目的:本研究的目的是评估护理慢性肾脏病患者的护士在提高知识水平方面的教育干预效果。护患互动,性能,技能能力和临床决策。
方法:系统评价。
方法:检索随机对照试验的文献,在10个数据库中对护士进行了慢性肾脏病相关教育干预的准实验研究和实验前研究.两名审稿人独立筛选文章,评估研究并提取数据。
方法:PubMed,科克伦,Embase,CINAHL完成,ERIC,社会科学数据库,ASSIA,Scopus,WebofScienceandProQuest论文和论文全球数据库从成立之日起至2022年12月21日进行搜索。
结果:本综述包括3项随机对照试验和8项实验前研究。由于研究之间的高度异质性,进行了没有荟萃分析的合成。干预教学会议,学习活动,自学模块,讨论和基于网络的培训系统有效地提高了护士的知识,护患互动,性能,技能能力和临床决策。患者的护患互动有所改善,总体生活质量没有显着下降。
结论:这篇综述显示了对护理慢性肾脏病患者的护士进行教育干预在改善护士和患者预后方面的有效性。持续改善长达1年。
■研究结果可以指导未来护士护理慢性肾脏病患者的培训范围。
结论:护士通常缺乏如何改善慢性肾脏病患者护理的在职培训。这项研究发现,培训护士如何照顾这些患者可以改善护士的结果,这可以转化为更高质量的患者护理。
■本文坚持无荟萃分析(SWiM)报告指南的合成。
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions for nurses caring for patients with chronic kidney disease in improving knowledge, nurse-patient interaction, performance, skills competence and clinical decision-making.
METHODS: Systematic
review.
METHODS: Search of literature for randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and pre-experimental studies on chronic kidney disease-related educational interventions for nurses was conducted across 10 databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, appraised studies and extracted data.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, Social Science Database, ASSIA, Scopus, Web of Science and ProQuest Thesis and Dissertations Global databases were searched from date of inception to 21 December 2022.
RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials and eight pre-experimental studies were included in this
review. Synthesis without meta-analysis was conducted due to high heterogeneity among studies. Interventions with teaching sessions, learning activities, self-study modules, discussion and a web-based training system were effective in improving nurses\' knowledge, nurse-patient interaction, performance, skills competence and clinical decision-making. Patients experienced an improvement in nurse-patient interaction and no significant decrease in overall quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: This
review has shown the effectiveness of educational interventions for nurses caring for people with chronic kidney disease in improving outcomes for both nurses and patients, with sustained improvements up to a period of 1 year.
UNASSIGNED: Study findings can guide the scope of future training for nurses caring for patients with chronic kidney disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses often lack in-service training on how to improve care for patients with chronic kidney disease. This study found that training nurses on how to care for such patients can improve outcomes for nurses, which can translate to higher quality of patient care.
UNASSIGNED: This paper adhered to the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline.