UNASSIGNED: Prostate cancer represents a major health concern worldwide, with the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and locally advanced prostate cancer posing a particular challenge. Rezvilutamide, a new androgen receptor antagonist from China, has shown early promise; however, its real-world effectiveness and safety profile require further evidence. This case series evaluates the preliminary clinical outcomes of rezvilutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), focusing on PSA response and radiological findings across various stages of prostate cancer in four patients.
UNASSIGNED: Case 1 details a 68-year-old male with low-volume mHSPC who exhibited a positive therapeutic response, demonstrated by decreasing PSA levels and improved radiographic results, despite experiencing mild side effects related to the drug. Case 2 describes a 71-year-old male with high-volume mHSPC who had a favorable outcome, with no significant changes in tumor size or metastatic spread and no negative reactions to the drug. Case 3 involves a 55-year-old male with locally advanced prostate cancer, who saw a reduction in PSA levels and a small decrease in tumor volume, yet with ongoing bladder involvement. Genetic testing showed no significant mutations. Case 4 presents a 74-year-old male with extensive metastatic disease who initially responded to the treatment but later exhibited disease advancement and an ATM gene mutation, signaling a shift to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This finding underscores the crucial role of genetic testing in directing future treatment, with therapies such as olaparib or chemotherapy being advised.
UNASSIGNED: Rezvilutamide has shown a potential benefit in the management of mHSPC and locally advanced prostate cancer, generally with a mild safety profile. Initial positive responses, particularly in PSA decline and radiographic progression, are promising. Nevertheless, the varying responses, notably concerning genetic mutations, highlight the necessity for tailored treatment approaches. Due to the small cohort and brief follow-up period, more extensive research with larger populations and prolonged monitoring is essential to conclusively determine the benefits and safety of rezvilutamide. The utilization of genetic insights is key to refining treatment decisions and enhancing outcomes for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

The purpose of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa), using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists, is to suppress the levels of testosterone. Since testosterone is the precursor of estradiol (E2), one of the major undesired effects of ADT is the concomitant loss of E2, causing among others an increased bone turnover and bone loss and an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Therefore, the guidelines for ADT indicate to combine ADT routinely with bone-sparing agents such as bisphosphonates, denosumab or selective estrogen receptor modulators. However, these compounds may have side effects and some require inconvenient parenteral administration. Co-treatment with estrogens is an alternative approach to prevent bone loss and at the same time, to avoid other side effects caused by the loss of estrogens, which is the topic explored in the present narrative review. Estrogens investigated in PCa patients include parenteral or transdermal E2, diethylstilbestrol (DES), and ethinylestradiol (EE) as monotherapy, or high-dose estetrol (HDE4) combined with ADT. Cardiovascular adverse events have been reported with parenteral E2, DES and EE. Encouraging effects on bone parameters have been obtained with transdermal E2 (tE2) and HDE4, in the tE2 development program (PATCH study), and in the LHRHa/HDE4 co-treatment study (PCombi), respectively. Confirmation of the beneficial effects of estrogen therapy with tE2 or HDE4 on bone health in patients with advanced PCa is needed, with special emphasis on bone mass and fracture rate.

Acinar adenocarcinoma, ductal adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma are the subtypes of prostate cancer (PCa). Most of the pathological types of PCa are acinar adenocarcinoma, while ductal adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma are uncommon. The case of acinar adenocarcinoma with ductal and mucinous adenocarcinoma has not been reported before. Herein, we report a treatment experience involving a 72-year-old man who presented similarly as most PCa patients, but the pathologic diagnosis was acinar adenocarcinoma with focal ductal and mucinous adenocarcinoma differentiating. Besides, this case is associated with lung metastasis, after radical prostatectomy (RP) and endocrine therapy the pulmonary nodule exerted a shrinking trend and the PSA level of this patient is still maintained at 0 ng/ mL till now. Through literature review, we found that patients who diagnosed as mixed pathological type of PCa had a lower survivor than pure PCa patients. Furthermore, there is no corresponding consensus or guideline for treating such multiple differentiated PCa patients. Surprisingly, this patient showed a high sensitivity to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Although the tumor presented aggressiveness, the followup results were satisfactory and we will continue to pay attention to his physical condition. We report this case to provide a treatment strategy for the patients with multi-differentiated PCa complicated with organ metastases.

BACKGROUND: Aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3) is an important oxidoreductase with multiple substrates, that are involved in producing extra-testicular androgens. Its activity is influenced by environmental exposures, as well as by genetic variants. These genetic variants could therefore produce variable testosterone levels and subsequent androgen receptor (AR) activation. This could lead to differential downstream production of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA). As PSA level is used for clinical evaluation of the prostate, these variations could impact prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis, as well as PC management outcomes. This review brings together information with regards to key functions of this enzyme, its relevance in PC, its transcriptional regulation, clinical aspects associated with genetics, differential regulation in cancer and cancer progression, and the types of AKR1C3 inhibitors with future therapeutic value.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these discussions, hypotheses are forwarded for future applicability of this enzyme and its genetic variants in transformational medical practices in PC. Options for the use of personalised AKR1C3 inhibitor drugs for late stage PC are also discussed.