BACKGROUND: BRAF mutation has been recognized as a negative prognostic marker for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but these data are from common BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. Combination therapy of BRAF inhibitor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody has been approved for BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. However, BRAF non-V600 mutations are rare mutations, and their clinical behavior is not understood. Moreover, the BRAF K601E mutation is extremely rare in mCRC, and there have been no reports on its specific treatment.
METHODS: Herein, we report the case of a 59-year-old female with super aggressive mCRC with multiple metastases, which extended to whole body including mediastinal to abdominal lymph nodes, bones, pleura, and peritoneum. The companion diagnostics of tumor tissues showed RAS/BRAF wild-type without microsatellite instability. She received chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] and leucovorin) plus panitumumab, following FOLFIRI (irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU and leucovorin) plus ramucirumab. For the next regimen selection, a comprehensive genomic profiling panel was performed and revealed a BRAF K601E mutation, which was not covered in the initial companion diagnostics. After disease progression, a combination of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was selected as third-line chemotherapy. The serum levels of tumor markers were immediately decreased accompanied by improvements in pleural effusion and ascites. However, the disease progressed again, and best supportive care was done instead.
CONCLUSIONS: This case offers novel insights into the clinical behaviors of BRAF non-V600E-mCRC, potentially advancing personalized therapy for rare and aggressive cases.

UNASSIGNED: The development of new and changing melanocytic lesions has been increasingly reported as an adverse dermatologic toxicity of BRAF inhibitor therapy. Melanocytic lesions and melanomas induced by BRAF inhibitor therapy that lack BRAF V600E expression have been less commonly described. One mechanism that has been proposed for the development of BRAF inhibitor-induced melanocytic lesions, including those lacking BRAF V600E expression, is the paradoxical activation of the MAPK signaling pathway in BRAF wild-type (BRAFWT) cells.
UNASSIGNED: Herein, we report a rare case of a 39-year-old woman who developed numerous BRAF V600E-negative eruptive melanocytic nevi following encorafenib, cetuximab, and binimetinib combination therapy, the current standard of care for the treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Patients treated with BRAF inhibitors, with or without related combination therapies, who develop BRAFWT melanocytic lesions are at risk for developing both dysplastic nevi and melanoma, thereby warranting baseline dermatoscopic evaluation prior to the initiation of therapy as well as regular follow-up during and after treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Encorafenib and binimetinib, a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, is a standard of care for patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. This combination is known to have gastrointestinal side effects, most of which are mild and managed symptomatically. However, very few studies have reported severe colitis.
UNASSIGNED: We report here 2 patients with advanced melanoma who developed severe ulcerated right colitis manifested by diarrhea and hematochezia while being treated with encorafenib and binimetinib after immune checkpoint therapy.
UNASSIGNED: This rare but serious adverse event was not described in early phase 3 trials but has emerged in recent years, particularly with the sequential use of immune checkpoint inhibitors followed by BRAF/MEK inhibitors. In a comprehensive review of the existing literature, we identified 20 cases of severe colitis due to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological features are described to provide insight into the current understanding of this poorly understood clinical entity.

暂无摘要。

In the era of personalized medicine, small-molecule inhibitors have become key to targeting many malignancies. Multiple hematologic malignancies are driven by small-molecule pathways that are seemingly ripe for such targeting. In this case report, we present a patient who was treated with a mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor for what was originally diagnosed as a histiocytic sarcoma. Re-biopsy ultimately revealed an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), but his disease initially showed a remarkable response to MEK inhibition. This case illustrates both the importance of obtaining high-quality biopsy specimens for diagnostic and molecular analysis as well as the need for further research into the molecular drivers of T-cell lymphomas that may be amenable to targeted therapies.

暂无摘要。

There are only limited treatment options for metastatic NRAS mutant melanoma patients with resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Besides activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway, they often have additional disturbances in cell cycle regulation. However, unlike BRAF mutant melanoma, no targeted therapy has yet been approved for NRAS mutant melanoma so far. Here we present a NRAS mutant melanoma patient with response to combined binimetinib and ribociclib therapy following characterization of the molecular defects of the tumor by panel sequencing. Next generation sequencing (708 cancer genes) of a soft tissue metastasis revealed a homozygous deletion of CDKN2A in addition to the previously known NRAS mutation, as well as amplification of CCNE1 and CDK6. Immunohistochemical staining of the altered cell cycle genes confirmed loss of p16, reduced expression of p21 and high expression of CDK6 and cyclin D1. As the patient had been progressive on combined immunotherapy, targeted therapy with combined MEK and CDK4/6 inhibition was initiated as recommended by the molecular tumor board. Response to treatment was monitored with PET/CT and liquid biopsy, serum LDH, and S100. In addition, a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) was used to prove the efficacy of the two drugs in combination. Furthermore, senescence-associated beta-galactosidase staining showed that more cells were senescent under the combination treatment of binimetinib and ribociclib. Our case demonstrates how an individualized, molecular-based therapeutic approach could be found based on next-generation sequencing results. Furthermore our report highlights the fruitful and efficient collaboration of dermatooncologists, human geneticists, molecular pathologists, biochemists, radiologists, and nuclear physicians. Further studies are urgently needed to expand the very limited therapeutic landscape of NRAS mutated melanoma.

Sixty percent of patients with stage IV melanoma may develop brain metastases, which result in significantly increased morbidity and a poor overall prognosis. Phase 3 studies of melanoma usually exclude patients with untreated brain metastases; therefore, clinical data for intracranial responses to treatments are limited.
A multicenter, retrospective case series investigation of consecutive BRAF-mutant patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) treated with a combination of BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and MEK inhibitor binimetinib was conducted to evaluate the antitumor response. Assessments included the intracranial, extracranial, and global objective response rates (according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1); the clinical benefit rate; the time to response; the duration of response; and safety.
A total of 24 patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant MBMs treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib in 3 centers in the United States were included. Patients had received a median of 2.5 prior lines of treatment, and 88% had prior treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The intracranial objective response rate was 33%, and the clinical benefit rate was 63%. The median time to a response was 6 weeks, and the median duration of response was 22 weeks. Among the 21 patients with MBMs and prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, the intracranial objective response rate was 24%, and the clinical benefit rate was 57%. Similar outcomes were observed for extracranial and global responses. The safety profile for encorafenib plus binimetinib was similar to that observed in patients with melanoma without brain metastases.
Combination therapy with encorafenib plus binimetinib elicited intracranial activity in patients with BRAF-mutant MBMs, including patients previously treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted and ongoing.