Calciphylaxis is a rare and severe disease characterized by calcification, fibrosis, and thrombosis of small blood vessels. Although it primarily affects patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, limited cases have been reported of calciphylaxis in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and lupus. This case report describes the occurrence of calciphylaxis in a 35-year-old female recently diagnosed with lupus nephritis class IV and AKI requiring dialysis.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Calciphylaxis, also called calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is a rare benign cutaneous manifestation. Although little is known about its pathogenesis, it is thought to be a result of vascular wall calcification leading to soft tissue necrosis, and it is usually encountered in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on long-term renal dialysis. Breast calciphylaxis is a rare entity that may present as a breast mass or necrotic ulcers, and it is common for it to be initially mistaken for a malignant breast pathology. In this article, we present a case of bilateral breast calciphylaxis in a 66-year-old female with ESKD receiving long-term dialysis.

Calciphylaxis is a rare and life-threatening condition in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In this case report, we reported a 72-year-old female who had undergone aortic and mitral mechanical valve replacement 22 years ago due to rheumatic aortic and mitral stenosis. Following the valve replacement, she initiated warfarin treatment. Five years ago, she received a diagnosis of uremia and has since been undergoing regular hemodialysis. Ten months prior to her current admission, she experienced excruciating pain and was diagnosed with calciphylaxis. Additionally, an electrocardiogram revealed atrial fibrillation, while echocardiography indicated that the aortic and mitral mechanical valves were appropriately positioned, with normal perivalvular surroundings and good valve leaflet activity. No noticeable thrombosis was observed in the left atrium or left atrial appendage. Color Doppler imaging showed moderate stenosis in the lower extremity arteries, with no venous thromboembolism present. Extensive eggshell-like calcification within the arterial media was detected. The patient was managed with regular hemodialysis, symptomatic treatments (including anticoagulation and analgesia), and sodium thiosulfate. Unfortunately, symptomatic management provided limited relief, and during the one-month follow-up period, the patient passed away due to septic shock. Currently, there is insufficient conclusive evidence regarding alternative influential anticoagulants or appropriate prosthetic valve selection. For individuals with ESKD receiving maintenance hemodialysis, early identification, diagnosis, and treatment of calciphylaxis are of paramount importance.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of case reports and case series to investigate risk factors, treatment modalities, and the outcome of penile calciphylaxis.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify case reports or case series of penile calciphylaxis. The patient characteristics, laboratory investigations, diagnostic modalities, treatment modalities, and outcomes were extracted. We compared clinical characteristics and treatment between patients who survived or demised and between patients with clinical improvement and those without to identify the poor prognostic risk factors.
RESULTS: Ninety-four articles were included from 86 case reports and 8 case series with 121 patients. Most of the patients were on hemodialysis (78.9%). The median time since starting dialysis was 48 months (24-96 months). Sodium thiosulfate was used to treat penile calciphylaxis in 23.6%. For surgical management, partial or total penectomy was performed in 45.5% of the patients. There was no association between sodium thiosulfate use, partial or total penectomy, and improvement in clinical outcomes. The mortality rate in patients with penile calciphylaxis was 47.8% and the median time to death was 3 months (0.75-9 months). The presence of extragenital involvement was significantly related to mortality (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: A calcified penile artery results in penile calciphylaxis, a rare vascular phenomenon associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of penile calciphylaxis includes the medical management of risk factors, surgical debridement, or penectomy. Therefore, early prevention and diagnosis as well as immediate appropriate treatment are needed.

Calciphylaxis is a serious complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Dialysis patients are the most affected, especially those who are obese and diabetic, have liver diseases and autoimmune diseases, or are on systemic glucocorticoids. Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is curative for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and calciphylaxis in most cases. Calciphylaxis after parathyroidectomy is a rare presentation. We present a case of a young patient who developed calciphylaxis after parathyroidectomy, an uncommon presentation.

Calciphylaxis is a thrombotic vasculopathy characterized by painful necrotic ulcerations. There are no Food and Drug Administration approved therapies despite high mortality.
To compare mortality and wound healing outcomes in patients treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in addition to intravenous sodium thiosulfate (IV STS) versus patients who received IV STS only. Findings were stratified by dialysis status and modality.
93 patients were included, with 57 patients in the control group (IV STS) and 36 patients in the treatment group (HBOT + IV STS). Mortality data were analyzed with traditional survival analyses and Cox proportional hazard models. Longitudinal wound outcomes were analyzed with mixed effects modeling.
Univariate survival analyses showed that full HBOT treatment was associated with significantly (P = .016) longer survival time. Increasing number of HBOT sessions was associated with improved mortality outcomes, with 1, 5, 10 and 20 sessions yielding decreasing hazard ratios. There was also a significant (P = .042) positive association between increasing number of HBOT sessions and increased wound score.
Data collection was retrospective.
HBOT may have a role in the treatment of calciphylaxis with benefits demonstrated in both mortality and wound healing. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify which patients would most benefit from this intervention.

Limited data are available on the utilization of sodium thiosulfate (STS) treatment for calciphylaxis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, while it is well-studied in hemodialysis (HD) patients. A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify reported cases of PD patients with calciphylaxis who received STS. The search covered the inception of the databases through August 2022. Across 19 articles, this review identified 30 PD patients with calciphylaxis who received STS. These included 15 case reports, 2 case series, and 2 cohort studies. The administration routes and doses varied depending on the study. For intravenous (IV) administration (n = 18), STS doses ranged from 3.2 g twice daily to 25 g three times weekly for 5 weeks to 8 months. Outcomes included 44% of patients experiencing successful wound healing, 6% discontinuing STS due to adverse effects, 67% transitioning to HD, and 50% dying from calciphylaxis complications. For intraperitoneal (IP) administration (n = 5), STS doses ranged from 12.5 to 25 g three to four times weekly for 12 h to 3 months. Results showed 80% of patients achieving successful wound healing, 80% discontinuing STS due to adverse effects, 40% transitioning to HD, and 20% dying from IP STS-related chemical peritonitis. In cases where patients switched from IV to IP STS (n = 3), doses ranged from 12.5 to 25 g two to three times weekly for 2.5 to 5 months. Among them, 67% experienced successful wound healing, while 33% died from sepsis. Two cases utilized oral STS at a dose of 1500 mg twice daily for 6 and 11 months, resulting in successful wound healing without adverse effects or need for HD. However, one patient (50%) died due to small bowel obstruction. This systematic review provides an overview of STS treatment for PD patients with calciphylaxis. Although successful treatment cases exist, adverse effects were significant. Further research, including larger clinical studies and pharmacokinetic data, is necessary to establish the optimal route, dose, and efficacy of STS in PD patients.

Calciphylaxis, also known as Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), is a serious disorder that presents with skin necrosis due to calcification of dermal and subcutaneous adipose tissue capillaries and arterioles. The condition occurs primarily in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, and it carries high morbidity and mortality, primarily due to sepsis, with an estimated six-month survival of approximately 50%. Although there are no high-quality studies to guide the optimal treatment approach for patients with calciphylaxis, many retrospective studies and case series support treatment with sodium thiosulfate (STS). Despite the frequent use of STS as an off-label treatment, data regarding its safety and efficacy are limited. STS has generally been considered a safe drug with mild side effects. However, severe metabolic acidosis associated with STS is a rare and life-threatening complication of STS treatment and is often unpredictable. Herein, we report a 64-year-old female with ESRD on peritoneal dialysis (PD) who presented with a profound high anion gap metabolic acidosis and severe hyperkalemia while on STS treatment for CUA. No other etiology for her severe metabolic acidosis other than STS was identified. ESRD patients receiving STS should be monitored closely for this side effect. Dose reduction, increasing the duration of infusion, or even discontinuing STS treatment should be considered if severe metabolic acidosis develops.