A 20-year-old man was presented with ulcerative gastritis and duodenitis complicated by pyloric stenosis. Helicobacter pylori infection was excluded, and the lesions did not respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors. No other parts of the intestinal tract showed signs of inflammation. Histopathological review showed signs of chronic inflammation with granuloma formation. A tentative diagnosis of isolated upper gastrointestinal (UGI) Crohn\'s disease was performed. However, additional work-up revealed significantly positive IgG4 staining as well as elevated IgG4 serum levels. Since granulomatous disease is unlikely in IgG4-related disease, an eventual diagnosis of overlapping IgG4-related disease and Crohn\'s disease (CD) was performed. Treatment with systemic steroids and anti-TNF in combination with azathioprine led to rapid symptomatic improvement. In this article, we review the available literature on IgG4-related gastroduodenitis, granulomatous gastritis, and upper GI CD. We suggest the possibility that IgG4-infiltration may be a marker of severely active inflammatory bowel disease rather than a separate disease entity.

Background and Objectives: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but may entail a risk of lymphoma due to TNF-α\'s role in immune surveillance. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the risk of lymphoma in patients with RA treated with anti-TNF agents versus patients treated with methotrexate and/or a placebo. Materials and Methods: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for relevant literature. Data were extracted and analyzed to determine risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with heterogeneity assessed using I2 statistics. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Results: The search yielded 932 articles, 13 of which were retained for qualitative review and 12 for quantitative synthesis. Overall, the studies reviewed included 181,735 participants: 3772 from six RCTs and 177,963 from seven observational studies. The meta-analysis of RCTs revealed no significant difference in the risk of lymphoma between patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy and patients on conventional treatments, with an overall RR of 1.43 (95% CI: 0.32-5.16) and I2 of 0%. Conversely, observational studies showed some variability, with an overall RR of 1.43 (95% CI: 0.59-3.47) and significant heterogeneity (I2 = 95%), whereas others indicated a potentially elevated risk of lymphoma in specific subgroups but had inconsistent results. Conclusions: The systematic and meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the risk of lymphoma for patients with RA treated with anti-TNF-α agents versus conventional therapies. However, given the limitations of the studies included, additional research is needed to validate the results and explore potential risk factors contributing to the development of lymphoma in patients with RA.

BACKGROUND: The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology.
METHODS: A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.
RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi.

Etanercept (ETN) is a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that works as a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF inhibitor) by blocking the effects of naturally occurring TNF. This review will evaluate the effect of ETN as a monotherapy or combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of RA. This systematic review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was done on PubMed and Google Scholar from 1999 to 2023. Predefined eligibility criteria were set for selected studies, which include: free full-text articles published; randomized control trials (RCTs); systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and observational studies in a patient with RA treated with ETN as initial therapy or as an add-on to conventional disease-modified therapy. Hence, the data had been extracted, and a quality assessment of each study was done by two individual authors. When comparing patients who received 15-25 mg of MTX with those who also received 25 mg of ETN in combination, 71% achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) by 24 weeks, compared to 27% in the MTX and placebo groups (p<0.001), and 39% achieved American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50), compared to 3% in the placebo + MTX group (p<0.001). Low disease activity (DAS 28) was more common in patients who had both MTX and ETN (64.5% with DAS <2.4 and 56.3% with DAS 28 <3.2) compared to patients who received only one medication (44.4% with DAS <2.4 and 33.2% with DAS 28 <3.2 for ETN and 38.6% with DAS <2.4 and 28.5% with DAS 28 <3.2 for MTX, with P<0.01). ETN demonstrated smaller changes from baseline in the modified Sharp score (TSS) and erosion scores (ES) at 12 months and two years, as well as a decreased change in the ES score at one year (with a trend of P value = 0.06 for the TSS score), in comparison to those receiving DMARD. Reactions at the injection site (42% vs. 7%, P<0.001) were the only events that occurred significantly more frequently in the ETN plus-MTX group. Combining ETN and MTX appears to help control RA symptoms by decreasing the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response and DAS score, as well as halting the disease\'s progression on X-rays. The most common adverse effects were reactions to ETN administered alone at the injection site, likely because of patient awareness of the treatment received. There was also concern about tuberculosis and malignancy, but no recent data is available. Therefore, a larger clinical trial with longer follow-up is required to ascertain long-term safety and benefits.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn\'s disease [PFCD] is unknown. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare combined surgical intervention and anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] therapy [combined therapy] vs either therapy alone.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically up to end December 2023. Surgical intervention was defined as an exam under anaesthesia ± setons. We calculated weighted risk ratios [RRs] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for our co-primary outcomes: fistula response and healing, defined clinically as a reduction in fistula drainage or number of draining fistulas and fistula closure respectively.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies were analysed: 515 patients treated with combined therapy, 330 patients with surgical intervention, and 406 patients with anti-TNF therapy with follow-up between 10 weeks and 3 years. Fistula response [RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.93-1.30, p = 0.28] and healing [RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.86-1.31, p = 0.58] was not significantly different when comparing combined therapy with anti-TNF therapy alone. In contrast, combined therapy was associated with significantly higher rates of fistula response [RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.10-1.41, p < 0.001] and healing [RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.00-1.36, p = 0.05] compared with surgical intervention alone. Our results remained stable when limiting to studies that assessed outcomes within 1 year and studies where <10% of patients underwent fistula closure procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined surgery and anti-TNF therapy was not associated with improved PFCD outcomes compared with anti-TNF therapy alone. Due to an inability to control for confounding and small study sizes, future, controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

SB5 is an approved biosimilar of adalimumab, a recombinant monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody. The approval of SB5 was based on the comparison with reference adalimumab in analytical studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity assessments, and randomized controlled trials. Efficacy data was primarily obtained in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and extended to include additional indications such as psoriasis, Crohn\'s disease, or ulcerative colitis by extrapolation. Following its approval, additional post-marketing data have been collected comparing SB5 with reference adalimumab. This review summarizes the clinical data on SB5 from randomized controlled trials and provides a comprehensive overview of the available post-approval data. In \"real-world\" settings, SB5 was as effective as its reference product across different indications and countries, treatment persistence was well maintained throughout studies, and no new safety concerns were identified. In both controlled and \"real-world\" settings, switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 was not associated with altered efficacy or clinical complications. In post-approval studies, the quality of SB5 was consistent over time, independent of the batch and process changes, and the SB5 autoinjector was preferred over other autoinjectors by both healthcare professionals and patients. Taken together, these data support the use of SB5 whenever reference adalimumab is appropriate and demonstrate that switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 is feasible.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapy is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However due to cost and safety concerns, dose de-escalation strategies after achieving remission have been suggested.
OBJECTIVE: To critically review available data on dose de-escalation of biologics [or other advanced therapies] in IBD. We will focus on studies evaluating de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially optimised, and also on studies assessing de-escalation from standard dosing.
METHODS: A systematic bibliographic search was performed.
RESULTS: The mean frequency of de-escalation after previous dose intensification [12 studies, 1,474 patients] was 34%. The corresponding frequency of de-escalation from standard dosing [five studies, 3,842 patients] was 4.2%. The relapse rate of IBD following anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially dose-escalated [10 studies, 301 patients] was 30%. The corresponding relapse rate following anti-TNF de-escalation from standard dosing [nine studies, 494 patients] was 38%. The risk of relapse was lower for patients in clinical, biologic, and endoscopic/radiological remission at the time of de-escalation. A role of anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring in the decision to dose de-escalate has been demonstrated. In patients relapsing after de-escalation, re-escalation is generally effective. De-escalation is not consistently associated with a better safety profile. The cost-effectiveness of the de-escalation strategy remains uncertain. Finally, there is not enough evidence to recommend dose de-escalation of biologics different from anti-TNFs or small molecules.
CONCLUSIONS: Any consideration for de-escalation of biologic therapy in IBD must be tailored, taking into account the risks and consequences of a flare and patients\' preferences.

Palmoplantar psoriasis (PP) represents a localized type of disease. While controversy over its\' classification exists, a hyperkeratotic type, a pustular type and palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) have been recognized. PP management is regularly supported by biologic agents. Our study aimed to review and synthesize available data regarding the efficacy of approved biologics for PP and PPP.
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and ClinicalTrilas.gov. Utilizing random-effects inverse-variance frequentist network meta-analyses (NMAs), we ranked interventions. The proportion of participants with cleared skin was the primary outcome. Fifty and 75% improvement in palmoplantar psoriasis area severity index (PPASI) were also explored (PPASI50, PPASI75).
In total, 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy of on-label adalimumab, bimekizumab, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab were included. Data for PP were synthesized. Every biologic agent examined, except from infliximab, outperformed placebo. On-label secukinumab exhibited the highest probability of inducing complete resolution. Ixekizumab and infliximab ranked best on inducing PPASI50 and PPASI75. Our review supports that guselkumab is effective for PPP.
Secukinumab, ixekizumab and infliximab are effective for PP. Research is warranted to produce evidence about the efficacy of biologics in PP and PPP.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) versus conventional management during maintenance treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNFα) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: A search was conducted up to January 2022 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was the ability to maintain clinical remission at 12 months. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Nine studies were identified: one systematic review, six randomised clinical trials, and two cohort studies. No superior efficacy of proactive TDM [relative risk 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.37, n=528; I2=55%] was shown. Proactive TDM could improve the durability of anti-TNFα treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.12; 95%CI: 0.05-0.27; n=390; I2=45%), prevent acute infusion reactions (OR 0.21; 95%CI: 0.05-0.82; n=390; I2=0%), decrease adverse events (OR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15-0.98; n=390; I2=14%), and reduce the probability of surgery, at lower economical expenditure.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysed evidence did not confirm the superiority of proactive TDM of anti-TNFα treatment over conventional management in patients with IBD, so proactive TDM should not currently be recommended.

Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a rare autoinflammatory disease, clinically characterized by chronic and recurrent episodes of osteoarticular inflammation, that generally presents in children and adolescents. From a dermatological point-of-view, CMRO can be associated with skin rashes mainly including psoriasis, palmoplantar pustulosis and acne. Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease classified within the spectrum of neutrophilic dermatoses that, in some cases, has been reported as cutaneous manifestation in CMRO patients. This paper presents a 16-year female patient diagnosed with CMRO, who presented PG lesions located on the lower leg, that arose after the administration of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor adalimumab. Cases of PG have been reported in patients being treated with certain medications, including TNF-α antagonists, leading to classified them in a setting aptly termed \"drug-induced PG.\" In this paper, we discuss the co-occurrence of PG and CRMO, in the light of recent evidence on the pathogenesis of both diseases and giving ample space to a literature review on drug induced PG. In our case, it is plausible that PG could be considered a cutaneous manifestation of CRMO, although the mechanisms underlying this intriguingly relationship remain to be fully unraveled.