anti-D

反 D
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Transplacental or fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) may occur during pregnancy or at delivery and lead to immunization to the D antigen if the mother is Rh-negative and the baby is Rh-positive. This can result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in subsequent D-positive pregnancies. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among pregnant women in Ethiopia.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, HINARI, AFRO Library Databases, and African Online Journal databases for all available studies using the following keywords: \"High rhesus (Rh(D)) negative frequency\", \"ABO blood group distribution\", \"haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN)\", \"rh isoimmunization\", \"anti-RhD immunoglobulin\", \"D-negative pregnancies\", \"Frequency\", \"ABO and Rh blood group distribution\", \"feto-maternal hemorrhage\", \"rhesus D negative pregnant mothers\", \"kleihauer-betke test (KBT)\", \"Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia\", \"non-sensitized RhD-negative pregnant women\", \"antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis\", \"Hemolytic disease of the newborn (alloimmunization), Ethiopia. The search string was developed using \"AND\" and \"OR\" Boolean operators. All published and unpublished observational studies reporting the distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among pregnant women in Ethiopia were included. The study participants were all pregnant women in Ethiopia, and the main outcome measure of this systematic review and meta-analysis was Rhesus D-negative blood type and ABO blood group distribution among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The data was extracted by the author (AAA) by using a standardized JBI data extraction format. Microsoft Excel (2016), and Stata version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. The random effect model was used for estimating the pooled effects, and the publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of the funnel plots and objectively by using the Egger\'s test (i.e. p < 0.05).
    RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two articles were identified through electronic database searching. Of which, 34 were excluded due to duplication, 65 through review of titles and abstracts, and 22 full-text articles were excluded for not reporting the outcome variable and other reasons. Finally, 7 were included to estimate the distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The pooled distribution of Rh-negative blood group among pregnant women in Ethiopia was 10.8% (95%CI: 7.53-14.07, I2 = 85%, p < 0.001). In the ABO system, type O was the most prevalent 39.9% (37.51-42.38), followed by A (30.59% (26.00-35.18)), B (23.04% (20.03-26.05)), and AB the least (4.82%(3.17-6.47)), in the pattern O > A > B > AB.
    CONCLUSIONS: The pooled distribution of Rh-negative blood group among pregnant women in Ethiopia was high. Rh alloimmunization remains a major factor responsible for perinatal morbidity in Ethiopia and may result in the compromise of the woman\'s obstetric care due to the unaffordability of anti-D immunoglobulin. There is the urgent need for the implementation of universal access to anti-D immunoglobulin for the Rh-negative pregnant population in Ethiopia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)和抗D免疫球蛋白(anti-D)治疗小儿免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的疗效和安全性。
    我们遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,包括所有评估抗D和IVIG治疗儿童ITP疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。我们搜查了Medline,Embase,和Cochrane数据库。主要结果是达到各项研究中定义的血小板计数反应和出血反应的儿童比例。其他安全性结果包括输注反应和溶血。
    纳入了11项558名儿童的研究。抗D在增加血小板计数时明显不如IVIG,在24-72小时阈值均>20×109/L(抗D与IVIG的缓解率:0.85,95%CI0.78-0.94)和在24-72小时>50×109/L(抗D与IVIG的缓解率:0.75,95%CI0.61-0.92)。在4项研究中评估了出血反应,但报告中的一些异质性导致结论不明确。抗D输注后的一般症状频率低于IVIG后(PetoOR0.39,95%CI0.25-0.62)。抗D后溶血更频繁。研究的总体质量较低。
    与反D相比,IVIG在血小板计数方面产生了更好的反应,并且可以优选作为具有急性出血症状的儿童ITP的一线治疗。然而,IVIG对血小板计数的优越性的临床意义尚不清楚.
    To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D) in pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, including all randomized controlled trials that have assessed the efficacy and safety of anti-D and IVIG in children with ITP. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Primary outcomes were the proportion of children achieving platelet count responses as defined in each study and bleeding response. Other safety outcomes included infusion reactions and hemolysis.
    Eleven studies with 558 children were included. Anti-D was significantly inferior to IVIG at increasing platelet counts, both for thresholds of  >20 × 109/L at 24-72 hours (response rate ratio for anti-D vs IVIG: 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.94) and  >50 × 109/L at 24-72 hours (response rate ratio for anti-D vs IVIG: 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92). Bleeding response was assessed in 4 studies, but some heterogeneity in reporting leads to unclear conclusion. General symptoms after anti-D infusion were less frequent than after IVIG (Peto OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62). Hemolysis was more frequent after anti-D. The overall quality of the studies was low.
    Compared with anti-D, IVIG led to a better response in terms of platelet count and may be preferred as a first-line treatment of ITP in children with acute hemorrhagic symptoms. However, the clinical significance of IVIG superiority on platelet count remains unclear.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号