CONCLUSIONS: Over the past few decades, hypertension (HTN) has affected both young and old people. The public health problem has an enormous economic impact on societies as well. The present review aimed to understand and compare the differences from the available literature on HTN treatment at the primary care level in various states and at the national level in India. We reviewed the latest international, national, and state guidelines/protocols available for the treatment of HTN. In addition, we also searched the PubMed database with relevant Medical Subject Headings terms and included the articles published in the last 5 years. A total of 204 articles were screened and finally, eligible 5 articles were included in the review. International guidelines preferred thiazide diuretics as a drug of choice. While the state protocols and national guidelines preferred calcium channel blockers, followed by angiotensin receptor blockers as the drug of choice. All these guidelines focused on low-dose monotherapy. These guidelines also summarized additional drugs required in case of comorbid conditions. However, the new Essential Medicine List published by the World Health Organization prefers low-dose fixed-drug combination (two-drug regimen) at the primary care level for treatment of HTN. There was not much cost difference between monotherapy and fixed-drug regimens based on the published studies. With due rise in HTN cases, the standardized protocol is ubiquitously needed for better application, comparison, and streamline of the program. Fixed-drug combination therapy can be considered for better control rates among hypertensives by improving adherence and efficacy.

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive agents due to their effectiveness in reducing blood pressure (BP), along with their good tolerability and evidence of reducing hypertension (HTN)-related cardiovascular and renal diseases. Cilnidipine, a unique dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, exhibits potent inhibitory action on both N-type and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. With excellent oral absorption and a prolonged duration of action, it demonstrates a significant antihypertensive effect. It effectively reduces BP both systolic and diastolic while providing renal, neurological, and cardiovascular protection. Unlike L-type CCBs, cilnidipine does not increase pulse rates (PRs) and is associated with reduced occurrence of pedal edema. Cilnidipine is an effective treatment choice for individuals with mild to moderate essential HTN, whether it is administered alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities.

UNASSIGNED: The calcium channel has been considered to have great potential as a drug target for neuroprotective therapy in Parkinson\'s disease (PD), but previous studies yielded inconsistent results.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and the risk and progression of PD.
UNASSIGNED: The terms such as \'Parkinson\'s disease\', \'PD\', \'calcium channel blockers\', and \'CCB\' were used to search the literature published before 1 May 2023 in English databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for studies on CCB and PD. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 190 works of literature were preliminarily retrieved, and 177 works of literature were excluded by eliminating duplicates, reading abstracts, and reading full texts. A total of nine studies were finally included in the meta-analysis of the CCB and the risk of PD, and five studies were included in the systematic review of the CCB and the progression of PD. A total of 2,961,695 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The random-effects model was used for analysis due to significant heterogeneity. The main results of the meta-analysis showed that the use of CCB could reduce the risk of PD (relative risk 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.99).
UNASSIGNED: CCB use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PD. Whether CCB use has a disease-modifying effect on PD needs further study.
UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO: CRD42024508242.

In India, around 234 million adults (one in three) suffer from hypertension (HTN). An average of 10% of these cases are likely to be resistant hypertension (RH). This load of 23 million patients is expected to expand further with revisions in diagnostic criteria. The treatment and control rates of hypertension in India average around 30% and 15%, respectively. Pharmacological management involves a stepwise approach starting with optimizing the A-C-D (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and thiazide-like diuretics) triple-drug combination, followed by substitution with a thiazide-like diuretic and use of spironolactone as a next step (fourth drug). The subsequent steps are suggestions based on expert input and must be individualized. These include using a β-blocker as the fifth drug and an α1-blocker or a peripheral vasodilator as a final option when target blood pressure (BP) values are not achieved. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are likely to be helpful in managing RH due to their renal and cardiovascular protection as well as mortality benefits. SGLT2i lowers BP independent of the dosage and concomitant anti-hypertensive medications. Patient education and tools to monitor BP and treatment compliance will improve outcomes with these medications. In addition to therapeutic intervention, a preventive approach for RH mandates a need to identify patients at risk and use appropriate preventive and optimal therapy to prevent uncontrolled hypertension in patients with cardiovascular disorders.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is associated with the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) and its progression, however, it remains unclear whether antihypertensive medicines alter PCa risk or prognosis. This systematic review evaluated the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in the risk and prognosis of PCa. This review was performed in line with PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
METHODS: Eligible studies comprised peer-reviewed observational studies which reported the role of CCBs and RAS inhibitors in PCa, had accessible full texts, and were written in English. Using a combination of keywords, 5 electronic bibliographic databases which included Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus were searched.
RESULTS: A total of 1,346 studies were retrieved and 18 met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies reported reduced or no associated risk, improved prognosis, and survival with the use of RAS inhibitors. Studies on CCBs showed evidence of associated risk of PCa. Data extraction from retrieved studies focused on included study characteristics, setting, authors, year, outcomes of interest, and risk ratios. The quality assessment of included studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute study assessment tools, showed that all studies had good quality.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of RAS inhibitors was mostly associated with lower risks or improved prognosis of PCa. CCBs may also be associated with risks of PCa. This suggests that high-risk patients managed with CCBs should be actively monitored for PCa. However, there is need for further evidence from large-scale prospective, controlled cohort studies to determine any influence of CCBs on PCa.

BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of nimodipine following subarachnoid hemorrhage is a practice established four decades ago when clinical management differed from current and the concept of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) was not established. The applicability of the original studies is limited by the fact of not reflecting current practice; by utilising a dichotomised outcome measure such as good neurological outcome versus death and vegetative state; by applying variable dosing regimens and including all causes of poor neurological outcome different than DCI. This study aims to review the available evidence to discuss the ongoing role of nimodipine in contemporaneous clinical practice.
METHODS: PRISMA guidelines based review, evaluated the evidence on the prophylactic use of nimodipine. The following search engines: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and PubMed, identified Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) with neurological benefit as outcome measure and the impact of fixed versus weight-based nimodipine dosing regimens.
RESULTS: Eight RCT were selected. Three of those trials with a total of 349 patients, showed a reduction on death and vegetative state (pooled RR: 0.62; 95 % confidence interval-CI: 0.45, 0.86) related to DCI. Amongst all studies, all cause death (pooled RR = 0.73, [95 % CI: 0.56, 0.97]) favoured a fixed-dose regimen (pooled RR: 0.60; [95 % CI: 0.43, 0.85]).
CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence demonstrates that nimodipine only reduces the risk for DCI-related death or vegetative state and that fixed-dose regimens favour all cause infarct and death independent of DCI. Contemporaneous studies assessing the benefit of nimodipine beyond death or vegetative states and applying individualized dosing are warranted.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and the leading cause of death in Colombia. While the rate of hypertension awareness in Colombia is generally high, rates of treatment initiation, adherence, and blood pressure (BP) control are suboptimal. Major international hypertension guidelines recommend starting treatment with a combination of antihypertensive agents, and the use of a single-pill combination (SPC) to maximize adherence. In contrast, Colombian hypertension guidelines recommend starting treatment with diuretic monotherapy in most patients, and only initiating combination therapy in those with BP > 160/100 mmHg. Therefore, the aim of the current narrative review is to examine the rationale for using SPCs to treat hypertension in Colombia, in the context of the major issues for BP control there. There is evidence of widespread therapeutic inertia in hypertension management, particularly in primary care, in Colombia. Moreover, combination therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and long-acting calcium channel blockers, which are internationally recommended as first-line drug therapies, are underutilized there. Adherence to antihypertensive therapy is low in Colombia and may be enhanced by use of SPCs as well as better patient education and follow-up. While there are promising national initiatives to improve BP management, more needs to be done by individual physicians. Antihypertensive SPCs are available on the national essential medicines list and may help to overcome some of the problems with suboptimal adherence, therapeutic inertia, and low rates of BP control that contribute to the high cardiovascular death rate in Colombia.

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for Raynaud\'s phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DU) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and other connective tissue diseases (CTD), in order to inform the Portuguese recommendations for managing RP and DU in these patients.
A SLR was conducted until May 2022 to identify studies assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for RP and DU in SSc and other CTD. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and their extensions for assessing efficacy and safety of interventions. Observational studies with a comparator were included for evaluating the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions and safety of pharmacological interventions. The risk of bias of each study was assessed using standard tools.
Out of 71 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, 59 evaluated pharmacological and 12 non-pharmacological interventions. We found moderate quality evidence supporting the efficacy of calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and intravenous prostacyclin analogues in reducing RP frequency, severity, and duration. Intravenous iloprost had a small to moderate effect size in improving DU healing. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors were effective in reducing total DU count, new DU occurrence, and enhancing DU healing. Bosentan effectively prevented new DU in SSc patients. No new safety concerns were associated with these treatments. The studies on non-pharmacological interventions were, in general, of low quality, and had a small sample size. Warming measures decreased frequency and duration of RP attacks; laser therapy improved RP-related outcomes; local oxygen-ozone therapy improved RP outcomes as an add-on therapy; bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation improved DU-associated pain; periarterial sympathectomy and vascular bypass reduced DU number and finger amputation risk.
The available evidence supports the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions, namely nifedipine, sildenafil, iloprost, and bosentan in treating RP and DU in patients with SSc and other CTD. Scarce and low-quality evidence does support the use of some non-pharmacological interventions but with only a modest effect size. This SLR underscores the limited availability of high-quality evidence for determining the optimal treatment.

Introduction: Recent studies suggest that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) could reduce the risk of active tuberculosis and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of CCBs on the risk of developing active tuberculosis and mortality. Methods: We systematically searched for observational studies and clinical trials published in six databases until 31 August 2023, following a PECO/PICO strategy. Results: We included eight observational studies, 4,020,830 patients, among whom 241,761 had diabetes mellitus and 30,397 had active tuberculosis. According to our results, CCBs reduce the risk of developing active tuberculosis by 29% (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.67-0.75) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. However, CCBs do not show any benefit in terms of tuberculosis-related mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.98-1.02). For both outcomes, no statistical heterogeneity was found (I2 = 0, p > 0.10). This protective effect of CCBs on the risk of active tuberculosis remained independent of the type of patient (with diabetes mellitus vs. general population) or the class of CCB administered (DHP-CCB vs. non-DHP-CCB) (test for subgroup differences I2 = 0, p > 0.10). However, this beneficial effect was more significant among the general population (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.66-0.74) compared to patients with diabetes mellitus (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.86) and among those patients treated with DHP-CCBs (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.74) compared to patients treated with non-DHP-CCBs (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.78). Conclusion: CCBs may reduce the risk of active TB in patients with diabetes and the general population. On the contrary, CCBs do not seem to have a protective effect on tuberculosis-related mortality. However, more evidence is still needed. We recommend developing clinical trials to verify these findings, including more diverse populations. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=352129].

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has had increasing prevalence and indications in the last decade. Calcium channel blocker overdose (CCBOD) can lead to significant cardiopulmonary dysfunction and has also increased in recent years. CCBOD results in cardiac depression, vasoplegia, and hyperglycemia. Expert consensus recommends treatment with calcium, high-dose insulin, inotropes, and vasopressors. Our systematic review evaluated when to initiate ECMO in the CCBOD population and the mortality rate associated with use. Electronic literature review identified all relevant studies for CCBOD and ECMO. PRISMA guidelines for systematic review were followed. Three independent authors reviewed abstracts and full texts, and only CCB ingestion without polypharmacy was included. Two authors independently collected data, which included demographics, current medical treatments, ECMO type, and survival. From 314 abstracts, 25 papers were included with a median publication year of 2019. Twenty-six patients were included with an average age of 32.7 years and 42%/58% male/female. Average time on ECMO 4.3 days. VA and VV ECMO use were 92.3% and 7.7%, respectively, and 84.6% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Before ECMO, most patients received 4-5 medical treatments (53.8%). Our systematic review demonstrates ECMO is a newly used, yet valuable therapy for CCBOD when medical treatment fails. Survival to discharge after ECMO for CCBOD is substantially higher than standard VV or VA ECMO. Medical management is still the mainstay therapy for CCBOD, but we show that a persistently unstable patient may benefit from prompt evaluation at an ECMO center for treatment.