BACKGROUND: There are no systematic reviews analyzing cervical cerclage\'s role in improving the perinatal outcome of the second twin in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) pregnancies following a second trimester or very early preterm birth of the first twin.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of rescue cervical cerclage on delaying the delivery of the second twin after the delivery of the first twin in DCDA twin pregnancies. The secondary objective was to analyze the effect of rescue cervical cerclage on the perinatal outcome of the second twin in DCDA pregnancies compared to the non-cerclage group.
METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline databases, and the Cochrane Library. The studies selected were limited to human subjects and published online by December 2023. Two sets of results in this systematic review are described; the first set includes the outcomes of pregnancies with a DCDA twin pregnancy from the cohort of case series. The meta-analysis was performed for the cohort, and a combined narrative report was provided for the second set of results for the case reports.
RESULTS: A literature search resulted in 27 case series and 36 case reports. The case series analysis demonstrated that the mean gestation age of twin 2 at delivery with cervical cerclage (27.5 weeks) compared to those without cervical cerclage (24.4 weeks) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, analysis of the case series showed that twin 2 with cerclage had a statistically significant increase in latency period (days 44.7 vs 23.67) and birth weight (grams 3320 vs 2460) compared to the group without cerclage (p = -value was 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). It is difficult to draw any significant conclusion with complications of cervical cerclage; however, there were slightly more chorioamnionitis and respiratory distress syndrome in the cerclage group. The case report analysis showed no significant difference with or without cervical cerclage.
CONCLUSIONS: From this review, it can be concluded that in DCDA twin pregnancies, cervical cerclage insertion after the extremely premature delivery or miscarriage of twin 1 may increase the gestational age at delivery, prolong the delivery interval, and increase the birth weight of twin 2. However, a large prospective multicenter randomized control trial should be performed to assess the benefit of cervical cerclage in DCDA twins to improve the delivery interval latency period and perinatal outcome of twin 2 after the delivery of twin 1.

BACKGROUND: The management of women with premature cervical dilatation and exposed unruptured fetal membranes remains uncertain and controversial. Treatment options may include expectant management or emergency cervical cerclage (ECC). Little is known regarding the effectiveness of individual interventions, or additional therapies. This systematic review aims to summarise all existing evidence to improve understanding of the treatment options and pregnancy outcomes for women presenting with premature cervical dilatation.
METHODS: Databases were searched using a prospective protocol (CRD42021286275). Studies were eligible for inclusion across five distinct comparison groups if they included women with premature cervical dilatation and reported clinical outcomes. Primary outcome was pregnancy loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death and termination of pregnancy). Planned subgroups included singletons and twins, and low-cervical or high-cervical suture. Pairwise random effects meta-analysis calculated in RevMan5.4, single arm random effects proportional meta-analysis calculated using RevMan and R studio. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.
RESULTS: 6781 abstracts were screened, and 177 (four randomised controlled trials) studies included in the five analysis groups. Women receiving ECC were significantly less likely to experience pregnancy loss (combined RR 0.48 95 %CI 0.39-0.59 singleton RR 0.48 95 %CI 0.34-0.67 twin only RR 0.39 95 %CI 0.26-0.58) compared to expectant management. Adjuvant amnioreduction with ECC was not found to reduce pregnancy loss (RR 1.12 (95 % CI 0.73-1.72) or any other outcomes compared to ECC without amnioreduction. Women were significantly more likely to experience pregnancy loss (RR3.85 95 %CI 3.13-4.74) after ECC compared to planned cerclage. The probability of intra-operative rupture of membranes at ECC insertion was 3.3 % (95 %CI 1.8-5.1) and the probability of an ECC attempt being abandoned was 2.6 % (95 %CI 1.1-4.6 %).
CONCLUSIONS: ECC appears to reduce the risk of pregnancy loss for both singletons and twins although the overall quality of evidence is poor. It is important that women are counselled regarding the outcomes following cerclage according to indication. Pregnancy complications are common after ECC although the rates of intra-operative complications are lower than may be anticipated. Randomised trials remain imperative for understanding the role of ECC and adjunctive treatments in preventing pregnancy loss in this condition.

BACKGROUND: The protocol for delayed-interval delivery of the second twin in twin pregnancies has not been standardized. Cervical cerclage is often performed, but its use is debated. To conduct a scoping review on cervical cerclage for prolonging the intertwin delivery interval and improving second twin survival and maternal outcomes after preterm delivery or spontaneous abortion of the first twin in twin pregnancies.
METHODS: Seven Chinese and English language databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2023, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Chinese Science Journal Database, and Sinomed. Relevant observational studies that assessed the effectiveness of the use of cervical cerclage in delayed-interval delivery of twins were screened and selected, and raw data were extracted, and descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 102 articles were retrieved. After screening and exclusion of duplicate and irrelevant articles, 22 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were obtained. Studies in which cerclage was performed reported longer intertwin delivery intervals than those that did not perform cerclage, and the difference was statistically significant. The cerclage group also tended to have lower rates of chorioamnionitis and maternal complications, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: After excluding patients with contraindications, emergency cervical cerclage can be considered in cases of spontaneous abortion of the first twin in twin pregnancies to prolong the gestation and improve the prognosis of the remaining fetus until it becomes viable and increases its birth weight.

Cervical cerclage is a common procedure employed to prevent preterm birth in women with cervical insufficiency. Complications such as injuries to the cervix and bladder, and premature membrane rupture are well-documented, while genitourinary fistulas are a rare occurrence. This article reports a rare case of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) formation in a 27-year-old woman following the placement of a McDonald cervical cerclage. The patient presented with continuous watery vaginal leakage, which began during the last 2 months of her pregnancy. Clinical and cystoscopic examinations revealed the presence of a VVF, which was further confirmed through voiding cystourethrography and perineal magnetic resonance imaging. Notably, the patient had undergone the cerclage procedure 18 months prior to the onset of symptoms, making this case particularly unusual. We believe that the VVF formation was associated with the use of Mersilene tape, which may have slowly eroded through the cervix and subsequently breached the urothelium. This case underscores the importance of considering cerclage-related genitourinary fistulas as potential complications, especially when evaluating and counseling patients who have undergone cervical procedures like the McDonald technique. In conclusion, this case highlights the need for vigilant monitoring and a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with symptoms of genitourinary fistulas after such procedures. Further research and awareness in this area are warranted to better understand the risk factors and mechanisms underlying this unusual complication.
Our patient presented with continuous watery leakage that started during the last 2 months of her pregnancy. The patient was diagnosed with an abnormal communication between the bladder and vagina following the placement of cervical Mersilene tape. After 18 months, the opening was repaired, and the patient fully recovered 2 months after surgery. Complications associated with cerclage are rare and commonly related to injuries to the cervix or bladder, premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and bleeding, as described in published reports. This case report described the unusual complication of vesicovaginal fistula formation after the placement of a McDonald suture. We emphasize that vesicovaginal fistula can have a serious impact on social, mental, and sexual health. Any practitioner dealing with such patients should be aware of these associated health problems during management.

Vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage are both effective interventions for reducing preterm birth. It is currently unclear whether combined therapy offers superior effectiveness than single therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of combining cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the prevention of preterm birth.
We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Scopus (from their inception to 2020).
The review accepted randomized and pseudorandomized control trials, nonrandomized experimental control trials, and cohort studies. High risk patients (shortened cervical length <25mm or previous preterm birth) who were assigned cervical cerclage, vaginal progesterone, or both for the prevention of preterm birth were included. Only singleton pregnancies were assessed.
The primary outcome was birth <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included birth <28 weeks, <32 weeks and <34 weeks, gestational age at delivery, days between intervention and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, cesarean delivery, neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intubation, and birthweight. Following title and full-text screening, 11 studies were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROBINS-I and RoB-2). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) tool.
Combined therapy was associated with lower risk of preterm birth at <37 weeks than cerclage alone (risk ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.79) or progesterone alone (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.96). Compared with cerclage only, combined therapy was associated with preterm birth at <34 weeks, <32 weeks, or <28 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased birthweight, increased gestational age, and a longer interval between intervention and delivery. Compared with progesterone alone, combined therapy was associated with preterm birth at <32 weeks, <28 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased birthweight, and increased gestational age. There were no differences in any other secondary outcomes.
Combined treatment of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone could potentially result in a greater reduction in preterm birth than in single therapy. Further, well-conducted and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these promising findings.

BACKGROUND: As the rate of multiple pregnancies increases, delayed interval delivery (DID) is increasingly being implemented to improve perinatal outcomes. But there are no international guidelines for DID in multiple pregnancies. We report a case of DID in a quadruplet pregnancy and review the relevant literature to summarize the management of DID in multiple pregnancies.
METHODS: A 22-year-old woman, 22 2/7 weeks\' gestation, with quadruplets, was admitted to the hospital for a first cervical cerclage due to cervical dilation. Twenty-five days later, it was found that the cervix was dilated again, so after removing the cervical cerclage, the first quadruplet was delivered vaginally (25 6/7 weeks), and a second cervical cerclage was performed. Four days later, due to re-dilation of the cervix, after removal of the cervical cerclage, the second quadruplet was delivered vaginally (26 3/7 weeks), followed by a third cervical cerclage. Six days later, the pregnancy was terminated by cesarean section due to fetal distress, and the third and fourth quadruplets were delivered (27 2/7 weeks). The patient had no postoperative complications, and all four infants were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit and discharged successfully.
CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes that comprehensive management of delayed interval delivery can improve perinatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies, including anti-infection, tocolytic therapy, practice to promote fetal lung, and cervical cerclage.

Cervical cerclages are associated with improved live birth rates and have low short- and long-term risks. However, there have been reports of fistula formation or erosion of cerclage into the surrounding tissue. Those complications are uncommon and yet are serious. The risk factors associated with its development are still unclear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the incidence of fistula formation or erosion following transvaginal cervical cerclage and the associated clinical and sociodemographic factors. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases to retrieve articles related to transvaginal or transabdominal cervical cerclage. Databases were searched up to July 2021. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO ID 243542). A total of 82 articles were identified describing cervical cerclage and erosion or fistula formation. A total of 9 full-text articles were included. There were seven case reports and series that described 11 patients who experienced late complications following cervical cerclage. Many of the cerclage procedures were done electively (66.7%). The most common type of cerclage was McDonald (80%). While all cases reported fistula formation, the main location was vesicovaginal fistulas (63.6%). One patient (9.1%) had erosion of their cerclage and another (9.1%) had bladder calculi. Of 75 patients who underwent cerclage in two retrospective case reviews, the overall incidence of fistula was 1.3% and abscess was also 1.3%. Although rare, the most common long-term complication of cervical cerclage placement is fistula formation, particularly vesicovaginal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Existing guidelines and studies on the benefits of cerclage in twin pregnancies with a dilated cervix have low reliability and inconsistent conclusions. New randomized control trials and cohort studies focusing on twin pregnancies with cervical insufficiency were published recently. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes of cerclage placement and expectant treatment in twin pregnancies with a dilated cervix using recent data.
METHODS: We screened the PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with cervical dilation, with and without cerclage placement, published until December 2020. Estimates were pooled using random-effects or fixed-effect models depending on the heterogeneity. Mean difference, 95% confidence interval, and relative risk were used to compare the outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analyses followed the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines for systematic reviews of observational studies.
RESULTS: Five studies, comprising 275 twin pregnancies, met the inclusion criteria; of those, 167 underwent cerclage and 108 were expectantly managed. Cerclage placement significantly prolonged the interval from the time of diagnosis to delivery and reduced the incidence of preterm delivery, perinatal death, and complications. The fetal outcomes improved significantly in cases managed with cerclage.
CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, emergent cerclage is a potential option for managing twin pregnancies with cervical dilation of at least 1 cm.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies with cervical cerclage remain inconsistent. Thus, this study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the value of cervical cerclage as a treatment strategy to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies with regard to both maternal and neonatal outcomes.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies and trials from their inception up to December 2020. Outcomes were expressed as risk ratios and standardized mean differences in a meta-analysis model using STATA 15.0 software.
RESULTS: The search included 944 studies, 15 of which were eligible for inclusion, representing 726 patients treated with cervical cerclage and 8578 non-cerclage treatment controls. When the cervical length was <15 mm, the risk ratio of preterm birth at <37 weeks (0.77, p = 0.01), <34 weeks (0.58, p = 0.002), and <32 weeks (0.61, p = 0.024) of gestation in the cerclage group was significantly lower than that in the non-cerclage group.
CONCLUSIONS: For twin pregnancies with a cervical length <15 mm, cervical cerclage was associated with significant reduction in preterm birth.

Cervical insufficiency is a defect of the cervix that leads to failure to preserve a full-term intrauterine pregnancy. Laparoscopic cerclage and open transabdominal cerclage (TAC) are effective ways to manage patients with cervical insufficiency. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the complications of laparoscopic cerclage and open TAC in the management of cervical insufficiency.
We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science using our search strategy and screened the results for our criteria. We extracted the results reported and analyzed them using Open Meta-Analyst (OpenMeta[Analyst], Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI) and Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) software.
We included all randomized controlled and observational trials performed on patients with cervical insufficiency undergoing open TAC or laparoscopic cerclage that matched our search strategy. We excluded letters to the editor, reviews, meetings/conference abstracts, non-English or nonhuman studies, and instances where the full text was not available.
We included a total of 33 trials. Both interventions of laparoscopic cerclage and open TAC were associated with significantly less total fetal loss (laparoscopic cerclage, relative risk [RR] 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.08; p <.001, and open TAC, RR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.51; p <.009). The overall blood loss in open TAC was 110.589 mL (95% CI, 93.737-127.44; p <.001), and in laparoscopic cerclage, it was 24.549 mL (95% CI, 9.892-39.205; p = .001). In addition, open TAC had a positive effect regarding incidence of hemorrhage >400 mL (RR 0.077; 95% CI, 0.033-0.122; p <.001). Preterm premature rupture of membranes was significant in the open TAC (RR 0.037; 95% CI, 0.019-0.055; p <.001) and laparoscopic cerclage groups (RR 0.031; 95% CI, 0.009-0.053; p = .006).
Laparoscopic cerclage may be safer than open TAC in the management of cervical insufficiency because we found a statistically significant lower incidence of fetal loss, blood loss, and rate of hemorrhage in the laparoscopic cerclage group. Clinically, this evidence may help support favoring a laparoscopic approach over an open one in appropriate patients, although it is unclear whether this benefit is limited to cerclages placed either before pregnancy or placed in the first-trimester or both.