chemonucleolysis

化学核溶解
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆糖酶化学溶解术可显著改善腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床症状。我们评估了condoliase治疗后>1年的手术干预率和结果。
    方法:这是一项对之前两次随机接受condoliase或安慰剂的患者的随访研究,安慰剂对照临床试验,随访1年。进行了治疗后手术调查和现场检查,并分析了临床试验记录和其他访谈数据中的患者数据,以评估手术干预率。患者腰椎疾病症状,Oswestry残疾指数,和影像学特征进行了评估。
    结果:在患者中(condoliase,n=228;安慰剂,n=128)参加临床试验,临床试验结束后,231名患者的其他治疗后手术数据可用,179名患者接受了试验后检查,临床试验结束后至少5年17个月。安慰剂组和condoliase组的手术干预率为20.7%(95%置信区间:14.2-29.7)和13.4%(95%置信区间:8.8-20.2),分别。安慰剂组和condoliase组注射前Oswestry残疾指数评分的平均变化为-24.7±15.0和-32.7±18.6(组间差异:-8.0±17.3;95%置信区间:-13.2至-2.7)。观察到Modic2型变化,特别是在condoliase组中。腰椎疾病症状与影像学特征变化之间没有关系。
    结论:这项超过1年的随访研究显示,没有出现对condoliase的新的安全性问题。然而,因为这项研究有几个局限性,例如大量的随访损失,需要进一步的研究。
    BACKGROUND: Chemonucleolysis with condoliase significantly improved clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar disc herniation. We evaluated the surgical intervention rate and outcomes for >1 year after condoliase treatment.
    METHODS: This was a follow-up study of patients who received condoliase or placebo in two previous randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with 1-year follow-ups. A post-treatment surgery survey and on-site examination were administered and patients\' data from the clinical trial records and additional interview data were analyzed to evaluate the surgical intervention rate. Patients\' lumbar disease symptoms, Oswestry Disability Index, and imaging features were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Among the patients (condoliase, n = 228; placebo, n = 128) enrolled in the clinical trials, additional post-treatment surgery data were available for 231 patients after the clinical trials ended, and 179 patients underwent post-trial examinations, at least 5 years and 17 months after the end of the clinical trials. The surgical intervention rate in the placebo and condoliase groups was 20.7% (95% confidence interval: 14.2-29.7) and 13.4% (95% confidence interval: 8.8-20.2), respectively. The mean change in Oswestry Disability Index score from pre-injection in placebo and condoliase groups was -24.7 ± 15.0 and -32.7 ± 18.6 (between-group difference: -8.0 ± 17.3; 95% confidence interval: -13.2 to -2.7). Modic Type 2 changes were observed, particularly in the condoliase group. No relationship between lumbar disease symptoms and change in imaging features was found.
    CONCLUSIONS: This follow-up study more than 1 year revealed no new safety concerns of condoliase. However, because the study had several limitations, such as large loss of follow-up, further research is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下背痛伴或不伴神经根性腿痛是一种极其常见的健康状况,显著影响患者的活动和生活质量。当保守管理失败时,硬膜外注射只能暂时缓解,经常使用。盘内氧气-臭氧可以提供硬膜外注射的替代方案,并进一步减少对显微椎间盘切除术的需要。
    比较单节段腰椎间盘突出症致难治性神经根性腿痛患者使用椎间盘内氧气-臭氧与显微椎间盘切除术的非劣效性治疗状况和临床效果。
    在三个欧洲医院脊柱中心进行的多中心前瞻性前瞻性非劣效性随机对照试验。
    49名患者(平均年龄40岁,17名女性/32名男性)患有单级腰椎间盘突出症,神经根腿部疼痛超过六周,对医疗管理的抵抗力是随机的,25用于椎间盘内氧气-臭氧,24用于显微椎间盘切除术。88%(49个中的43个)接受了指定的治疗,并构成了AS治疗(AT)人群。
    主要结果是腿部疼痛总体改善6个月。其他验证的临床结果,包括背部数字疼痛评分(NRS),罗兰莫里斯残疾指数(RMDI)和EQ-5D,是在基线时收集的,1周,1-,3-,和6个月。记录程序技术结果,并在所有随访间隔评估不良事件。
    氧气臭氧治疗作为门诊日间手术,包括通过校准的输送系统以35±3μg/cc的氧气-臭氧浓度输送的一次性椎间盘内注射。作为开放微盘切除术的开腹手术,没有脊柱仪器,而不是小而全的显微切除术。使用治疗后(AT)和意向治疗(ITT)人群进行了6个月累积加权平均腿部疼痛NRS评分的非劣效性差异为-1.94点的主要分析。在事后分析中,在每次随访时比较治疗组相对于基线改善的差异,使用基线腿部疼痛作为协变量。
    在初步分析中,使用AT人群的治疗组之间的腿部疼痛改善的总体6个月差异为-0.31(SE,0.84)支持显微椎间盘切除术和使用ITT人群,差异为0.32(SE,0.88)有利于氧气-臭氧的观点。氧-臭氧和显微椎间盘切除术之间的差异没有超过AT治疗差异的非劣效性95%的置信下限(95%的下限,-1.72)或ITT(95%下限,-1.13)人口。两种治疗方法均导致腿部疼痛的基线快速且具有统计学意义的改善。背痛,RMDI,和EQ-5D持续随访。组间差异对任何结果均不显著。在6个月的随访中,71%(24人中的17人)接受氧气臭氧治疗的患者,避免显微椎间盘切除术。氧气-臭氧的平均手术时间明显比微椎间盘切除术快58分钟(p<.0010),并且氧气-臭氧手术的平均放电时间明显较短(4.3±2.9小时与44.2±29.9小时,p<.001)。任一治疗组均未发生重大不良事件。
    椎间盘内氧气-臭氧化学溶核术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症,对医疗管理无反应,在6个月平均腿部疼痛改善后,符合显微椎间盘切除术的非劣效性标准。两个治疗组取得了相似的快速显著临床改善,持续和总体,71%的人接受椎间盘内氧气臭氧能够避免手术。
    Low back pain with or without radicular leg pain is an extremely common health condition significantly impacting patient\'s activities and quality of life. When conservative management fails, epidural injections providing only temporary relief, are frequently utilized. Intradiscal oxygen-ozone may offer an alternative to epidural injections and further reduce the need for microdiscectomy.
    To compare the non-inferiority treatment status and clinical outcomes of intradiscal oxygen-ozone with microdiscectomy in patients with refractory radicular leg pain due to single-level contained lumbar disc herniations.
    Multicenter pilot prospective non-inferiority blocked randomized control trial conducted in three European hospital spine centers.
    Forty-nine patients (mean 40 years of age, 17 females/32 males) with a single-level contained lumbar disc herniation, radicular leg pain for more than six weeks, and resistant to medical management were randomized, 25 to intradiscal oxygen-ozone and 24 to microdiscectomy. 88% (43 of 49) received their assigned treatment and constituted the AS-Treated (AT) population.
    Primary outcome was overall 6-month improvement over baseline in leg pain. Other validated clinical outcomes, including back numerical rating pain scores (NRS), Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDI) and EQ-5D, were collected at baseline, 1 week, 1-, 3-, and 6-months. Procedural technical outcomes were recorded and adverse events were evaluated at all follow-up intervals.
    Oxygen-ozone treatment performed as outpatient day surgeries, included a one-time intradiscal injection delivered at a concentration of 35±3 μg/cc of oxygen-ozone by a calibrated delivery system. Discectomies performed as open microdiscectomy inpatient surgeries, were without spinal instrumentation, and not as subtotal microdiscectomies. Primary analyses with a non-inferiority margin of -1.94-point difference in 6-month cumulative weighted mean leg pain NRS scores were conducted using As-Treated (AT) and Intent-to-Treat (ITT) populations. In post hoc analyses, differences between treatment groups in improvement over baseline were compared at each follow-up visit, using baseline leg pain as a covariate.
    In the primary analysis, the overall 6-month difference between treatment groups in leg pain improvement using the AT population was -0.31 (SE, 0.84) points in favor of microdiscectomy and using the ITT population, the difference was 0.32 (SE, 0.88) points in favor of oxygen-ozone. The difference between oxygen-ozone and microdiscectomy did not exceed the non-inferiority 95% confidence lower limit of treatment difference in either the AT (95% lower limit, -1.72) or ITT (95% lower limit, -1.13) populations. Both treatments resulted in rapid and statistically significant improvements over baseline in leg pain, back pain, RMDI, and EQ-5D that persisted in follow-up. Between group differences were not significant for any outcomes. During 6-month follow-up, 71% (17 of 24) of patients receiving oxygen-ozone, avoided microdiscectomy. The mean procedure time for oxygen-ozone was significantly faster than microdiscectomy by 58 minutes (p<.0010) and the mean discharge time from procedure was significantly shorter for the oxygen-ozone procedure (4.3±2.9 hours vs. 44.2±29.9 hours, p<.001). No major adverse events occurred in either treatment group.
    Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis for single-level lumbar disc herniations unresponsive to medical management, met the non-inferiority criteria to microdiscectomy on 6-month mean leg pain improvement. Both treatment groups achieved similar rapid significant clinical improvements that persisted and overall, 71% undergoing intradiscal oxygen-ozone were able to avoid surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    OBJECTIVE Chemonucleolysis with condoliase has the potential to be a new, less invasive therapeutic option for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The aim of the present study was to determine the most suitable therapeutic dose of condoliase. METHODS Patients between 20 and 70 years of age with unilateral leg pain, positive findings on the straight leg raise test, and LDH were recruited. All eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive condoliase (1.25, 2.5, or 5 U) or placebo. The primary end point was a change in the worst leg pain from preadministration (baseline) to week 13. The secondary end points were changes from baseline in the following items: worst back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36, and neurological examination. For pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses, plasma condoliase concentrations and serum keratan sulfate concentrations were measured. The safety end points were adverse events (AEs) and radiographic and MRI parameters. Data on leg pain, back pain, abnormal neurological findings, and imaging parameters were collected until week 52. RESULTS A total of 194 patients received an injection of condoliase or placebo. The mean change in worst leg pain from baseline to week 13 was -31.7 mm (placebo), -46.7 mm (1.25 U), -41.1 mm (2.5 U), and -47.6 mm (5 U). The differences were significant at week 13 in the 1.25-U group (-14.9 mm; 95% CI -28.4 to -1.4 mm; p = 0.03) and 5-U group (-15.9 mm; 95% CI -29.0 to -2.7 mm; p = 0.01) compared with the placebo group. The dose-response improvement in the worst leg pain at week 13 was not significant (p = 0.14). The decrease in the worst leg pain in all 3 condoliase groups was observed from week 1 through week 52. Regarding the other end points, the worst back pain and results of the straight leg raise test, ODI, and SF-36 showed a tendency for sustained improvement in each of the condoliase groups until week 52. In all patients at all time points, plasma condoliase concentrations were below the detectable limit (< 100 μU/ml). Serum keratan sulfate concentrations significantly increased from baseline to 6 hours and 6 weeks after administration in all 3 condoliase groups. No patient died or developed anaphylaxis or neurological sequelae. Five serious AEs occurred in 5 patients (3 patients in the condoliase groups and 2 patients in the placebo group), resolved, and were considered unrelated to the investigational drug. Severe AEs occurred in 10 patients in the condoliase groups and resolved or improved. In the condoliase groups, back pain was the most frequent AE. Modic type 1 change and decrease in disc height were frequent imaging findings. Dose-response relationships were observed for the incidence of adverse drug reactions and decrease in disc height. CONCLUSIONS Condoliase significantly improved clinical symptoms in patients with LDH and was well tolerated. While all 3 doses had similar efficacy, the incidence of adverse drug reactions and decrease in disc height were dose dependent, thereby suggesting that 1.25 U would be the recommended clinical dose of condoliase. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00634946 (clinicaltrials.gov).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of chemonucleolysis and psoas compartment block (PCB) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations (LDHs) and to explore the role of PCB in managing postoperative pain of collagenase injection.
    METHODS: Two groups of patients (N = 192) were treated in different ways, respectively. Group A (N = 95) was treated with chemonucleolysis only (the injection of oxygen-ozone combined with collagenase into the lumbar disc and the epidural space); group B (N = 97) was treated with chemonucleolysis and PCB. After the treatment, the patients were followed-up, and the therapeutic effect was assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months by the relative pain reduction, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.
    RESULTS: In group A, treatment success rate was 64.2% (61 of 95), 82.1% (78 of 95), 84.2% (80 of 95), and 86.3% (82 of 95) at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. In group B, treatment success rate was 86.5% (84 of 97), 89.6% (87 of 97), 93.8% (91 of 97), and 91.7% (89 of 97) at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. There was statistically significant difference in outcome between two groups at 1 week, but there were no statistically significant difference in outcome between two groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. VAS scores and ODI were significantly decreased in both group A and group B, when compared with the baseline values in the same group at all points of follow-up. Group B produced a significant reduction in the VAS scores and ODI when compared with group A at: 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Computer tomography (CT)-guided chemonucleolysis combined with PCB leads to rapid pain relief, fewer postoperative pain of collagenase injection happen, and should be regarded as a useful treatment for the management of LDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号