背景:以患者和家庭为中心的护理被认为是最佳实践。这种方法与高质量和积极的护理体验有关,鼓励和启用家庭在床边的存在。COVID-19大流行,然而,导致严格限制医院就诊,这威胁到卫生专业人员提供以家庭为中心的护理的能力。
目的:探讨COVID-19访客限制对重症监护病房临终危重疾病期间家庭关系的影响。
方法:采用回顾性集体案例研究方法,使用半结构化访谈,通过电话或变焦进行,按照COVID-19的限制。
方法:两个参与者组,包括在重症监护病房死亡的患者(n=6)和大城市医院的重症监护护士(n=3)。
结果:对失去亲人的近亲的采访持续了25-59分钟(平均值=41),重症监护护士访谈持续了31-52分钟(平均=43).归纳内容分析揭示了五个主题:(一)第一次告别,当时没有意识到的重要性;(Ii)混淆规则和限制,强调家庭联系的身体和情感障碍;(iii)沟通不足,这进一步影响了近亲;(四)最后的告别,匆忙,情绪化,没有隐私;和(V)反思。
结论:这个集体案例研究表明,访客限制对失去亲人的近亲和更广泛的家庭产生了深远的影响。以家庭为中心的护理方法,保护和优先考虑家庭联系,必须强调将患者视为较大家庭单位的一部分。
结论:重症监护团队必须在访客限制期间考虑自己的临终关怀方法,寻找新的,灵活和创新的方式来改善沟通,促进以家庭为中心的护理,保持病人与家庭的联系,促进结束生命的文化习俗,仪式对近亲和更广泛的家庭单位至关重要。
BACKGROUND: Patient and family-centred care is considered best practice. Such an approach is associated with high quality and positive experiences of care, and family presence at the bedside is encouraged and enabled. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, resulted in strictly enforced restrictions on hospital visitation, which threatened health professionals\' ability to provide family-centred care.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of COVID-19 visitor restrictions on family relationships during critical illness at the end of life in the intensive care unit.
METHODS: A retrospective collective
case study approach was taken, using semi-structured interviews, conducted via telephone or Zoom, in accordance with COVID-19 restrictions.
METHODS: Two participant groups, bereaved next-of-kin of patients who died in the intensive care unit (n = 6) and critical care nurses (n = 3) from a major metropolitan hospital were included.
RESULTS: Interviews with bereaved next-of-kin lasted 25-59 (mean = 41) minutes, and critical care nurse interviews lasted 31-52 (mean = 43) minutes. Inductive content analysis revealed five themes: (i) the first farewell, the significance not realised at the time; (ii) confusing rules and restrictions, which emphasised physical and created emotional barriers to family connections; (iii) inadequate communication, which further impacted next-of-kin; (iv) final farewells, which were rushed, emotional and afforded no privacy; and (v) reflecting back.
CONCLUSIONS: This collective
case study demonstrates the profound impact visitor restrictions have had on bereaved next-of-kin and the wider family. A family-centred approach to care, protecting and prioritising family connection, and recognising the patient as a person who is part of a larger family unit must be emphasised.
CONCLUSIONS: Critical care teams must consider their own approach to end-of-life care during times of visitor restrictions, finding new, flexible and innovative ways to improve communication, promote family-centred care, maintain the patient-family connection and facilitate end-of-life cultural customs, and rituals imperative to next-of-kin and the wider family unit.