cervical insufficiency

宫颈机能不全
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在调查日本经腹部环扎术(TAC)的产科结局。
    方法:向日本183个实施高质量围产期管理的机构发送了关于TAC的问卷。作为第一步问卷,我们询问TAC是否在2011年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间进行.在调查问卷的第二步中,我们向所有进行TAC的机构询问了所有病例的特征.
    结果:第一次调查的应答率为59%(108/183)。在108个机构中,27人在133例怀孕中进行了TAC(25%)。在这27个机构中,19回答了第二次调查。这项研究包括125例怀孕,其中5例流产(孕周<22周),69名婴儿在37孕周后出生(55%)。在17个机构进行了82次开腹环扎术,在3个机构进行了43次腹腔镜TACs。TAC的年龄没有差异,TAC的孕周,TAC的手术时间,分娩时的孕周,妊娠中期损失的发生率,或早产(37孕周前)两组间的发生率。然而,开放TAC期间的失血量大于腹腔镜TAC期间的失血量。
    结论:TAC在日本是一种罕见的宫颈机能不全手术。TAC可能是预防高危患者中期妊娠丢失和早产的安全有用方法。在日本,TAC也可能是改善宫颈机能不全患者围产期结局的关键选择。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the obstetric outcomes of transabdominal cerclage (TAC) in Japan.
    METHODS: Questionnaires on TAC were sent to 183 institutions performing high-quality perinatal management in Japan. As a first-step questionnaire, we asked whether TAC was performed between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022. In the second step of the questionnaire, the characteristics of all cases were asked from all institutions in which TAC was performed.
    RESULTS: The response rate for the first survey was 59% (108/183). Of the 108 institutions, 27 performed TAC (25%) in 133 pregnancies. Of these 27 institutions, 19 responded to the second survey. One hundred twenty-five pregnancies were included in this study, five of which were aborted (gestational weeks <22 weeks), and 69 babies were born after 37 gestational weeks (55%). Eighty-two open abdominal cerclages were performed at 17 institutions and 43 laparoscopic TACs at three institutions. There were no differences in the age at TAC, gestational weeks at TAC, operative time of TAC, gestational weeks at delivery, incidence rate of second-trimester loss, or preterm delivery (before 37 gestational weeks) rate between the two groups. However, blood loss during open TAC was greater than that during laparoscopic TAC.
    CONCLUSIONS: TAC is a rare surgery for cervical insufficiency in Japan. TAC may be a safe and useful method for preventing second-trimester loss and preterm delivery in high-risk patients. TAC may also be a key option in Japan to improve perinatal outcomes in patients with cervical insufficiency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定哪些非侵入性感染指标能更好地预测宫颈环扎术后感染。以及应密切监测CC感染指标后的天数。
    方法:回顾性研究,单中心研究纳入了2021年1月至2022年12月的619例单胎妊娠患者.根据医生对CC后感染的判断,将患者分为感染组和未感染组。注册信息包括患者特征,宫颈机能不全病史,CC胎龄,手术方法(麦当劳/Shirodkar),CC的目的,妊娠中期流产/早产,感染史或危险因素,CC后第1、3、5和7天的感染指数。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少患者特征偏差。C反应蛋白(CRP)的统计学分析白细胞(WBC),中性粒细胞计数(NEU),中性粒细胞计数百分比(NEU_P),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),和降钙素原(PCT)在感染组与未感染组相比,采用卡方检验和t检验。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线用于进一步评估CRP的诊断价值,PCT,CRP-PCT联合应用。
    结果:在纳入的619名患者中,206名患者使用PSM进行匹配并随后进行评估。CC后第1天和第3天的PCT值在两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。感染组第1天的CRP水平明显高于未感染组(P<0.05)。第3天,与未感染组相比,感染组CRP平均值显著升高(P<0.05)。IL-6、WBC、NEU,和NEU_P没有产生临床显着结果。CRP的ROC曲线下面积,PCT,第1天和第3天的CRP-PCT均低于0.7。在预防性CC组中,在d1时获得的CRP和CRP-PCT的AUC值高于0.7,表明诊断准确性中等.
    结论:对于CC手术后的女性,特别是预防目的,从CC后第1天到第3天,血清CRP和PCT水平升高可能预示着潜在的术后感染,保证密切监测。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify which non-invasive infection indicators could better predict post-cervical cerclage (CC) infections, and on which days after CC infection indicators should be closely monitored.
    METHODS: The retrospective, single-center study included 619 single-pregnancy patients from January 2021 to December 2022. Patients were categorized into infected and uninfected groups based on physicians\' judgments of post-CC infections. Registered information included patient characteristics, cervical insufficiency history, gestational age at CC, surgical method (McDonald/Shirodkar), purpose of CC, mid-pregnancy miscarriage/preterm birth, infection history or risk factors, and infection indices on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after CC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce patient characteristic bias. Statistical analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil count (NEU), percentage of neutrophil count (NEU_P), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) in the infected group compared with the uninfected group was performed using chi-square tests and t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to further assess the diagnostic value of CRP, PCT, and CRP-PCT in combination.
    RESULTS: Among the 619 included patients, 206 patients were matched using PSM and subsequently assessed. PCT values on day 1 and day 3 after CC exhibited significant differences between the two groups in two statistical ways (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). The CRP levels on day 1 were significantly higher in the infected group compared to the uninfected group in two statistical ways (P < 0.05). On day 3, the mean CRP value was significantly elevated in the infected group compared to the uninfected group (P < 0.05). Analyses of IL-6, WBC, NEU, and NEU_P did not yield clinically significant results. The area under the ROC curves for CRP, PCT, and CRP-PCT on day 1 and day 3 were all below 0.7. In the preventive CC group, the AUC values of CRP and CRP-PCT obtained on d1 were found to be higher than 0.7, indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy.
    CONCLUSIONS: For women after CC surgery, especially of preventive aim, increased serum CRP and PCT levels from post-CC day 1 to day 3 may signal a potential postoperative infection, warranting close monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估与安慰剂相比,口服益生菌对环扎术孕妇妊娠结局的影响。
    方法:本研究是一项在Yasuj进行的双盲随机临床试验,伊朗。114名接受环扎的合格参与者被随机分为接受益生菌佐剂或17α-OHP(250毫克,IM)从怀孕第16-37周开始服用安慰剂,采用“阻滞”随机方法。我们的主要结局是早产(PTB)(晚期和早期),次要结局是其他产科和新生儿结局,包括早产胎膜破裂(PPROM)。产前胎膜破裂(PROM),交货方式,和新生儿结局,包括人体测量特征和Apgar评分(1分钟和5分钟)。
    结果:结果表明,在<34岁时,两组之间的PTB没有统计学上的显着差异(15.51%vs.17.86%;P=0.73)和怀孕34-37周(8.7%vs.16.1%;P=0.22),和交货方式(P=0.09)。PPROM(8.7%与28.5%;P=0.006)PROM(10.3%vs.25%;P=0.04)与对照组相比,接受益生菌佐剂的患者显着降低。交货后,本研究的结果表明,新生儿体重无显著差异(3082.46±521.8vs.2983.89±623.89),头部情况(36.86±1.53vs.36.574±1.52),高度(45.4±5.34vs.47.33±4.92)和Apgar评分在一个(0.89±0.03vs.0.88±0.05)和五分钟(0.99±0.03vs.出生后0.99±0.03)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,从第16周到第37周服用Lactofem益生菌可以减少PPROM和PROM等并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oral probiotic effect on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women undergoing cerclage compared to placebo.
    METHODS: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial undertaken in Yasuj, Iran. 114 eligible participants who have undergone cerclage were randomly divided to either receive probiotic adjuvant or 17α-OHP (250 mg, IM) with placebo from the 16th -37th week of pregnancy by \"block\" randomization method. Our primary outcomes were preterm labor (PTB) (late and early) and secondary outcomes were other obstetrical and neonatal outcomes included preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM), mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes including anthropometric characterize and Apgar score (one and fifth-minute).
    RESULTS: Results show that there are no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of PTB in < 34th (15.51% vs. 17.86%; P = 0.73) and 34-37th weeks of pregnancy (8.7% vs. 16.1%; P = 0.22), and mode of delivery (P = 0.09). PPROM (8.7% vs. 28.5%; P = 0.006) PROM (10.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.04) was significantly lower in patients receiving probiotic adjuvant compared to the control group. After delivery, the findings of the present study showed that there were no significant differences in newborn\'s weight (3082.46 ± 521.8vs. 2983.89 ± 623.89), head circumstance (36.86 ± 1.53vs. 36.574 ± 1.52), height (45.4 ± 5.34 vs. 47.33 ± 4.92) and Apgar score in one (0.89 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05) and five minutes (0.99 ± 0.03vs. 0.99 ± 0.03) after birth.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our result has shown that the consumption of Lactofem probiotic from the 16th week until 37th of pregnancy can lead to a reduction of complications such as PPROM and PROM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:宫颈机能不全是妊娠中期早产和流产的重要危险因素;宫颈环扎术是一种治疗选择。本研究旨在评估各种临床因素的预测作用,并为抢救环扎后的近期和长期结果开发预测模型。方法:我们对妊娠14至26周接受抢救环扎术的患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。数据是从参与医院的电子病历系统中收集的。结果分为立即失败(环扎术后无法维持妊娠至少48小时,妊娠潜伏期<2天)和长期成功(维持妊娠至少28周)。分析影响这些结果的临床因素。结果:本研究共纳入98例患者。即时失败与更长的脱垂膜长度相关,入院时C反应蛋白水平升高,和延长的操作时间。成功维持妊娠至少28周与诊断时的胎龄较早有关。羊膜检查结果阴性,功能性子宫颈的长度更长,环扎时宫颈扩张较小。即时失败和长期成功的二元逻辑回归模型表现出出色和良好的预测能力,分别(AUROC=0.912,95%CI:0.834-0.989;AUROC=0.872,95%CI:0.788-0.956)。结论:开发的logistic回归模型为抢救环扎术患者的预后评估提供了有价值的工具。能够做出明智的临床决策。
    Purpose: Cervical insufficiency is a significant risk factor for preterm birth and miscarriage during the second trimester; cervical cerclage is a treatment option. This study seeks to evaluate the predictive roles of various clinical factors and to develop predictive models for immediate and long-term outcomes after rescue cerclage. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study on patients who underwent rescue cerclage at 14 to 26 weeks of gestation. Data were collected from the Electronic Medical Record systems of participating hospitals. Outcomes were dichotomized into immediate failure (inability to maintain pregnancy for at least 48 hours post-cerclage, gestational latency < 2 days) and long-term success (maintenance of pregnancy until at least 28 weeks of gestation). Clinical factors influencing these outcomes were analyzed. Results: The study included 98 patients. Immediate failure correlated with longer prolapsed membrane lengths, elevated C-reactive protein levels at admission, and extended operation time. The successful maintenance of pregnancy until at least 28 weeks was associated with earlier gestational age at diagnosis, negative AmniSure test results, longer lengths of the functional cervix, and smaller cervical dilatation at the time of cerclage. Binary logistic regression models for immediate failure and long-term success exhibited excellent and good predictive abilities, respectively (AUROC = 0.912, 95% CI: 0.834-0.989; and AUROC = 0.872, 95% CI: 0.788-0.956). Conclusion: The developed logistic regression models offer a valuable tool for the prognostic assessment of patients undergoing rescue cerclage, enabling informed clinical decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查宫颈应变率(SR)的变化,宫颈长度(CL),宫颈功能不全妇女孕早期子宫动脉血流参数,并评价这些指标对孕早期宫颈功能不全筛查的临床疗效。
    这项回顾性研究是在2021年9月至2023年1月之间对60名宫颈机能不全的孕妇和100名正常孕妇进行的,并测量了妊娠早期宫颈的超声参数。颈椎SR,CL,在妊娠11-14周时测量两组的子宫动脉阻力指数(RI)。由SR表示的应变弹性成像用于评估内部和外部宫颈开口的硬度。
    在怀孕初期,宫颈机能不全组内、外宫颈开口处的SR明显高于正常妊娠组(SRI:0.19±0.018%vs.0.16±0.014%;SRE:0.26±0.028%vs.0.24±0.025%;p<.001)。宫颈机能不全组的CL明显短于正常妊娠组(34.3±2.9mmvs.35.2±1.99mm;p=.036),而宫颈机能不全组比正常妊娠组的宫颈血液灌注也差(子宫动脉RI:0.76±0.07vs.0.74±0.05;p=.048)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,SRI诊断宫颈机能不全的最佳临界值为0.17%,SRE为0.25%,CL为33.8mm,子宫动脉RI为0.78。在这些参数中,SRI的ROC曲线具有最大的曲线下面积[AUC=0.89(p<.001)],具有最高的灵敏度(78%)和特异性(82%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,宫颈内开口处的SR(OR17.47,95%置信区间(CI)5.08-60.08;p<.001)和CL(OR5.05,95%CI1.66-15.32;p=.004)在两组之间仍显示出显着差异。
    宫颈弹性成像是筛查早孕宫颈机能不全的有效工具。宫颈内开口处的SR是筛查宫颈机能不全的有价值的指标,与CL和子宫动脉血流指数相比,对筛查这种情况具有优越的临床疗效。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate changes in the cervical strain rate (SR), cervical length (CL), and uterine artery blood flow parameters during early pregnancy in women with cervical insufficiency and evaluate the clinical efficacy of these markers for screening of cervical insufficiency in early pregnancy.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study in 60 pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and 100 normal pregnant women was conducted between September 2021 and January 2023 and measured ultrasound parameters of the cervix during early pregnancy. The cervical SR, CL, and uterine artery resistance index (RI) were measured in both groups at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Strain elastography represented by the SR was used to assess the hardness of the internal and external cervical openings.
    UNASSIGNED: During early pregnancy, the SR at the internal and external cervical openings were significantly higher in the cervical insufficiency group than those in the normal pregnancy group (SR I: 0.19 ± 0.018% vs. 0.16 ± 0.014%; SR E: 0.26 ± 0.028% vs. 0.24 ± 0.025%; p < .001). The CL was significantly shorter in the cervical insufficiency group than that measured in the normal pregnancy group (34.3 ± 2.9 mm vs. 35.2 ± 1.99 mm; p = .036), while cervical blood perfusion was also poorer in the cervical insufficiency group than that in the normal pregnancy group (uterine artery RI: 0.76 ± 0.07 vs. 0.74 ± 0.05; p = .048). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal critical values for diagnosing cervical insufficiency were 0.17% for SR I, 0.25% for SR E, 33.8 mm for CL, and 0.78 for uterine artery RI. Of these parameters, the ROC curve for SR I had the largest area under the curve [AUC = 0.89 (p < .001)], with the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (82%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the SR at the internal cervical opening (OR 17.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.08-60.08; p < .001) and CL (OR 5.05, 95% CI 1.66-15.32; p = .004) still showed significant differences between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Cervical elastography is an effective tool for screening early pregnancy cervical insufficiency. The SR at the internal cervical opening is a valuable indicator for screening cervical insufficiency and has superior clinical efficacy for screening for this condition compared to that of CL and the uterine artery blood flow index.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建立一个列线图来预测双胎妊娠孕妇在<28周时的自发性早产。
    方法:我们回顾性研究了2015年12月至2022年2月在两家医院发生无症状宫颈扩张或宫颈缩短的双胎妊娠妇女的医疗记录。来自一个中心的数据用于开发模型,来自另一个中心的数据用于评估模型。
    结果:本研究共纳入270例双胎妊娠。我们纳入了4个项目(宫颈长度,宫颈扩张,C反应蛋白和环扎的使用)在应用于验证集时,以令人满意的区分和校准来构建28周列线图。发展和外部队列中28周列线图的C指数为0.88(95%CI,0.84-0.93)和0.89(95%CI,0.80-0.98),分别。列线图的灵敏度达到70.70%,特异性97.10%,正预测值95.61%,负预测值78.77%。此外,决策曲线分析显示,列线图显示出积极的临床获益.
    结论:我们开发并验证了在双胎妊娠中<28岁时预测自发性早产个体风险的良好性能的列线图。
    OBJECTIVE: To develop a nomogram to predict spontaneous preterm birth at < 28 weeks in pregnant women with twin pregnancies.
    METHODS: We retrospectively studied the medical records of twin-pregnancy women with asymptomatic cervical dilation or cervical shortening between December 2015 to February 2022 in two hospitals. Data from one center was used to develop the model and data from the other was used to evaluate the model.
    RESULTS: A total of 270 twin pregnancies were enrolled in the study. We incorporated 4 items (cervical length, cervical dilation, C-reactive protein and the use of cerclage) to build the 28-week nomogram with satisfactory discrimination and calibration when applied to the validation sets. The C index for the 28-week nomogram in the development and external cohort was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.93) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.98), respectively. The nomogram reached a sensitivity of 70.70%, specificity of 97.10%, positive predicted value of 95.61% and negative predicted value of 78.77%. Moreover, the decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram showed positive clinical benefit.
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a nomogram with good performance in predicting individual risk of spontaneous preterm birth at < 28 in twin pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:紧急宫颈环扎术是一种公认的预防中期妊娠流产和早产的方法;但是,它的好处仍然存在争议。本研究旨在建立预测早产风险高的单胎妊娠患者紧急宫颈环扎术后早产和妊娠潜伏期的术前模型。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2015年至2023年在三个机构接受急诊环扎的患者的数据。将患者分为衍生队列(n=141)和独立验证队列(n=61)。使用单变量和多变量逻辑和Cox回归分析来识别独立的预测变量并建立模型。Harrell的C-index,与时间相关的接收器工作特性曲线和曲线下的面积,校正曲线,并进行决策曲线分析以评估模型.
    结果:这些模型在环扎放置时纳入了孕周,既往孕中期流产和/或早产史,宫颈扩张,术前C反应蛋白水平。预测28周前早产模型的C指数在推导队列中为0.87(95%CI:0.82-0.93),在独立验证队列中为0.82(95%CI:0.71-0.92);预测妊娠潜伏期模型的C指数为0.70(95%CI:0.66-0.75)和0.78(95%CI:0.71-0.84),分别。在派生集中,曲线下面积分别为0.84、0.81和0.84,用于预测1-,3和5周妊娠延长,分别。外部验证的相应值分别为0.78、0.78和0.79。校准曲线显示观察到的和预测的持续怀孕概率之间的良好均匀性。决策曲线分析显示出令人满意的临床实用性。
    结论:这些新模型为急诊环扎术患者提供了可靠且有价值的预后预测。这些模型可以帮助临床医生和患者在选择宫颈环扎术之前做出个性化的临床决策。
    BACKGROUND: Emergency cervical cerclage is a recognized method for preventing mid-trimester pregnancy loss and premature birth; however, its benefits remain controversial. This study aimed to establish preoperative models predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant patients with a high risk of preterm birth.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who received emergency cerclage between 2015 and 2023 in three institutions. Patients were grouped into a derivation cohort (n = 141) and an independent validation cohort (n = 61). Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive variables and establish the models. Harrell\'s C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the models.
    RESULTS: The models incorporated gestational weeks at cerclage placement, history of prior second-trimester loss and/or preterm birth, cervical dilation, and preoperative C-reactive protein level. The C-index of the model for predicting preterm birth before 28 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93) in the derivation cohort and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.92) in the independent validation cohort; The C-index of the model for predicting gestational latency was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84), respectively. In the derivation set, the areas under the curves were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.84 for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-week pregnancy prolongation, respectively. The corresponding values for the external validation were 0.78, 0.78, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves showed a good homogeneity between the observed and predicted ongoing pregnant probabilities. Decision curve analyses revealed satisfactory clinical usefulness.
    CONCLUSIONS: These novel models provide reliable and valuable prognostic predictions for patients undergoing emergency cerclage. The models can assist clinicians and patients in making personalized clinical decisions before opting for the cervical cerclage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:母体应激已被确定为与早产相关的最常见的临床表型之一。美国妇产科医师学会建议在围产期至少进行一次焦虑筛查。围产期焦虑的患病率受到缺乏正式筛查方案和高危人群报告不足的挑战。例如有不良妊娠结局史的患者。
    目的:本研究在有或无自发性早产患者的队列中使用了一种有效的焦虑筛查工具,并比较了组间评分和阳性筛查率的差异。此外,这项研究评估了与阳性筛查相关的围产期结局,并描述了一项转诊方案,包括围产期心理健康咨询师的评估和临床诊断.假设先前有自发性早产史的患者会比对照组有更高的自我报告的焦虑症状,而那些在妊娠<35周时复发性早产的患者会有最高的焦虑筛查得分。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,对我们机构2个产前护理诊所的患者进行广泛性焦虑症7项筛查。早产队列由有自发性早产病史的患者组成,胎膜早破,或宫颈机能不全与没有此病史的对照组相比。筛查是在进入产前护理或转诊到我们的高风险产科诊所时开始的。纳入标准包括说英语或西班牙语的患者和单胎妊娠,排除标准包括妊娠合并重大先天性异常,妊娠34周后登记,妊娠<20周时分娩,和不完整的交付数据。对于广泛性焦虑症7项屏幕得分≥10的患者,将其转诊给心理健康顾问。围产期结局比较广泛性焦虑症7项筛查阳性组与广泛性焦虑症7项筛查阴性组,包括学生t检验,卡方检验,和Wilcoxon秩和检验,P值<.05以确定显著性。
    结果:在2020年9月至2021年12月之间,对1349名参与者进行了分析,在先前的早产队列中有143例患者(11%),在对照组中有1206例(89%)。在研究妊娠中,有早产和妊娠≤35周随后分娩史的患者,其广泛性焦虑症7项筛查评分明显高于妊娠35周后分娩的对照组(中位评分:4[四分位距,1-9]vs2[四分位数间距,0-6],分别为;P=.006)。总的来说,187名参与者(14%)筛查阳性,在先前的早产组中明显高于对照组(20%vs13%;P=0.036)。值得注意的是,117名患者(63%)接受了转诊,32例(17%)筛查阳性的患者被诊断为围产期情绪障碍。
    结论:使用广泛性焦虑症7项筛查,复发性早产患者的自我报告焦虑高于对照组。在那些有正面屏幕的人中,17%的人被诊断患有围产期情绪障碍。
    BACKGROUND: Maternal stress has been identified as one of the most common clinical phenotypes associated with preterm birth. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends anxiety screening at least once in the perinatal period. The prevalence of perinatal anxiety is challenged by the absence of formalized screening protocols and underreporting in high-risk populations, such as those with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: This study administered a validated anxiety screening tool in a cohort of patients with and without a previous spontaneous preterm birth and compared differences in score and rate of a positive screen between groups. Moreover, this study evaluated perinatal outcomes associated with a positive screen and described a referral protocol involving evaluation by a perinatal mental health counselor and clinical diagnoses. A hypothesis was made that patients with a previous history of spontaneous preterm birth would have higher self-reported anxiety symptoms than controls and that those with recurrent preterm delivery at <35 weeks of gestation would have the highest anxiety screening scores.
    METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study administering the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item screen to patients enrolled in 2 prenatal care clinics at our institution. The preterm birth cohort consisted of patients with a history of spontaneous preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, or cervical insufficiency compared with the control cohort without this history. Screening was initiated at entry to prenatal care or referral to our high-risk obstetrical clinic. The inclusion criteria included English- or Spanish-speaking patients and singleton pregnancy, and the exclusion criteria included pregnancies complicated by a major congenital anomaly, enrollment after 34 weeks of gestation, delivery at <20 weeks of gestation, and incomplete delivery data. Referral to a mental health counselor was offered to those with a Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item screen score of ≥10. Perinatal outcomes as a comparison between the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item screen-positive group and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item screen-negative group were performed with statistical methods, including the Student t test, chi-square test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with a P value of <.05 to determine significance.
    RESULTS: Between September 2020 and December 2021, 1349 participants were analyzed, with 143 patients (11%) in the previous preterm birth cohort and 1206 (89%) patients in the control cohort. Patients with a history of preterm birth and subsequent delivery at ≤35 weeks of gestation in the study pregnancy had significantly higher Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item screen scores than controls with delivery after 35 weeks of gestation (median score: 4 [interquartile range, 1-9] vs 2 [interquartile range, 0-6], respectively; P=.006). Overall, 187 participants (14%) screened positive with significantly higher rates in the previous preterm birth group than in the control group (20% vs 13%; P=.036). Of note, 117 patients (63%) accepted a referral, and 32 patients (17%) with a positive screen were diagnosed with a perinatal mood disorder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent preterm birth have higher self-reported anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item screen than controls. Of those with a positive screen, 17% were diagnosed with a perinatal mood disorder.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较孕前腹腔镜经腹环扎术(TAC)与腹腔镜TAC治疗宫颈机能不全的疗效。
    方法:一项回顾性分析研究,比较孕前腹腔镜TAC与妊娠腹腔镜TAC的结局。在我们医院接受腹腔镜TAC的总共178例患者被纳入研究。122例患者行间隔环扎,56例患者在怀孕期间进行了环扎术。
    结果:共178例符合纳入标准的患者被纳入分析。妊娠中期流产减少了50%,在接受腹腔镜TAC孕前的患者中,足月活产的总体增加(32.53%)。妊娠前腹腔镜TAC和妊娠腹腔镜TAC的胎儿存活率分别为90%和85%左右,分别。尽管孕前和孕期腹腔镜TAC的产科结局相当,由于妊娠期间与手术相关的并发症,妊娠前腹腔镜TAC比妊娠中的腹腔镜TAC更安全。
    结论:妊娠前腹腔镜TAC比腹腔镜TAC产生更好的妊娠结局,并且围手术期并发症较少。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage (TAC) pre-pregnancy and laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy in treating cervical insufficiency.
    METHODS: A retrospective analytical study comparing outcomes of laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy with laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy. A total of 178 patients who underwent laparoscopic TAC at our hospital were enrolled in the study. In total, 122 patients underwent interval cerclage, and 56 patients underwent cerclage during pregnancy.
    RESULTS: A total of 178 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Second-trimester abortions decreased by 50%, with an overall increase in full-term live births (32.53%) in patients undergoing laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy. The fetal survival rate was around 90% and 85% with laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy and laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy, respectively. Although the obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy and in pregnancy were comparable, laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy was safer than laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy due to the complications associated with the procedure during pregnancy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy yielded better reproductive outcomes than laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy and was associated with fewer perioperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在描述一系列可能的环扎失败患者的妊娠结局,这些患者接受了具有潜在指征的重复环扎(RC)。
    方法:我们回顾性收集了上海2019年至2022年55例单胎妊娠的病例系列,中国。所有包括妇女提供书面知情同意书,这项研究得到了两家医院伦理委员会的批准。我们比较了不同适应症的妊娠与RC之间的妊娠结局。
    结果:在案例系列中,9例患者接受RC治疗,其适应症是在先前的缝合环下有突出的膜(A组),其余46例患者行无痛宫颈扩张术(B组)。B组分娩时的妊娠年龄短于A组(30.7vs37.6周,P=0.009)。早产率<32周(63.0%vs22.2%,P=0.033)和<37周(76.1%vs33.3%,P=0.002),B组明显高于A组。在接受无痛宫颈扩张RC的46例患者中,28例宫颈扩张为1至2厘米(C组),另18例宫颈扩张为3至6厘米(D组)。D组分娩时的胎龄短于C组(27.4vs31.5周,P=0.037)。然而,两组<32周或<37周的早产率相似.
    结论:RC可能是可能环扎失败患者的抢救策略。环扎环下的膜突出或宫颈扩张<3cm可能是更好的妊娠结局的指标。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the pregnancy outcomes of a case series of patients with probable cerclage failure who received repeat cerclage (RC) with potential indications.
    METHODS: We retrospectively collected a case series of 55 singleton pregnancies with RC from 2019 to 2022 in Shanghai, China. All included women provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the ethics committees of the two hospitals. We compared pregnancy outcomes between pregnancies with RC for different indications.
    RESULTS: Among the case series, nine patients underwent RC for the indication of protruding membranes below the previous suture loop (group A), and the other 46 patients for painless cervix dilation (group B). Gestational age at delivery was shorter in group B than in group A (30.7 vs 37.6 weeks, P = 0.009). Rates of preterm birth <32 weeks (63.0% vs 22.2%, P = 0.033) and < 37 weeks (76.1% vs 33.3%, P = 0.002) were significantly higher in group B than in group A. Of the 46 patients who underwent RC for painless cervical dilation, 28 had cervical dilation of 1 to 2 cm (group C) and the other 18 had cervical dilation of 3 to 6 cm (group D). The gestational age at delivery was shorter in group D than in group C (27.4 vs 31.5 weeks, P = 0.037). However, rates of preterm birth <32 or <37 weeks were similar between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: RC may constitute a rescue strategy for patients with probable cerclage failure. Protrusion of membranes below the cerclage loop or cervical dilation <3 cm may be an indicator of better pregnancy outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号