chest radiography

胸部 X 线摄影
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:本研究旨在通过胸部X线摄片和生化指标分析腹膜和血液透析患者的生存率。确定常见的透析病因和死亡原因,揭示预后因素,并有助于临床实践。材料与方法:对2018年10月至2020年2月收集的33例腹膜透析患者和37例血液透析患者的数据进行了回顾性横断面研究。对70个月(2018年10月至2024年6月)的生存率和死亡率进行回顾性追踪。胸部X光测量(心胸指数,肺血管蒂宽度,右肺动脉直径,膈肌高度)和生化参数(尿素,白蛋白,肌酐,甲状旁腺激素,铁蛋白,血红蛋白,动脉血气,钾)分析了它们对存活率的影响。统计分析包括描述性统计,卡方检验,费希尔的精确检验,贝叶斯分析,McNemar测试,Kaplan-Meier生存分析,Cox回归,贝叶斯相关检验,线性回归分析(散点图),ROC分析。采用SPSS20.0进行数据分析,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:高血压,2型糖尿病,和泌尿生殖系统疾病是主要的透析病因。腹膜炎(38.5%)和心血管疾病(47.4%)是腹膜和血液透析患者死亡的主要原因,分别。胸部X线显着差异包括血液透析中的肺血管蒂宽度和肺动脉直径以及腹膜透析中的隔膜高度。Kaplan-Meier在方法之间没有显示生存差异。Cox回归识别年龄,完整的副激素水平,iPTH/PVPW比值,和临床状态作为生存和死亡因素。用于死亡率预测的iPTH/PVPW比值截止值≤6.8。结论:年龄,完整的副激素水平,肺血管蒂宽度,和临床状态显着影响透析患者的生存率。高血压和糖尿病的管理,泌尿生殖系统疾病的管理和随访,感染控制,患者教育,定期心血管检查可以提高生存率。此外,iPTH/PVPW比值可以预测死亡风险。
    Background and Objectives: This study aims to analyze survival in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients using chest radiography and biochemical parameters, determine common dialysis etiologies and causes of death, reveal prognostic factors, and contribute to clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with data from 33 peritoneal dialysis and 37 hemodialysis patients collected between October 2018 and February 2020. Survival and mortality were retrospectively tracked over 70 months (October 2018-June 2024). Chest X-ray measurements (cardiothoracic index, pulmonary vascular pedicle width, right pulmonary artery diameter, diaphragmatic height) and biochemical parameters (urea, albumin, creatinine, parathormone, ferritin, hemoglobin, arterial blood gas, potassium) were analyzed for their impact on survival. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Fisher\'s exact test, Bayesian analysis, McNemar test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression, Bayesian correlation test, linear regression analysis (scatter plot), and ROC analysis. SPSS 20.0 was used for data analysis, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and urogenital disorders were the main dialysis etiologies. Peritonitis (38.5%) and cardiovascular diseases (47.4%) were the leading causes of death in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients, respectively. Significant chest X-ray differences included pulmonary vascular pedicle width and pulmonary artery diameter in hemodialysis and diaphragm height in peritoneal dialysis. Kaplan-Meier showed no survival difference between methods. Cox regression identified age, intact parathormone levels, iPTH/PVPW ratio, and clinical status as survival and mortality factors. The iPTH/PVPW ratio cut-off for mortality prediction was ≤6.8. Conclusions: Age, intact parathormone levels, pulmonary vascular pedicle width, and clinical status significantly impact survival in dialysis patients. Management of hypertension and diabetes, management and follow-up of urogenital disorders, infection control, patient education, and regular cardiovascular check-ups may improve survival rates. Additionally, the iPTH/PVPW ratio can predict mortality risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:晚期间质性肺病(ILD)患者努力进行肺活量测定以评估呼吸功能。胸片上的心胸比率(CTR)可以潜在地反映肺体积;然而,这一点尚未完全确立。本研究旨在阐明间质性肺疾病患者CTR与呼吸功能的关系。患者和方法我们回顾了2018年4月至2023年3月我科收治的120例特发性间质性肺病患者,他们接受了胸部X线摄影。肺活量测定,还有超声心动图.多元线性回归分析用于确定与CTR相关的因素。使用Pearson相关系数评估CTR与呼吸或心功能之间的相关性。结果多元线性回归分析显示肺活量百分比(β=-0.598,p<0.001),年龄(β=0.405,p<0.001),女性(β=0.177,p=0.047)与CTR独立相关,而左心室射血分数之间没有观察到关系,身体质量指数,和吸烟习惯。CTR与肺活量呈显著负相关(r=-0.490,p<0.001)。结论CTR升高可能反映肺活量下降,但不是心脏功能下降,间质性肺病患者。因此,测量CTR可以有益于预测ILD患者的进展。
    Objective Patients with advanced interstitial lung disease (ILD) struggle to undergo spirometry to evaluate the respiratory function. The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on chest radiography can potentially reflect the lung volume; however, this has not yet been fully established. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the CTR and the respiratory function in patients with interstitial lung diseases. Patients and Methods We reviewed 120 consecutive patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who were admitted to our department between April 2018 and March 2023 and who underwent chest radiography, spirometry, and echocardiography. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with the CTR. Correlations between the CTR and the respiratory or cardiac function were assessed using Pearson\'s correlation coefficient. Results A multiple linear regression analysis showed the percent vital capacity (β = -0.598, p <0.001), age (β = 0.405, p <0.001), and female sex (β = 0.177, p = 0.047) to be independently associated with the CTR, whereas no relationship was observed between the left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, and smoking habits. The CTR was significantly negatively correlated with the vital capacity (r = -0.490, p <0.001). Conclusions An increased CTR might reflect a decreased vital capacity, but not a decreased cardiac function, in patients with interstitial lung diseases. Measuring the CTR can thus be beneficial for predicting progression in patients with ILD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术胸部超声(TUS)是一种在各种情况下在全世界范围内普及的监测工具。提供动态的机会,床边评价。最近的研究表明,使用TUS可以诊断由钝性胸部创伤(BCT)引起的病理,产生有利的结果。这项研究旨在比较TUS与胸部X线照相术(CXR)在诊断闭合性胸部创伤引起的肺部病变中的实用性。方法对58例诊断为BCT的患者进行了前瞻性横断面研究,这些患者在巴塞罗那的“LuisRazetti博士”大学医院寻求急诊护理,委内瑞拉,从2023年11月到2024年1月。结果患者,75.9%(n=44)为男性,平均年龄为37.8岁(标准差=18.4岁)。据报道,8.6%(n=5)的患者受伤,包括60%(n=3)气胸和40%(n=2)血胸。94.8%(n=55)的病例的超声结果与CXR一致,科恩的卡帕系数为0.9(95%置信区间(CI)=0.642-1.0)。TUS表现出比CXR更高的灵敏度(100%vs.60%)用于检测BCT患者的血胸和气胸,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.991(95%CI=0.968-1.013)。结论BCT主要发生于年轻男性,主要导致气胸和血胸病变,与CXR相比,通过TUS可检测到更高的灵敏度。TUS的使用应被视为BCT患者初始评估的重要组成部分。
    Background The thoracic ultrasound (TUS) is a monitoring tool that has gained worldwide popularity in various scenarios, offering the opportunity for dynamic, bedside evaluations. Recent studies indicate that the use of TUS enables the diagnosis of pathologies resulting from blunt chest trauma (BCT), yielding favorable outcomes. This study aimed to compare the utility of TUS versus chest radiography (CXR) in diagnosing pulmonary pathologies resulting from closed-chest traumas. Methodology A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 58 patients diagnosed with BCT who sought emergency care at the \"Dr. Luis Razetti\" University Hospital in Barcelona, Venezuela, from November 2023 to January 2024. Results Of the patients, 75.9% (n = 44) were male, with an average age of 37.8 years (standard deviation = 18.4 years). Injuries were reported in 8.6% (n = 5) of the patients, including 60% (n = 3) pneumothorax and 40% (n = 2) hemothorax. Ultrasound results coincided with CXR in 94.8% (n = 55) of the cases, with a Cohen\'s kappa coefficient of 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.642-1.0). TUS demonstrated higher sensitivity than CXR (100% vs. 60%) for detecting hemothorax and pneumothorax in patients with BCT, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 (95% CI = 0.968-1.013). Conclusions BCT predominantly occurred in young males, resulting primarily in pneumothorax and hemothorax lesions, detectable with higher sensitivity through TUS compared to CXR. The use of TUS should be considered an essential component of the initial assessment for individuals with BCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    为了确定透析患者中心静脉导管(CVC)的尖端位置,指南建议在导管插入后使用胸部X线照相术(CXR)确定,没有透视。然而,一些研究人员提出,经胸超声心动图(TTE)可以替代CXR,但这并没有被广泛采用。这项研究旨在确定上述两种方法中哪一种更适合定位CVC的尖端位置。这项前瞻性研究包括2021年3月至2022年12月在我们医院接受血液透析的160名患者。通过颈内静脉插入CVC后,我们使用经胸超声心动图和CXR来确定CVC的尖端,并将结果与计算机断层扫描(CT)的结果进行比较。在定位CVC尖端的TTE和CXR之间的比较中,我们获得了三个主要发现。(1)与CXR相比,TTE与误诊病例较少。(2)TTE提供更高的灵敏度(位置2的灵敏度相似),特异性,阳性/阴性预测值,和精度比CXR。(3)比较TTE和CXR的接收机工作特性曲线时,前者的曲线下面积(95%置信区间)较大.此外,我们在解剖学上发现:经食管经胸超声心动图显示的“高回声三角”相当于上腔静脉进入右心房。TTE比CXR更适合作为CVC头端定位的首次检查,因为它提高了诊断准确性并减少了X射线辐射损伤。
    To determine the tip position of the central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with dialysis, the guidelines recommend that it be determined using chest radiography (CXR) after catheterization, without fluoroscopy. However, some researchers have proposed that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can replace CXR, but this has not been widely adopted. This study aimed to determine which of the two aforementioned methods is more suitable for locating the tip position of the CVC. This prospective study included 160 patients who underwent hemodialysis at our hospital from March 2021 to December 2022. After inserting the CVC through the internal jugular vein, we used transthoracic echocardiography and CXR to determine the tip of the CVC and compared the results with those of computed tomography (CT). In the comparison between TTE and CXR for locating the CVC tip, we obtained three main findings. (1) TTE was associated with fewer misdiagnosed cases than CXR. (2) TTE provided higher sensitivity (similar sensitivity in position 2), specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and accuracy than CXR. (3) When comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves of TTE and CXR, the area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for the former was larger. Additionally, we made anatomical discoveries: the \"hyperechoic triangle\" recognized by TTE was equivalent to the entrance of the superior vena cava into the right atrium shown by transesophageal transthoracic echocardiography. TTE is more suitable than CXR as the first examination for CVC tip localization, as it improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces X-ray radiation damage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸部X线摄影(CXR)是COVID-19肺炎治疗计划和病程监测的辅助工具。该研究的目的是描述被诊断为COVID-19肺炎的儿童CXR异常表现的影像学模式和严重程度评分。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括通过逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应试验证实为COVID-19的儿童,他们在到达时接受了CXR。对CXR的发现进行了回顾,和改良的射线照相评分进行评估。
    结果:异常CXR发现的数量为976个中的106个(10.9%)。毛玻璃不透明(GGO)常见于>9岁的儿童(19/26,73.1%),而支气管周围增厚主要见于<5岁的儿童(25/54,46.3%)。总的来说,最常见的影像学表现是支气管周围增厚(54/106,51%).下肺区(56/106,52.8%)是最常见的受累区域,周围和肺门周围均无优势(84/106,79.2%)。关于基于异常CXR结果的COVID-19肺炎的严重程度,106例中81例(76.4%)有轻度肺部异常。在21例(19.8%)和4例(3.8%)中,重度肺部异常,分别。虽然在不同的儿科年龄组之间的影像学严重程度评分没有显着差异,初始CXR和药物治疗的严重程度评分存在显著差异.
    结论:本研究阐明了儿科人群中影像学特征的年龄分布。GGO常见于>9岁的儿童,而支气管周围增厚在<5岁的儿童中占主导地位。下肺区是最常见的受累区域,严重程度高的肺部评分需要更多的药物治疗和氧气支持。
    Chest radiography (CXR) is an adjunct tool in treatment planning and monitoring of the disease course of COVID-19 pneumonia. The purpose of the study was to describe the radiographic patterns and severity scores of abnormal CXR findings in children diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia.
    This retrospective study included children with confirmed COVID-19 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test who underwent CXR at the arrival. The CXR findings were reviewed, and modified radiographic scoring was assessed.
    The number of abnormal CXR findings was 106 of 976 (10.9%). Ground-glass opacity (GGO) was commonly found in children aged > 9 years (19/26, 73.1%), whereas peribronchial thickening was predominantly found in children aged < 5 years (25/54, 46.3%). Overall, the most common radiographic finding was peribronchial thickening (54/106, 51%). The lower lung zone (56/106, 52.8%) was the most common affected area, and there was neither peripheral nor perihilar predominance (84/106, 79.2%). Regarding the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia based on abnormal CXR findings, 81 of 106 cases (76.4%) had mild lung abnormalities. Moderate and severe lung abnormalities were found in 21 (19.8%) and 4 (3.8%) cases, respectively. While there were no significant differences in the radiographic severity scores among the various pediatric age groups, there were significant disparities in severity scores in the initial CXR and medical treatments.
    This study clarified the age distribution of radiographic features across the pediatric population. GGO was commonly found in children aged > 9 years, whereas peribronchial thickening was predominant in children aged < 5 years. The lower lung zone was the most common affected area, and the high severity lung scores required more medical treatments and oxygen support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸部创伤占所有创伤的20-25%,是第三大最常见的死亡原因,腹部损伤和头部创伤后。在急诊室(ED),将不稳定的患者转移到X射线室来检测气胸和血胸总是有风险的,在充血和繁忙的ED中,床旁X射线不仅会导致特定患者的辐射暴露,还会导致周围患者的辐射暴露。通过使用床边超声检查(USG)作为胸部创伤患者的初始成像方式,可以避免这种情况。目的比较超声与胸部X线检查对胸部创伤患者气胸和血胸的敏感性和特异性。方法这项横断面诊断研究在Jawaharlal研究生医学教育与研究所进行了为期一年的研究,Puducherry,印度,三级护理中心。所有怀疑有胸部外伤史的连续患者(n=255)均纳入研究。由经过培训的急诊医师使用USG对患者进行床边评估,随后接受胸部X线照相以记录气胸和血胸。与复合金标准(胸部X线摄影和计算机断层扫描胸部)相比,计算超声和胸部X线(CXR)的敏感性和特异性。结果255例患者中,89%是男性。患者的平均年龄为43.46(标准偏差16.3)。道路交通事故(RTA)是最常见的伤害方式(81%)。受伤和到达医院之间的中位数(四分位距)时间间隔为4小时(2.5-7)。约16.1%的患者有皮下气肿。约88.2%的患者血流动力学稳定,78%的患者伴有其他系统损伤。USG检测气胸的敏感性和特异性分别为85.7%和95.3%,CXR的敏感性和特异性分别为71.4%和100%。我们的研究发现,USG检测血胸的敏感性和特异性分别为79%和97.9%,CXR的敏感性和特异性分别为62.9%和100%。即使在进行计算机断层扫描的患者中,USG检测气胸和血胸的敏感性高于CXR。USG检测气胸的特异性与CXR相同,USG检测血胸的特异性高于CXR。结论USG检测气胸和血胸的敏感性高于CXR。USG在检测气胸和血胸方面的特异性与CXR相当。因此,急诊医师在复苏期间进行床边USG有助于胸部创伤患者的快速诊断和早期管理。
    Background Thoracic trauma accounts for 20-25% of all traumas and is the third most frequent cause of death, after abdominal injury and head trauma. In the Emergency Department (ED), shifting an unstable patient to the X-ray room for detecting pneumothorax and hemothorax is always risky and bedside X-ray causes radiation exposure not only to the particular patient but also to the surrounding patients in a congested and busy ED. This can be avoided by using bedside ultrasonography (USG) as the initial imaging modality in chest trauma patients. Objective To compare the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography and chest radiography in detecting pneumothorax and hemothorax in chest trauma patients. Methods This cross-sectional diagnostic study was conducted for a period of one year at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India, a tertiary care centre. All consecutive patients (n=255) with a suspected history of chest trauma were included in the study. The patients were evaluated bedside using USG by point of care ultrasonography trained emergency medicine physician and subsequently underwent chest radiography for documentation of pneumothorax and hemothorax. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for ultrasonography and chest X-ray (CXR) compared with the composite gold standard (chest radiography and computed tomography thorax). Results Of the 255 patients, 89% were males. The mean age of the patients was 43.46 (standard deviation 16.3). Road traffic accident (RTA) was the most common mode of injury (81%). The median (interquartile range) time interval between injury and arrival at the hospital was four hours (2.5-7). About 16.1% of the patients had subcutaneous emphysema. About 88.2% of the patients were hemodynamically stable and 78% of the patients had associated other system injuries. The sensitivity and specificity of USG in detecting pneumothorax were 85.7% and 95.3% respectively and that of CXR were 71.4% and 100% respectively. Our study found that the sensitivity and specificity of USG in detecting hemothorax were 79% and 97.9% respectively and that of CXR were 62.9% and 100% respectively. Even in the subset of patients in whom a computed tomography scan was done, the sensitivity of USG was higher than that of CXR in detecting pneumothorax and hemothorax. The specificity of USG in detecting pneumothorax was the same as that of CXR and the specificity of USG in detecting hemothorax was higher than that of CXR in that subset of patients. Conclusion The sensitivities of USG in detecting pneumothorax and hemothorax were higher than that of CXR. The specificities of USG in detecting pneumothorax and hemothorax were comparable to that of CXR. Hence bedside USG performed by emergency physician during resuscitation helps in rapid diagnosis and early management of chest trauma patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:矽肺是一种进行性和不可逆的疾病,主要由暴露于结晶二氧化硅粉尘引起,在较小程度上,吸烟。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些危险因素对该疾病发病率增加的潜在综合影响.方法:1999年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间,共有1688名男性工人受雇于中国石材加工厂。通过健康监测收集了工业结晶二氧化硅粉尘的累积暴露量和吸烟的包装年,使用逻辑回归模型估算了由于工业二氧化硅暴露和吸烟引起的矽肺变化的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs).结果:在所有参与者中,长期暴露于工业用二氧化硅粉尘与类似矽肺的影像学表现之间存在显著的暴露-反应关系(OR1.74,95%CI1.25~2.41).然而,在中年工人中,发现长时间吸烟与肺矽肺的X线证据之间存在微弱且统计学上无显著性的关系(OR1.59,95%CI1.00~2.53).此外,显著的综合效应,超过添加剂模型,在每个年龄组和就业部门中进行了鉴定(由于相互作用导致的相对风险0.51,95%CI0.08至3.42)。结论:实施有效的除尘措施和烟草控制策略至关重要,以增强石材加工行业所有年龄段员工的呼吸健康。
    Background: Silicosis is a progressive and irreversible disease primarily caused by exposure to crystalline silica dust and, to a lesser extent, cigarette smoking. However, further research is needed to validate the potential combined effect of these risk factors on the increased incidence of the disease. Methods: A total of 1688 male workers employed at a Chinese stone processing plant between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019, were included in the study. Cumulative exposure to industrial crystalline silica dust and packyears of smoking were collected through health surveillance, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for silicotic changes due to industrial silica exposure and cigarette smoking were estimated using logistic regression models. Results: Among all participants, a significant exposure-response relationship was observed between long-term exposure to industrial silica dust and radiographic findings resembling silicosis (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.41). However, among middle-aged workers, a weak and statistically insignificant relationship was found between prolonged cigarette smoking and X-ray evidence of lung silicosis (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.53). Furthermore, significant combined effects, exceeding the additive models, were identified in each age group and employment sector (relative risk due to interaction 0.51, 95% CI 0.08 to 3.42). Conclusions: It is critically important to implement effective dust removal measures and tobacco control strategies in order to enhance respiratory health among employees across all age groups in the stone processing industry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:及时区分肺结核(TB)和非结核性分枝杆菌肺病(NTM-LD),在影像学上相似,很重要,因为传染性和治疗方法不同。这项研究旨在评估人工智能是否可以通过胸部X射线(CXR)与分枝杆菌肺病的嫌疑人区分TB或NTM-LD患者。
    方法:总共1500个CXR,包括500名肺结核患者,NTM-LD,和来自两家医院的临床怀疑但分枝杆菌培养阴性的患者,在这项研究中进行回顾性收集和评估。我们开发了深度神经网络(DNN),并在内部和外部测试集中使用接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积评估了模型性能。此外,我们进行了一项读者研究,并在三种不同分枝杆菌流行情况下测试了我们的模型.
    结果:在内部和外部测试集中,我们的DNN模型对肺结核的AUC分别为0.83±0.005和0.76±0.006,NTM-LD为0.86±0.006和0.64±0.017,和0.77±0.007和0.74±0.005的发射器。DNN模型在内部测试集上的分类精度(66.5±2.5%)高于高级(50.8±3.0%,p<0.001)和初级肺科医师(47.5±2.8%,p<0.001)。在不同的流行场景中,DNN模型在检测TB和分枝杆菌肺病的AUC方面具有稳定的性能。
    结论:DNN模型在对疑似分枝杆菌肺病患者进行分类方面具有令人满意的性能和更高的准确性。DNN模型可能是一个互补的一线筛选工具。
    BACKGROUND: Timely differentiating between pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD), which are radiographically similar, is important because infectiousness and treatment differ. This study aimed to evaluate whether artificial intelligence could distinguish between TB or NTM-LD patients by chest X-rays (CXRs) from suspects of mycobacterial lung disease.
    METHODS: A total of 1500 CXRs, including 500 each from patients with pulmonary TB, NTM-LD, and patients with clinical suspicion but negative mycobacterial culture (Imitator) from two hospitals, were retrospectively collected and evaluated in this study. We developed a deep neural network (DNN) and evaluated model performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) in both internal and external test sets. Furthermore, we conducted a reader study and tested our model under three scenarios of different mycobacteria prevalence.
    RESULTS: Among the internal and external test sets, the AUCs of our DNN model were 0.83 ± 0.005 and 0.76 ± 0.006 for pulmonary TB, 0.86 ± 0.006 and 0.64 ± 0.017 for NTM-LD, and 0.77 ± 0.007 and 0.74 ± 0.005 for Imitator. The DNN model showed higher performance on the internal test set in classification accuracy (66.5 ± 2.5%) than senior (50.8 ± 3.0%, p < 0.001) and junior pulmonologists (47.5 ± 2.8%, p < 0.001). Among different prevalence scenarios, the DNN model has stable performance in terms of AUC to detect TB and mycobacterial lung disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: DNN model had satisfactory performance and a higher accuracy than pulmonologists on classifying patients with presumptive mycobacterial lung diseases. DNN model could be a complementary first-line screening tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    目的:未知基于人工智能的计算机辅助检测(AI-CAD)是否可以在现实世界的临床实践中提高胸片(CR)解释的准确性。我们旨在通过一项务实的随机对照试验,将AI-CAD辅助的CR解释的准确性与常规解释的准确性进行比较,这些患者出现急性呼吸道症状的急诊科(ED)。
    方法:在三级转诊机构的ED中接受急性呼吸道症状CRs的患者被随机分配到干预组(在AI-CAD辅助下进行CR解释)或对照组(无AI辅助)。使用商用AI-CAD系统(LunitINSIGHTCXR,版本2.0.2.0;LunitInc.)。其他临床实践与标准程序一致。值班见习放射科医师对CR解释识别急性胸部疾病的敏感性和假阳性率是主要和次要结果,分别。在ED访视后至少30天,根据对患者病历的审查,建立了急性胸部疾病的参考标准。
    结果:我们将3576名参与者随机分配到任何一个干预组(1761名参与者;平均年龄±标准差,65±17岁;978名男性;472名参与者中的急性胸部疾病)或对照组(1815名参与者;64±17岁;988名男性;491名参与者中的急性胸部疾病)。敏感性(干预组的67.2%[317/472]与对照组为66.0%[324/491];比值比,1.02[95%置信区间,0.70-1.49];P=0.917)和假阳性率(19.3%[249/1289]与18.5%[245/1324];赔率比,1.00[95%置信区间,0.79-1.26];P=0.985)值班放射科医师的CR解释与AI-CAD的使用无关。
    结论:AI-CAD并没有提高CR解释诊断有急性呼吸道症状的ED患者的急性胸部疾病的敏感性和假阳性率。
    It is unknown whether artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection (AI-CAD) can enhance the accuracy of chest radiograph (CR) interpretation in real-world clinical practice. We aimed to compare the accuracy of CR interpretation assisted by AI-CAD to that of conventional interpretation in patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute respiratory symptoms using a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
    Patients who underwent CRs for acute respiratory symptoms at the ED of a tertiary referral institution were randomly assigned to intervention group (with assistance from an AI-CAD for CR interpretation) or control group (without AI assistance). Using a commercial AI-CAD system (Lunit INSIGHT CXR, version 2.0.2.0; Lunit Inc.). Other clinical practices were consistent with standard procedures. Sensitivity and false-positive rates of CR interpretation by duty trainee radiologists for identifying acute thoracic diseases were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. The reference standards for acute thoracic disease were established based on a review of the patient\'s medical record at least 30 days after the ED visit.
    We randomly assigned 3576 participants to either the intervention group (1761 participants; mean age ± standard deviation, 65 ± 17 years; 978 males; acute thoracic disease in 472 participants) or the control group (1815 participants; 64 ± 17 years; 988 males; acute thoracic disease in 491 participants). The sensitivity (67.2% [317/472] in the intervention group vs. 66.0% [324/491] in the control group; odds ratio, 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.49]; P = 0.917) and false-positive rate (19.3% [249/1289] vs. 18.5% [245/1324]; odds ratio, 1.00 [95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.26]; P = 0.985) of CR interpretation by duty radiologists were not associated with the use of AI-CAD.
    AI-CAD did not improve the sensitivity and false-positive rate of CR interpretation for diagnosing acute thoracic disease in patients with acute respiratory symptoms who presented to the ED.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在比较床边超声检查(US)和床边胸片(CR)在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)定位外周中心静脉导管(PICC)中的应用。
    该研究是一项前瞻性的自我对照临床试验。最终招募了181名新生儿患者进行PICC置管。CR,其次是美国,用于评估和重新调整导管尖端的位置。PICC关键结构的成像能力,测量数据的波动,尖端到心房距离的测量,操作时间,婴儿体温变化,获得并比较了两种成像方式的直接费用。
    (1)查看PICC关键结构的比较:导管尖端的显示率,SVC与右心房交界处,IVC和右心房交界处和尖端到心房的距离为99.47%,100%,美国的100%和99.47%,100%,98.42%,CR为97.37%和95.79%,分别。(2)US和CR测量数据的波动:US测量的尖端到心房的距离为0.631(0.435-0.820)cm,CR测量为0.593(0.210-0.825)cm。美国显示出较窄的基准方差范围。(3)美国和CR的一致性:对于一致性分析,Kappa系数(κ)为0.843(P<0.05),显示其有利的一致性。(4)手术时间和婴儿体温下降的比较:对于CR检查,所花费的时间明显长于美国(59.7±26.33vs.79.6±28.06,P<0.001);与美国相比,CR手术导致婴儿体温显着下降(0.14±0.11vs.0.34±0.19,P<0.001)。(5)直接费用的比较:CR定位的总成本明显高于美国(¥153.99vs.¥143,P=0.026)。
    US在PICC尖端定位方面表现出比CR优越的特征。它可能有望在NICU中常规使用。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the applications of bedside ultrasonography (US) and bedside chest radiography (CR) in positioning peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) at Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).
    UNASSIGNED: The study is a prospective before and after self-control clinical trial. A consecutive series of 181 neonate patients were finally enrolled for PICC placement. CR, followed by US, was used to evaluate and readjust the sites of catheter tips. The imaging capability for PICC key structures, fluctuation of the measured data, measurement of tip-to-atrium distance, operation time, infants\' body temperature changes, and direct expenses of the two imaging modalities were obtained and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: (1) Comparison in viewing PICC key structures: the display rate of catheter tip, SVC-and-right-atrium junction, IVC-and-right-atrium junction and tip-to-atrium distance is 99.47%, 100%, 100% and 99.47% for US and 100%, 98.42%, 97.37% and 95.79% for CR, respectively. (2) Fluctuation of the measured data by US and CR: the tip-to-atrium distance measured by US is 0.631 (0.435-0.820) cm, and that measured by CR is 0.593 (0.210-0.825) cm. US showed a narrower range of datum variance. (3) Consistency between US and CR: for consistency analysis, the Kappa coefficient (κ) was 0.843 (P < 0.05), showing their favorable consistency. (4) Comparison of operation time and infants\' body temperature drop: for a CR exam, the time period taken was significantly longer than that of US (59.7 ± 26.33 vs. 79.6 ± 28.06, P < 0.001); and CR operations caused a significant babies\' body temperature drop compared to US (0.14 ± 0.11 vs. 0.34 ± 0.19, P < 0.001). (5) Comparison of the direct expenses: the total cost for CR positioning was significantly higher than that for US (¥153.99 vs. ¥143, P = 0.026).
    UNASSIGNED: US exhibited superior traits to CR in the positioning of PICC tip. It could be promising for routine use in NICU.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号