BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is widely used in abdominal emergency surgery (AES), and the possibility of extending this approach to the more recent robotic surgery (RS) arouses great interest. The slow diffusion of robotic technology mainly due to high costs and the longer RS operative time when compared to laparoscopy may represent disincentives, especially in AES. This study aims to report our experience in the use of RS in AES assessing its safety and feasibility, with particular focus on intra- and post-operative complications, conversion rate, and surgical learning curve. Our data were also compared to other experiences though an extensive literature review.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a single surgeon series of the last 10 years. From January 2014 to December 2023, 36 patients underwent urgent or emergency RS. The robotic devices used were Da Vinci Si (15 cases) and Xi (21 cases).
RESULTS: 36 (4.3%) out of 834 robotic procedures were included in our analysis: 20 (56.56%) females. The mean age was 63 years and 30% of patients were ≥ 70 years. 2 (5.55%) procedures were performed at night. No conversions to open were reported in this series. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (5.5%) major complications were collected. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality were 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that RS may be a useful and reliable approach also to AES and intraoperative laparoscopic complications when performed in selected hemodynamically stable patients in very well-trained robotic centers. The technology may increase the minimally invasive use and conversion rate in emergent settings in a completely robotic or hybrid approach.

Williams syndrome was first reported by Williams and Beuren in 1961-1962. It is a genetic disorder that is caused by a sporadic microdeletion of chromosome 7, which includes the elastin gene. The development of gastrointestinal pathology, such as diverticular disease, is associated with the deletion of this specific gene. Almost one-third of patients with Williams syndrome develop diverticular disease. The first episode of diverticulitis appears in 8% of patients, diagnosed with Williams syndrome, before the age of 40. According to the literature, in the case of complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey III) in patients with WS, the treatment is mainly surgical resection of sigmoid and colostomy (Hartmann procedure) or anastomosis. We present an interesting case with a 31-year-old male, with Williams syndrome and Hinchey III diverticulitis, who underwent laparoscopic lavage and primary closure of the perforation. To our knowledge, this is the first case in literature that a patient with Williams syndrome and complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey III) was treated this way and the results until now are encouraging.

The treatment of diverticulitis is experiencing a shift in management due to a number of large scale clinical trials. For instance, clinicians are beginning to recognize that avoidance of antibiotics in uncomplicated diverticulitis is not associated with worse outcomes. Additionally, while the decision to proceed with elective surgical resection for recurrent uncomplicated disease is less conclusive and favors a patient-centric approach, complicated disease with a large abscess denotes more aggressive disease and would likely benefit from elective surgical resection. Lastly, in patient with acutely perforated diverticulitis who require urgent surgical intervention, laparoscopic lavage is generally not recommended due to high re-intervention rates and the preferred surgical procedure is primary anastomosis with or without diversion due to high morbidity and low rates of Hartmann reversal.

The aims of the present study are to compare the severity of acute diverticulitis in the first episode and in later bouts, and to determine whether there are risk factors for the presence of free perforation at the onset of diverticulitis. A single-center retrospective study was conducted of patients who developed a first episode of acute diverticulitis between January 2011 and August 2021 diagnosed by computed tomography and followed up for at least 1 year. Free perforation was considered to be present in patients with diverticulitis stage III and IV according to the Hinchey classification (modified by Wasvary). The analysis included 394 patients (224 men and 170 women) with a mean age of 58 years. Forty-eight patients (12.2%) presented free perforation at some point in the course of the disease, 43 during the first episode and 5 during subsequent bouts. The perforation subgroup showed higher rates of stoma creation and mortality (relative risks of 12.3 and 23.5, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR: 1.041 95% CI 1.016-1.067), lung disease (OR 2.154 95% CI 1.038-4.472) and immunosuppression (OR: 2.812 95% CI 1.315-6.015) were independent factors for free perforation at diverticulitis onset. Free perforation occurs more frequently during the first episode of acute diverticulitis. Older patients, immunosuppressed patients and those with respiratory disease have a greater risk of presenting freely perforated diverticulitis. Therefore, it is essential to maintain a high level of clinical suspicion in these patients to activate early focus control and thus avoid fatal outcomes.

The differential diagnosis for left lower quadrant pain is wide and conditions range from the benign and self-limited to life-threatening surgical emergencies. Along with patient history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, imaging is often critical to limit the differential diagnosis and identify life-threatening abnormalities. This document will discuss the guidelines for the appropriate use of imaging in the initial workup for patients who present with left lower quadrant pain, patients with suspected diverticulitis, and patients with suspected complications from diverticulitis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

The management of perforated non-faeculent diverticulitis has traditionally involved performing a colonic resection (CR). Laparoscopic lavage (LL) has emerged as a less invasive alternative in recent years. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of LL in the surgical treatment of perforated non-faeculent diverticulitis. To that end, we conducted a search on Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases for comparative studies in the English language published till June 2021 [PROSPERO (CRD42021269410)]. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) and the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS). Data were analysed using Cochrane RevMan. Pooled odds ratio (POR) and cumulative weighted ratios (CWR) were calculated. A total of 13 studies involving 1061 patients were found eligible, including seven studies based on three randomised control trials (RCTs). LL was associated with a reduced risk of wound infection, stoma formation, and need for further surgery by 77% [POR: 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.74], 83% (POR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05-0.56), and 53% (POR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23-0.97) respectively. Duration of surgery and hospitalisation was reduced by 54% and 43% respectively. However, LL was associated with higher rates of unplanned reoperations (POR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.22-3.42), recurrence (POR: 9.47, 95% CI: 3.24-27.67), and peritonitis (POR: 8.92, 95% CI: 2.71-29.33). No differences in mortality or readmission rates were observed. LL in Hinchey III diverticulitis lowers the incidence of stoma formation and overall reoperations without an increase in mortality but at the cost of higher recurrence rates and peritonitis. A limitation of this study was the inclusion of non-RCTs. An elective resection should be considered after LL. Guidelines for surgical techniques in LL need to be standardised.

Background Acute diverticulitis is a common surgical condition and one of the leading gastrointestinal conditions that require hospital admission. The presence of complications increases the hospital stay and risk of requiring surgical intervention. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features that can be identified during clinical assessment and evaluate their predictive value and sensitivity in differentiating between complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis. Methodology This retrospective case-control study was performed on patients with acute diverticulitis at Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. Data were collected for patients presenting from January 2015 to December 2017. Patients with acute diverticulitis confirmed by computed tomography (CT) were included in the study. Multiple clinical assessment aspects were reported and compared between complicated diverticulitis and uncomplicated diverticulitis groups. Results Data from a total of 116 cases were collected, 10 of which were excluded due to lack of CT diagnosis. Forty-four cases had complicated diverticulitis (case group), and 62 cases had uncomplicated diverticulitis (control group). Twenty-three cases (52.2%) had the first episode of diverticulitis in the complicated group compared to 24 cases (38.7%) in the uncomplicated group, with an odds ratio of 1.73 (0.79-3.789). Eight cases (18.2%) had previously complicated diverticulitis in the complicated group compared to 11 cases (17.7%) in the uncomplicated group, with an odds ratio of 1.03 (0.37-2.82). Six cases (13.6%) had a fever (T > 38) in the complicated group compared to two cases (3.2%) in the uncomplicated group, with an odds ratio of 4.74 (0.9-24.7), a sensitivity of only 13.64%, and a specificity of 96.77%. Twelve cases (27.3%) had tachycardia, two cases (4.5%) had hypotension, and five cases (11.4%) had peritonism in the complicated group compared to two cases (3.2%), one case (1.6%), and one case (1.6%) in the uncomplicated group, with odds ratios of 11.25 (2.37-53.4), 2.9 (0.255-33), and 7.82 (0.88-69.5), respectively; sensitivity was 27.27%, 4.55%, and 11.36% for tachycardia, hypotension, and peritonism, whereas specificity was 96.77%, 98.39%, and 98.39%, respectively. Conclusions The study found no significant correlation between having complicated diverticulitis and previous episodes of complicated diverticulitis, immunosuppression, pain severity, or change in bowel habits. Perrectal bleeding was found to reduce the risk of having complicated diverticulitis. Our results did not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between the first episode of diverticulitis and having complicated diverticulitis. Physical signs, when abnormal, are highly specific in predicting complicated diverticulitis. Tachycardia was found to have the highest positive predictive value and odds ratio compared to the other observed physical signs.

Background Gastrointestinal manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are increasingly recognized. Through potentially overlapping pathophysiology, co-occurrence of COVID-19 and first-time acute diverticulitis has been reported. Our study aims to further characterize this association in COVID-19-positive patients within a large tertiary care academic center. Methodology Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who subsequently developed acute diverticulitis within 30 days were identified between 2020 and 2022. COVID-19 and acute diverticulitis were diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction and computed tomography, respectively. Patients with prior history of acute diverticulitis were excluded. Patient characteristics and comorbid conditions were collected. Characterization of the COVID-19 course (treatment setting, medical/ventilatory therapy) and acute diverticulitis (treatment setting, medical/surgical therapy, complications) was performed retrospectively. Subanalysis was performed by COVID-19 vaccination status, the severity of COVID-19, and the timing of acute diverticulitis diagnosis. Results A total of 81 patients were identified, with a median duration between COVID-19 diagnosis and acute diverticulitis of 13 days (interquartile range = 2.5-21.0), with 44.4% of patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19. The all-cause complication rate of acute diverticulitis was noted to be 59.3%, most commonly intestinal perforation (39.5%), abscess formation (37.0%), and peritonitis (14.8%). Although a trend toward increased all-cause complications (65.9%), intestinal perforation (43.9%), and peritonitis (19.5%) was noted in unvaccinated patients, this did not reach significance. Although all-cause complication rate did not differ in patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis at the time of COVID-19 presentation, a significantly elevated incidence of intestinal perforation (55.9% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.01), peritonitis (29.4% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.01), and the need for emergent surgical intervention (38.2% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.01) was noted. Conclusions Our study indicates that patients diagnosed with first-time acute diverticulitis within 30 days of COVID-19 infection have a high complication rate, most commonly intestinal perforation. Additionally, patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis at the same time as COVID-19 detection had a significantly elevated rate of complications and emergent surgical needs. Given the high complication rate, patients who develop diverticulitis within a short timeframe of COVID-19 infection may benefit from increased clinician vigilance and monitoring.

暂无摘要。

This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of the LOLA trial.
Within the LOLA arm of the international, multicentre LADIES trial, patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis were randomised between laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy. Outcomes were collected up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the present study was cumulative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations (including stoma reversals), stoma rates, and sigmoidectomy rates in the lavage group.
Long-term follow-up was recorded in 77 of the 88 originally included patients, 39 were randomised to sigmoidectomy (51%) and 38 to laparoscopic lavage (49%). After 36 months, overall cumulative morbidity (sigmoidectomy 28/39 (72%) versus lavage 32/38 (84%), p = 0·272) and mortality (sigmoidectomy 7/39 (18%) versus lavage 6/38 (16%), p = 1·000) did not differ. The number of patients who underwent a reoperation was significantly lower for lavage compared to sigmoidectomy (sigmoidectomy 27/39 (69%) versus lavage 17/38 (45%), p = 0·039). After 36 months, patients alive with stoma in situ was lower in the lavage group (proportion calculated from the Kaplan-Meier life table, sigmoidectomy 17% vs lavage 11%, log-rank p = 0·0268). Eventually, 17 of 38 (45%) patients allocated to lavage underwent sigmoidectomy.
Long-term outcomes showed that laparoscopic lavage was associated with less patients who underwent reoperations and lower stoma rates in patients alive after 36 months compared to sigmoidectomy. No differences were found in terms of cumulative morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be improved to reduce risk for short-term complications after which lavage could still be a valuable treatment option.