy controls, the mean values of all 15 parameters were comparable between the right and the left side (p>.05). When compared to controls, the patients had significantly lower maximum foot loads (p=.01) and average foot loads (p=.05) on the affected side during walking indicating lesser load transmission, in the preoperative period. Within the affected foot, the load transfer was higher on the first metatarsal/ medial arch while significantly less on the lateral metatarsals (p=.04). The percentage load on whole foot and forefoot was significantly less on standing (p=.01). Significant improvements were noted in the post-operative period, especially in the maximum foot surface area (p=.01), maximum and average foot loads, and improved weight transfers on lateral arch and forefoot (p=.02). The load on whole foot increased significantly from 46.1%±5.5% (preoperative) to 48.1%±5.5% (postoperative) and 49.9%±3.3% at follow-up (p=.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study using Pedobarography to document altered foot pressure patterns during ambulation in patients with disc herniation and stenosis. Decreased load transfer, asymmetrical and unphysiological distribution of pressures on the affected foot were observed during weight bearing, which improved after surgical decompression.

OBJECTIVE: Median arcuate ligament syndrome is caused by compression and stenosis of the celiac artery. Incision of the median arcuate ligament improves persistent abdominal symptoms. The study aimed at evaluating the outcomes in patients who underwent median arcuate ligament syndrome decompression using a self-report questionnaire.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome who underwent decompression surgery between April 2021 and February 2023. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the study. Laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries were performed in seven and three patients, respectively. The median operation time was 147 minutes. The median hospitalization period after the operation was seven days. The degrees of celiac artery stenosis before and after surgery were compared and the per cent diameter stenosis did not significantly improve; five of 10 patients (50%) had > 50% stenosis in the celiac artery after the operation. Compared to the baseline, the scores of upper gastrointestinal symptoms significantly improved during the six months\' period (p < 0.001). Additionally, we evaluated the influence of post-operative per cent diameter stenosis and divided the patients into two groups (≥ 50% vs, < 50%). The scores of upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in both groups improved significantly from baseline. However, the symptomatic improvement at six months in the post-operative per cent diameter stenosis < 50% group was significantly greater than that in the ≥ 50% group (p = 0.016). The scores of lower gastrointestinal symptoms did not change significantly during the six-month period.
CONCLUSIONS: Decompression surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome could improve upper gastrointestinal symptoms regardless of the post-operative per cent diameter stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The one-hole split endoscopy (OSE) was first proposed and clinically applied in China in 2019. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of one-hole split endoscopy (OSE) and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: One hundred sixty patients with LSS who met the inclusion from November 2020 to August 2022 were analyzed and divided into OSE and UBE groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust the imbalanced confounding variables between the two groups. After matching, surgical outcomes were recorded, and clinical data, including functional scores and imaging findings, were compared. Functional scores included the visual analog scale of leg pain (VAS-LP) and back pain (VAS-BP), the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Imaging data included dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA), lumbar range of motion (ROM), and sagittal translation (ST).
RESULTS: After PSM, 104 LSS patients were included in the study, and all covariates were well-balanced between the two groups. Among the matched patients, the OSE showed advantages over the UBE regarding operative time (62.42 ± 4.86 vs. 68.96 ± 4.56) and incision length (2.30 ± 0.14 vs. 2.70 ± 0.15) (P < 0.001). However, differences between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay, and complication rates were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference regarding VAS-BP, VAS-LP, JOA, and ODI between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, all clinical and functional scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05). Postoperative DCSA of both groups was significantly found to be improved (P < 0.05), ROM and ST remained within the normal range, and no cases of lumbar instability were recorded. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates in the OSE and UBE groups were 94.23% and 90.38%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.713).
CONCLUSIONS: OSE is an alternative technique to UBE for the treatment of LSS, with similar satisfactory clinical outcomes, shorter operative time, and smaller incision length. Further studies are needed for long-term efficacy.

UNASSIGNED: Open decompression is currently the standard surgical procedure for symptomatic OLF. As the minimal invasive method gains popularity, UBE is considered a reliable technique with less complication. However, the outcome is still in question. This study aimed to evaluate and compare UBE versus open surgery in symptomatic OLF cases.
UNASSIGNED: We evaluated 35 patients with single- or two-level thoracic OLF, underwent decompression by open or UBE. Surgery duration, estimated blood loss, and LOS were recorded as intraoperative parameters. Minimum follow-up was 1 year to evaluate clinical parameters based on the mJOA score, Frankel grade, and recovery rate (RR).
UNASSIGNED: The UBE procedure showed significant superiority with faster surgery (62.5 min vs. 180 min; p < 0.001), less blood loss (50 mL vs. 250 mL; p < 0.001), and shorter LOS (4 days vs. 6 days; p < 0,001). UBE patients showed notable clinical improvement on the mJOA score at 1 year (8.2 ± 0.18 vs. 6.8 ± 0.24; p = 0.015). Frankel grade improvements seen in both groups with 51.4% of subjects having at least a 1-point upgrade. RR in 1 year resulted in significant recovery in UBE group (RR-UBE 43.2 ± 17 vs. RR-open 26.3 ± 15.3; p < 0.05). No neurological deterioration or significant complication occurred after either procedure.
UNASSIGNED: The UBE technique allows faster decompression with less blood loss and shorter LOS compared to open surgery. It was found to be a reliable treatment option in treating OLF with favorable clinical outcomes and improved patient neurological status.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the standard procedure for the treatment of cervical spinal stenosis (CSS), but complications such as adjacent segment degeneration can seriously affect the long-term efficacy. Currently, posterior endoscopic surgery has been increasingly used in the clinical treatment of CSS. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of single-segment CSS patients who underwent full endoscopic laminotomy decompression or ACDF.
METHODS: 138 CSS patients who met the inclusion criteria from June 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into endoscopic and ACDF groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust the imbalanced confounding variables between the groups. Then, perioperative data were recorded and clinical outcomes were compared, including functional scores and imaging data. Functional scores included Visual Analog Scale of Arms (A-VAS) and Neck pain (N-VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and imaging data included Disc Height Index (DHI), Cervical range of motion (ROM), and Ratio of grey scale (RVG).
RESULTS: After PSM, 84 patients were included in the study and followed for 24-30 months. The endoscopic group was significantly superior to the ACDF group in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and hospital stay (P < 0.001). Postoperative N-VAS, A-VAS, JOA, and NDI were significantly improved in both groups compared with the preoperative period (P < 0.001), and the endoscopic group showed better improvement at 7 days postoperatively (P < 0.05). The ROM changes of adjacent segments were significantly larger in the ACDF group at 12 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The RVG of adjacent segments showed a decreasing trend, and the decrease was more marked in the ACDF group at last follow-up (P < 0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates in the endoscopic group and ACDF group were 90.48% and 88.10%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Full endoscopic laminotomy decompression is demonstrated to be an efficacious alternative technique to traditional ACDF for the treatment of single-segment CSS, with the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery, and less impact on cervical spine kinematics and adjacent segmental degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) between direct and indirect decompression in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.
METHODS: Patients who underwent single-level LLIF were randomized into 2 groups: direct decompression (group D) and indirect decompression (group I). Clinical outcomes including the Oswestry Disability index and visual analogue scale of back and leg pain were collected. Radiographic outcomes including cross-sectional area (CSA) of thecal sac, disc height, foraminal height, foraminal area, fusion rate, segmental, and lumbar lordosis were measured.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were eligible for the analysis, with a distribution of 14 subjects in each group. The average age was 66.1 years. Postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in all clinical parameters. However, these improvements did not show significant difference between both groups at all follow-up periods. All radiographic outcomes were not different between both groups, except for the increase in CSA which was significantly greater in group D (77.73 ± 20.26 mm2 vs. 54.32 ± 35.70 mm2, p = 0.042). Group I demonstrated significantly lower blood loss (68.13 ± 32.06 mL vs. 210.00 ± 110.05 mL, p < 0.005), as well as shorter operative time (136.35 ± 28.07 minutes vs. 182.18 ± 42.67 minutes, p = 0.002). Overall complication rate was not different.
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect decompression through LLIF results in comparable clinical improvement to LLIF with additional direct decompression over 1-year follow-up period. These findings suggest that, for an appropriate candidate, direct decompression in LLIF might not be necessary since the ligamentotaxis effect achieved through indirect decompression appears sufficient to relieve symptoms while diminishing blood loss and operative time.