OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as marker of bone metastases in patients of genitourinary cancers compared to bone scan, and to correlate with NCCN guidelines.
METHODS: This retro-prospective, observational study included all newly diagnosed patients of renal, bladder (muscle invasive) and prostate cancers who presented from July 2014 to March 2017. For diagnosis of bone metastases, ALP groups (raised/normal) were compared with bone scan (positive/negative). Sub-group analysis was done on patients with normal ALP levels and positive bone scan.
RESULTS: 150 patients were included and stratified depending on bone scan findings. Hemoglobin values were significantly different between two groups in renal and prostate cancers (p=0.015 and 0.002 respectively). AL values were significantly different between two groups in prostate cancers (p=0.0008), but not for others. Three out of seven patients with bone metastases for renal cancers (42.9%) and all three for bladder cancers had normal ALP values, no bone symptoms, and would have been missed. For prostate cancers, out of 23 who had bone metastases, ALP was normal in ten. All these ten had Gleason score of > 8 and all except one had S. PSA > 20ng/ml. All cases would have been detected irrespective of ALP values.
CONCLUSIONS: ALP has limited sensitivity but reasonable negative predictive value for bone metastases in genitourinary cancers. Current guidelines may miss significant number of cases with bone metastases for renal and bladder cancers. Current guidelines have good accuracy for prostate cancers, since PSA and Gleason score are independent predictors of bone metastases.

The diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), an uncommon immune-mediated cholestatic liver disease, is based on positive circulating anti-mitochondrial (AMA) and/or PBC-specific anti-nuclear autoantibodies (ANA), coupled with elevated serum alkaline phopsphatase (ALP) levels. Timely initiation of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid prevents progression to cirrhosis and liver failure. We aimed at investigating liver histology in patients with normal ALP level and positive AMA and/or PBC-specific ANA.
We searched the Swiss PBC Cohort Study database, which includes subjects with positive PBC autoimmune serology and normal ALP levels, for patients who underwent a liver biopsy. Histological slides were centrally reviewed by an expert liver pathologist, and sera were centrally re-tested for AMA and ANA.
30 patients were included; 90% females, median age 53 (range 27-72) years. Twenty-four (80%) had liver histology typical for (n = 2), consistent with (n = 16) or suggestive of (n = 6) PBC, including three of four AMA-negative ANA-positive patients. Among 22 ursodeoxycholic acid treated patients, 14 had elevated GGT levels before treatment; a significant decrease of the median GGT level between pre- (1.46 x ULN) and post- (0.43 x ULN) treatment (p = 0.0018) was observed.
In our series, a high proportion of AMA positive patients with normal ALP levels have PBC. For the first time we show histological diagnosis of PBC in AMA-negative/PBC-specific ANA-positive subjects and the potential role of GGT as a biomarker in PBC patients with normal baseline ALP levels. Current guidelines for the diagnosis of PBC do not cover the whole extent of PBC presentation, with important clinical implications in terms of timely treatment initiation.

Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure.Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability.Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality.Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.

Mineral and bone disorder (MBD) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and is associated with risk of fractures, cardiovascular disease, and death. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend monitoring CKD-MBD biochemical markers, including parathyroid hormone (PTH), phosphorus, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D), calcium, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD.
To determine guideline adherence, we used administrative claims records from the 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries with Parts A, B, and D coverage, 2007 to 2015, and identified cohorts of patients with nondialysis stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD. Testing for biochemical markers during follow-up was defined based on laboratory procedure codes. Baseline factors associated with laboratory testing were determined using logistic regression. All analyses were performed separately by CKD stage.
A total of 640,946 stage 3, 136,278 stage 4, and 22,076 stage 5 CKD patients, 50.2-52.9% women, mean age 74.4-78.0 years, were followed for a mean of 2.5, 1.3, and 0.7 years respectively. The frequency of testing was low for PTH (35.2-48.2%), phosphorus (46.6-62.0%), and 25D (29.3-46.7%). Testing was somewhat higher for calcium (88.1-95.4%) and ALP (63.5-88.1%); most tests were features of larger panels (e.g., basic metabolic panel). Older age, most comorbid conditions, and lack of prior nephrology care were associated with lower likelihood of testing.
In fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, laboratory testing for CKD-MBD biochemical markers appears to be suboptimal in relation to KDIGO guidelines. Competing priories, such as management of comorbid disease and preparation for renal replacement therapy, may distract from CKD-MBD monitoring.

An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of Paget\'s disease of bone (PDB) was developed using GRADE methodology, by a Guideline Development Group (GDG) led by the Paget\'s Association (UK). A systematic review of diagnostic tests and pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options was conducted that sought to address several key questions of clinical relevance. Twelve recommendations and five conditional recommendations were made, but there was insufficient evidence to address eight of the questions posed. The following recommendations were identified as the most important: 1) Radionuclide bone scans, in addition to targeted radiographs, are recommended as a means of fully and accurately defining the extent of metabolically active disease in patients with PDB. 2) Serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is recommended as a first-line biochemical screening test in combination with liver function tests in screening for the presence of metabolically active PDB. 3) Bisphosphonates are recommended for the treatment of bone pain associated with PDB. Zoledronic acid is recommended as the bisphosphonate most likely to give a favorable pain response. 4) Treatment aimed at improving symptoms is recommended over a treat-to-target strategy aimed at normalizing total ALP in PDB. 5) Total hip or knee replacements are recommended for patients with PDB who develop osteoarthritis in whom medical treatment is inadequate. There is insufficient information to recommend one type of surgical approach over another. The guideline was endorsed by the European Calcified Tissues Society, the International Osteoporosis Foundation, the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, the Bone Research Society (UK), and the British Geriatric Society. The GDG noted that there had been a lack of research on patient-focused clinical outcomes in PDB and identified several areas where further research was needed. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease in which a cycle of immune mediated biliary epithelial cell injury, cholestasis and progressive fibrosis can culminate over time in an end-stage biliary cirrhosis. Both genetic and environmental influences are presumed relevant to disease initiation. PBC is most prevalent in women and those over the age of 50, but a spectrum of disease is recognised in adult patients globally; male sex, younger age at onset (<45) and advanced disease at presentation are baseline predictors of poorer outcome. As the disease is increasingly diagnosed through the combination of cholestatic serum liver tests and the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies, most presenting patients are not cirrhotic and the term cholangitis is more accurate. Disease course is frequently accompanied by symptoms that can be burdensome for patients, and management of patients with PBC must address, in a life-long manner, both disease progression and symptom burden. Licensed therapies include ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid (OCA), alongside experimental new and re-purposed agents. Disease management focuses on initiation of UDCA for all patients and risk stratification based on baseline and on-treatment factors, including in particular the response to treatment. Those intolerant of treatment with UDCA or those with high-risk disease as evidenced by UDCA treatment failure (frequently reflected in trial and clinical practice as an alkaline phosphatase >1.67 × upper limit of normal and/or elevated bilirubin) should be considered for second-line therapy, of which OCA is the only currently licensed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended agent. Follow-up of patients is life-long and must address treatment of the disease and management of associated symptoms.

Clinicians are required to assess abnormal liver chemistries on a daily basis. The most common liver chemistries ordered are serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin. These tests should be termed liver chemistries or liver tests. Hepatocellular injury is defined as disproportionate elevation of AST and ALT levels compared with alkaline phosphatase levels. Cholestatic injury is defined as disproportionate elevation of alkaline phosphatase level as compared with AST and ALT levels. The majority of bilirubin circulates as unconjugated bilirubin and an elevated conjugated bilirubin implies hepatocellular disease or cholestasis. Multiple studies have demonstrated that the presence of an elevated ALT has been associated with increased liver-related mortality. A true healthy normal ALT level ranges from 29 to 33 IU/l for males, 19 to 25 IU/l for females and levels above this should be assessed. The degree of elevation of ALT and or AST in the clinical setting helps guide the evaluation. The evaluation of hepatocellular injury includes testing for viral hepatitis A, B, and C, assessment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alcoholic liver disease, screening for hereditary hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson\'s disease, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. In addition, a history of prescribed and over-the-counter medicines should be sought. For the evaluation of an alkaline phosphatase elevation determined to be of hepatic origin, testing for primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis should be undertaken. Total bilirubin elevation can occur in either cholestatic or hepatocellular diseases. Elevated total serum bilirubin levels should be fractionated to direct and indirect bilirubin fractions and an elevated serum conjugated bilirubin implies hepatocellular disease or biliary obstruction in most settings. A liver biopsy may be considered when serologic testing and imaging fails to elucidate a diagnosis, to stage a condition, or when multiple diagnoses are possible.

Paget\'s disease of bone (osteitis deformans) is a benign focal disorder of accelerated skeletal remodeling. Either a single bone (monostotic) or multiple bones (polyostotic) can be affected. In patients with suspected Paget\'s disease plain radiographs of the suspicious regions of the skeleton are recommended. The initial biochemical evaluation of a patient should be done using serum total ALP (alkaline phosphatase) or with the use of a more specific marker of bone formation: PINP (intact N-terminal type 1 procollagen propeptide) or CTX (cross-linked C‑telopeptide). Treatment with a bisphosphonate is recommended for most patients with active Paget\'s disease who are at risk for further skeletal and extraskeletal complications. A single dose of 5 mg i.v. zoledronate as the treatment of choice in patients without contraindications is suggested. Oral bisphosphonates are less potent when compared to zoledronate. Treatment with an antiresorptive agent induces a more rapid decrease in resorption markers compared to formation marker. Measurement of total ALP or other baseline disease activity markers (e. g. CTX) at 6 to 12 weeks, when bone turnover will have shown a substantial decline, is an acceptable and cost-effective option. Maximum suppression of high bone turnover may require measurement at 6 months after administration. In patients with increased bone turnover, biochemical follow-up is recommended to be used as a more objective indicator of relapse rather than symptoms. The prolonged response after zoledronate treatment should be assessed every 1-2 years after normal bone turnover. With less potent drugs, every 6 to 12 months is appropriate.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for follow-up of clinically localized renal neoplasms undergoing active surveillance, or following definitive therapy.
METHODS: A systematic literature review identified published articles in the English literature between January 1999 and 2011 relevant to key questions specified by the Panel related to kidney neoplasms and their follow-up (imaging, renal function, markers, biopsy, prognosis). Study designs consisting of clinical trials (randomized or not), observational studies (cohort, case-control, case series) and systematic reviews were included.
RESULTS: Guideline statements provided guidance for ongoing evaluation of renal function, usefulness of renal biopsy, timing/type of radiographic imaging and formulation of future research initiatives. A lack of studies precluded risk stratification beyond tumor staging; therefore, for the purposes of postoperative surveillance guidelines, patients with localized renal cancers were grouped into strata of low- and moderate- to high-risk for disease recurrence based on pathological tumor stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation for patients on active surveillance and following definitive therapy for renal neoplasms should include physical examination, renal function, serum studies and imaging and should be tailored according to recurrence risk, comorbidities and monitoring for treatment sequelae. Expert opinion determined a judicious course of monitoring/surveillance that may change in intensity as surgical/ablative therapies evolve, renal biopsy accuracy improves and more long-term follow-up data are collected. The beneficial impact of careful follow-up will also need critical evaluation as further study is completed.

暂无摘要。