co-composting

共同堆肥
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    绿色废物(GW)管理是一个关键问题,由于其高生产率和各种物理性质和化学成分。堆肥是GW处理和增值的有希望的替代方法。然而,难以抑制的组分如木质素和纤维素的存在增加了加工时间。诸如添加共底物和操作修改之类的策略改善了处理时间和堆肥质量。因此,在这项研究中,已经实施了三种策略:(i)添加未加工食品(UF)和加工食品(PF)作为GW的共同底物,以改善过程开始时底物的营养成分,(ii)添加磷矿(PR)以提高产品质量,和(iii)使用两阶段堆肥(TSC)来加速降解。为此,用相同混合物(48%GW+21%UF+18%PF+13%木屑(SW))进行三种处理:(i)TA(TSC+15%PR),(ii)TB(传统堆肥+15%PR),和(iii)TC(传统堆肥)。在工艺和堆肥质量方面,TSC与TC相比没有显着差异,而PR的加入增加了产品的磷含量。然而,根据哥伦比亚土壤改良法,TC生产的堆肥质量最高。
    Green waste (GW) management is a key issue due to its high production rate and its variety of physical properties and chemical composition. Composting is a promising alternative for GW treatment and valorization. However, the presence of recalcitrant components such as lignin and cellulose increase the processing time. Strategies such as addition of co-substrates and operative modifications have improved the processing time and compost quality. Therefore, in this study, three strategies have been implemented (i) addition of unprocessed food (UF) and processed foods (PF) as co-substrates for GW to improve the nutrients composition of the substrates at the beginning of the process, (ii) addition of phosphate rock (PR) to improve product quality, and (iii) the use of two-stage composting (TSC) to accelerate the degradation. For this purpose, three treatments with the same mixture (48% GW + 21% UF + 18% PF + 13% sawdust (SW)) were conducted: (i) TA (TSC + 15% PR), (ii) TB (traditional composting +15% PR), and (iii) TC (traditional composting). TSC did not show significant differences compared with TC regarding the process and compost quality, while the addition of PR increased the phosphorus content of the product. However, TC produced the compost with the highest quality according to the Colombian legislation for soil amendment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将污泥和膨胀剂与少量茄子废物(EP)(4.7%和8.6%)进行了全面堆肥,以评估其联合增值的可行性并减少堆肥过程中的气味影响。在这个意义上,物理化学,在整个堆肥过程中监测呼吸和嗅觉变量。研究的物理化学变量彼此相关,以评估它们对最终产品质量和气味影响的影响。观察到氮浓度的降低与有机物的去除并不平行,这影响了散发的气味浓度。此外,在共堆肥过程的水解阶段,与最低的EP浓度(4.7%EP:9214和14720ouE/m3)或不添加EP(参考堆肥堆:10200和22500ouE/m3)相比,当农业废物含量最高(8.6%EP:6317和8192ouE/m3)时,气味浓度较低。尽管污水污泥比茄子废物更容易生物降解,在合适的条件下进行共堆肥过程。获得稳定的堆肥需要大约90天。因此,共同堆肥可能是一种合适的替代方法,可以使EP增值并减少污水污泥的气味影响,随之而来的经济,社会和环境效益。
    Sewage sludge and bulking agent with small proportions of eggplant waste (EP) (4.7 and 8.6%) were co-composted at full scale to evaluate the feasibility of their joint valorization and to reduce the odorous impact during composting. In this sense, physico-chemical, respirometric and olfactometric variables were monitored throughout the co-composting process. The physico-chemical variables studied were related to each other to evaluate their effect on the quality of the final product and the odoriferous impact. It was observed that the reduction in nitrogen concentration was not parallel to the removal of organic matter, which influenced the odor concentration emitted. Furthermore, during the hydrolytic stage of the co-composting process, the odor concentration was lower when the agricultural waste content was highest (8.6% EP: 6317 and 8192 ouE/m3) in comparison with the lowest concentration of EP (4.7% EP: 9214 and 14720 ouE/m3) or without the addition of EP (reference composting pile: 10200 and 22500 ouE/m3). Although sewage sludge is more biodegradable than eggplant waste, the co-composting process was carried out under suitable conditions. Approximately 90 days were required to obtain a stabilized compost. Consequently, co-composting might be a suitable alternative to valorize EP and reduce the odoriferous impact of sewage sludge, with the consequent economic, social and environmental benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号