UNASSIGNED: Reductions in opioid prescribing by health care providers can lead to a decreased risk of opioid dependence in patients. Peer comparison has been demonstrated to impact providers\' prescribing habits, though its effect on opioid prescribing has predominantly been studied in the emergency department setting.
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to describe the development of an enterprise-wide opioid scorecard, the architecture of its implementation, and plans for future research on its effects.
UNASSIGNED: Using data generated by the author\'s enterprise vendor-based electronic health record, the enterprise analytics software, and expertise from a dedicated group of informaticists, physicians, and analysts, the authors developed an opioid scorecard that was released on a quarterly basis via email to all opioid prescribers at our institution. These scorecards compare providers\' opioid prescribing habits on the basis of established metrics to those of their peers within their specialty throughout the enterprise.
UNASSIGNED: At the time of this study\'s completion, 2034 providers have received at least 1 scorecard over a 5-quarter period ending in September 2021. Poisson regression demonstrated a 1.6% quarterly reduction in opioid prescribing, and chi-square analysis demonstrated pre-post reductions in the proportion of prescriptions longer than 5 days\' duration and a morphine equivalent daily dose of >50.
UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the first peer comparison effort with high-quality evidence-based metrics of this scale published in the literature. By sharing this process for designing the metrics and the process of distribution, the authors hope to influence other health systems to attempt to curb the opioid pandemic through peer comparison. Future research examining the effects of this intervention could demonstrate significant reductions in opioid prescribing, thus potentially reducing the progression of individual patients to opioid use disorder and the associated increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Predictive modeling based on multi-omics data, which incorporates several types of omics data for the same patients, has shown potential to outperform single-omics predictive modeling. Most research in this domain focuses on incorporating numerous data types, despite the complexity and cost of acquiring them. The prevailing assumption is that increasing the number of data types necessarily improves predictive performance. However, the integration of less informative or redundant data types could potentially hinder this performance. Therefore, identifying the most effective combinations of omics data types that enhance predictive performance is critical for cost-effective and accurate predictions.
METHODS: In this study, we systematically evaluated the predictive performance of all 31 possible combinations including at least one of five genomic data types (mRNA, miRNA, methylation, DNAseq, and copy number variation) using 14 cancer datasets with right-censored survival outcomes, publicly available from the TCGA database. We employed various prediction methods and up-weighted clinical data in every model to leverage their predictive importance. Harrell\'s C-index and the integrated Brier Score were used as performance measures. To assess the robustness of our findings, we performed a bootstrap analysis at the level of the included datasets. Statistical testing was conducted for key results, limiting the number of tests to ensure a low risk of false positives.
RESULTS: Contrary to expectations, we found that using only mRNA data or a combination of mRNA and miRNA data was sufficient for most cancer types. For some cancer types, the additional inclusion of methylation data led to improved prediction results. Far from enhancing performance, the introduction of more data types most often resulted in a decline in performance, which varied between the two performance measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the prevailing notion that combining multiple omics data types in multi-omics survival prediction improves predictive performance. Thus, the widespread approach in multi-omics prediction of incorporating as many data types as possible should be reconsidered to avoid suboptimal prediction results and unnecessary expenditure.

For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), N-glycosylation has been proved to be widely involved in various aspects of the disease, including development, metastasis, subtyping, diagnosis and prognosis. The common practice is to discover biomarkers in situ of cancer occurrence (i.e., cancer vs. adjacent tissues) yet to clinically monitor in sera because of non-invasiveness. This study benchmarks N-glycoproteomics characterization of common differential tissue and serum N-glycoproteins of patients with HCC. Differential N-glycosylation in matched tissue and serum samples from the same patients were quantitatively characterized at the intact N-glycopeptide molecular level, and 29 common N-glycoproteins were found. Subcellular localization analysis was carried out to confirm the tissue originality. Secreted N-glycoprotein APOH was up-regulated, and transmembrane and intracellular N-glycoproteins including OSMR, GAT2, CSF-1 and MAGI3 were down-regulated.

Synthetic tabular health data plays a crucial role in healthcare research, addressing privacy regulations and the scarcity of publicly available datasets. This is essential for diagnostic and treatment advancements. Among the most promising models are transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). In this paper, we compare LLM models of the Pythia LLM Scaling Suite with varying model sizes ranging from 14M to 1B, against a reference GAN model (CTGAN). The generated synthetic data are used to train random forest estimators for classification tasks to make predictions on the real-world data. Our findings indicate that as the number of parameters increases, LLM models outperform the reference GAN model. Even the smallest 14M parameter models perform comparably to GANs. Moreover, we observe a positive correlation between the size of the training dataset and model performance. We discuss implications, challenges, and considerations for the real-world usage of LLM models for synthetic tabular data generation.

Mendelian randomization (MR), which utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs), has gained popularity as a method for causal inference between phenotypes using genetic data. While efforts have been made to relax IV assumptions and develop new methods for causal inference in the presence of invalid IVs due to confounding, the reliability of MR methods in real-world applications remains uncertain. Instead of using simulated datasets, we conducted a benchmark study evaluating 16 two-sample summary-level MR methods using real-world genetic datasets to provide guidelines for the best practices. Our study focused on the following crucial aspects: type I error control in the presence of various confounding scenarios (e.g., population stratification, pleiotropy, and family-level confounders like assortative mating), the accuracy of causal effect estimates, replicability, and power. By comprehensively evaluating the performance of compared methods over one thousand exposure-outcome trait pairs, our study not only provides valuable insights into the performance and limitations of the compared methods but also offers practical guidance for researchers to choose appropriate MR methods for causal inference.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive session summaries enable effective continuity in mental health counseling, facilitating informed therapy planning. However, manual summarization presents a significant challenge, diverting experts\' attention from the core counseling process. Leveraging advances in automatic summarization to streamline the summarization process addresses this issue because this enables mental health professionals to access concise summaries of lengthy therapy sessions, thereby increasing their efficiency. However, existing approaches often overlook the nuanced intricacies inherent in counseling interactions.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effectiveness of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in selectively summarizing various components of therapy sessions through aspect-based summarization, aiming to benchmark their performance.
METHODS: We first created Mental Health Counseling-Component-Guided Dialogue Summaries, a benchmarking data set that consists of 191 counseling sessions with summaries focused on 3 distinct counseling components (also known as counseling aspects). Next, we assessed the capabilities of 11 state-of-the-art LLMs in addressing the task of counseling-component-guided summarization. The generated summaries were evaluated quantitatively using standard summarization metrics and verified qualitatively by mental health professionals.
RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated the superior performance of task-specific LLMs such as MentalLlama, Mistral, and MentalBART evaluated using standard quantitative metrics such as Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE)-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Score across all aspects of the counseling components. Furthermore, expert evaluation revealed that Mistral superseded both MentalLlama and MentalBART across 6 parameters: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, coherence, opportunity costs, and perceived effectiveness. However, these models exhibit a common weakness in terms of room for improvement in the opportunity costs and perceived effectiveness metrics.
CONCLUSIONS: While LLMs fine-tuned specifically on mental health domain data display better performance based on automatic evaluation scores, expert assessments indicate that these models are not yet reliable for clinical application. Further refinement and validation are necessary before their implementation in practice.

Translating RNA-seq into clinical diagnostics requires ensuring the reliability and cross-laboratory consistency of detecting clinically relevant subtle differential expressions, such as those between different disease subtypes or stages. As part of the Quartet project, we present an RNA-seq benchmarking study across 45 laboratories using the Quartet and MAQC reference samples spiked with ERCC controls. Based on multiple types of \'ground truth\', we systematically assess the real-world RNA-seq performance and investigate the influencing factors involved in 26 experimental processes and 140 bioinformatics pipelines. Here we show greater inter-laboratory variations in detecting subtle differential expressions among the Quartet samples. Experimental factors including mRNA enrichment and strandedness, and each bioinformatics step, emerge as primary sources of variations in gene expression. We underscore the profound influence of experimental execution, and provide best practice recommendations for experimental designs, strategies for filtering low-expression genes, and the optimal gene annotation and analysis pipelines. In summary, this study lays the foundation for developing and quality control of RNA-seq for clinical diagnostic purposes.

BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in remote Australia have initiated bold policies for health-enabling stores. Benchmarking, a data-driven and facilitated \'audit and feedback\' with action planning process, provides a potential strategy to strengthen and scale health-enabling best-practice adoption by remote community store directors/owners. We aim to co-design a benchmarking model with five partner organisations and test its effectiveness with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores in remote Australia.
METHODS: Study design is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with consenting eligible stores (located in very remote Northern Territory (NT) of Australia, primary grocery store for an Aboriginal community, and serviced by a Nutrition Practitioner with a study partner organisation). The Benchmarking model is informed by research evidence, purpose-built best-practice audit and feedback tools, and co-designed with partner organisation and community representatives. The intervention comprises two full benchmarking cycles (one per year, 2022/23 and 2023/24) of assessment, feedback, action planning and action implementation. Assessment of stores includes i adoption status of 21 evidence-and industry-informed health-enabling policies for remote stores, ii implementation of health-enabling best-practice using a purpose-built Store Scout App, iii price of a standardised healthy diet using the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healthy Diets ASAP protocol; and, iv healthiness of food purchasing using sales data indicators. Partner organisations feedback reports and co-design action plans with stores. Control stores receive assessments and continue with usual retail practice. All stores provide weekly electronic sales data to assess the primary outcome, change in free sugars (g) to energy (MJ) from all food and drinks purchased, baseline (July-December 2021) vs July-December 2023.
CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesise that the benchmarking intervention can improve the adoption of health-enabling store policy and practice and reduce sales of unhealthy foods and drinks in remote community stores of Australia. This innovative research with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities can inform effective implementation strategies for healthy food retail more broadly.
BACKGROUND: ACTRN12622000596707, Protocol version 1.

The coronavirus disease 19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to a global health crisis with millions of confirmed cases and related deaths. The main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for viral replication and presents an attractive target for drug development. Despite the approval of some drugs, the search for effective treatments continues. In this study, we systematically evaluated 342 holo-crystal structures of Mpro to identify optimal conformations for structure-based virtual screening (SBVS). Our analysis revealed limited structural flexibility among the structures. Three docking programs, AutoDock Vina, rDock, and Glide were employed to assess the efficiency of virtual screening, revealing diverse performances across selected Mpro structures. We found that the structures 5RHE, 7DDC, and 7DPU (PDB Ids) consistently displayed the lowest EF, AUC, and BEDROCK scores. Furthermore, these structures demonstrated the worst pose prediction results in all docking programs. Two structural differences contribute to variations in docking performance: the absence of the S1 subsite in 7DDC and 7DPU, and the presence of a subpocket in the S2 subsite of 7DDC, 7DPU, and 5RHE. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate Mpro conformations for SBVS, providing valuable insights for advancing drug discovery efforts.

In the context of neurorehabilitation, there have been rapid and continuous improvements in sensors-based clinical tools to quantify limb performance. As a result of the increasing integration of technologies in the assessment procedure, the need to integrate evidence-based medicine with benchmarking has emerged in the scientific community. In this work, we present the experimental validation of our previously proposed benchmarking scheme for upper limb capabilities in terms of repeatability, reproducibility, and clinical meaningfulness. We performed a prospective multicenter study on neurologically intact young and elderly subjects and post-stroke patients while recording kinematics and electromyography. 60 subjects (30 young healthy, 15 elderly healthy, and 15 post-stroke) completed the benchmarking protocol. The framework was repeatable among different assessors and instrumentation. Age did not significantly impact the performance indicators of the scheme for healthy subjects. In post-stroke subjects, the movements presented decreased smoothness and speed, the movement amplitude was reduced, and the muscular activation showed lower power and lower intra-limb coordination. We revised the original framework reducing it to three motor skills, and we extracted 14 significant performance indicators with a good correlation with the ARAT clinical scale. The applicability of the scheme is wide, and it may be considered a valuable tool for upper limb functional evaluation in the clinical routine.