curative effect

疗效
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Zellweger谱系障碍(ZSD)是一组异质性的常染色体隐性遗传疾病,其特征是过氧化物酶体形成缺陷,可归因于PEX基因家族的突变。ZSD患者有严重的神经损伤,包括癫痫发作,严重迟缓,和畸形特征,预后不良。目前,没有具体的,有效治疗。这里,我们研究了异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)对PEX1相关ZSD的影响。疑似临床先证者在我院神经内科首次确诊。先证者在诊断后不久死亡,和他的家人被研究。我们发现一个兄弟有相同的基因改变,他被诊断出患有婴儿Refsum病(IRD),是ZSD的最温和形式。我们用allo-HSCT进行治疗,应孩子父母的要求。移植后,我们观察到临床表现显著改善,非常长链的脂肪酸,和脑部MRI。随访2年,患者恢复良好,未出现任何异常临床表现。我们在用allo-HSCT治疗ZSD-IRD方面取得了令人满意的短期结果。将进行长期随访和观察以确定长期预后。
    Zellweger spectrum disorder (ZSD) is a heterogeneous group of autosomal recessive disorders characterized by a defect in peroxisome formation and attributable to mutations in the PEX gene family. Patients with ZSD have profound neurologic impairments, including seizures, severe retardation, and dysmorphic features, and poor prognosis. Currently, there is no specific, effective treatment. Here, we investigated the effects of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on PEX1-related ZSD. The suspected clinical proband was first diagnosed at the Department of Neurology of our hospital. The proband died soon after diagnosis, and his family was studied. We found that a brother had the same genetic alterations, and he was diagnosed with Infantile Refsum disease (IRD) as the mildest form of ZSD. We implemented treatment with allo-HSCT, at the request of the child\'s parents. After transplantation, we observed significant improvements in the clinical manifestations, very-long-chain fatty acids, and brain MRI. The patient has recovered well and not showed any abnormal clinical manifestations after 2 years of follow-up. We have achieved satisfactory short-term results in the treatment of ZSD-IRD with allo-HSCT. Long-term follow-up and observation will be performed to determine the long-term prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of study reports on spa therapy based on randomized controlled trials by the spa therapy and balneotherapy checklist (SPAC), and to show the relationship between SPAC score and the characteristics of publication. We searched the following databases from 1990 up to September 30, 2013: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Ichushi Web, Global Health Library, the Western Pacific Region Index Medicus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We used the SPAC to assess the quality of reports on spa therapy and balneotherapy trials (SPAC) that was developed using the Delphi consensus method. Fifty-one studies met all inclusion criteria. Forty studies (78%) were about \"Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective)\". The total SPAC score (full-mark; 19 pts) was 10.8 ± 2.3 pts (mean ± SD). The items for which a description was lacking (very poor; <50%) in many studies were as follows: \"locations of spa facility where the data were collected\"; \"pH\"; \"scale of bathtub\"; \"presence of other facility and exposure than bathing (sauna, steam bath, etc.)\"; \"qualification and experience of care provider\"; \"Instructions about daily life\" and \"adherence\". We clarified that there was no relationship between the publish period, languages, and the impact factor (IF) for the SPAC score. In order to prevent flawed description, SPAC could provide indispensable information for researchers who are going to design a research protocol according to each disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a checklist of items that describes and measures the quality of reports of interventional trials assessing spa therapy.
    METHODS: The Delphi consensus method was used to select the number of items in the checklist. A total of eight individuals participated, including an epidemiologist, a clinical research methodologist, clinical researchers, a medical journalist, and a health fitness programmer. Participants ranked on a 9-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist.
    RESULTS: Three rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus. The final checklist contained 19 items, with items related to title, place of implementation (specificity of spa), care provider influence, and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from withdrawals, loss to follow-up, and low treatment adherence.
    CONCLUSIONS: This checklist is simple and quick to complete, and should help clinicians and researchers critically appraise the medical and healthcare literature, reviewers assess the quality of reports included in systematic reviews, and researchers plan interventional trials of spa therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号