auditory threshold

听觉阈值
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估和比较单侧先天性耳道闭锁(UCAA)患者的闭锁成形术和Bonebridge(BB)植入的听力学结果,指导临床决策。
    方法:本研究包括27名诊断为UCAA的受试者。十三人植入了BB,14人接受了闭锁成形术。所有患者都接受了手术前后的检查,包括纯音测听法,声场阈值(SFT),语音接收阈值(SRT),单词识别得分(WRS),和水平声源定位测试。
    结果:(1)术后,闭锁成形术组SFT平均下降11.79±5.93dBHL,BB组下降24.46±9.36dBHL,与闭锁成形术组相比,BB组的下降幅度明显更大(P<0.05)。(2)两组在正常耳罩条件下,术后平均双音节WRS显着改善。BB组的改善程度明显高于闭锁成形术组。(3)当语音信号从CAA侧出现时,噪声来自正常听力侧,与术前水平相比,两个手术组术后信噪比均显著下降,闭锁组信噪比提高2.14±2.95dB,BB组信噪比提高4.92±5.83dB(P<0.05)。(4)术前平均最小听觉角为29.71±18.42°,术后6个月降至18.1±10.07°,改善有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论:我们得出的结论是,在安静和嘈杂的条件下,闭锁成形术和Bonebridge植入术都可以显着改善UCAA儿童的言语感知。BoneBridge植入似乎比闭锁成形术提供更好的听力学结果。闭锁成形术可以显著提高声音定位的准确性。在Bonebridge植入后的短时间内未观察到声音定位精度的显着改善。应以更大的样本量和更长的随访时间进行进一步的研究。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare audiological outcomes of atresiaplasty and Bonebridge (BB) implantation in patients with unilateral congenital aural atresia (UCAA), to guide clinical decision-making.
    METHODS: Twenty-seven subjects diagnosed with UCAA were included in the study. Thirteen were implanted with the BB, while 14 undergone atresiaplasty. All patients underwent pre-and post-surgery examinations, including pure-tone audiometry, sound field threshold (SFT), speech reception threshold (SRT), word recognition score (WRS), and horizontal sound source localization tests.
    RESULTS: (1) Postoperatively, the average SFT decreased by 11.79 ± 5.93 dB HL in the atresiaplasty group and by 24.46 ± 9.36 dB HL in the BB group, with a significantly greater decrease in the BB group compared to the atresiaplasty group (P < 0.05). (2) Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in average disyllabic WRS postoperatively under normal ear-masking conditions, with the BB group showing a significantly higher improvement than the atresiaplasty group. (3) When the speech signal was presented from the CAA side with noise from the normal hearing side, both surgical groups exhibited a significant decrease in postoperative signal-to-noise ratio compared to preoperative levels, with improvements of 2.14 ± 2.95 dB SNR in the atresiaplasty group and 4.92 ± 5.83 dB SNR in the BB group (P < 0.05). (4) The average minimum audible angle preoperative in the atresiaplasty group was 29.71 ± 18.42°, which decreased to 18.1 ± 10.07° at 6 months postoperatively, showing a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that both atresiaplasty and Bonebridge implantation can significantly improve speech perception under both quiet and noisy conditions in children with UCAA. BoneBridge implantation appears to provide better audiological outcomes than atresiaplasty. Atresiaplasty can significantly improve the accuracy of sound localization. No significant improvement in sound localization accuracy was observed in the short period after Bonebridge implantation. Further research should be conducted with a larger sample size and longer follow-up time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对先天性圆窗闭锁(CRWA)患者的听力特征知之甚少。这项研究旨在通过将CRWA患者的听力特征与两种相对常见的先天性中耳异常进行比较:先天性stapedial固定(CSF)和先天性听骨不连续性(COD)。
    方法:文献检索得到5例经手术证实的CRWA患者(7只耳朵),他们被包括在CRWA组中,还有我们的一个病人.空气和骨传导阈值;空气-骨间隙(ABG);以及Carhart切口的存在和深度进行了分析。将CRWA组的这些测听变量与CSF(n=15)和COD(n=22)组的变量进行比较,包括从我们机构的医疗数据库中确定的患者。
    结果:CRWA组的平均骨和空气传导阈值为16.4(标准偏差[SD]:2.9;95%置信区间[CI]:14.6-18.3)和44.6(SD:3.5;95%CI:42.6-47.3)dB听力水平(HL)。高频(≥2kHz)的骨传导阈值高于低频(<2kHz)的骨传导阈值,虽然高频下的空气传导阈值低于低频下的阈值:高频下的ABG明显小于低频下的ABG(2kHz与0.5kHz,p=0.027;2kHzvs.1kHz,p=0.041;4kHzvs.0.5kHz,p=0.042;4kHzvs.1kHz,p=0.027)。Carhart切口的发生率和深度没有组间差异。
    结论:CRWA可以表现为一种独特的听力测量模式,在≥2kHz时具有较差的骨传导和较好的空气传导,导致在较高频率下的ABG明显小于在较低频率下的ABG。我们的发现表明,这种模式不同于CSF和COD。与CRWA相关的独特啤酒瓶形听力图可能有助于先天性传导性听力损失患者的早期诊断。
    OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the hearing characteristics in patients with congenital round window atresia (CRWA). This study aimed to investigate hearing characteristics in patients with CRWA by comparing them with two relatively common congenital middle ear anomalies: congenital stapedial fixation (CSF) and congenital ossicular discontinuity (COD).
    METHODS: Literature searches yielded five patients with surgically confirmed CRWA (seven ears), who were included in the CRWA group, along with one of our patients. Air and bone conduction thresholds; air-bone gap (ABG); and presence and depth of the Carhart notch were analyzed. These audiometric variables in the CRWA group were compared with those in the CSF (n = 15) and COD (n = 22) groups, comprising patients identified from our institution\'s medical database.
    RESULTS: Average bone and air conduction thresholds in the CRWA group were 16.4 (standard deviation [SD]: 2.9; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 14.6-18.3) and 44.6 (SD: 3.5; 95 % CI: 42.6-47.3) dB hearing level (HL). Bone conduction thresholds at high frequencies (≥2 kHz) were higher than those at low frequencies (<2 kHz), while air conduction thresholds at high frequencies were lower than those at low frequencies: ABGs at high frequencies were significantly smaller than those at low frequencies (2 kHz vs. 0.5 kHz, p = 0.027; 2 kHz vs. 1 kHz, p = 0.041; 4 kHz vs. 0.5 kHz, p = 0.042; 4 kHz vs. 1 kHz, p = 0.027). There were no between-group differences in incidence and depth of the Carhart notch.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRWA could manifest as a distinct audiometric pattern with poorer bone conduction and better air conduction at ≥2 kHz, resulting in significantly smaller ABGs at higher frequencies than that at lower frequencies. Our findings indicated that this pattern differed from that of CSF and COD. The unique beer bottle-shaped audiogram associated with CRWA might facilitate its early diagnosis in patients with congenital conductive hearing loss.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    听力损失在退伍军人中很常见,和广泛的听力保健资源优先考虑在退伍军人管理局(VA)。严重的听力损失对言语理解提出了独特的沟通挑战,而放大可能无法克服。我们分析了2005年至2017年VA听力测定库的数据,以及听力损失严重程度与言语识别得分之间的关系。我们假设,即使有足够的听觉能力,患有严重或更严重听力损失的退伍军人的重要子集也会有较差的独立言语感知结果。社会人口统计学特征和合并症是使用电子病历以及听力残疾的自我报告指标进行汇编的。我们确定了一组137,500名独特的退伍军人,其中有232,789个听力图显示双侧严重或更严重的听力损失(四频PTA>70dBHL)。首次听力损失严重或更严重的退伍军人的中位数(IQR;范围)年龄为81岁(74至87岁;21-90岁),大多数是男性(136,087[99%])和非西班牙裔白人(107,798[78.4%])。在双侧严重或更严重听力损失的患者中,41,901(30.5%)的语音识别得分也很差(<50%的单词),听力损失的严重程度与言语感知的恶化有关。我们观察到中度-重度和更高水平的听力损失的人的言语感知能力的变异性,这些人可能从放大中获得有限的益处。有沟通挑战的退伍军人可能需要替代方法和治疗策略,例如人工耳蜗植入物,以支持沟通需求。
    Hearing loss is common among Veterans, and extensive hearing care resources are prioritized within the Veterans Administration (VA). Severe hearing loss poses unique communication challenges with speech understanding that may not be overcome with amplification. We analyzed data from the VA Audiometric Repository between 2005 and 2017 and the relationship between hearing loss severity with speech recognition scores. We hypothesized that a significant subset of Veterans with severe or worse hearing loss would have poor unaided speech perception outcomes even with adequate audibility. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities were compiled using electronic medical records as was self-report measures of hearing disability. We identified a cohort of 137,500 unique Veterans with 232,789 audiograms demonstrating bilateral severe or worse hearing loss (four-frequency PTA > 70 dB HL). The median (IQR; range) age of Veterans at their first audiogram with severe or worse hearing loss was 81 years (74 to 87; 21-90+), and a majority were male (136,087 [99%]) and non-Hispanic white (107,798 [78.4%]). Among those with bilateral severe or worse hearing loss, 41,901 (30.5%) also had poor speech recognition scores (<50% words), with greater hearing loss severity correlating with worse speech perception. We observed variability in speech perception abilities in those with moderate-severe and greater levels of hearing loss who may derive limited benefit from amplification. Veterans with communication challenges may warrant alternative approaches and treatment strategies such as cochlear implants to support communication needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于经常暴露于高水平的噪音,音乐家有听力损失和耳鸣的风险。由于听觉系统受损,这种风险水平以前可能被低估了,比如耳蜗突触病,使用标准临床措施可能不容易检测到。大多数先前调查音乐家听力损失的研究都涉及横断面研究设计,这些设计可能仅捕获与噪声暴露有关的听力健康快照。这项研究的目的是调查累积噪声暴露对行为的影响,电生理学,以及2年内听力正常的早期职业音乐家和非音乐家的听力损害自我报告指数。参与者完成了年度测试电池,包括纯音测听,延长高频听阈,失真产物耳声发射(DPOAE),在噪声中的语音感知,听觉脑干反应,和耳鸣的自我报告措施,高音,在背景噪音中听到。参与者还完成了噪声暴露结构化访谈,以估计整个研究期间的累积噪声暴露。线性混合模型评估随时间的变化。纵向分析包括64名早期职业音乐家(女性n=34;年龄范围为T0=18-26岁)和30名非音乐家(女性n=20;年龄范围为T0=18-27岁)。由于音乐才能,几乎没有纵向变化。随着时间的推移,某些措施的微小改善可能归因于实践/重测效果。一些措施(例如,外毛细胞功能的DPOAE指数)与每个时间点的噪声暴露有关,但随着时间的推移没有显示出显著的变化。一小部分参与者报告他们的耳鸣症状恶化,参与者将其归因于噪声暴露,或者不使用听力保护。未来的纵向研究应该试图捕捉噪声暴露在更长时期的影响,在几个时间点拍摄,精确测量听力随时间的变化。“有风险”个体的听力保护计划应密切监测DPOAE,以在听力测定阈值临床正常时检测噪声引起的听力损失的早期迹象。
    Musicians are at risk of hearing loss and tinnitus due to regular exposure to high levels of noise. This level of risk may have been underestimated previously since damage to the auditory system, such as cochlear synaptopathy, may not be easily detectable using standard clinical measures. Most previous research investigating hearing loss in musicians has involved cross-sectional study designs that may capture only a snapshot of hearing health in relation to noise exposure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cumulative noise exposure on behavioural, electrophysiological, and self-report indices of hearing damage in early-career musicians and non-musicians with normal hearing over a 2-year period. Participants completed an annual test battery consisting of pure tone audiometry, extended high-frequency hearing thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), speech perception in noise, auditory brainstem responses, and self-report measures of tinnitus, hyperacusis, and hearing in background noise. Participants also completed the Noise Exposure Structured Interview to estimate cumulative noise exposure across the study period. Linear mixed models assessed changes over time. The longitudinal analysis comprised 64 early-career musicians (female n = 34; age range at T0 = 18-26 years) and 30 non-musicians (female n = 20; age range at T0 = 18-27 years). There were few longitudinal changes as a result of musicianship. Small improvements over time in some measures may be attributable to a practice/test-retest effect. Some measures (e.g., DPOAE indices of outer hair cell function) were associated with noise exposure at each time point, but did not show a significant change over time. A small proportion of participants reported a worsening of their tinnitus symptoms, which participants attributed to noise exposure, or not using hearing protection. Future longitudinal studies should attempt to capture the effects of noise exposure over a longer period, taken at several time points, for a precise measure of how hearing changes over time. Hearing conservation programmes for \"at risk\" individuals should closely monitor DPOAEs to detect early signs of noise-induced hearing loss when audiometric thresholds are clinically normal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的听力障碍,会影响生活质量。目前,听力障碍没有批准的药物治疗。本研究旨在探讨姜黄素对慢性肾脏病患者听力损害的保护作用及其可能机制。我们对40名未接受透析并有听力障碍的慢性肾脏病患者进行了一项随机对照试验。参与者被随机分为两组。一组每天接受姜黄素,另一组接受安慰剂12周。III波和V波之间的间隔,V波的潜伏期,听觉脑干反应(ABR)阈值,语音接收阈值(SRT),对干预前后的言语歧视评分(SDS)进行评价和分析。治疗后,在姜黄素组中,III-V波间隔和V波潜伏期明显缩短(P值<0.0001),ABR阈值也显著改善(P值<0.0001).在试验组中,SDS增加(P=0.001),SRT减弱(P<0.0001)。在安慰剂组中,我们要么由于病程而明显恶化,要么变化不明显。姜黄素的每日给药,可以明显改善CKD患者的听力障碍。因此,姜黄素应考虑作为治疗慢性肾病患者听力障碍的治疗选择。
    Hearing impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), can affect the quality of life. At present, hearing dysfunction does not have an approved pharmacologic therapy. This study aimed to investigate the protective effects and possible mechanisms of curcumin as a therapeutic agent on hearing impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 40 chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis with hearing impairment. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. One group received curcumin daily and the other received a placebo for 12 weeks. The interval between III and V waves, latency of wave V, auditory brain stem response (ABR) threshold, speech reception threshold (SRT), and speech discrimination score (SDS) were evaluated and analyzed before and after the intervention. After treatment, in the curcumin group, III-V waves interval and the latency of wave V were significantly reduced (P value < 0.0001), also ABR threshold was demonstrated a significant improvement (P value < 0.0001). In the trial group, the SDS was increased (P = 0.001) and the SRT was attenuated (P < 0.0001). We had either significant deterioration due to the course of the disease or insignificant changes in the placebo group. Daily administration of curcumin, can significantly improve hearing impairment in CKD patients. Accordingly, curcumin should be considered as a therapeutic option for treating hearing impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估Mimi听力测试(MHT)移动应用在检测空气传导(AC)阈值和筛查中度听力损失中的准确性。
    方法:前瞻性临床研究。
    方法:三级护理中心。
    方法:有或没有不同程度听力损失的参与者,18岁及以上,在听力评估时没有认知障碍,也没有活动性耳漏或耳垢嵌塞.
    方法:听力损失严重程度不同的受试者在同一天在安静的房间(45.5dB背景噪声)中接受了常规的室内听力图以及MHT的移动筛查。常规的过耳耳机和降噪耳机都使用MHT进行了测试。
    方法:在离散频率和纯音平均值(PTA)下,对常规测听和基于移动的测听之间的AC阈值进行了比较。
    结果:共有75名成年人(平均年龄:56.2岁,54.7%男性)被招募,63人用于分析。在使用常规耳机用MHT测量的阈值中,44.0%在常规听力图的10dB以内,相比之下,39.3%使用降噪耳机。MHT在高频(4-8kHz)下表现出最佳精度。当筛查中度听力损失(PTA>40dBHL)时,MHT的敏感性和特异性分别为100.0%和80.2%,分别。
    结论:MHT对于识别中度听力损失是可靠的,但在低频检测阈值方面缺乏准确性。降噪耳机似乎仅在4,000Hz时提高了精度。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of the Mimi Hearing Test (MHT) mobile application in the detection of air conduction (AC) thresholds and in screening for moderate hearing loss.
    METHODS: Prospective clinical study.
    METHODS: Tertiary care center.
    METHODS: Participants with or without a varying degree of hearing loss, aged 18 years and over, without cognitive impairment and without active otorrhea or earwax impaction at the time of the hearing assessment were included.
    METHODS: Subjects with a ranging severity of hearing loss underwent a conventional in-booth audiogram as well as mobile-based screening with MHT in a quiet room (45.5 dB background noise) on the same day. Both regular over-the-ear and noise-canceling headphones were tested with MHT.
    METHODS: Comparisons of AC thresholds between conventional audiometry and mobile-based audiometry at discrete frequencies and with pure-tone averages (PTA) were performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 75 adults (mean age: 56.2 yr, 54.7% male) were recruited and 63 used for analysis. Of the thresholds measured with MHT using regular headphones, 44.0% were within 10 dB of the conventional audiogram, compared to 39.3% using noise-canceling headphones. MHT demonstrated best accuracy at high frequencies (4-8 kHz). When screening for moderate hearing loss (PTA >40 dB HL), MHT demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 80.2%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: MHT is reliable for identifying moderate hearing loss but lacks precision in detecting thresholds at low frequencies. Noise canceling headphones seem to improve its precision at 4,000 Hz only.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项多中心研究检查了9至11个月大的儿童人工耳蜗植入的安全性和有效性。预期的影响是支持有关儿科人工耳蜗候选人的候选人资格评估和预后咨询的实践。分析中包括了在美国和加拿大的五个人工耳蜗植入中心使用人工耳蜗有限公司设备在9-11个月大的儿童的临床图表中的数据。该研究包括2012年1月1日至2017年12月31日(队列1,n=83)或2018年1月1日至2020年5月15日(队列2,n=50)期间植入一个或两个Nucleus设备的两个队列的数据。监测植入后2年内的主要不良事件(需要另一次手术/住院治疗)和次要不良事件(单独使用药物治疗或接受不需要手术或住院的预期疗程),并通过听力测定阈值和父母报告来衡量结果收集IT-MAIS和LittlEARS问卷。结果显示,41名儿童发生了60起不良事件,植入了227只耳朵(26%),其中11名儿童发生了14起主要事件;所有事件都是暂时的并已解决。所有结果指标均显示使用人工耳蜗改善听力。研究结果表明,该程序对婴儿是安全的,并且它们显示出人工耳蜗植入的明显益处,包括增加的听觉和听力发育。
    This multi-center study examined the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children between 9 and 11 months of age. The intended impact was to support practice regarding candidacy assessment and prognostic counseling of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Data in the clinical chart of children implanted at 9-11 months of age with Cochlear Ltd devices at five cochlear implant centers in the United States and Canada were included in analyses. The study included data from two cohorts implanted with one or two Nucleus devices during the periods of January 1, 2012-December 31, 2017 (Cohort 1, n = 83) or between January 1, 2018 and May 15, 2020 (Cohort 2, n = 50). Major adverse events (requiring another procedure/hospitalization) and minor adverse events (managed with medication alone or underwent an expected course of treatment that did not require surgery or hospitalization) out to 2 years post-implant were monitored and outcomes measured by audiometric thresholds and parent-reports on the IT-MAIS and LittlEARS questionnaires were collected. Results revealed 60 adverse events in 41 children and 227 ears implanted (26%) of which 14 major events occurred in 11 children; all were transitory and resolved. Improved hearing with cochlear implant use was shown in all outcome measures. Findings reveal that the procedure is safe for infants and that they show clear benefits of cochlear implantation including increased audibility and hearing development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨影响中重度听力损失老年患者使用助听器依从性的因素。
    方法:这种观察,prospective,单中心研究纳入中度至重度听力损失患者.在安装一个或两个HA之前和一年后对它们进行了评估。
    结果:共有86名患者被纳入研究,其中69.8%(86人中的60名;用户组)在拟合后1年继续使用他们的HA;6名患者没有继续使用他们的HA(非用户)。用户组比非用户组年轻,但差异不显著。USER组在基线时的独立听觉阈值明显优于NON-USER组。HA的使用导致语音测听和听觉阈值的改善。用户组也有认知功能的维持。
    结论:使用HA1年可改善听觉表现,并无认知功能恶化。试验注册:这项研究是回顾性注册的。NCT04333043在ClinicalTrials.gov(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/)于2020年3月26日。本研究已在VastaEmiliaNord地区伦理委员会注册,编号104,批准日期2017年7月17日。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate which factors influence the adherence to hearing aid (HA) use in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    METHODS: This observational, prospective, single-centre study enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. They were evaluated before and 1 year after having either one or two HAs fitted.
    RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled in the study and of these 69.8% (60 of 86; USER group) continued to use their HA at 1 year after fitting; six patients had not continued their use (NON-USERS). The USER group was younger than the NON-USER group, but the difference was not significant. The USER group had a significantly better unaided auditory threshold at baseline than the NON-USER group. HA use resulted in improvements in speech audiometry and auditory threshold. There was also a maintenance of cognitive function in the USER group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of HA for 1 year resulted in improved auditory performance and an absence of a deterioration of cognitive function.Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered under no. NCT04333043 at ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/) on the 26 March 2020. This research has been registered with the Ethics Committee of the Area Vasta Emilia Nord under number 104, date of approval 17/07/2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床,我们发现耳鸣患者常有听力损失。根据耳鸣最普遍的机制,也就是说,传入复位后神经元的自发放电和异常同步,耳鸣频率与听力损失的频率密切相关。
    这项研究的目的是调查耳鸣音调与听力损失频率的相关性。
    本研究共纳入500例单侧或双侧慢性耳鸣患者。所有患者均接受纯音测听(PTA)和耳鸣声学检查。记录听力损失水平和频率。统计分析耳鸣音高与听力损失水平和频率的关系。
    我们的结果表明,500名耳鸣患者中有96.6%的人有听力损失。统计分析表明低频耳鸣与LF听力损失有关,但中频和高频(MF和HF)耳鸣与MF和HF听力损失没有显着相关。耳鸣音高与最高听阈的重合度与听力损失程度相关。
    绝大多数慢性主观性耳鸣患者有听力损失,耳鸣的频率与听力损失的程度和频率相关,但不完全在听力损失的频率范围内。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinically, we find that tinnitus patients often have hearing loss. According to the most accepted mechanism of tinnitus, that is, the spontaneous discharge and abnormal synchronization of neurons after afferent reduction, tinnitus frequency is closely related to the frequency of hearing loss.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of tinnitus pitch with the frequency of hearing loss.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 500 patients with unilateral or bilateral chronic tinnitus were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent pure tone audiometry (PTA) and tinnitus acoustic examination. Hearing loss levels and frequencies were recorded. The relationship between tinnitus pitch and hearing loss level and frequency was statistically analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results showed that 96.6% of the 500 tinnitus patients had hearing loss. Statistical analysis showed that low frequency (LF) tinnitus was correlated with LF hearing loss, but moderate frequency & high frequency (MF&HF) tinnitus was not significantly associated with MF&HF hearing loss. The coincidence of tinnitus pitch with the highest hearing threshold correlated with the degree of hearing loss.
    UNASSIGNED: The vast majority of patients with chronic subjective tinnitus had hearing loss, and the frequency of tinnitus correlated with the degree and frequency of hearing loss but not exactly fall within the frequency range of hearing loss.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of auditory neuropathy (AN) patients with normal hearing or mild hearing loss. Methods: Data from Multicenter Study on Clinical Diagnosis and Intervention of Acoustic Neuropathy (registration number: ChiCTR2100050125). According to the Chinese clinical practice guideline of auditory neuropathy (version 2022), these patients divided into two groups: the normal hearing group (PTA Normal, PTAN group, the average hearing threshold<20 dB HL) and the mild hearing loss group (PTA Mild hearing loss, PTAM group, the average hearing threshold between 20-35 dBHL). The audiology characteristics, clinical features, and follow-up were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 8 and SPSS 20.0 software. Results: A total of 75 AN with normal hearing or mild hearing loss were included in this study. The PTAN group consisted of 19 patients (38 ears), including 12 males and 7 females. The average onset age was (16.9±4.5) years old, while the test age was (22.1±5.8) years old for PTAN group. The PTAM group consisted of 56 patients (112 ears), including 29 males and 27 females. The average onset age was (16.2±7.9) years old, while the test age was (23.9±9.0) yeas old for PTAM group. The average hearing threshold of low frequency (0.125-0.5 kHz) was significantly decreased. ABR disappeared in 86.00% (126/150) of the patients. The speech recognition rate was 71.80±22.44% in the PTAN group and 58.08±29.28% in the PTAM group.-SP/AP was 0.98±0.47 in the PTAN and 1.07±0.63 in PTAM group; 40 (53.33%) patients had tinnitus. 29 patients (58 ears) were followed up, including 10 patients (20 ears) in the PTAN group and 19 patients (38 ears) in the PTAM group. There was no significant change in hearing threshold in short-term follow-up (<3 years). With the extension of the disease duration (>3 years), the PTAN group tended to decrease at low frequency, and the PTAM group decreased at high frequency first. The hearing threshold at 0.25 kHz in the PTAN group and 4 kHz in the PTAM group decreased significantly. Conclusions: AN patients with normal hearing or mild hearing loss exhibit abnormal results in audiological examination results, including ABR, electrocochleography and speech discrimination score. A combination of audiological tests should be used to make the diagnosis of AN. With the progression of the disease, AN with normal hearing or mild hearing loss tends to decrease.
    目的: 探究纯音测听气导平均听阈(pure-tone average,PTA)正常或轻度听力损失的听神经病(auditory neuropathy,AN)患者的临床特征及其听力变化规律。 方法: 研究对象来自听神经病临床诊断和干预多中心研究(注册号:ChiCTR2100050125),AN诊断标准依照2022年中国听神经病临床实践指南。筛选首诊纯音测听平均听阈(500、1 000、2 000、4 000 Hz)正常或存在轻度听力损失的AN患者,分为纯音平均听阈正常组(PTA-Normal组,即PTAN组,平均听阈<20 dBHL)和轻度听力损失组(PTA-Mild hearing loss组,即PTAM组,平均听阈20~35 dBHL),观察记录患者的听力学特征、临床表现和伴随症状以及随访结果,采用GraphPad Prism 8及SPSS 20.0软件进行数据分析。 结果: 共纳入纯音平均听阈正常或轻度听力损失的AN患者75例(150耳),其中PTAN组19例(38耳),男12例、女7例,发病年龄(16.9±4.5)岁(均数±标准差,下同)、检测年龄为(22.1±5.8)岁;PTAM组共56例(112耳),男29例、女27例,发病年龄(16.2±7.9)岁、检测年龄(23.9±9.0)岁。两组患者首诊低频(125~500 Hz)平均听阈显著升高;86.0%(126/150)的患耳听性脑干反应(ABR)波形缺失;PTAN组言语识别率为71.8%±22.4%,PTAM组言语识别率为58.1%±29.3%;PTAN组耳蜗电图-SP/AP为0.98±0.47,PTAM组为1.07±0.63。75例AN患者中40例(53.3%)存在耳鸣,部分患者还伴有其他系统功能异常。29例患者完成随访,其中PTAN组10例,PTAM组19例。短期随访(<3年),29例患者听阈均未发生明显变化;随着病程延长(>3年),PTAN组趋向于低频听力先下降,而PTAM组则表现为高频听力先下降,PTAN组250 Hz与PTAM组4 000 Hz听阈均显著升高。 结论: 纯音平均听阈正常或轻度听力损失的AN患者存在ABR、耳蜗电图、言语识别率等听力学检查结果异常,临床实践中应组合运用各项听力学检查对其进行综合评估;随着病程延长,这部分患者的听力逐渐下降,应动态评估其听力改变。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号